Prospective, multicenter study on the economic and clinical impact of gene-expression assays in early-stage breast cancer from a single region: the PREGECAM registry experience.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impact of gene-expression assays (GEAs) on treatment decisions in a real-world setting of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients. METHODS: This is a regional, prospective study promoted by the Council Health Authorities in Madrid. Enrolment was offered to women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-negative or micrometastatic, stage I or II breast cancer from 21 hospitals in Madrid. Treatment recommendations were recorded before and after knowledge of tests results. An economic model compared the cost-effectiveness of treatment, guided by GEAs or by common prognostic factors. RESULTS: 907 tests (440 Oncotype DX® and 467 MammaPrint®) were performed between February 2012 and November 2014. Treatment recommendation changed in 42.6% of patients. The shift was predominantly from chemohormonal (CHT) to hormonal therapy (HT) alone, in 30.5% of patients. GEAs increased patients' confidence in treatment decision making. Tumor grade, progesterone receptor positivity and Ki67 expression were associated with the likelihood of change from CHT to HT (P < 0.001) and from HT to CHT (P < 0.001). Compared with current clinical practice genomic testing increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.00787 per patient and was cost-saving from a national health care system (by 13.867€ per patient) and from a societal perspective (by 32.678€ per patient). CONCLUSION: Using GEAs to guide adjuvant therapy in ESBC is cost-effective in Spain and has a significant impact on treatment decisions.

Update on adjuvant hormonal treatment of early breast cancer.

Clinical trials conducted over the last two decades have demonstrated that 5 years of treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) after local treatment in postmenopausal patients with positive hormone receptor early breast cancer improves disease-free survival and overall survival. More recently, aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been tested in several randomized clinical trials in this setting. The studies have tested either AI versus TAM or different sequential approaches combining the two agents. While the most effective strategy remains to be determined, overall, incorporation of AI resulted in better disease-free survival, particularly in the worst-prognosis subgroup of patients. In addition, long-term treatment with AI was, in general, well tolerated. However, mature results are needed in order to be able to assess the effect in overall survival. The authors of this supplement paper include the key points of roundtable presentations and discussions of hormonal therapy in breast cancer by topic.