Weight-based enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in young trauma patients: analysis of the CLOTT-1 registry.

Introduction: Optimal venous thromboembolism (VTE) enoxaparin prophylaxis dosing remains elusive. Weight-based (WB) dosing safely increases anti-factor Xa levels without the need for routine monitoring but it is unclear if it leads to lower VTE risk. We hypothesized that WB dosing would decrease VTE risk compared with standard fixed dosing (SFD). Methods: Patients from the prospective, observational CLOTT-1 registry receiving prophylactic enoxaparin (n=5539) were categorized as WB (0.45-0.55 mg/kg two times per day) or SFD (30 mg two times per day, 40 mg once a day). Multivariate logistic regression was used to generate a predicted probability of VTE for WB and SFD patients. Results: Of 4360 patients analyzed, 1065 (24.4%) were WB and 3295 (75.6%) were SFD. WB patients were younger, female, more severely injured, and underwent major operation or major venous repair at a higher rate than individuals in the SFD group. Obesity was more common among the SFD group. Unadjusted VTE rates were comparable (WB 3.1% vs. SFD 3.9%; p=0.221). Early prophylaxis was associated with lower VTE rate (1.4% vs. 5.0%; p=0.001) and deep vein thrombosis (0.9% vs. 4.4%; p<0.001), but not pulmonary embolism (0.7% vs. 1.4%; p=0.259). After adjustment, VTE incidence did not differ by dosing strategy (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.48); however, early administration was associated with a significant reduction in VTE (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74). Conclusion: In young trauma patients, WB prophylaxis is not associated with reduced VTE rate when compared with SFD. The timing of the initiation of chemoprophylaxis may be more important than the dosing strategy. Further studies need to evaluate these findings across a wider age and comorbidity spectrum. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic/care management.

Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (itSAH) are often transferred to a Level I or II trauma center for neurosurgical evaluation. Recent literature suggests that some patients, such as those with high Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, may be safely observed without neurosurgical consultation. The objective of this study was to investigate characteristics of patients with itSAH to determine the clinical utility of neurosurgical evaluation and repeat imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 350 patients aged ≥ 18 y with initial computed tomography head (CTH) showing itSAH and GCS scores of 13-15. Patient demographics, medical history, medications, length of stay, transfer status, injury type and severity, and CTH results were extracted for analysis. Bivariate analyses were conducted to determine whether any factors were associated with a worsening repeat CTH. RESULTS: Most patients were female (57.4%) with blunt injuries (99.1%). The median age was 73 y. Neurosurgery was consulted for 342 (97.7%) patients, with one (0.3%) requiring intervention. Of 311 (88.9%) repeat imaging, 16 (5.1%) showed worsening. Factors with statistically significant associations with worsening CTH included injury severity; neurological deficit; lengths of stay; and a history of congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, or substance use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that patients with itSAH and high GCS scores may be able to be managed safely without neurosurgical oversight. The factors strongly associated with worsening CTH may be useful in identifying patients who need transfer for intensive care. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and develop appropriate management strategies for patients with itSAH.

Sigh Ventilation in Patients With Trauma: The SiVent Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Among patients receiving mechanical ventilation, tidal volumes with each breath are often constant or similar. This may lead to ventilator-induced lung injury by altering or depleting surfactant. The role of sigh breaths in reducing ventilator-induced lung injury among trauma patients at risk of poor outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether adding sigh breaths improves clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pragmatic, randomized trial of sigh breaths plus usual care conducted from 2016 to 2022 with 28-day follow-up in 15 academic trauma centers in the US. Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, mechanical ventilation because of trauma for less than 24 hours, 1 or more of 5 risk factors for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, expected duration of ventilation longer than 24 hours, and predicted survival longer than 48 hours. Interventions: Sigh volumes producing plateau pressures of 35 cm H2O (or 40 cm H2O for inpatients with body mass indexes >35) delivered once every 6 minutes. Usual care was defined as the patient's physician(s) treating the patient as they wished. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was ventilator-free days. Prespecified secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality. Results: Of 5753 patients screened, 524 were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 43.9 [19.2] years; 394 [75.2%] were male). The median ventilator-free days was 18.4 (IQR, 7.0-25.2) in patients randomized to sighs and 16.1 (IQR, 1.1-24.4) in those receiving usual care alone (P = .08). The unadjusted mean difference in ventilator-free days between groups was 1.9 days (95% CI, 0.1 to 3.6) and the prespecified adjusted mean difference was 1.4 days (95% CI, -0.2 to 3.0). For the prespecified secondary outcome, patients randomized to sighs had 28-day mortality of 11.6% (30/259) vs 17.6% (46/261) in those receiving usual care (P = .05). No differences were observed in nonfatal adverse events comparing patients with sighs (80/259 [30.9%]) vs those without (80/261 [30.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In a pragmatic, randomized trial among trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation with risk factors for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, the addition of sigh breaths did not significantly increase ventilator-free days. Prespecified secondary outcome data suggest that sighs are well-tolerated and may improve clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02582957.

An Analysis of Outcomes After Trauma in Obstetric Patients.

Traumatic injury in obstetric patients has been shown to correlate with adverse fetal outcomes; however, data predates modern resuscitation and imaging techniques. A single center retrospective review was performed analyzing risk factors for obstetric outcomes for pregnant patients seen at a Level 1 Trauma Center from 2010 to 2020. 571 pregnant patients were compared to nonpregnant child-bearing age women. Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were higher in nonpregnant patients (5 vs 0, P < .001), with similar mortality (P = .07). 558 (98%) injured pregnant patients had an ISS < 9. 122 (21%) pregnant patients suffered obstetric or fetal complications, had higher ISS (P < .001), higher abbreviated injury scales (AIS) for thorax, abdomen, spine, lower extremities (P < .05), and lower gestational age (P = .005). Age, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), AIS Abdomen and Lower Extremity, and preterm pregnancy were predictive of adverse outcomes. Non-caucasian race, higher gestational age, and term pregnancy were predictive of labor during admission.

Risk Factors Associated With Neurosurgical Intervention in Patients With Mild Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Community centers commonly transfer patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to level 1 and 2 trauma centers for neurosurgical evaluation regardless of the degree of injury. Determining risk factors leading to neurosurgical intervention (NSI) may reduce morbidity and mortality of traumatic ICH and the transfer of patients with lower risk of NSI. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients admitted or transferred to a level 1 trauma center from October 2015 to September 2019 with Glassgow Coma Scale score 13-15 and traumatic ICH on initial head computerized tomography (CTH) scan. Bivariate analyses and multivariable regression were used to identify factors associated with progression to NSI. RESULTS: Of 1542 included patients, 8.2% required NSI. A greater proportion were male (69.1% versus 52.3%, P = 0.0003), on warfarin (37.7% versus 21.6%, P = 0.0023), presented with subdural hemorrhage (98.4% versus 63.3%, P < 0.0001, larger subdural hemorrhage size (median 19 mm [interquartile range {IQR}: 14-25] versus 5 mm [IQR: 3-8], P < 0.0001), and had a worsening repeat CTH (24.4% versus 13%, P < 0.0001). On physical examination, more patients had confusion (40.5% versus 31.4%, P = 0.0495) and hemiparesis (16.2% versus 2.6%, P < 0.0001). CTH findings of midline shift (80.2% versus 10.8%, P < 0.0001) and shift size (median 8.0 mm [IQR: 5.0-12.0] versus 4 mm [IQR: 3-5], P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with NSI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical factors and patient characteristics can be used to infer a greater risk of requiring NSI. These factors could reduce unnecessary transfers and hasten the transfer of patients more likely to progress to NSI.

Challenging Traditional Paradigms in Posttraumatic Pulmonary Thromboembolism.

Importance: Pulmonary clots are seen frequently on chest computed tomography performed after trauma, but recent studies suggest that pulmonary thrombosis (PT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after trauma are independent clinical events. Objective: To assess whether posttraumatic PT represents a distinct clinical entity associated with the nature of the injury, different from the traditional venous thromboembolic paradigm of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study was conducted by the Consortium of Leaders in the Study of Traumatic Thromboembolism (CLOTT) study group. The study was conducted at 17 US level I trauma centers during a 2-year period (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020). Consecutive patients 18 to 40 years of age admitted for a minimum of 48 hours with at least 1 previously defined trauma-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factor were followed up until discharge or 30 days. Exposures: Investigational imaging, prophylactic measures used, and treatment of clots. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of interest were the presence, timing, location, and treatment of any pulmonary clots, as well as the associated injury-related risk factors. Secondary outcomes included DVT. We regarded pulmonary clots with DVT as PE and those without DVT as de novo PT. Results: A total of 7880 patients (mean [SD] age, 29.1 [6.4] years; 5859 [74.4%] male) were studied, 277 with DVT (3.5%), 40 with PE (0.5%), and 117 with PT (1.5%). Shock on admission was present in only 460 patients (6.2%) who had no DVT, PT, or PE but was documented in 11 (27.5%) of those with PE and 30 (25.6%) in those with PT. Risk factors independently associated with PT but not DVT or PE included shock on admission (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) (odds ratio, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.72-4.39; P < .001) and major chest injury with Abbreviated Injury Score of 3 or higher (odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.56; P = .007). Factors associated with the presence of PT on admission included major chest injury (14 patients [50.0%] with or without major chest injury with an Abbreviated Injury Score >3; P = .04) and major venous injury (23 [82.1%] without major venous injury and 5 [17.9%] with major venous injury; P = .02). No deaths were attributed to PT or PE. Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge, this CLOTT study is the largest prospective investigation in the world that focuses on posttraumatic PT. The study suggests that most pulmonary clots are not embolic but rather result from inflammation, endothelial injury, and the hypercoagulable state caused by the injury itself.

The impact of COVID-19 infection on outcomes after injury in a state trauma system.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped the health care system in 2020. COVID-19 infection has been associated with poor outcomes after orthopedic surgery and elective, general surgery, but the impact of COVID-19 on outcomes after trauma is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to Pennsylvania trauma centers from March 21 to July 31, 2020. The exposure of interest was COVID-19 (COV+) and the primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and complications. We compared demographic and injury characteristics between positive, negative, and not-tested patients. We used multivariable regression with coarsened exact matching to estimate the impact of COV+ on outcomes. RESULTS: Of 15,550 included patients, 8,170 (52.5%) were tested for COVID-19 and 219 (2.7%) were positive (COV+). Compared with COVID-19-negative (COV-) patients, COV+ patients were similar in terms of age and sex, but were less often white (53.5% vs. 74.7%, p < 0.0001), and more often uninsured (10.1 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.002). Injury severity was similar, but firearm injuries accounted for 11.9% of COV+ patients versus 5.1% of COV- patients (p < 0.001). Unadjusted mortality for COV+ was double that of COV- patients (9.1% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.0001) and length of stay was longer (median, 5 vs. 4 days; p < 0.001). Using coarsened exact matching, COV+ patients had an increased risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 6.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29-15.99), any complication (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.08-3.16), and pulmonary complications (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 2.02-16.54) compared with COV- patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with concomitant traumatic injury and COVID-19 infection have elevated risks of morbidity and mortality. Trauma centers must incorporate an understanding of these risks into patient and family counseling and resource allocation during this pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic Study.

Point of care ultrasound facilitated diagnosis of right ventricular mass as the etiology of syncope; A case report of intravenous leiomyomatosis.

Syncope is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint. Rarely, syncope can be the result of right ventricular outflow obstruction from an intracardiac tumor, such as an intracardiac extension of intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL). Typically, this type of tumor is confined to the pelvic veins, but in very rare cases, it can extend through the inferior vena cava into the right atrium. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be a crucial tool in the ED for identifying intracardiac tumors presenting as syncope and expediting clinical management. We present the case of a 39-year-old female with no prior medical history that presented to the ED having experienced dyspnea on exertion and two syncopal episodes prior to ED admission. POCUS use in the ED elucidated the presence of a right atrial mass and further imaging showed a mass on the patient's uterus. After surgical removal of a portion of the atrial mass, a subsequent biopsy revealed it had leiomyoma-like features; as such, the patient was diagnosed with IVL. This case illustrates the importance of using POCUS in the ED to help determine the etiology of syncope. Although intracardiac extensions of IVL are rare, it is important for emergency physicians to keep this diagnosis in the differential in patients with symptoms or risk factors suggestive of IVL with intracardiac extension.

Right Patient, Right Place, Right Time : Field Triage and Transfer to Level I Trauma Centers.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to compare outcomes of trauma patients taken directly from the field to a Level I trauma center (direct) versus patients that were first brought to a Level III trauma center prior to being transferred to a Level I (transfer) within our inclusive Delaware trauma system. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Level I center's trauma registry was performed using data from 2013 to 2017 for patients brought to a single Level I trauma center from 2 surrounding counties. The direct cohort consisted of 362 patients, while the transfer cohort contained 204 patients. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate hospital length of stay (LOS), while logistic regression was used for mortality, complications, and craniotomy. Covariates included age, gender, county, and injury severity score (ISS). Propensity score weighting was also performed between the direct and transfer cohorts. RESULTS: When adjusting for age, gender, ISS, and county, transferred patients demonstrated worse outcomes compared with direct patients in both the regression and propensity score analyses. Transferred patients were at increased risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.17, CI 1.10-4.37, P = .027) and craniotomy (OR 3.92, CI 1.87-8.72, P < .001). Age was predictive of mortality (P < .001). ISS was predictive of increased risk of mortality (P < .001), increased LOS (P < .001), and craniotomy (P < .001). Older age, Sussex County, and higher ISS were predictive of patients being transferred (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Delays in the presentation to our Level I trauma center resulted in worse outcomes. Patients that meet criteria should be considered for transport directly to the highest level trauma center in the system to avoid delays in care.

Right Patient, Right Place, Right Time: Field Triage and Transfer to Level I Trauma Centers.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to compare the outcomes of trauma patients taken directly from the field to a level I trauma center (direct) versus patients that were first brought to a level III trauma center prior to being transferred to a level I (transfer) within our inclusive Delaware trauma system. METHODS: A retrospective review of the level I center's trauma registry was performed using data from 2013 to 2017 for patients brought to a single level I trauma center from two surrounding counties. The direct cohort consisted of 362 patients, while the transfer cohort contained 204 patients. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate hospital length of stay (LOS), while logistic regression was used for mortality, complications, and craniotomy. Covariates included age, gender, county, and injury severity score (ISS). Propensity score weighting was also performed between the direct and transfer cohorts. RESULTS: When adjusting for age, gender, ISS, and county, transferred patients demonstrated worse outcomes compared to direct patients in both the regression and propensity score analyses. Transferred patients were at increased risk of mortality (OR 2.17, CI 1.10-4.37, P = .027) and craniotomy (OR 3.92, CI 1.87-8.72, P < .001). Age was predictive of mortality (P < .001). ISS was predictive of increased risk of mortality (P < .001), increased LOS (P < .001), and craniotomy (P < .001). Older age, Sussex County, and higher ISS were predictive of patients being transferred (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Delays in presentation to our level I trauma center resulted in worse outcomes. Patients that meet criteria should be considered for transport directly to the highest level trauma center in the system to avoid delays in care.

Outcomes with advanced versus basic life support in blunt trauma.

INTRODUCTION: The role of advanced life support (ALS) versus basic life support (BLS) in blunt trauma is controversial. Previous studies have shown no mortality benefit with ALS for penetrating trauma but the blunt population has mostly remained unaddressed. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center comparing outcomes in blunt trauma patients managed by ALS versus BLS from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Both Injury Severity Score (ISS) and select Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) were used to determine differences in mortality, length of stay (LOS) and complications based on mode of transportation, prehospital time, and number of prehospital interventions. RESULTS: 698 total patients were identified. Mortality and complications were grossly higher in ALS patients (p = 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). When accounting for ISS and AIS there was no difference in mortality (p=<0.001-0.003). Prehospital interventions did not increase prehospital time (p = 0.7) but did correlate with increased mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is no mortality advantage for blunt trauma patients managed by ALS versus BLS.

The "Death Diamond": Death Beyond Trauma.

Thromboelastography (TEG) has become a critical tool for the diagnosis, assessment, and management of hyperfibrinolysis and coagulopathy in trauma. In 2015, Chapman et al. of the Denver group coined the term "Death Diamond" (DD) to describe a TEG tracing identified in a unique trauma population. The DD was associated with a 100 per cent positive predictive value for mortality. Given the potential prognostic implications and resource savings associated with validating the DD as a marker of futile care, we sought to further evaluate DD outcomes. A retrospective review of 6850 TEGs, 34 patients (24 trauma and 10 nontrauma), displayed a DD tracing. Through invasive procedures and transfusions, nine DD tracing "normalized," but, ultimately, this did not impact the outcome because the DD had a positive predictive value of 100 per cent for mortality in both populations. The median survival time in trauma patients was two hours compared with seven hours in nontrauma patients. Overall, this study further validates the predictive value of the DD in a trauma population while also serving as an assessment of the DD in a nontrauma population. Given these findings, a DD may prove to be an indicator of futile care. Further multicenter studies should be conducted to confirm these results.

Improving Tracheostomy Decannulation Rate In Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Identify the effect of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy decannulation protocol (TDP) in the trauma population. DESIGN: Single center retrospective review. SETTING: American College of Surgeons Level 1 Trauma Center; large academic associated community hospital. PATIENTS: Adult trauma patients who required a tracheostomy. INTERVENTIONS: A TDP empowering respiratory therapists to move patients towards tracheostomy decannulation (TD). MEASUREMENTS: TD rate, time to TD, length of stay, reintubation and recannulation rates. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 252 patients met inclusion criteria during the study period with 134 presenting after the TDP was available. Since the TDP was implemented, patients managed by the TDP had a 50% higher chance of TD during the hospital stay (p<0.001). The time to TD was 1 day shorter with the TDP (p=0.54). There was no difference in time to discharge after ventilator liberation (p=0.91) or in discharge disposition (p=0.66). When comparing all patients, the development of a TDP, regardless if a patient was managed by the TDP, resulted in an 18% higher chance of TD (p=0.003). Time to TD was 5 days shorter in the post intervention period (p=0.07). There was no difference in discharge disposition (p=0.88) but the time to discharge after ventilator liberation was shorter post protocol initiation (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In a trauma population, implementation of a TDP significantly improves TD rates during the same hospital stay. A larger population will be required to identify patient predictive factors for earlier successful TD.

Optimal Reversal of Novel Anticoagulants in Trauma.

The incidence of patients with trauma on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of thromboembolic disorders is increasing. In severe bleeding or hemorrhage into critical spaces, urgent reversal of this underlying pharmacologic coagulopathy becomes paramount. Optimal reversal strategy for commonly used NOACs is still evolving. Basic tenets of evaluation of patients with trauma and resuscitation remain the same. Clinical outcomes data in bleeding human patients with trauma are lacking, but are needed to establish efficacy and safety in these treatments. This article summarizes the available evidence and provides the optimal reversal strategy for bleeding patients with trauma on NOACs.

A Case Review Series of Christiana Care Health System's Experience with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Instillation.

Acute and chronic wounds afflict a multitude of patients to varying degrees. Wound care treatment modalities span the spectrum of technological advancement and with that differ greatly in cost. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can now be combined with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d). This case review series of 11 patients in a community hospital setting provides support for the utilization of NPWTi-d. Additionally, current literature on the use of NPWTi-d in comparison to NPWT will be reviewed.  We highlight three specific cases. The first case is a 16-year-old male who was shot in the left leg. He suffered a pseudoaneurysm and resultant compartment syndrome. This required a fasciotomy and delayed primary closure. To facilitate this, NPWTi-d was employed and resulted in a total of four operative procedures before closure 13 days after admission. Next, a 61-year-old uncontrolled diabetic female presented with necrotizing fasciitis of the lower abdomen and pelvis. She underwent extensive debridement and placement of NPWTi-d with Dakin's solution. A total of four operative procedures were performed including delayed primary closure six days after admission. Finally, a 48-year-old female suffered a crush injury with internal degloving. NPWTi-d with saline was utilized until discharge home on postoperative day 12. NPWTi-d, when compared to NPWT, has been reported to lead to a decrease in time to operative closure, hospital length of stay, as well as operative procedures required. The cost-benefit analysis in one retrospective review noted a $1,400 savings when these factors were taken into account. This mode of wound care therapy has significant benefits that warrant the development of a prospective randomized controlled trial to further define the improvement in quality-of-life provided to the patient and the reduction of potential overall healthcare costs.

Embedding a trauma hospitalist in the trauma service reduces mortality and 30-day trauma-related readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing the increasing age and comorbid conditions of patients admitted to our trauma service, we embedded a hospitalist on the trauma service at our Level I trauma center.This program was initiated in January 2013. This study was designed to investigate differences in outcomes between trauma patients who received care from the trauma hospitalist (THOSP) program and similarly medically complex trauma patients who did not receive THOSP care. METHODS: There were 566 patients comanaged with THOSP between December 2013 and November 2014. These patients were matched (1:2) with propensity scores to a contemporaneous control group based on age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and comorbid conditions. Outcomes examined included mortality, trauma-related readmissions, upgrades to the intensive care unit, hospital length of stay, the development of in-hospital complications, and the frequency of obtaining medical subspecialist consultation. Differences in outcomes were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test or χ test as appropriate. RESULTS: High-quality matching resulted in the loss of 97 THOSP patients for the final analysis. Table 1 shows the balance between the two groups after matching. While there was a 1-day increase in hospital length of stay and an increase in upgrades to the intensive care unit, there was a reduction in mortality, trauma-related readmissions, and the development of renal failure after implementation of the THOSP program (Table 2). Implementation of this program made no significant difference in the frequency of cardiology, nephrology, neurology, or endocrinology consultations. There was also no difference in the development of the complications of venous thromboembolism, pneumonia, stroke, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, or alcohol withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that embedding a hospitalist on the trauma service reduces mortality and trauma-related readmissions. A reason for these improved outcomes may be related to THOSP "vigilance." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Remote and interdisciplinary research in surgical knowledge production.

BACKGROUND: Surgical knowledge production has changed dramatically in the last 30 y, moving away from investigations by individual surgeon researchers and toward remote and interdisciplinary research. We investigated how surgeons make decisions about engaging in research and identify motivators, facilitators, and barriers to conducting research in an increasingly challenging environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with surgeons from academic medical centers across the United States. We asked participants to describe their experiences and opinions regarding remote and interdisciplinary collaborations. RESULTS: Of 64 surgeon researchers invited, 21 (33%) agreed and participated in semistructured interviews. Each interview lasted an average (standard deviation) of 29 min (12). Surgeons were motivated by both internal and external factors, including some that might be identified as barriers. The internal desire to improve care and the need for collaboration to address increasingly complex questions requiring larger samples sizes emerged as most significant to interview participants. Social networks were identified as the dominant facilitator of multisite research, with technology playing a supporting role. Barriers to remote and interdisciplinary research ranged from individual, "micro" level barriers, through structural barriers that include institutional level challenges and competing priorities, to macrolevel system and policy-level barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons clearly recognize the importance of high-quality research aligned with current paradigms of clinical care and are using remote and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve the quality of the science they produce and align their work with the demand for increasingly high levels of evidence.

Determining the magnitude of surveillance bias in the assessment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: A prospective observational study of two centers.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma. Controversy exists regarding the use of lower extremity duplex ultrasound screening and surveillance (LEDUS). Advocates cite earlier diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) to prevent clot propagation and pulmonary embolism (PE). Opponents argue that LEDUS identifies more DVT (surveillance bias) but does not reduce the incidence of PE. We sought to determine the magnitude of surveillance bias associated with LEDUS and test the hypothesis that LEDUS does not decrease the incidence of PE after injury. METHODS: We compared data from two Level 1 trauma centers: Scripps Mercy Hospital, which used serial LEDUS, and Christiana Care Health System, which used LEDUS only for symptomatic patients. Beginning in 2013, both centers prospectively collected data on demographics, injury severity, and VTE risk for patients admitted for more than 48 hours. Both centers used mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis based on VTE risk assessment. RESULTS: Scripps Mercy treated 772 patients and Christiana Care treated 454 patients with similar injury severity and VTE risk. The incidence of PE was 0.4% at both centers. The odds of a DVT diagnosis were 5.3 times higher (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-12.9; p < 0.0001) for patients admitted to Scripps Mercy than for patients admitted to Christiana Care. Of the 80 patients who developed DVT, PE, or both, 99% received prophylaxis before the event. Among those who received pharmacologic prophylaxis, the VTE rates between the two centers were not statistically significantly different (Scripps Mercy, 11% vs. Christiana Care, 3%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The odds of a diagnosis of DVT are increased significantly when a program of LEDUS is used in trauma patients. Neither pharmacologic prophylaxis nor mechanical prophylaxis is completely effective in preventing VTE in trauma patients. VTE should not be considered a "never event" in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level III.