Effect of Isoniazid Intake on Ethionamide Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients.

Ethionamide is recommended as part of regimens to treat multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. This study was conducted to (i) describe the distribution of ethionamide MICs, (ii) describe the pharmacokinetics of ethionamide, and (iii) determine the probability of attaining target area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24)/MIC values associated with suppression of resistant subpopulation and microbial kill. Participants received 15 to 20 mg of drug/kg of body weight of ethionamide daily (in 500- or 750-mg doses) as part of a multidrug regimen. Pretreatment MICs of ethionamide for Mycobacterium tuberculosis sputum isolates were determined using Sensititre MYCOTB MIC plates. Plasma concentrations of ethionamide (measured predose and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h postdose) were available for 84 patients. A one-compartment disposition model, including a liver compartment capturing hepatic extraction, best described ethionamide pharmacokinetics. Clearance and volume were allometrically scaled using fat-free mass. Isoniazid coadministration reduced ethionamide clearance by 31%, resulting in a 44% increase in AUC0-24. The median (range) MIC (n = 111) was 2.5 mg/liter (<0.3 to >40 mg/liter). Simulations showed increased daily doses of ethionamide (1,250 mg, 1,500 mg, and 1,750 mg for patients weighing ≤45 kg, 46 to 70 kg, and >70 kg, respectively) resulted in the probability of attaining an area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h for the free, unbound fraction of a drug (fAUC0-24)/MIC ratio of ≥42 in more than 90% of patients only at the lowest MIC of 0.3 mg/liter. The WHO-recommended doses of ethionamide do not achieve target concentrations even for the lowest MIC measured in the cohort.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Cycloserine and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients Dosed with Terizidone.

Cycloserine is a WHO group B drug for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data for cycloserine when dosed as terizidone are sparse. The aim of this analysis was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of cycloserine when administered as terizidone and predict the doses of terizidone attaining cycloserine exposures associated with efficacy. The plasma cycloserine level was measured 2 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation in patients hospitalized for second-line tuberculosis treatment. The pretreatment MICs of cycloserine were determined for the clinical isolates. We enrolled 132 participants with rifampicin-resistant TB; 79 were HIV positive. The median pretreatment MIC was 16 mg/liter. A one-compartment disposition model with two clearance pathways, nonrenal (0.35 liters/h) and renal (0.43 liters/h), described cycloserine pharmacokinetics well. Nonrenal clearance and the volume of distribution were allometrically scaled using fat-free mass. Smoking increased nonrenal clearance by 41%. Simulations showed that with daily doses of terizidone (750 mg and 1,000 mg for patients weighing ≤45 kg and >45 kg, respectively), the probability of maintaining the plasma cycloserine concentration above the MIC for more than 30% of the dosing interval (30% T>MIC) (which is associated with a 1.0-log10-CFU/ml kill in vitro) exceeded 90% at MIC values of ≤16 mg/liter, but the proportion of patients achieving 100% T>MIC (which is associated with the prevention of resistance) was more than 90% only at MICs of ≤8 mg/liter. Based on a target derived in vitro, the WHO-recommended doses of terizidone are effective for cycloserine MICs of ≤8 mg/liter, and higher doses are required to prevent the development of resistance.

Quantitative assessment of the activity of antituberculosis drugs and regimens.

Introduction: Identification of optimal drug doses and drug combinations is crucial for optimized treatment of tuberculosis. Areas covered: An unprecedented level of research activity involving multiple approaches is seeking to improve tuberculosis treatment. This report is a review of the quantitative methods currently used on clinical data sets to identify drug exposure targets and optimal drug combinations for tuberculosis treatment. A high-level summary of the methods, including the strengths and weaknesses of each method and potential methodological improvements is presented. Methods incorporating data generated from multiple sources such as in vitro and clinical studies, and their potential to provide better estimates of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets, are discussed. PK/PD relationships identified are compared between different studies and data analysis methods. Expert opinion: The relationships between drug exposures and tuberculosis treatment outcomes are complex and require analytical methods capable of handling the multidimensional nature of the relationships. The choice of a method is guided by its complexity, interpretability of results, and type of data available.

Propagation of measurement errors in glomerular filtration rate determination: a comparison of slope-intercept, single-sample and slope-only methods.

BACKGROUND: Measurement errors occurring during glomerular filtration rate (GFR) studies propagate to an error in the calculated GFR. Previous work has modelled measurement errors for slope-intercept (SI-GFR), single-sample (SS-GFR) and slope-only (SO-GFR) methods. In this study, we have extended these models. The primary aims were to (i) compare measurement errors in two-sample SI-GFR, three-sample SI-GFR, SS-GFR and SO-GFR, and (ii) determine the sensitivity of GFR to errors arising from different measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study expanded on previous models of GFR measurement error incorporating biological data from 786 patients and realistic measurement errors. GFR median absolute error and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for each method. A sensitivity analysis was carried out for individual measurement errors. RESULTS: The median absolute error ranged between 1.2 and 2.3 ml/min/1.73 m, lowest for SS-GFR (4 h) and highest for SO-GFR. At higher rates of clearance, CV was less than 5% for all methods. CV increased rapidly when GFR decreased below a threshold ranging between 34 and 56 ml/min/1.73 m, lowest for three-point SI-GFR and highest for SO-GFR. SI-GFR and SS-GFR are most sensitive to injected activity quantification, but less sensitive to other measurement errors. CONCLUSION: Measurement errors are probably insignificant relative to biological variation for GFR of more than 60 ml/min/1.73 m, but become significant irrespective of biological variation at lower GFR, particularly in serial studies when GFR less than 25 ml/min/1.73 m. Limits of precision recommended in the 2018 British Nuclear Medicine Society guideline are appropriate for once-off GFR measurement, whereas slightly more stringent limits are proposed for serial studies.

Effect of efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy and high-dose rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid.

Objectives: To describe the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid in TB/HIV-coinfected patients, and assess the effects of efavirenz co-administration and a 50% increase in the dose of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetic parameters of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid. Methods: TB/HIV-coinfected patients participating in the three-treatment-arm RAFA randomized controlled trial conducted in West Africa were recruited into the pharmacokinetics sub-study. Five serial blood samples were collected on a single visit between 4 and 8 weeks after initiation of antituberculosis treatment. Concentration-time data for isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects models. Results: Isoniazid concentrations from 150 patients were available for analysis, and 79 of these (53%) also had concentrations of acetyl-isoniazid. Isoniazid pharmacokinetics was best described with a two-compartment disposition model with lagged first-order absorption and elimination using a semi-mechanistic model describing hepatic extraction. The model identified two elimination pathways, separating formation of acetyl-isoniazid from other routes of metabolism. The predicted AUC0-24 is reduced by 29% in patients who are fast acetylators of isoniazid and receiving efavirenz-based ART (6.73 versus 4.68 mg·h/L). In slow acetylators, efavirenz-based ART had no effect on isoniazid exposure (AUC0-24 = 17.5 mg·h/L). Conclusions: Efavirenz-based ART affects the acetylation metabolic pathway amongst rapid acetylators, resulting in reduced exposure to isoniazid. Pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid were not influenced by the 50% increase in rifampicin dose.

Current research toward optimizing dosing of first-line antituberculosis treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Drug concentrations in tuberculosis patients on standard regimens vary widely with clinically important consequences. Areas covered: We review the available literature identifying factors correlated with pharmacokinetic variability of antituberculosis drugs. Based on population pharmacokinetic models and the weight, height, and sex distributions in a large data base of African tuberculosis patients, we propose simplified weight-based doses of the available fixed dose combination(FDC) for adults with drug susceptible tuberculosis. Emerging studies will support optimized weight-based dosing for children. Other sources of important pharmacokinetic variability include genetic variants, drug-drug interactions, formulation quality, and methods of preparation and administration. Expert commentary: Optimized weight band-based dosing will result in more equitable distribution of drug exposures by weight. The use of high doses of isoniazid in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis would be safer and more effective if a feasible test was developed to allow stratified dosing according to acetylator type. There is an urgent need for more suitable formulations of many second-line drugs for children. The adoption of new technologies and efficient FDC design may allow further advances for patients and treatment programs. Lastly, current efforts to ensure adequate quality of antituberculosis drug products are not preventing the use of substandard products to treat patients with tuberculosis.

Pharmacokinetics of Pyrazinamide and Optimal Dosing Regimens for Drug-Sensitive and -Resistant Tuberculosis.

Pyrazinamide is used in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) because its sterilizing effect against tubercle bacilli allows the shortening of treatment. It is part of standard treatment for drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB, and it is being considered as a companion drug in novel regimens. The aim of this analysis was to characterize factors contributing to the variability in exposure and to evaluate drug exposures using alternative doses, thus providing evidence to support revised dosing recommendations for drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Pyrazinamide pharmacokinetic (PK) data from 61 HIV/TB-coinfected patients in South Africa were used in the analysis. The patients were administered weight-adjusted doses of pyrazinamide, rifampin, isoniazid, and ethambutol in fixed-dose combination tablets according to WHO guidelines and underwent intensive PK sampling on days 1, 8, 15, and 29. The data were interpreted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. PK profiles were best described using a one-compartment model with first-order elimination. Allometric scaling was applied to disposition parameters using fat-free mass. Clearance increased by 14% from the 1st day to the 29th day of treatment. More than 50% of patients with weight less than 55 kg achieved lower pyrazinamide exposures at steady state than the targeted area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h of 363 mg · h/liter. Among patients with drug-susceptible TB, adding 400 mg to the dose for those weighing 30 to 54 kg improved exposure. Average pyrazinamide exposure in different weight bands among patients with MDR-TB could be matched by administering 1,500 mg, 1,750 mg, and 2,000 mg to patients in the 33- to 50-kg, 51- to 70-kg, and greater than 70-kg weight bands, respectively.

Correction: Use of the 'Accountability for Reasonableness' Approach to Improve Fairness in Accessing Dialysis in a Middle-Income Country.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164201.].

Use of the 'Accountability for Reasonableness' Approach to Improve Fairness in Accessing Dialysis in a Middle-Income Country.

Universal access to renal replacement therapy is beyond the economic capability of most low and middle-income countries due to large patient numbers and the high recurrent cost of treating end stage kidney disease. In countries where limited access is available, no systems exist that allow for optimal use of the scarce dialysis facilities. We previously reported that using national guidelines to select patients for renal replacement therapy resulted in biased allocation. We reengineered selection guidelines using the 'Accountability for Reasonableness' (procedural fairness) framework in collaboration with relevant stakeholders, applying these in a novel way to categorize and prioritize patients in a unique hierarchical fashion. The guidelines were primarily premised on patients being transplantable. We examined whether the revised guidelines enhanced fairness of dialysis resource allocation. This is a descriptive study of 1101 end stage kidney failure patients presenting to a tertiary renal unit in a middle-income country, evaluated for dialysis treatment over a seven-year period. The Assessment Committee used the accountability for reasonableness-based guidelines to allocate patients to one of three assessment groups. Category 1 patients were guaranteed renal replacement therapy, Category 3 patients were palliated, and Category 2 were offered treatment if resources allowed. Only 25.2% of all end stage kidney disease patients assessed were accepted for renal replacement treatment. The majority of patients (48%) were allocated to Category 2. Of 134 Category 1 patients, 98% were accepted for treatment while 438 (99.5%) Category 3 patients were excluded. Compared with those palliated, patients accepted for dialysis treatment were almost 10 years younger, employed, married with children and not diabetic. Compared with our previous selection process our current method of priority setting based on procedural fairness arguably resulted in more equitable allocation of treatment but, more importantly, it is a model that is morally, legally and ethically more defensible.

Model-Based Evaluation of Higher Doses of Rifampin Using a Semimechanistic Model Incorporating Autoinduction and Saturation of Hepatic Extraction.

Rifampin is a key sterilizing drug in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). It induces its own metabolism, but neither the onset nor the extent of autoinduction has been adequately described. Currently, the World Health Organization recommends a rifampin dose of 8 to 12 mg/kg of body weight, which is believed to be suboptimal, and higher doses may potentially improve treatment outcomes. However, a nonlinear increase in exposure may be observed because of saturation of hepatic extraction and hence this should be taken into consideration when a dose increase is implemented. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data from 61 HIV-TB-coinfected patients in South Africa were collected at four visits, on days 1, 8, 15, and 29, after initiation of treatment. Data were analyzed by population nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Rifampin PKs were best described by using a transit compartment absorption and a well-stirred liver model with saturation of hepatic extraction, including a first-pass effect. Autoinduction was characterized by using an exponential-maturation model: hepatic clearance almost doubled from the baseline to steady state, with a half-life of around 4.5 days. The model predicts that increases in the dose of rifampin result in more-than-linear drug exposure increases as measured by the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve. Simulations with doses of up to 35 mg/kg produced results closely in line with those of clinical trials.