Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 32
2.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 22(12): 1220-1222, 2023 Dec 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051859

Keloids and hypertrophic scars negatively impact the quality of life for millions of people in the world. Unfortunately, though many thera-peutic approaches are used to treat scars, they are often limited in efficacy with high rates of recurrence. Lately, a better understanding of the immune dysregulation of several dermatologic conditions has led to the emergence of multiple cytokine-targeted therapies for numerous conditions. Several studies have implicated T helper 2 (Th2) immune dysregulation in the development of scars and keloids, with interleukins (IL)-4 and -13 identified as pro-fibrotic mediators. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor alpha antagonist that inhibits the ex-pression of both IL-4 and -13. Herein, we describe a 44-year-old woman who developed numerous disfiguring hypertrophic scars and keloids after suffering from a severe herpes zoster infection. Given the number of scars, intralesional corticosteroid injections were not feasible. Therefore, treatment with systemic dupilumab was initiated. Many scars flattened, several even developing a cigarette-paper-like texture due to rapid involution. The largest and most recalcitrant keloid was further treated with intralesional dupliumab injec-tions every 2 weeks with an even more dramatic improvement noted in 2 months. To our knowledge, this is the first report of treating multiple keloids and hypertrophic scars with both systemic and intralesional dupilumab. Dermatologists may want to consider treating keloids that cover a large area with systemic dupilumab, a therapy with an established, reassuring safety profile. The most recalcitrant areas may further benefit from concentrating dupilumab by intralesional delivery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1220-1222.  doi:10.36849/JDD.6385.


Cicatrix, Hypertrophic , Keloid , Female , Humans , Adult , Keloid/pathology , Cicatrix, Hypertrophic/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Injections, Intralesional , Treatment Outcome
18.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 21(3): 339-353, 2020 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096127

Dermatomyositis is a rare inflammatory disease with characteristic cutaneous findings and varying amounts of systemic involvement. Patients may present with skin disease alone, have concomitant muscle disease, or have extracutaneous manifestations such as pulmonary disease or an associated malignancy. Given such diverse presentations, dermatomyositis is both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. However, a prompt diagnosis is of utmost importance to institute adequate therapy and screen patients for an associated malignancy. Dermatologists should play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of patients with dermatomyositis as cutaneous disease tends to be chronic, negatively impact quality of life, and be more recalcitrant to therapy. In this review, we discuss diagnosis, with a focus on myositis-specific antibodies and their associated phenotypes. We also review therapies available for this often refractory skin disease.


Dermatomyositis/diagnosis , Dermatomyositis/therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Antimalarials/administration & dosage , Antipruritics/administration & dosage , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Biopsy , Delayed Diagnosis/prevention & control , Dermatomyositis/blood , Dermatomyositis/immunology , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Muscle, Skeletal/immunology , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Protective Clothing , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/immunology , Skin/pathology , Skin/radiation effects , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
20.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 312(7): 527-531, 2020 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31773259

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic skin disease that significantly impacts quality of life (QOL). This study tested a novel method to measure QOL in CLE using willingness-to-pay (WTP) stated preferences, and aimed to determine which of nine domains of life are most affected by CLE. Twenty-one participants with CLE ranked the domains in order of impact on CLE-related QOL, and then stated how many United States dollars they would be willing to pay for a hypothetical cure for each domain. Eighty-one percent of participants were female; mean age was 42.4 years. Photosensitivity was ranked highest by 71.4% of respondents. Participants were willing to pay the most for a hypothetical cure for CLE specific to photosensitivity (median = $200,000), the least for a cure specific to self-care (median = $0). Participants were willing to pay a median of $1,000,000 for an overall cure for CLE. Limitations include a small sample size for this pilot study and that willingness-to-pay may be influenced by individual perception of money and socioeconomic factors. This study successfully pilot-tested a WTP method and ranking task for health-related QOL. Photosensitivity was the domain of life most affected by CLE, which is a domain unique to our novel tool.


Health Expenditures , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/therapy , Patient Preference/economics , Quality of Life , Adult , Female , Humans , Light/adverse effects , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/economics , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/psychology , Male , Patient Preference/psychology , Pilot Projects , Skin/immunology , Skin/radiation effects , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
...