RESUMEN
Meaningful steps have been taken toward using holistic approaches in outpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI) (i.e., treating the whole individual); however, research and practice continue to disproportionately focus on adapting to physical and cognitive changes. Research suggests treatment focusing on individual values may be important for psychological adjustment after TBI. The current study sought to explore individual values across multiple life domains in those with TBI as well as what values outpatient rehabilitation was helpful for, and to examine discrepancies between these factors (i.e., value-consistent rehabilitation) in relation to important long-term treatment outcomes. 215 adults with a history of TBI who had participated in outpatient rehabilitation completed online surveys assessing how consistent outpatient rehabilitation was with individual values, psychological flexibility, and quality of life. The life domains with the greatest discrepancies between individual importance and rehabilitation helpfulness were spirituality, intimate relations, and family relations. Greater value-consistent rehabilitation was associated with higher levels of psychological flexibility and quality of life beyond demographics and injury characteristics. Our findings provide further support in favour of holistic, client-centred approaches that are facilitated by neurological rehabilitation programs.
RESUMEN
Mental imagery is the mental re-creation of perceptual experiences, events and scenarios, and motor acts. In our previous study, we assessed whether motor imagery (MI) training combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging-based neurofeedback could improve the motor function of nondemented subjects with mild Parkinson's disease (PD) (N = 22). We used visual imagery (VI) (e.g., of scenes or events, but not of self-movements) training without neurofeedback for the control group (N = 22). Notably, both groups showed significant and comparable improvement in motor function after four weeks of daily imagery practice. In this study, we further examined the neural correlates of the motor enhancement as a result of the VI training by analyzing the self-reported VI content during daily practice and relating its quality to the functional connectivity characteristics of the same subjects. We demonstrated that the VI practice encompassed multisensory, spatial, affective, and executive processes all of which are also important for motor function in real life. Subjects with worse global disease severity also showed poorer quality of the VI content. Finally, the quality of the VI content showed significant positive correlations with the functional connectivity changes during the VI tasks in brain areas supporting visuospatial and sensorimotor processes. Our findings suggest that mental imagery training combining VI and MI may enhance motor function in patients with mild PD, and more broadly, underline the importance of incorporating self-reports of thoughts and experiences in neuroimaging studies that examine the brain mechanisms of complex cognitive processes especially in neuropsychiatric patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Mapeo Encefálico , Gravedad del Paciente , ImaginaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychology trainees have identified mentorship as an important factor in their training. Limited past work has been conducted on mentorship within neuropsychology, and there is a need to better understand the experiences and perspectives of neuropsychology mentors. METHOD: Self-identified mentors in clinical neuropsychology completed a survey about their mentorship practices, including culturally responsive mentorship, as well as perceived barriers and challenges to providing effective mentorship. Themes were derived using qualitative analyses for free response questions, and descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables. RESULTS: Mentors identified assessment, professionalism, and ethics as top priorities in mentorship, which may reflect the overlap within neuropsychology of assessment supervision and mentoring. Reported best practices included being self-aware and engaging in a personalized approach to mentorship relationships that varies depending upon the needs of the mentee. A majority reported that their training program is not diverse and they themselves do not mentor trainees from diverse backgrounds which provides a clear area for targeted efforts to recruit and retain diversity in the discipline. Mentors described practices related to discussing diversity-related differences with their trainees including self-disclosure, creating a safe space for conversations, and tailoring discussions to the individual trainee. They reported an interest in more training on how to engage in culturally competent mentorship. Two barriers to providing effective mentorship identified most by mentors were time constraints and a lack of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight a variety of perspectives and approaches to mentorship, which may be beneficial for mentors to consider as they reflect on their mentorship practices and/or for trainees as part of their professional development toward becoming future mentors themselves. These results also highlight the need for a greater emphasis on mentorship training within neuropsychology, including training in culturally responsive mentorship practices.