RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the association between opioid prescriptions given after tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy (T + A) and pain-related return visit rates in pediatric patients. Determine association between Food and Drug Administration (FDA) black box warning against opioid use in this population and pain-related return visit rates. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who underwent T + A between April 2012 and December 2015 and had return visits to the emergency department or urgent care center. Data were obtained from the hospital electronic warehouse using International Classification of Diseases-9/10 procedure codes. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for return visits were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to measure association between opioid prescriptions and return visit rates as well as FDA warning and return visit rates adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: There were 4778 patients who underwent T + A, median age, 5 years. Of these, 752 (15.7%) had return visits. Pain-related return visits were higher in patients who received opioid prescriptions (adjusted OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.57). After FDA warning, opioids were prescribed at a lower rate (47.9%) compared with previous (98.6%) (OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.008-0.02). Pain-related return visits were lower after FDA warning (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.87). Steroid prescription rate increased after FDA warning (OR, 415; 95% CI, 197-874). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescriptions were associated with higher pain-related return visits after T + A, whereas issuance of FDA black box warning against codeine use was associated with lower pain-related return visits. Our data suggest that the black box warning potentially had unintended benefits in pain management and health care usage.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Tonsilectomía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Adenoidectomía/efectos adversos , Tonsilectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de MedicamentosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) and vaping are a popular form of substance abuse among adolescents. Studies have shown that adolescents have a poor understanding of e-cigs but little is known about parental understanding. The primary objective was to assess if a discrepancy in perception and knowledge regarding the content and safety profile of e-cigs between adolescents and their parents exists. METHODS: Single-site prospective questionnaire analysis of adolescents (12-21 years) and their parents between November 2018 and March 2019 was performed. Each participant pair received an anonymous, confidential, electronic questionnaire. Data were collected via Research Electronic Data Capture. χ2 and independent t tests were used for comparative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 300 adolescent/parent pairs were included for analysis. The mean age of adolescents was 15.1 years (SD, 2.1), and that of parents was 43.9 years (SD, 8.7). Overall knowledge of e-cigs was inadequate in both adolescents and parents: 93.7% and 88.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Less adolescents (49.0%) compared with parents (71.0%) perceived any health risks to smoking e-cigs (P < 0.0001). Among adolescents, 17% admitted to smoking e-cigs compared with 5.4% smoking conventional tobacco cigarettes (P < 0.0001), and they reported using e-cigs (17.0%) more often than any other substance except alcohol (27.3%). Only 49.7% of adolescents reported receiving formal education at school regarding e-cigs. Parents reported discussing e-cigs risks/benefits with adolescents less often than other topics (71.3% vs 79.0% to 84.3%; P < 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that perception and knowledge regarding the content and safety profile of e-cigs are poor among both adolescents and parents. These findings support the need for tighter federal regulation and an increase in public health awareness programs.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Adolescente , Humanos , Padres , Percepción , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) is a fulminant central nervous system infection caused by the thermophilic free-living ameba Naegleria fowleri. Few survivals have been documented and adequate treatment is lacking. We report 2 PAM cases, 1 fatal and 1 surviving, treated with the novel antiparasitic agent miltefosine.
Asunto(s)
Antiprotozoarios/efectos adversos , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Protozoarias del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Protozoarias del Sistema Nervioso Central/parasitología , Naegleria fowleri , Fosforilcolina/análogos & derivados , Infecciones Protozoarias del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Protozoarias del Sistema Nervioso Central/mortalidad , Niño , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Naegleria fowleri/efectos de los fármacos , Naegleria fowleri/aislamiento & purificación , Fosforilcolina/efectos adversos , Fosforilcolina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Determine whether the use of a metronome improves chest compression rate and depth during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on a pediatric manikin. METHODS: A prospective, simulation-based, crossover, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants included pediatric residents, fellows, nurses, and medical students who were randomly assigned to perform chest compressions on a pediatric manikin with and without an audible metronome. Each participant performed 2 rounds of 2 minutes of chest compressions separated by a 15-minute break. RESULTS: A total of 155 participants performed 2 rounds of chest compressions (74 with the metronome on during the first round and 81 with the metronome on during the second round of CPR). There was a significant improvement in the mean percentage of compressions delivered within an adequate rate (90-100 compressions per minute) with the metronome on compared with off (72% vs 50%; mean difference [MD] 22%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 29%). No significant difference was noted in the mean percentage of compressions within acceptable depth (38-51 mm) (72% vs 70%; MD 2%; 95% CI, -2% to 6%). The metronome had a larger effect among medical students (73% vs 55%; MD 18%; 95% CI, 8% to 28%) and pediatric residents and fellows (84% vs 48%; MD 37%; 95% CI, 27% to 46%) but not among pediatric nurses (46% vs 48%; MD -3%; 95% CI, -19% to 14%). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of chest compressions during CPR can be optimized by the use of a metronome. These findings will help medical professionals comply with the American Heart Association guidelines.