Telerehabilitation: A Solution for Patients After Hip Fracture?

- Hip fracture is the most common cause of hospitalization in frail geriatric subjects due to osteoporosis and recurrent falls. The clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation after surgery in patients with hip fractures recommend to start treatment early. However, the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic between December 2019 and January 2020 forced to lockdown. Thus, telerehabilitation seemed the best solution to remote assistance. In this scenario, the aim of our study is to assess the effects of telerehabilitation and to clarify and rearrange the knowledge about its usability and feasibility in patients after hip fracture in emergency conditions, such as the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2. Three databases were systematically searched from caption to December 2023, considering only articles published in peer-reviewed journals, with the use of three macro-areas: 'telerehabilitation', 'remote rehabilitation' and 'hip fracture'. In the present review, 26 articles were considered eligible and 10 were included. Heterogeneous results were found due to the different characteristics of the patients recruited in the studies, designs and type of the studies, and reporting/conducting of the research. Also, the typologies of telerehabilitation provided were various. In conclusion, this review demonstrated that telerehabilitation is safe, effective and well tolerated from patients and seems to be not inferior to the conventional physiotherapy. It also plays a positive role in psychological rehabilitation, in the prevention of complications and in the maintenance of achieved goals. However, further studies are needed to guide the clinical practice in providing the better posology and typology of telerehabilitation.

[A&F: obstacles to implementing interventions in the health system.] / A&F: gli ostacoli nell'implementare interventi nel sistema sanitario.

Understanding how well a clinician or health care team is performing provides an essential foundation for improvement. If done well, Audit and Feedback (A&F) provides data in non-judgemental, motivating insights and leads to changes in clinical processes that benefit patients. This article will explore obstacles to optimizing the potential positive effects of A&F to improve patient care and outcomes by examining three interrelated steps in the process: the audit; the feedback; and the action. The audit requires data that will be perceived as both valid and actionable. Acquiring and using such data properly often requires partnerships. Feedback recipients need to know how to turn data into action. The A&F, therefore, should include components that direct the recipient toward feasible next steps to undertake the change that will lead to improvement. The proposed actions may be individual (learning new diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, trying a more patient-centered approach, etc.) or organizational (more proactive approaches often including the involvement of additional team members). The ability to turn feedback into action will depend on the culture of the recipient-group, and its level of experience with these change processes. Feedback facilitation or coaching may be useful for some groups or certain kinds of desired changes in practice. Inadequate leadership and support for health professionals, as they try to respond to A&F, is also often a barrier. Finally, with the final focus on the challenges of the individual Work Packages (WP) within the Easy-Net network program, the article focuses on what were the facilitating and hindering factors, the obstacles encountered, and the resistance to change overcome, useful considerations in support of the increasingly widespread implementation of A&F activities in our Healthcare System in the future.

Nabiximols plus robotic assisted gait training in improving motor performances in people with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, affecting ambulation even in people with only mild neurological signs. Patients with MS frequently experience spasticity, which contributes significantly to impair their motor functions, including ambulation, owing to muscle stiffness, spasms, and pain. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the role of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol(THC):cannabidiol(CBD) oromucosal spray, coupled to robot-aided gait training (RAGT) using the Lokomat©Pro to improve functional ambulation in patients with MS. METHODS: We compared 20 patients with MS, who were treated with THC:CBD oromucosal spray in add-on to the ongoing oral antispastic therapy (OAT) (group A), with 20 individuals with MS (matched for clinical-demographic characteristics) who were treated only with OAT (group B). Both the groups underwent RAGT using the Lokomat-Pro (three 45-minute sessions per week). Our primary outcome measures were the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the 10 meters walking test (10MWT). As secondary outcome measures we evaluated the brain cortical excitability by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Both parameters were taken before and after the end of the RAGT. RESULTS: FIM improved in group A more than in group B (p<0.001). Moreover, 10MWT decreased in group A more than in group B (p<0.001). These clinical findings were paralleled by a more evident reshape of intracortical excitability in both upper and lower limbs, as suggested by motor evoked potential amplitude increase (p<0.001), intracortical inhibition strengthening (p<0.001), and intracortical facilitation decrease (p=0.01) in group A as compared to group B. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the combined THC:CBD-RAGT approach could be useful in improving gait performance in patients with MS.