AAPM Task Group 334: A guidance document to using radiotherapy immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment.

Use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiation therapy has increased substantially in recent years as more radiotherapy centers are having MR simulators installed, requesting more time on clinical diagnostic MR systems, or even treating with combination MR linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. With this increased use, to ensure the most accurate integration of images into radiotherapy (RT), RT immobilization devices and accessories must be able to be used safely in the MR environment and produce minimal perturbations. The determination of the safety profile and considerations often falls to the medical physicist or other support staff members who at a minimum should be a Level 2 personnel as per the ACR. The purpose of this guidance document will be to help guide the user in making determinations on MR Safety labeling (i.e., MR Safe, Conditional, or Unsafe) including standard testing, and verification of image quality, when using RT immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment.

Feasibility and Safety of Diffusing Alpha-Emitter Radiation Therapy for Recurrent or Unresectable Skin Cancers.

Importance: Patients with recurrent or unresectable skin cancers have limited treatment options. Diffusing alpha-emitter radiation therapy (DaRT), a novel solid tumor management strategy using alpha-particle interstitial brachytherapy, may address this challenge. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of using DaRT to manage recurrent or unresectable skin cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study of patients who received a 2-week to 3-week treatment course and were followed up for 24 weeks after treatment during 2021 and 2022 at 2 sites in the US. Patients with malignant skin tumors or soft tissue tumors were recruited if they had limited treatment options for tumors recurrent after prior surgery or external beam radiotherapy or unresectable tumors. Intervention: Patients underwent DaRT to deliver a physical dose of 10 Gy (equivalent weighted dose of 200 CGE) to the tumor. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility of the DaRT procedure was evaluated based on the ability of investigators to successfully deliver radiation to the tumor. Patients were followed up for adverse events (AEs) for 24 weeks and for tumor response by physicians' physical examination and imaging 12 weeks after device removal. Results: This study included 10 participants with recurrent or unresectable skin cancer (median [IQR] age, 72 [68-75] years; 6 males [60%]; 4 females [40%]). Six patients (60%) had recurrent disease, and 4 (40%) had tumors that were deemed unresectable. Tumors were located on the nose, chin, eyelid, scalp, neck, trunk, and extremities. Median (range) tumor volume before treatment was 2.1 cm3 (0.65-12.65 cm3). The mean (SD) prescription dose coverage of the gross tumor volume was 91% (2.8%) with all tumors having coverage of 85% or more. No device-related grade 3 AEs were noted. Common AEs were grade 1 to 2 erythema, edema, and pruritus. At 12 weeks following treatment, there was a 100% complete response rate. Nine of 10 complete responses (90%) were confirmed by CT imaging. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests the feasibility and preliminary safety of DaRT in the management of recurrent or unresectable skin cancers. The favorable safety profile and high response rates are promising. A US trial for marketing approval based on this pilot study is under way. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04377360.

AAPM medical physics practice guideline 13.a: HDR brachytherapy, part A.

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines (MPPGs) will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: (1) Must and must not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. (2) Should and should not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances. Approved by AAPM's Executive Committee April 28, 2022.

Salvage resection plus cesium-131 brachytherapy durably controls post-SRS recurrent brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Salvage of recurrent previously irradiated brain metastases (rBrM) is a significant challenge. Resection without adjuvant re-irradiation is associated with a high local failure rate, while reirradiation only partially reduces failure but is associated with greater radiation necrosis risk. Salvage resection plus Cs131 brachytherapy may offer dosimetric and biologic advantages including improved local control versus observation, with reduced normal brain dose versus re-irradiation, however data are limited. METHODS: A prospective registry of consecutive patients with post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) rBrM undergoing resection plus implantation of collagen-matrix embedded Cs131 seeds (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies) prescribed to 60 Gy at 5 mm from the cavity was analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent 24 operations with Cs131 implantation in 25 tumor cavities. Median maximum preoperative diameter was 3.0 cm (range 1.1-6.3). Gross- or near-total resection was achieved in 80% of lesions. A median of 16 Cs131 seeds (range 6-30), with a median air-kerma strength of 3.5 U/seed were implanted. There was one postoperative wound dehiscence. With median follow-up of 1.6 years for survivors, two tumors recurred (one in-field, one marginal) resulting in 8.4% 1-year progression incidence (95%CI = 0.0-19.9). Radiographic seed settling was identified in 7/25 cavities (28%) 1.9-11.7 months post-implantation, with 1 case of distant migration (4%), without clinical sequelae. There were 8 cases of radiation necrosis, of which 4 were symptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: With > 1.5 years of follow-up, intraoperative brachytherapy with commercially available Cs131 implants was associated with favorable local control and toxicity profiles. Weak correlation between preoperative tumor geometry and implanted tiles highlights a need to optimize planning criteria.

Protocol for the measurement of the absorbed dose rate to water for a planar 32P beta emitting brachytherapy source: A multi-institutional validation.

PURPOSE: This is a multi-institutional report on inter-observer and inter-instrument variation in the calibration of the absorbed dose rate for a planar 32P beta emitting brachytherapy source. Measurement accuracy is essential since the dose profile is steep and the source is used for the treatment of tumors that are located in close proximity to healthy nervous system structures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An RIC-100 32P source was calibrated by three institutions using their own equipment and following their standard procedures. The first institution calibrated the source with an electron diode and EBT3 film. The second institution used an electron diode. The third institution used HD810 film. Additionally, each institution was asked to calibrate the source using an electron diode and procedure that was shared among all institutions and shipped along with the radiation source. The dose rate was reported in units of cGy*min-1 at a water equivalent depth of 1 mm. RESULTS: Close agreement was observed in the measurements from different users and equipment. The variation across all diode detectors and institutions had a standard deviation of 1.8% and maximum difference of 4.6%. The observed variation among two different diode systems used within the same institution had a mean difference of 1.6% and a maximum variation of 1.8%. The variations among film and diode systems used within the same institution had a mean difference of 2.9% and a maximum variation of 4.3% CONCLUSIONS: The absorbed dose rate measurement protocol of the planar beta-emitting 32P source permits consistent dosimetry across three institutions and five different electron diode and radiochromic film systems. The methodologies presented herein should enable measurement consistency among other clinical users, which will help ensure high quality patient treatments and outcomes analysis.

Safety practices and opportunities for improvement in brachytherapy: A patient safety practices survey of the American Brachytherapy Society membership.

PURPOSE: Safe delivery of brachytherapy and establishing a safety culture are critical in high-quality brachytherapy. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) Quality and Safety Committee surveyed members regarding brachytherapy services offered, safety practices during treatment, quality assurance procedures, and needs to develop safety and training materials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 22-item survey was sent to ABS membership in early 2019 to physicians, physicists, therapists, nurses, and administrators. Participation was voluntary. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics and relative frequency distributions. RESULTS: There were 103 unique responses. Approximately one in three was attending physicians and one in three attending physicists. Most were in practice >10 years. A total of 94% and 50% performed gynecologic and prostate brachytherapy, respectively. Ninety-one percent performed two-identification patient verification before treatment. Eighty-six percent performed a time-out. Ninety-five percent had an incident reporting or learning system, but only 71% regularly reviewed incidents. Half reviewed safety practices within the last year. Twenty percent reported they were somewhat or not satisfied with department safety culture, but 92% of respondents were interested in improving safety culture. Most reported time, communication, and staffing as barriers to improving safety. Most respondents desired safety-oriented webinars, self-assessment modules, learning modules, or checklists endorsed by the ABS to improve safety practice. CONCLUSIONS: Most but not all practices use standards and quality assurance procedures in line with society recommendations. There is a need to heighten safety culture at many departments and to shift resources (e.g., time or staffing) to improve safety practice. There is a desire for society guidance to improve brachytherapy safety practices. This is the first survey to assess safety practice patterns among a national sample of radiation oncologists with expertise in brachytherapy.

The American Brachytherapy society consensus statement for skin brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Keratinocyte carcinoma (KC, previously nonmelanoma skin cancer) represents the most common cancer worldwide. While surgical treatment is commonly utilized, various radiation therapy techniques are available including external beam and brachytherapy. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society has created an updated consensus statement regarding the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of KCs. METHODS: Physicians and physicists with expertise in skin cancer and brachytherapy created a consensus statement for appropriate patient selection, data, dosimetry, and utilization of skin brachytherapy and techniques based on a literature search and clinical experience. RESULTS: Guidelines for patient selection, evaluation, and dose/fractionation schedules to optimize outcomes for patients with KC undergoing brachytherapy are presented. Studies of electronic brachytherapy are emerging, although limited long-term data or comparative data are available. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents an appropriate option for patients with small KCs with multiple techniques available. CONCLUSIONS: Skin brachytherapy represents a standard of care option for appropriately selected patients with KC. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents a well-established technique; however, the current recommendation is that electronic brachytherapy be used for KC on prospective clinical trial or registry because of a paucity of mature data.

Novel intraoperative radiotherapy utilizing prefabricated custom three-dimensionally printed high-dose-rate applicators.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is an effective strategy for the delivery of high doses of radiotherapy to a residual tumor or resection cavity with relative sparing of nearby healthy tissues. This strategy is an important component of the multimodality management of pediatric soft tissue sarcomas, particularly in cases where patients have received prior courses of external beam radiotherapy. PURPOSE: Tumor beds with significant topographic irregularity remain a therapeutic challenge because existing IORT technologies are typically most reliable with flat surfaces. To address this limitation, we have developed a novel strategy to create custom, prefabricated high-dose-rate (HDR)-IORT applicators designed to match the shape of an anticipated surgical cavity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Silastic applicators are constructed using three-dimensional (3D) printing and are derived from volumetric segmentation of preoperative imaging. RESULTS: HDR preplanning with the applicators improves dosimetric accuracy and minimizes incremental operative time. In this report, we describe the fabrication process for the 3D-printed applicators and detail our experience utilizing this strategy in two pediatric patients who underwent HDR-IORT as part of complex base of skull sarcoma resections. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience suggests that usage of the custom applicators is feasible, versatile for a variety of clinical situations, and enables the uniform delivery of high superficial doses of radiotherapy to irregularly shaped surgical cavities.

The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for electronic brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy is utilized in the treatment of many different malignancies; although traditionally performed with low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate techniques, more recently, electronic brachytherapy (EB) has emerged as a potential alternative. At this time, there are no evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians in patient selection for EB and concerns exits regarding differences in dosimetry as compared to traditional brachytherapy techniques. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society appointed a group of physicians and physicists to create a consensus statement regarding the use of EB. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Physicians and physicists with expertise in brachytherapy created a site-directed consensus statement for appropriate patient selection and utilization of EB based on a literature search and clinical experience. RESULTS: EB has been utilized to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation with, thus far acceptable local control and toxicity rates including a randomized trial that used EB to deliver intraoperative radiotherapy; however, prospective data with large patient numbers and long-term follow up are needed. Increasing numbers of patients have been treated with EB for nonmelanomatous skin cancers; although, preliminary data are promising, there is a lack of data comparing EB to traditional radiotherapy techniques as well as a lack of long-term follow up. For treatment of the vaginal cuff with EB, small retrospective studies have been reported without long-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: In light of a randomized trial in breast showing higher rates of recurrence and the lack of prospective data with mature follow up with other sites, as well as concerns regarding dosimetry, it is not recommended that EB be utilized for accelerated partial breast irradiation, nonmelanomatous skin cancers, or vaginal cuff brachytherapy outside prospective clinical trials at this time.

Endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: Management of locally recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer (EC) after standard chemoradiation is challenging. This study updates our experience of treating medically inoperable EC patients with endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (EHDRBT) including the patients treated with a novel multiballoon channel centering esophageal applicator. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with early-stage primary (n = 7), posttreatment persistent (n = 7), and recurrent (n = 19) EC treated with EHDRBT at our institution were included. Median dose and treatment lengths were 14 Gy (range 10-17.5 Gy) and 6 cm (3.5-9.0 cm), respectively. Endoscopy and biopsy were performed 3 months after EHDRBT and then every 3-6 months thereafter. RESULTS: Median followup was 17.4 months (range 5.0-88.3). Grade 1 and 2 toxicities were observed in 13 (44.8%) and 11 (37.9%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 toxicity (tracheoesophageal fistula) was observed in 1 patient who had previously received two courses of external beam radiotherapy as well as a stent insertion. Median overall survival (OS) for entire cohort was 20.9 months, and 1-year OS was 78%. Complete response was achieved in 58.6% of patients with median time to failure and 1-year disease-free survival of 10.3 months (range 5.4-28.2) and 27%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For medically inoperable patients with early-stage primary or local posttreatment residual or recurrent EC, EHDRBT is a well-tolerated treatment option with minimal Grade ≥3 toxicity. Brachytherapy in our hands continues to be a safe treatment option. Although 58.6% of patients achieved a complete response and the OS of this cohort is relatively good, long-term local control and cure remains a challenge.

Placement of an absorbable rectal hydrogel spacer in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy with palladium-103.

PURPOSE: Rates of rectal toxicity after low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer are dependent on rectal dose, which is associated with rectal distance from prostate and implanted seeds. Placement of a hydrogel spacer between the prostate and rectum has proven to reduce the volume of the rectum exposed to higher radiation dose levels in the setting of external beam radiotherapy. We present our findings with placing a rectal hydrogel spacer in patients following LDR brachytherapy, and we further assess the impact of this placement on dosimetry and acute rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2016 and April 2017, 74 patients had placement of a hydrogel spacer, immediately following a Pd-103 seed-implant procedure. Brachytherapy was delivered as follows: as a monotherapy to 26 (35%) patients; as part of planned combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy to 40 (54%) patients; or as a salvage monotherapy to eight (11%) patients. Postoperative MRI was used to assess separation achieved with rectal spacer. Acute toxicity was assessed retrospectively using Radiation Oncology Therapy Group radiation toxicity grading system. Rectal dosimetry was compared with a consecutive cohort of 136 patients treated with seed implantation at our institution without a spacer, using a 2-tailed paired Student's t test (p < 0.05 for statistical significance). RESULTS: On average, 11.2-mm (SD 3.3) separation was achieved between the prostate and the rectum. The resultant mean rectal volume receiving 100% of prescribed dose (V100%), dose to 1 cc of rectum (D1cc), and dose to 2 cc of rectum (D2cc) were 0 (SD 0.05 cc), 25.3% (SD 12.7), and 20.5% (SD 9.9), respectively. All rectal dosimetric parameters improved significantly for the cohort with spacer placement as compared with the nonspacer cohort. Mean prostate volume, prostate V100 and dose to 90% of gland (D90) were 29.3 cc (SD 12.4), 94.0% (SD 3.81), and 112.4% (SD 12.0), respectively. Urethral D20, D5cc, and D1cc were 122.0% (SD 17.27), 133.8% (SD 22.8), and 144.0% (SD 25.4), respectively. After completing all treatments, at the time of first the followup, 7 patients reported acute rectal toxicity-6 experiencing Grade 1 rectal discomfort and 1 (with preexisting hemorrhoids) experiencing Grade 1 bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Injection of rectal spacer is feasible in the post-LDR brachytherapy setting and reduces dose to the rectum with minimal toxicity. Prostate and urethral dosimetries do not appear to be affected by the placement of a spacer. Further studies with long-term followup are warranted to assess the impact on reduction of late rectal toxicity.

Intraoperative implantation of a mesh of directional palladium sources (CivaSheet): Dosimetry verification, clinical commissioning, dose specification, and preliminary experience.

PURPOSE: To present the clinical commissioning of a novel 103Pd directional brachytherapy device (CivaSheet) for intraoperative radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical commissioning for the CivaSheet consisted of establishing: (1) source strength calibration capabilities, (2) experimental verification of TG-43 dosimetry parameters, (3) treatment planning system validation, and (4) departmental practice for dose specification and source ordering. Experimental verification was performed in water with radiochromic film calibrated with a 37 kVp X-ray beam. Percentage difference ([measurements - calculation]/calculation) and distance to agreement (difference between film-to-source distance and distance that minimized the percentage difference) were calculated. Nomogram values (in U/100 Gy) for all configurations (up to 20 × 20 sources) were calculated for source ordering. Clinical commissioning was used on patients enrolled in an ongoing Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. RESULTS: A source calibration procedure was established, and the treatment planning system was commissioned within standard clinical uncertainties. Percentage dose differences (distances to agreement) between measured and calculated doses were 8.6% (-0.12 mm), 0.6% (-0.01 mm), -6.4% (0.22 mm), and -10.0% (0.44 mm) at depths of 2.3, 5.1, 8.0, and 11.1 mm, respectively. All differences were within the experimental uncertainties. Nomogram values depended on sheet size and spatial extent. A value of 2.4U/100 Gy per CivaDot was found to satisfy most cases, ranging from 2.3 to 3.3U/100 Gy. Nomogram results depended on elongation of the treatment area with a higher variation observed for smaller treatment areas. Postimplantation dose evaluation was feasible. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioning and clinical deployment of CivaSheet was feasible using BrachyVision for postoperative dose evaluation. Experimental verification confirmed that the available TG-43 dosimetry parameters are accurate for clinical use.

Magnetic resonance imaging basics for the prostate brachytherapist.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in radiation therapy, and integration of MRI into brachytherapy in particular is becoming more common. We present here a systematic review of the basic physics and technical aspects of incorporating MRI into prostate brachytherapy. Terminology and MRI system components are reviewed along with typical work flows in prostate high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy. In general, the brachytherapy workflow consists of five key components: diagnosis, implantation, treatment planning (scan + plan), implant verification, and delivery. MRI integration is discussed for diagnosis; treatment planning; and MRI-guided brachytherapy implants, in which MRI is used to guide the physical insertion of the brachytherapy applicator or needles. Considerations and challenges for establishing an MRI brachytherapy program are also discussed.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy of rhabdomyosarcoma limited to the external auditory canal.

PURPOSE: To report on the single-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of a 21-month-old girl child with an embryonal, botryoid-type, rhabdomyosarcoma limited to the external auditory canal (EAC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 2.4-mm diameter catheter was inserted into the right EAC and placed against the tympanic membrane. A computed tomography simulation scan was acquired. A brachytherapy treatment plan, in which 21 Gy in seven fractions was prescribed to a 1-mm depth along the distal 2 cm of the catheter, was generated. Treatments were delivered under anesthesia without complication. A dosimetric comparison between this plan and an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan was then conducted. A clinical target volume (CTV), which encompassed a 1-mm margin along the distal 2 cm of the catheter, was delineated for both plans. Given positioning uncertainty under image guidance, a planning target volume (PTV = CTV + 3-mm margin) was defined for the IMRT plan. The IMRT plan was optimized for maximal CTV coverage but subsequently normalized to the same CTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100) of the brachytherapy plan. RESULTS: The IMRT plan was normalized to the brachytherapy CTV V100 of 82.0%. The PTV V100 of this plan was 34.1%. The PTV exhibited dosimetric undercoverage within the middle ear and toward the external ear. Mean cochlea doses for the IMRT and brachytherapy plans were 26.7% and 10.5% of prescription, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For rhabdomyosarcomas limited to the EAC, a standard brachytherapy catheter can deliver a highly conformal radiation plan that can spare the nearby cochlea from excess radiation.

Hip-related toxicity after prostate radiotherapy: Treatment related or coincidental?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and predictors of hip toxicity postradiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 4067 prostate cancer patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n=2569; 63%) or brachytherapy with or without supplemental EBRT (n=1508; 27%). 43% (n=1738) were treated with neo-adjuvant and concurrent ADT and 57% (n=2329) with radiotherapy alone. Hip toxicity was defined as moderate or severe pain upon ambulation with or without the need for hip-revision surgery. Median follow-up was 7years (range, 3-21years). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one (2.7%) patients developed moderate-to-severe hip pain after radiotherapy affecting ambulation. Of these, 73 (60%) required hip replacement secondary to persistent hip pain. Among patients with baseline degenerative joint disease (DJD) changes on scans, 10-year incidence of hip-related toxicity was 11% versus 3% for those without such changes (P<.001). The only variables on multivariate analysis associated with hip-related toxicity post-radiotherapy were baseline DJD on imaging (P<.0001) and prolonged ADT for salvage therapy (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate EBRT or brachytherapy is associated with low incidence of long-term hip-related toxicity. The only variables identified associated with hip toxicity posttherapy was the presence of baseline DJD and prolonged salvage ADT posttreatment for patients developing recurrence.

Impact of source position on high-dose-rate skin surface applicator dosimetry.

PURPOSE: Skin surface dosimetric discrepancies between measured and treatment planning system predicted values were traced to source position sag inside the applicator and to source transit time. We quantified their dosimetric impact and propose corrections for clinical use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We measured the dose profiles from the Varian Leipzig-style high-dose-rate (HDR) skin applicator, using EBT3 film, photon diode, and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter for three different GammaMedplus HDR afterloaders. The measured dose profiles at several depths were compared with BrachyVision Acuros calculated profiles. To assess the impact of the source sag, two different applicator orientations were considered. The dose contribution during source transit was assessed by comparing diode measurements using an HDR timer and an electrometer timer. RESULTS: Depth doses measured using the three dosimeters were in good agreement, but were consistently higher than the Acuros dose calculations. Measurements with the applicator face up were significantly (exceeding 10%) lower than those in the face down position, due to source sag inside the applicator. Based on the inverse square law, the effective source sag was evaluated to be about 0.5 mm from the planned position. The additional dose during source transit was evaluated to be about 2.8% for 30 seconds of treatment with a 40700 U (10 Ci) source. CONCLUSION: With a very short source-to-surface distance, the small source sag inside the applicator has a significant dosimetric impact. This effect is unaccounted for in the vendor's treatment planning template and should be considered before the clinical use of the applicator. Further investigation of other applicators with large source lumen diameter may be warranted.

Radiation safety of receptive anal intercourse with prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Prostate low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy involves implantation of radioactive seeds permanently into the prostate gland. During receptive anal intercourse, the penis of the partner may come in close proximity to the implanted prostate gland. We estimate the potential intrarectal dose rates and suggest guidance on radiation precautions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred two patients were included in the study. After implantation, with patients under anesthesia in the dorsal lithotomy position, a new set of ultrasound (US) images and a CT scan were obtained. The images were fused, radioactive seeds and US probe locations were determined on the CT, and prostate, bladder, and rectal contours were drawn on the US. Dose rates (cGy/h) were calculated for the portion of the US probe spanning the prostate for several dose-volume histogram parameters. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with (125)I and 82 patients with (103)Pd. Average dose rates at Day 0 to the portion of the US probe spanning the prostate were 2.1 ± 1.3 cGy/h and 2.5 ± 0.8 cGy/h for patients treated with (125)I and (103)Pd, respectively. After 60 days, average calculated probe dose drops to 1.0 ± 0.6 cGy/h and 0.2 ± 0.1 cGy/h for (125)I and (103)Pd, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: During the immediate weeks after prostate seed implant, the estimated intrarectal dose rates are higher in (103)Pd compared to (125)I. As (103)Pd decays faster than (125)I, 2 months after the implant, radiation exposure from (103)Pd becomes lower than (125)I. Receptive anal intercourse time should be kept as low as possible during 2 and 6 months after low-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate with (103)Pd and (125)I, respectively.

Long-term outcome of magnetic resonance spectroscopic image-directed dose escalation for prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term control and toxicity outcomes of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, who underwent low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with magnetic resonance spectroscopic image (MRSI)-directed dose escalation to intraprostatic regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-seven consecutive patients between May 2000 and December 2003 were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient underwent a preprocedural MRSI, and MRS-positive voxels suspicious for malignancy were identified. Intraoperative planning was used to determine the optimal seed distribution to deliver a standard prescription dose to the entire prostate, while escalating the dose to MRS-positive voxels to 150% of prescription. Each patient underwent transperineal implantation of radioactive seeds followed by same-day CT for postimplant dosimetry. RESULTS: The median prostate D90 (minimum dose received by 90% of the prostate) was 125.7% (interquartile range [IQR], 110.3-136.5%) of prescription. The median value for the MRS-positive mean dose was 229.9% (IQR, 200.0-251.9%). Median urethra D30 and rectal D30 values were 142.2% (137.5-168.2%) and 56.1% (40.1-63.4%), respectively. Median followup was 86.4 months (IQR, 49.8-117.6). The 10-year actuarial prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival was 98% (95% confidence interval, 93-100%). Five patients (11%) experienced late Grade 3 urinary toxicity (e.g., urethral stricture), which improved after operative intervention. Four of these patients had dose-escalated voxels less than 1.0 cm from the urethra. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose-rate brachytherapy with MRSI-directed dose escalation to suspicious intraprostatic regions exhibits excellent long-term biochemical control. Patients with dose-escalated voxels close to the urethra were at higher risk of late urinary stricture.

High- and low-dose-rate intraoperative radiotherapy for thoracic malignancies resected with close or positive margins.

PURPOSE: Local recurrence is a significant problem after surgical resection of thoracic tumors. As intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can deliver radiation directly to the threatened margin, we have used this therapy in an attempt to reduce local recurrence, using high-dose-rate (HDR) as well as low-dose-rate (LDR) techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing LDR ((125)I) mesh placement or HDR ((192)Ir) afterloading therapy during lung tumor resection between 2001 and 2013 at our institution. Competing risks methods were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of local failure. We also assessed possible predictive factors of local failure. RESULTS: Fifty-nine procedures (41 LDR and 18 HDR) were performed on 58 patients. Median follow-up was 55.1 months. Cumulative incidence of local failure at 1, 2, and 3 years was 28.5%, 34.2%, and 34.2%, respectively. Median overall survival was 39.9 months. There was no significant difference in local failure according to margin status, HDR vs. LDR, use of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy, or metastatic vs. primary tumor. Two patients (3.4%) experienced Grade 3+ toxicities likely related to brachytherapy. Additionally, 7 patients experienced Grade 3+ postsurgical complications unlikely related to brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: IORT is associated with good local control after resection of thoracic tumors otherwise at very high risk for local recurrence. There is a low incidence of severe toxicity attributable to brachytherapy. HDR-IORT appears to have equivalent outcomes to LDR-IORT. HDR or LDR-IORT can, therefore, be considered in situations where the oncologic completeness of thoracic tumor resection is in doubt.