Pathological findings after primary chemotherapy in patients undergoing simultaneous orchidectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for advanced germ cell tumours.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differential response to systemic chemotherapy in patients undergoing simultaneous orchidectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) after chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent simultaneous RPLND and orchidectomy after chemotherapy were identified from our clinical databases. Postoperative pathological findings and patient characteristics were reviewed. RESULTS: In all, 42 patients were identified. After chemotherapy, necrosis, teratoma and cancer were identified in 25 (59.5%), 14 (33.3%) and three (7.1%) RPLN specimens and 15 (35.7%), 15 (35.7%) and 12 (28.6%) orchidectomy specimens respectively. Of the 25 patients with necrotic RPLN specimens 12 (48.0%) had active disease within the orchidectomy specimen (eight invasive cancer and four mature teratoma). The overall histological discordance rate was 38.1%. Findings in the orchidectomy specimens were more aggressive than those in the RPLN specimens (i.e. cancer worse than teratoma, which is worse than necrosis) in 33.3%. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant disparity between orchidectomy and RPLND findings with viable tumour appearing frequently in the testis despite tumour-free RPLNs. These findings support completion orchidectomy as part of advanced testicular germ cell treatment.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy in patients with elevated tumour markers: indications, histopathology and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors affecting outcome and the pathological findings in patients who had retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND) after chemotherapy with elevated tumour markers, as such patients have an unfavourable prognosis, with further salvage chemotherapy being the usual treatment of choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Information on the preoperative treatment, tumour markers, histopathology and outcome data of the patients who had pcRPLND were extracted from the hospital databases. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis with Cox regression model. RESULTS: In all, 358 patients had pcRPLND between September 1992 and April 2006, by one surgeon. In 48 patients the tumour markers were elevated at the time of surgery, they were on a 'rising trend' in 26 (54%) and 'downward or stable' trend in 22 (46%). The overall incidence of active germ cell tumour, differentiated teratoma and necrosis in the resected specimens was 58%, 25% and 17%, respectively. The median follow-up was 51.5 months and the overall 5-year survival was 69%. The favourable prognostic factors assessed by univariate analysis were elevation of alpha-fetoprotein alone, complete resection of residual disease, histological finding of differentiated teratoma in the resected tissues and normalization of tumour markers after pcRPLND. By multivariate analysis the only statistically significant independent survival factor was the normalization of the tumour markers after pcRPLND. CONCLUSION: For selected patients with elevated tumour markers after chemotherapy, RPLND can offer a significant chance of cure with no need for further chemotherapy. The patients most likely to benefit are those with elevations of alpha-fetoprotein alone. In this group, pcRPLND can offer the prospect of long-term survival and should be considered in the management of selected patients.

Repeat retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection after chemotherapy for metastatic testicular germ cell tumour.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the operative findings, histopathology and clinical outcome of patients undergoing repeat retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) after initial chemotherapy and RPLND (PC-RPLND) for metastatic testicular germ cell tumour (GCT), as a small proportion relapse or have residual disease after incomplete resection in the lung, retrocrural or pelvic nodes, and retroperitoneum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1992 and May 2006, 359 patients had PC-RPLND under the care of one surgeon, 54 of which were repeat procedures. We compared the long-term outcome between those having primary and those having repeat PC-RPLND. RESULTS: The median (range) time from original to repeat surgery was 2.4 (0.25-26.5) years, and the median follow-up after the repeat procedure was 5.8 (0.08-12.9) years. There was no difference in survival between patients requiring only one PC-RPLND and those having a repeat procedure (P = 0.592). The most frequent sites of recurrent disease were: behind the great vessels/para-aortic areas (38, 46%), in the suprahilar region (18, 18%), in the retrocrural area (16, 19%), in the pelvic nodes (10, 12%) and in the lung (one, 1%). The most common pathological findings in the repeat PC-RPLNDs were differentiated teratoma (19, 35%), malignant teratoma undifferentiated (nine, 17%), adenocarcinoma (eight, 15%) and necrotic tissue (five, 9.2%). CONCLUSION: Although a small proportion of patients with metastatic GCT might require repeat PC-RPLND, there is no difference in survival between this group and those having one PC-RPLND. However, to avoid cancer recurrence and reoperation, it is crucial that the first PC-RPLND is careful and complete, preferably done in a centre with expertise in this procedure.

Retroperitoneal anomalies in men with testicular germ cell tumours.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether vascular and other retroperitoneal anomalies are more frequent during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for metastatic testicular tumours (when retroperitoneal masses persist after chemotherapy) than would be expected, based on the initial observations from one centre with a large experience of RPLND in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective series of 278 consecutive patients treated with RPLND for testicular tumours comprised the sample population. For each patient the presence or absence of four factors from the history was recorded. Each patient then underwent RPLND. During surgery, a template was constructed of the anatomy of the retroperitoneum and the information stored. Eight different retroperitoneal anatomical anomalies were identified in the sample population; the incidence of each was then compared with the largest available study of a normal population, and differences analysed statistically. RESULTS: Of the 278 patients who had RPLND, 55 had 59 anomalies (21%), found by history and as retroperitoneal vascular and urological anomalies; cryptorchidism was present in 7.6%, 9.5 times the incidence in the control population (P < 0.01). A left-sided inferior vena cava was present in 3.6% of patients, 21 times the incidence in the control population (P < 0.001); a retro-aortic left renal vein in 3.2%, four times that in the control population (P < 0.05); and ipsilateral renal agenesis had an incidence of 1% in the test population, 11 times greater than in the control population (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study of 278 RPLNDs provides evidence that some retroperitoneal anatomical anomalies are associated with testicular germ cell tumours. The link between maldescent and testicular tumours, rather than an isolated association, should be considered as part of a spectrum of retroperitoneal anomalies that occur in these men.

Surgical excision of isolated renal-bed recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To present our results on managing loco-regional recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with surgical excision, as local recurrence at the site of a previous nephrectomy is resistant to both systemic therapy and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 16 patients were operated on between 1994 and 2003 for local recurrence of RCC. The median (mean, range) age at the time of local recurrence was 57.9 (57.4, 28.9-71.7) years, and the median interval from primary surgery 2.22 (3.88, 0.27-14.46) years. Before surgery eight patients had been given systemic immunotherapy, with no response of their local recurrence. RESULTS: Two patients were deemed inoperable because of direct invasion of the great vessels and the liver by tumour. The remaining 14 patients had recurrence in residual adrenal tissue (two), para-aortic nodes (three), para-caval nodes (two), retrocaval nodes (one), renal bed (six), liver, spleen and stomach (one each), and diaphragm (two). Although complete macroscopic en-bloc clearance was achieved in these patients, only eight had tumour-free margins on histological examination. The histology was consistent with RCC recurrence in all cases. All of the patients were followed with computed tomography at regular intervals. At a median follow-up of 1.0 (1.65, 0.25-6.5) years, five patients remain disease-free, four have local and distant relapse, and five developed distant metastasis only. The presence of tumour at the resection margin was a significant factor in predicting local and distant disease-free survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: En bloc excision of isolated locally recurrent RCC is possible, and complete surgical extirpation can lead to prolonged disease-free survival.