RESUMEN
Background: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) leading to significant morbidity and dissatisfaction for patients. A popular system for robotic arm-assisted THA utilizes preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans for surgical planning. Accurate measurement of leg length is crucial for restoring appropriate patient anatomy during the procedure. This study investigates the interobserver and interlandmark reliability of 3 different pelvic landmarks for measuring preoperative LLD. Methods: We compiled preoperative pelvic CT scans from 99 robotic arm-assisted THAs for osteoarthritis. Radiologic leg length measurement was performed using the robotic arm-assisted THA application by 2 orthopaedic residents using reference lines bisecting the following pelvic landmarks: the anterior superior iliac spines, acetabular teardrops, and most inferior aspect of the ischial rami. Results: On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference found (P value = .924) for leg length measurement based on the 3 different pelvic anatomical landmarks. Leg length measurements showed interobserver reliability with significant Pearson correlation coefficients (r = 1.0, 0.94, 0.96, respectively) and nonsignificant differences in LLD means between subjects on paired sample (P value = .158, .085, 0.125, respectively) as well as between landmarks on pairwise comparison. Conclusions: The 3 pelvic landmarks used in this study can be used interchangeably with the lesser trochanter as the femoral reference point to evaluate preoperative LLD on pelvic CT in patients undergoing robotic-arm assisted THA. This study is the first of its kind to evaluate the interobserver and interlandmark reliability of anatomical landmarks on pelvic CT scans and suggests interchangeability of 3 pelvic landmarks for comparing leg length differences.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to create and evaluate a novel virtual platform dissection course to complement pediatric otolaryngology fellowship training in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A four-station, four-simulator virtual course was delivered to pediatric otolaryngology fellows virtually using teleconferencing software. The four stations consisted of microtia ear carving, airway graft carving, cleft lip repair, and cleft palate repair. Fellows were asked to complete pre- and post-course surveys to evaluate their procedural confidence, expertise, and attitudes towards the course structure. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of pre-course survey data showed fellows agreed that simulators should play an important part in surgical training (4.59 (0.62)); would like more options for training with simulators (4.31 (0.88)); and would like the option of saving their simulators for later reference (4.41 (0.85)). Fellows found the surgical simulators used in the course to be valuable as potential training tools (3.96 (0.96)), as competency or evaluation tools (3.91 (0.98)), and as rehearsal tools (4.06 (0.93)). Analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in overall surgical confidence in performing all four procedures. CONCLUSION: This virtual surgical dissection course demonstrates 3D printed surgical simulators can be utilized to teach fellows advanced surgical techniques in a low-risk, virtual environment. Virtual platforms are a viable, highly-rated option for surgical training in the setting of restricted in-person meetings and as a mechanism to increase access for fellows by reducing costs and travel requirements during unrestricted periods.
