Large Pediatric Randomized Clinical Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.

BACKGROUND: Large, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential in answering pivotal questions in child health. METHODS: We created a bird's eye view of all large, noncluster, nonvaccine pediatric RCTs with ≥1000 participants registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (last search January 9, 2020). We analyzed the funding sources, countries, outcomes, publication status, and correlation with the pediatric global burden of disease (GBD) for eligible trials. RESULTS: We identified 247 large, nonvaccine, noncluster pediatric RCTs. Only 17 mega-trials with ≥5000 participants existed. Industry funding was involved in only 52 (21%) and exclusively funded 47 (19%) trials. Participants were from high-income countries (HICs) in 100 (40%) trials, from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) in 122 (49%) trials, and from both HICs and LMICs in 19 (8%) trials; 6 trials did not report participants' country location. Of trials conducted in LMIC, 43% of investigators were from HICs. Of non-LMIC participants trials (HIC or HIC and LMIC), 39% were multicountry trials versus 11% of exclusively LMIC participants trials. Few trials (18%; 44 of 247) targeted mortality as an outcome. 35% (58 of 164) of the trials completed ≥12 months were unpublished at the time of our assessment. The number of trials per disease category correlated well with pediatric GBD overall (ρ = 0.76) and in LMICs (ρ = 0.69), but not in HICs (ρ = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Incentivization of investigator collaborations across diverse country settings, timely publication of results of large pediatric RCTs, and alignment with the pediatric GBD are of pivotal importance to ultimately improve child health globally.

Toxoplasmosis Among 38 751 Hematopoietic Stem-cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Disease Prevalence and a Compilation of Imaging and Autopsy Findings.

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients can be life threatening if not promptly diagnosed and treated. METHODS: We performed a systematic review (PubMed last search March 29, 2020) of toxoplasmosis among HSCT recipients and calculated the toxoplasmosis prevalence across studies. We also created a compilation list of brain imaging, chest imaging, and autopsy findings of toxoplasmosis among HSCT recipients. RESULTS: We identified 46 eligible studies (47 datasets) with 399 toxoplasmosis cases among 38 751 HSCT recipients. There was large heterogeneity in the reported toxoplasmosis prevalence across studies, thus formal meta-analysis was not attempted. The median toxoplasmosis prevalence among 38 751 HSCT recipients was 2.14% (range 0%-66.67%). Data on toxoplasmosis among at-risk R+HSCT recipients were more limited (25 studies; 2404 R+HSCT recipients [6.2% of all HSCT recipients]), although the median number of R+HSCT recipients was 56.79% across all HSCT recipients. The median toxoplasmosis prevalence across studies among 2404 R+HSCT was 7.51% (range 0%-80%) versus 0% (range 0%-1.23%) among 7438 R-HSCT. There were limited data to allow meaningful analyses of toxoplasmosis prevalence according to prophylaxis status of R+HSCT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Toxoplasmosis prevalence among HSCT recipients is underestimated. The majority of studies report toxoplasmosis prevalence among all HSCT recipients rather than only among the at-risk R+HSCT recipients. In fact, the median toxoplasmosis prevalence among all R+//R- HSCT recipients is 3.5-fold lower compared with the prevalence among only the at-risk R+HSCT recipients and the median prevalence among R+HSCT recipients is 7.51-fold higher than among R-HSCT recipients. The imaging findings of toxoplasmosis among HSCT recipients can be atypical. High index of suspicion is needed in R+HSCT recipients with fever, pneumonia, or encephalitis.