Long-term Trends in Infection-Related Mortality in Adults Treated With Maintenance Dialysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Infection is 1 of the top 3 causes of death in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. We evaluated the trends over time and risk factors for infection-related deaths among people receiving dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We included all adults who began dialysis between 1980 and 2018 in Australia and New Zealand. EXPOSURE: Age, sex, dialysis modality, and dialysis era. OUTCOME: Infection-related death. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Incidence was described and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) calculated for infection-related death. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards models were fitted, with non-infection-related death and kidney transplantation treated as competing events. RESULTS: The study comprised 46,074 patients who received hemodialysis and 20,653 who were treated with peritoneal dialysis who were followed for 164,536 and 69,846 person-years, respectively. There were 38,463 deaths during the follow-up period, 12% of which were ascribed to infection. The overall rate of mortality from infection (per 10,000 person-years) was 185 and 232 for patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively. The rates were 184 and 219 for males and females, respectively; and 99, 181, 255, and 292 for patients aged 18-44, 45-64, 65-74, 75 years and over, respectively. The rates were 224 and 163 for those commencing dialysis in years 1980-2005 and 2006-2018, respectively. The overall SMR declined over time, from 37.1 (95% CI, 35.5-38.8) in years 1980-2005 to 19.3 (95% CI, 18.4-20.3) in years 2006-2018, consistent with the declining 5-year SMR trend (P<0.001). Infection-related mortality was associated with being female, older age, and Aboriginal and/or a Torres Strait Islander or Maori. LIMITATIONS: Mediation analyses defining the causal relationships between infection type and infection-related death could not be undertaken as disaggregating the data was not feasible. CONCLUSIONS: The excess risk of infection-related death in patients on dialysis has improved substantially over time but remains more than 20 times higher than in the general population.

Perspectives of a proposed patient navigator programme for people with chronic kidney disease in rural communities: Report from national workshops.

AIMS: People who live in rural areas have reduced access to appropriate and timely healthcare, leading to poorer health outcomes than their metropolitan-based counterparts. The aims of the workshops were to ascertain participants' perspectives on barriers to access to dialysis and transplantation, to identify and prioritize the roles of a rural patient navigator, to discuss the acceptability and feasibility of implementing this role and identify possible outcomes that could be used to measure the success of the programme in a clinical trial. METHODS: Rural patients (n = 19), their caregivers (n = 5) and health professionals (n = 18) from Australia participated in three workshops. We analysed the data using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified four themes related to access to dialysis and transplantation: overwhelmed by separate and disconnected health systems, unprepared for emotional toll and isolation, lack of practical support and inability to develop trust and rapport. Four themes related to the role of the patient navigator programme: valuing lived experience, offering cultural expertise, requiring a conduit, and flexibility of the job description. The key roles prioritized by participants were psychological support and networking, provision/consolidation of education, and provision of practical support. CONCLUSION: Rural patients, caregivers and health professionals believed that programmes that include navigators with lived experience of dialysis and kidney transplantation and cultural expertise, especially for Aboriginal Australians, may have the potential to improve patient experiences in accessing healthcare.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management.

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Peritoneal mesothelioma: current status and future directions.

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare malignancy where life expectancy with systemic chemotherapy remains poor. Most patients with this disease are diagnosed late with extensive peritoneal disease burden leading to nausea, pain, and abdominal distention as a result of ascites and a partial bowel obstruction. A newly proposed staging system comprising elements of the tumor burden measured by the peritoneal cancer index, abdominal nodal status, and extra-abdominal metastases has been demonstrated to reliably stratify patient outcomes based on staging subgroups after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This new staging system may form the basis of selecting patients for radical surgery and improve survival outcomes.

Inflammatory markers in blood and serum tumor markers predict survival in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasms undergoing surgical cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The study examines the role inflammatory and tumor markers as biomarkers to preoperatively predict outcome in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasm undergoing cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. METHODS: Associations between baseline variables, tumor markers [CEA (carcinoembyronic antigen], CA125, CA199), inflammatory markers including neutrophils-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined in patients undergoing surgical cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for epithelial appendiceal neoplasm. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasm (low-grade pseudomyxoma, n = 117; appendiceal cancer, n = 57) underwent cytoreduction. On univariate analysis, all 3 inflammatory and tumor markers predicted for both PFS and OS, respectively; NLR ≤ 2.6 (P = 0.01, P = 0.002), PLR ≤ 166 (P = 0.006, P = 0.016), CRP ≤ 12.5 (P = 0.001, P = 0.008), CEA (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), CA125 (P = 0.004, P < 0.001), CA199 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, there were no independent predictors of OS. PFS was independently associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.02), CA199 > 37 (P = 0.003), and a CRP > 12.5 (P = 0.013). A higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI > 24) was associated with elevation in CEA > 12, CA125 > 39, CA199 > 37, PLR > 166 and CRP > 12. The tumor histologic subtype was associated with CA 199 levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this investigation suggest that preoperative inflammatory markers in blood and serologic tumor markers may predict outcomes and are associated with tumor biology in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasm undergoing cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment.

Approach to rectal cancer surgery.

Rectal cancer is a distinct subset of colorectal cancer where specialized disease-specific management of the primary tumor is required. There have been significant developments in rectal cancer surgery at all stages of disease in particular the introduction of local excision strategies for preinvasive and early cancers, standardized total mesorectal excision for resectable cancers incorporating preoperative short- or long-course chemoradiation to the multimodality sequencing of treatment. Laparoscopic surgery is also increasingly being adopted as the standard rectal cancer surgery approach following expertise of colorectal surgeons in minimally invasive surgery gained from laparoscopic colon resections. In locally advanced and metastatic disease, combining chemoradiation with radical surgery may achieve total eradication of disease and disease control in the pelvis. Evidence for resection of metastases to the liver and lung have been extensively reported in the literature. The role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases is showing promise in achieving locoregional control of peritoneal dissemination. This paper summarizes the recent developments in approaches to rectal cancer surgery at all these time points of the disease natural history.