Treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures: a narrative review and therapeutic strategy.

The posterolateral tibial plateau is crucial for maintaining knee stability during flexion, and fractures in this area often involve ligament and meniscus injuries, necessitating effective management. However, treating posterolateral tibial plateau fractures (PLF) poses significant challenges due to the complex anatomy. Therefore, this review aims to explore contemporary concepts of PLF, from identification to fixation, and proposes a comprehensive treatment strategy. In this article, the authors detail the injury mechanisms, fracture morphology, PLF classification systems, surgical approaches, and techniques for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as well as arthroscopic-assisted internal fixation (ARIF). The findings indicate that PLF is typically caused by flexion-valgus forces, resulting in depression or split-depression patterns. For isolated PLF, the supra-fibular head approach is often preferable, whereas posterior approaches are more suitable for combined fractures. Additionally, innovative plates, particularly the horizontal belt plate, have shown satisfactory outcomes in treating PLF. Currently, the 'bicondylar four-quadrant' concept is widely used for assessing and managing the tibial plateau fractures involving PLF, forming the cornerstone of the comprehensive treatment strategy. Despite challenges in surgical exposure and implant placement, ORIF remains the mainstream treatment for PLF, benefiting significantly from the supra-fibular head approach and the horizontal belt plate. Furthermore, ARIF has proven effective by providing enhanced visualization and surgical precision in managing PLF, emerging as a promising technique.

Importance of the Posterior Plate in Three-Column Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Validation.

OBJECTIVE: Dual-plate fixation was thought to be the gold standard for treating complicated bicondylar tibial plateau fractures, yet it was found to be hard to accommodate the posterior column in three-column fractures. Currently, column-specific fixation is becoming more and more recognized, but no comprehensive investigation has been performed to back it up. Therefore, the objective of this study was to validate the importance of posterior column fixation in the three-column tibial fractures by a finite element (FE) analysis and clinical study. METHODS: In FE analysis, three models were developed: the longitudinal triple-plate group (LTPG), the oblique triple-plate group (OTPG), and the dual-plate group (DPG). Three loading scenarios were simulated. The distribution of the displacement and the equivalent von Mises stress (VMS) in each structure was calculated. The comparative measurements including the maximum posterior column collapse (MPCC), the maximum total displacement of the model (MTD), the maximum VMS of cortical posterior column (MPC-VMS), and the maximum VMS located on each group of plates and screws (MPS-VMS). The clinical study evaluated the indicators between the groups with or without the posterior plate, including operation time, blood loss volume, full-weight bearing period, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scoring system (HSS), Rasmussen score, and common postoperative complications. RESULTS: In the FE analysis, the MPCC, the MPC-VMS, and the MTD were detected in much lower amounts in LTPG and OTPG than in DPG. In comparison with DPG, the LTPG and OTPG had larger MPS-VMS. In the clinical study, 35 cases were included. In the triple-plate (14) and dual-plate (21) groups, the operation took 115.6 min and 100.5 min (p < 0.05), respectively. Blood loss in both groups was 287.0 mL and 206.6 mL (p < 0.05), and the full-weight bearing period was 14.5 weeks and 16.2 weeks (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the HSS score was 85.0 in the triple-plate group and 77.5 in the dual-plate (p < 0.05), the Rasmussen score was 24.1 and 21.6 (p < 0.05), there were two cases with reduction loss (9.5%) in the dual-plate group and one case of superficial incision infection found in the triple-plate group. CONCLUSION: The posterior implant was beneficial in optimizing the biomechanical stability and functional outcomes in the three-column tibial plateau fractures.

Morphological characteristics and a new classification system of the inferior pole fracture of the patella: A computer-tomography-based study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to measure the morphological characteristics of inferior pole fracture of the patella (IPFP) and develop a practical classification system to determine the corresponding treatment protocols for different IPFPs with specific patterns. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic review was performed on a series of 71 patients with IPFP. The preoperative CT data were collected and measured using image processing software. The number of fragments, maximum fracture fragment anteroposterior length (MFFAL), maximum fracture fragment transverse length (MFFTL), fracture fragment coronal angle (FFCA), fracture fragment sagittal angle (FFSA), maximum fracture fragment height (MFFH) and maximum transverse sectional area (MTSA) were analysed. RESULTS: The mean number of fracture fragments was 3.8. The average MFFAL was 14.9 mm, the average MFFTL was 23.5 mm, the average FFCA was 92.1°, the average FFSA was 93.0°, the average MFFH was 13.6 mm, and the average MTSA was 299.3 mm2. A new classification system was introduced to describe the varied patterns of IPFP, summarized as (I) simple IPFP; (II) comminuted IPFP; (III) simple IPFP with simple patellar body fracture; and (IV) comminuted patellar fracture involving the inferior pole. With the four-type classification system, 12 type I, 22 type II, 21 type III, and 16 type IV lesions were observed, each with specific morphological characteristics. CONCLUSION: Most IPFPs exhibited a diversiform pattern, demonstrating that coverage fixation was likely needed. The four-type classification system might offer a valuable approach to help orthopaedic surgeons make individual treatment plans.