Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 20(5): 524-529.e3, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30424980

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the modified Hospital Elder Life Program (mHELP) comprising 3 nurse-administered protocols in older patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. DESIGN: Cluster randomized trial. SETTING: Two 36-bed GI wards at a university-affiliated medical center in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Older patients (≥65 years, N = 377) were recruited if they were scheduled for elective GI surgery with an expected length of hospital stay >6 days. After transferring to the GI ward after surgery, participants were randomly assigned to the mHELP or control group (1:1) by room rather than individually because most patient units are double- or triple-occupancy rooms. INTERVENTION: The mHELP protocols (early mobilization, oral and nutritional assistance, and orienting communication) were administered daily with usual care by a trained nurse until hospital discharge. The control group received usual care only. MEASURES: Outcomes were in-hospital nutritional decline, measured by body weight and Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, and Fried's frailty phenotype. Return of GI motility was examined as a potential mechanism contributing to observed outcomes. RESULTS: Participants (mean age = 74.5 years; 56.8% male) primarily underwent colorectal (56.5%), gastric (21.2%), and pancreatobiliary (13.8%) surgery. Participants who received the mHELP [for a median of 7 days (interquartile range = 6-10 days)] had significantly lower in-hospital weight loss and decline in MNA scores (weight -2.1 vs -4.0 lb, P = .002; score -3.2 vs -4.0, P = .03) than the control group. The mHELP group also had significantly lower rates of incident frailty during hospitalization (12.0% vs 21.7%, P = .022), and persistent frailty (50.0% vs 92.9%, P = .03). Participants in the mHELP group had trends toward an accelerated return of GI motility. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The mHELP effectively reduced nutritional decline, prevented new frailty, and promoted recovery of frailty present before admission. These nurse-administered protocols might be useful in other settings, including conditions managed at home or in nursing facilities.


Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Apoyo Nutricional/enfermería , Cuidados Posoperatorios/enfermería , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Femenino , Fragilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/enfermería , Taiwán
2.
Nurs Res ; 56(5): 332-8, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17846554

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral health contributes significantly to overall health. Finding a single item that can be used by primary care providers to screen elders who are in need of oral care is important. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article was to evaluate usefulness of the item: "Do you have regular dental checkups?" as a means to decide whether an oral health assessment or further referral is indicated. Answering no is postulated as a positive predictor of poor oral health and need for care. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a nutritional survey of 240 community-dwelling elders. Examiner-rated Kayser-Jones Brief Oral Health Status Examination; self-reported General Oral Health Assessment Index; number of remaining teeth; and pattern of checkups (regular vs. irregular) were evaluated by a trained gerontological nurse practitioner during an in-home assessment. RESULTS: A dental visit within the past year for any reason was reported by 132 subjects (55.0%), but only 81 (33.8%) reported some sort of regular dental checkups. For dentate elders (n = 147), an irregular checkup was associated with lower educational level, Protestant faith, and Black race. People with irregular checkups scored significantly lower on all three oral indices. The negative predictive values and likelihood ratio negative values ranged 98.7-100.0% and 0.00-0.98, respectively, indicating that this item of interest is valid for ruling-out dentate subjects with good oral health. For edentulous elders (n = 93), the item was less effective. DISCUSSION: A single item, "Do you have regular dental checkups?" can be used effectively to rule out dentate elders with good oral health and identify those who are in need of further oral health assessment or referrals.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Evaluación Geriátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Salud Bucal , Higiene Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Dentales/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Educación en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Taiwán/epidemiología , Enfermedades Dentales/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...