Diagnostic and management challenges for MDM2-, CDK4-negative fatty tumors of the retroperitoneum.

BACKGROUND: Neoplasms of the retroperitoneum that contain a major fat component may represent either benign entities, such as lipomas or angiomyolipomas, or malignancy such as liposarcoma. Distinguishing these diagnoses has important implications for management. While liposarcomas often stain positively for MDM2 and CDK4 proteins, absence of these markers can lead to diagnostic and management challenges. METHODS: We examined three cases in our institution of fat-containing masses of the retroperitoneum that lacked MDM2 and CDK4 markers to highlight the challenges in diagnosing and managing these cases. A thorough review of the literature examining radiologic and histologic features that can be used to determine that diagnosis was conducted and summarized. RESULTS: The three cases we present represent the three main diagnostic entities that can be found in among fatty tumors of the retroperitoneum: lipoma, angiomyolipoma, and liposarcoma. While radiologic features and analysis of histology helped to inform management, these cases in conjunction with the literature also illustrate the limitations of the diagnostic work up and importance also factoring the biologic behavior of the tumor in its management. CONCLUSION: Fat-containing tumors of the retroperitoneum that do not stain for MDM2 or CDK4 can pose a diagnostic challenge. Assessing radiologic and pathologic features in conjunction with the biologic behavior of these tumors should inform their management.

Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications.

Numerous models have been developed to quantify the combined effect of various risk factors to predict either risk of developing breast cancer, risk of carrying a high-risk germline genetic mutation, specifically in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, or the risk of both. These breast cancer risk models can be separated into those that utilize mainly hormonal and environmental factors and those that focus more on hereditary risk. Given the wide range of models from which to choose, understanding what each model predicts, the populations for which each is best suited to provide risk estimations, the current validation and comparative studies that have been performed for each model, and how to apply them practically is important for clinicians and researchers seeking to utilize risk models in their practice. This review provides a comprehensive guide for those seeking to understand and apply breast cancer risk models by summarizing the majority of existing breast cancer risk prediction models including the risk factors they incorporate, the basic methodology in their development, the information each provides, their strengths and limitations, relevant validation studies, and how to access each for clinical or investigative purposes.

An International Surgical Rotation as a Systems-Based Elective: The Botswana-University of Pennsylvania Surgical Experience.

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing need to address the global burden of surgical disease along with increasing interest in international surgical practice, necessitating an understanding of the challenges and issues that arise on a systems level when practicing abroad. DESIGN: This elective is a month-long rotation in which senior surgical residents participate in patient care as part of a surgical team in the main tertiary and teaching hospital in Gaborone, the capital city of Botswana. Clinical experience is combined with formal readings and educational sessions, with the attending surgeon supervising the program to develop a systems-based curriculum that contextualizes the clinical experience. A formal debriefing and written reflections by the residents at the conclusion of the rotation are used to qualitatively assess resident development and insight into systems-based international surgical practice. SETTING: Princess Marina Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents in their fourth clinical year of training. RESULTS: Our elective met important requirements outlined in the literature for foreign practice, including adequate supervision of the American trainees and care to not detract from local trainees' educational experience. Residents' debriefing and written reflections demonstrated an increased understanding of systems-based practice and awareness of issues important to successful international surgical practice and collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Our global surgery elective with a focus on systems-based practice sensitizes residents to the challenges and issues they must be aware of when practicing internationally.