RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Epidural spinal cord stimulation is a minimally invasive procedure with a growing list of indications. It has a good safety profile and analgesic effect, reduces the severity of spasticity, and activates various brain regions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with spastic syndrome and chronic disorders of consciousness resulting from severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). METHODS: Between 2021 and 2023, an epidural spinal cord stimulation test was performed in 34 patients with central paresis, severe hypertonia, and chronically altered consciousness following sTBI. The severity of spastic syndrome was assessed using a modified Ashworth scale. All patients underwent implantation of a cylindrical eight-contact test epidural electrode at C3-C5 cervical level, followed by neurostimulation and selection of individual modes. Tonic stimulation at a frequency of 60 Hz, "burst" mode, or a combination of the two was used. RESULTS: Epidural spinal cord stimulation was administered for an average of 4 ± 1.5 days, with tonic stimulation mode applied in 15 (44.1%) patients, "burst" mode in 10 (29.4%), and a combination of two in nine (26.5%) patients. A reduction in spasticity with clinical improvement was observed in 21 patients (61.8%). The Ashworth scale scores for distal and proximal upper extremities decreased from 3 points to 2.5 points and from 3 points to 2 points, respectively. This was significant in the right upper limbs (p = 0.0152 distally and p = 0.0164 proximally). Significant improvements were also seen in the lower extremities. Active movements in paretic limbs increased or appeared in 12 patients (35.3%), while a heightened level of consciousness was observed in six patients (17.6%). Permanent neurostimulator implantation was performed in 12 patients (35.3%), with no reported surgical complications. CONCLUSION: Epidural spinal cord stimulation shows promise as an invasive rehabilitation method for patients with sTBI sequelae. Its use reduced the severity of spastic syndrome in over half of patients and increased active movements in paretic limbs in over a third. Notably, neuromodulation at the cervical level yielded pronounced effects on the upper extremities, both proximally and distally. Findings regarding consciousness level improvement are particularly intriguing but warrant further validation through randomized trials.
RESUMEN
Background: The management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) lacks a consensus. Consequently, the choice between repeat microdiscectomy (MD) without fusion, discectomy with fusion, or endoscopic discectomy without fusion typically hinges on the surgeon's expertise. This study conducts a comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes among these three techniques and proposes a straightforward classification system for rLDH aimed at optimizing management. Patients and Methods: We examined the patients treated for rLDH at our institution. Based on the presence of facet resection, Modic-2 changes, and segmental instability, they patients were categorized into three groups: Types I, II, and III rLDH managed by repeat MD without fusion, MD with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (MD + TLIF), and transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TFED), respectively. Results: A total of 127 patients were included: 52 underwent MD + TLIF, 50 underwent MD alone, and 25 underwent TFED. Recurrence rates were 20%, 12%, and 0% for MD alone, TFED, and MD + TLIF, respectively. A facetectomy exceeding 75% correlated with an 84.6% recurrence risk, while segmental instability correlated with a 100% recurrence rate. Modic-2 changes were identified in 86.7% and 100% of patients experiencing recurrence following MD and TFED, respectively. TFED exhibited the lowest risk of durotomy (4%), the shortest operative time (70.80 ± 16.5), the least blood loss (33.60 ± 8.1), and the most favorable Visual Analog Scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index quality of life assessment at 2 years. No statistically significant differences were observed in these parameters between MD alone and MD + TLIF. Based on this analysis, a novel classification system for recurrent disc herniation was proposed. Conclusion: In young patients without segmental instability, prior facetectomy, and Modic-2 changes, TFED was available should take precedence over repeat MD alone. However, for patients with segmental instability, MD + TLIF is recommended. The suggested classification system has the potential to enhance patient selection and overall outcomes.