RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease with poor clinical outcomes. Primary pancreatic tumors originating from the head of the pancreas (H) have different prognostic implications than tumors arising from the body and tail (BT). This is thought to be largely due to anatomic differences, as molecular underpinnings of survival have not been fully explored. We hypothesized that differences in the primary site of H and BT tumors might account for differential molecular outcomes and response to chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective data from a single high-volume academic center were analyzed for hypothesis generation. A large-scale, real-world retrospective cohort of 2015 patients with next-generation sequencing (NGS) results were analyzed from a Real-World Evidence database. Progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated from the initiation of first line of therapy for advanced disease until discontinuation because of progression. HR and P values were computed via Cox regression between first-line FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nanoparticle albumin-bound (gem/nab) paclitaxel. Differences in frequencies of genomic alterations between H and BT were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Genomic alterations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway (such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2) were enriched (unadjusted P value = .00244) in BT tumors (21.7% of 618) relative to H tumors (15.6% of 942) where BRCA2 was a top contributor within this pathway. Median PFS in BT tumors on first-line FOLFIRINOX was longer than first line gem/nab-paclitaxel (P = .006393); this difference was not identified in H tumors (P = .5546). CONCLUSION: DDR pathway alterations including BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 are known predictors of increased benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy. NGS testing for germline and somatic mutations remains important in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, especially in BT tumors where DDR pathway alterations may be more common than in H tumors.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Gemcitabina , Reparación del ADNRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer carry poor prognoses; limited data exist to guide second-line therapy in the metastatic setting. Paclitaxel has been used yet is associated with limited efficacy. There is preclinical evidence of synergy between paclitaxel and cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel (arm A) versus paclitaxel plus cixutumumab (arm B) in the second-line for patients with metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. METHODS: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); 87 patients (43 in arm A, 44 in arm B) were treated. RESULTS: Median PFS was 2.6 months in arm A [90% CL 1.8-3.5] and 2.3 months in arm B [90% 2.0-3.5], P = .86. Stable disease was observed in 29 (33%) patients. Objective response rates for Arms A and B were 12% [90% CI, 5-23%] and 14% [90% CI, 6-25%]. Median overall survival was 6.7 months [90% CL 4.9-9.5] in arm A and 7.2 months [90% CL 4.9-8.1] in arm B, P = 56. CONCLUSION: The addition of cixutumumab to paclitaxel in second-line therapy of metastatic esophageal/GEJ cancer was well tolerated but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to standard of care (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01142388).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background and objective The prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally poor. PC responds only modestly to chemotherapy and chemoradiation, and surgical resection remains the only curative option. The risk of recurrence is high. PC patients are encountered in the hospital on initial diagnosis and later for surgeries and complications from PC. We analyzed PC hospitalizations in the United States as reported in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005 to 2011 to determine the extent to which aggressive interventions could be avoided, thereby decreasing the cost of hospitalization. We analyzed trends in palliative care utilization and hospice services. Methods The International Classification of Disease 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes were used to identify diagnoses and procedures performed. Weighted analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Dispositions at discharge were noted. Complications and procedures performed were also documented. Results A total of 574,522 cases with PC were identified. Trends are reported chronologically (2005 to 2011). Over time, inpatient deaths for PC have decreased (11.2%, 11.1%, 9.8%, 9.8%, 9.5%, 8.4%, 8.1%; p<0.001), and hospice discharges (HD) have increased (10.2%, 11.4%, 11.4%, 12,2%, 12.6%, 12.4%, 12.7%; p<0.001). Palliative care utilization has increased (2.9%, 3.9%, 3.8%, 5.6%, 8.8%, 10.2%, 11.9%; p<0.001). Complications including peritonitis, thrombosis, hypovolemia/shock, and acute kidney injury (AKI) have increased mortality rates and HD. Conclusion There is an increasing trend of palliative care and hospice service utilization among hospitalized PC patients. Until better-targeted treatments and screening become available, mortality and morbidity will remain high. The proportion of patients receiving aggressive interventions remains high and is associated with poor outcomes. It is desirable to conduct palliative care evaluation (PCE) early in patients with advanced disease and avoid aggressive interventions.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown clinical activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cabozantinib, a multi-TKI, exhibited potent antitumor activity superior to regorafenib in preclinical colorectal cancer patient-derived tumor xenograft models. This phase II study aimed to investigate cabozantinib, a multi-TKI, in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Experimental Design: A nonrandomized, two-stage, phase II clinical trial evaluating 12-week progression-free survival (PFS) was conducted in eight cancer centers across the United States between May 2018 and July 2020. Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled between May 2018 and May 2019, 40 of which were response evaluable. Of the total 769 reported adverse events (AE), 93 (12%) were ≥ grade 3. Five grade 5 AEs were reported of which four were unrelated to study drug and one was reported as possibly related due to bowel perforation. Eighteen patients (45%) achieved 12-week PFS with stable disease or better (confidence interval, 0.29-0.62; P < 0.001). One patient (3%) had a partial response, and 27 other patients achieved stable disease as best response per RECISTv1.1. Median PFS was 3.0 months, and median overall survival was 8.3 months. Of the 18 patients who achieved 12-week PFS, 12 had left-sided primary tumors, 11 were RAS wild type, 11 were PIK3CA wild type, and 6 had previous regorafenib therapy. The 12-week PFS rate was higher in RAS wild-type tumors compared with RAS mutant tumors (0.61 vs. 0.32; P = 0.11). Conclusions: This phase II study demonstrated clinical activity of cabozantinib in heavily pretreated, patients with refractory mCRC, and supports further investigation. Significance: Targeting angiogenesis through VEGF axis blockade provides incremental survival benefit in patients with mCRC. The hepatocyte growth factor/MET signal transduction pathway has been observed as a mechanism for acquired resistance. Dual inhibition of VEGF plus MET is an attractive therapeutic strategy. This phase II trial demonstrated clinical activity with cabozantinib, a multi-TKI targeting VEGFR2 and MET, in patients with refractory, mCRC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many studies show significantly improved survival after R0 resection compared with R1 resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC); however, the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) on this association is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive surgical margins (SMs) after NACRT compared with upfront surgery + adjuvant therapy in PAC. METHODS: All cases of surgically resected PAC at a single institution were reviewed from 1996 to 2014; patients treated with palliative intent, metastatic disease, and biliary/ampullary tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 300 patients were included; 134 patients received NACRT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine followed by surgery, and 166 patients received upfront surgery (+ adjuvant chemotherapy in 72% of patients and RT in 65%); 31% of both groups had a positive SM (+SM). The median OS for patients with a +SM or negative SM (-SM) was 26.6 and 31.6 months, respectively for NACRT, and 12.0 and 24.5 months, respectively, for upfront surgery. OS was significantly improved with -SM compared with +SM in both groups (p = 0.006). When resection yielded +SM, NACRT patients had improved OS compared with upfront surgery patients (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, +SM in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-4.24; p < 0.001) and older age (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, per year; p = 0.007) predicted worse OS. +SM in the NACRT group was not associated with worse OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.72-1.65; p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: Patients with a positive margin after NACRT and surgery had longer survival compared with patients with a positive margin after upfront surgery. NACRT should be strongly considered for patients at high risk of R1 resections.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , PronósticoRESUMEN
Background: Adipocyte-derived adiponectin may play a role in the host inflammatory response to cancer. We examined the association of plasma adiponectin with the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colon cancers and with vitamin D, clinicopathological features, and patient survival. Methods: Plasma adiponectin and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] were analyzed by radioimmunoassay in 600 patients with stage III colon cancer who received FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy (NCCTG N0147 [Alliance]). TIL densities were determined in histopathological sections. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence, and overall survival were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for potential confounders (ie, body mass index, race, TILs, and N stage). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: We found a statistically significant reduction in adiponectin, but not 25(OH)D, levels in tumors with high vs low TIL densities (median = 6845 vs 8984 ng/mL; P = .04). A statistically significant reduction in adiponectin was also observed in obese (body mass index >30 kg/m2) vs nonobese patients (median = 6608 vs 12 351 ng/mL; P < .001), in men vs women (median = 8185 vs 11 567 ng/mL; P < .001), in Blacks vs Whites or Asians (median = 6412 vs 8847 vs 7858 ng/mL; P < .03), and in those with fewer lymph node metastases (N1 vs N2: median = 7768 vs 9253 ng/mL; P = .01). Insufficiency of 25(OH)D (<30 ng/mL) was detected in 291 (48.5%) patients. In multivariable analyses, neither adiponectin nor 25(OH)D were associated with a statistically significant difference in DFS, overall survival , or time to recurrence in models adjusted for potential confounders. We found a statistically significant association of TILs with prognosis, yet no such interaction was observed for the association of adiponectin with TILs for DFS. Conclusions: Lower circulating adiponectin levels were associated with a statistically significant increase in TIL densities in colon cancers, indicating an enhanced antitumor immune response. In contrast to TILs, neither adiponectin nor 25(OH)D was independently prognostic.
Asunto(s)
Adiponectina/sangre , Neoplasias del Colon/inmunología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/citología , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Índice de Masa Corporal , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Colon/sangre , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Metástasis Linfática , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Grupos Raciales , Factores Sexuales , Vitamina D/sangreRESUMEN
Purpose: Current literature reports increased incidence of postpancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a precursor for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. The incidence of and risk factors (RFs) for NAFLD in the PD population, however, are not well elucidated. Methods: A cohort of 421 patients from a single institution who underwent PD for carcinoma and followed for at least 6 months were assessed retrospectively for age, gender, pathology, surgical complications (operative blood loss and length of stay [LOS]), comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity), tobacco use, pre- and postoperative nutritional status (albumin and body mass index [BMI]), use of pancreatic enzyme replacement, and perioperative laboratory values (hemoglobin and liver function test). Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine these potential RFs as predictors of time to development of post-PD NAFLD. Results: Sixty (14.3%) patients developed post-PD NAFLD. Patients with NAFLD were younger (61.10 vs. 65.01 years old) and had higher preoperative BMI (28.92 vs. 26.61). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model identified higher preoperative BMI, shorter postoperative LOS, and female gender as RFs for post-PD NAFLD. After excluding 12 patients with rare histology, there was a lower unadjusted hazard of developing NAFLD (p-value = 0.018) in the adenocarcinoma group than in the neuroendocrine and periampullary tumor groups. There was no statistically significant association between post-PD NAFLD and other characteristics. Conclusion: Female gender, higher preoperative BMI, and shorter LOS deserve closer monitoring for earlier detection and management of NAFLD.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent surgery for early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma (rPca) based on sequence (NAT, neoadjuvant therapy and/or AT, adjuvant therapy) and type (SA, single-agent or MA, multi-agent) of chemotherapy received. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with clinical stage I/II rPca diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were identified and five comparison matches (1: NAT vs. upfront resection (UR); 2: multi-agent neoadjuvant (MA NAT) vs. single-agent adjuvant therapy (SA AT), single-agent neoadjuvant therapy (SA NAT), multi-agent adjuvant therapy (MA AT); 3: MA NAT vs. MA AT; 4: NAT + AT vs NAT; 5: NAT + AT vs AT) were constructed using minimum distance matching strategy. Median OS (mOS) was analysed using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 18,470 patients with stage I/II rPca were eligible for analysis. NAT showed a 5 month (mo.) improved OS compared with UR (3271 patients/group, 28.1 vs 23.2 mo. P < 0.0001 hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79). MA-NAT was shown to be superior to other chemotherapy approaches SA AT, SA NAT, and MA AT (1349 patients/group: 30 vs. 25.9 mo., P = 0.0001 [HR: 0.82]). MA NAT showed a survival advantage over MA-AT (1349 patients/group, 30 vs 26.1 mo., P = 0.0008 [HR: 0.86]). The combination of NAT and AT showed a better outcome when compared with NAT alone (1128 patients/group, 31.6 vs 27.4 mo., P = 0.0011 [HR: 0.81]) or AT alone (1128 patients/group, 31.6 vs. 25.2 mo., P < 0.0001 [HR: 0.76]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage I/II rPca, MA NAT showed improved mOS compared to UR and all other chemotherapy sequences except both NAT plus AT. These findings support the use of MA NAT in stage I/II rPca patients and warrant prospective trials evaluating MA NAT and post-resection maintenance therapies.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for stage I-III esophageal cancer indicate that management should include surgery in appropriate patients. Variations in utilization of surgery may contribute to racial differences observed in survival. We sought to identify factors associated with racial disparities in surgical resection of esophageal cancer and evaluate associated survival differences. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 were identified using the National Cancer Database. Matched patient cohorts were created to reduce confounding. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of surgery. Multi-level modeling was performed to control for random effects of individual hospitals on surgical utilization. RESULTS: A total of 60,041 patients were included (4402 black; 55,639 white). After 1:1 matching, there were 5858 patients evenly distributed across race. For all stages, significantly fewer black than white patients received surgery. Black race independently conferred lower likelihood of receiving surgery in single-level multivariable analysis (OR (95% CI); stage I, 0.67 (0.48-0.94); stage II, 0.76 (0.60-0.96); stage III, 0.62 (0.50-0.76)) and after controlling for hospital random effects. Hospital-level random effects accounted for one third of the unexplained variance in receipt of surgery. Risk-adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality was higher for patients who did not undergo surgery. CONCLUSION: Black patients with esophageal cancer are at higher risk of mortality compared to white patients. This increased risk may be influenced by decreased likelihood of receiving surgical intervention for resectable disease, in part because of between-hospital differences. Improving access to surgical care may improve disparities in esophageal cancer survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Negro o Afroamericano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quinacrine plus a fluoropyrimidine has in vivo efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase 1b trial evaluated the combination of quinacrine plus capecitabine in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a modified Simon accelerated titration design, adults with treatment-refractory mCRC were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14/21-day cycle, and escalating doses of quinacrine 100 mg daily, 100 mg twice daily, and 200 mg twice daily for 21 days. The primary endpoint was identifying the maximum tolerated dose, determining tolerability and safety. In an expansion cohort, it was overall response rate and time to tumor progression (TTP). RESULTS: Ten patients (median age of 60 years) were treated in phase 1b. The first 2 quinacrine dosing levels were well tolerated. Dose-limiting toxicities were seen in 3 patients treated with quinacrine 200 mg twice daily. Five additional patients tolerated quinacrine 100 mg twice daily without further dose-limiting toxicities, thus establishing the maximum tolerated dose. Seven additional expansion-cohort patients enrolled onto the study before quinacrine manufacturing ceased within the United States. Five patients experienced stable disease, 1 partial response, and 10 disease progression. Median TTP overall was 2.12 months and median overall survival 5.22 months for the 17 patients. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine and quinacrine can be safely administered at the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 by mouth twice daily on days 1-14 and quinacrine 100 mg by mouth twice daily on days 1-21 of a 21-day cycle in mCRC patients. Although the expansion study was halted early, TTP was in line with other studies of refractory mCRC, suggesting activity of this regimen in heavily pretreated patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinacrina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Esquema de Medicación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Quinacrina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The recombinant fusion protein ipafricept blocks Wnt signaling, and in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel caused tumor regression in xenografts. This phase Ib study evaluated the combination of ipafricept with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose escalation started with standard dose nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and ipafricept (3.5 mg/kg days 1, 15). Because of fragility fractures seen with different anti-Wnt agents, following cohorts had ≥6 patients treated with ipafricept 3 to 5 mg/kg on day 1, and included bone marker monitoring and prophylactic bisphosphonates as indicated. On the basis of preclinical data, sequential dosing was evaluated in cohort 4 (ipafricept day 1 followed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine day 3). Objectives included safety, MTD, recommended phase II dose, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were enrolled, five in cohort 1 and seven each in cohorts 2-4. ipafricept-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and pyrexia. ipafricept-related AEs grade ≥3 included two events of aspartate aminotransferase elevation, and one each of nausea, rash, vomiting, and leucopenia. No dose-limiting toxicities or fragility fractures were observed. Nine patients (34.6%) had partial response, 12 (46.2%) stable disease as best response, with clinical benefit rate of 81%. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 m [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-18.4], median overall survival was 9.7 m (95% CI, 7.0-14). The study was terminated by the sponsor due to bone-related toxicity within this therapeutic program and concerns for commercial viability. One patient remains on therapy under compassionate use. CONCLUSIONS: Ipafricept can be administered with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with reasonable tolerance. Wnt pathway remains a therapeutic target of interest in mPDAC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Proteínas Wnt/antagonistas & inhibidores , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metastatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3NENs) have limited treatment options after progression on platinum-based therapy. We addressed the role of Pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated metastatic G3NENs. METHODS: Two open-label, phase 2 studies enrolled patients with G3NEN (Ki-67 > 20%) to receive Pembrolizumab at 200 mg I.V. every 3 weeks. Radiographic evaluation was conducted every 9 weeks with overall response rate as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and May 2018, 29 patients (13 males/16 females) with G3NENs were enrolled. One patient (3.4%) had an objective response and an additional six patients (20.7%) had stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 24.1%. Disease control rate (DCR) at 18 weeks was 10.3% (3/29). There was no difference in the DCR, PFS or OS between the PD-L1-negative and -positive groups (p 0.56, 0.88 and 0.55, respectively). Pembrolizumab was well tolerated with only 9 grade 3, and no grade 4 events considered drug-related. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab can be safely administered to patients with G3NENs but has limited activity as a single agent. Successful completion of our trials suggest studies in G3NENs are feasible and present an unmet need. Further research to identify active combination therapies should be considered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02939651 (10/20/2016).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/genética , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While a number of landmark clinical trials have led to the approval of combination chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC), older patients are underrepresented in these studies. We evaluated changes in practice patterns in the management of mPC among medical oncologists in the combination chemotherapy era (CCE). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary cancer center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. The cohort was divided into two groups (Pre-CCE, diagnosed with mPC between 2000 and 2009 and Post-CCE, diagnosed between 2010 and 2015). Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were conducted to determine the impact of treatment and prognostic variables on survival. RESULTS: 473 older patients with mPC were identified. Post-CCE, there were statistically significant increases in the use of chemotherapy (p < .005). While usage of gemcitabine was similar between groups, use of fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan increased Post-CCE. Use of chemotherapy conferred a modest but significant survival benefit (5 months Pre-CCE versus 6 months Post-CCE, p < .005). UVA and MVA showed significantly improved survival when older patients were treated with 2 or more chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited data available to guide clinicians on optimal usage of these treatments in older patients, medical oncology practice patterns for mPC have changed at an academic cancer center. Increases in chemotherapy use seems to confer a small survival benefit. Additional prospective data in older patients is necessary to improve our management of older patients with mPC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Vantictumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits Wnt pathway signaling through binding FZD1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 receptors. This phase Ib study evaluated vantictumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients received vantictumab at escalating doses in combination with standard dosing of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine according to a 3 + 3 design. A total of 31 patients were treated in 5 dosing cohorts. Fragility fractures attributed to vantictumab occurred in 2 patients in Cohort 2 (7 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and this maximum administered dose (MAD) on study was considered unsafe. The dosing schedule was revised to every 4 weeks for Cohorts 3 through 5, with additional bone safety parameters added. Sequential dosing of vantictumab followed by nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was also explored. No fragility fractures attributed to vantictumab occurred in these cohorts; pathologic fracture not attributed to vantictumab was documented in 2 patients. The study was ultimately terminated due to concerns around bone-related safety, and thus the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was not determined. The MAD of vantictumab according to the revised dosing schedule was 5 mg/kg (n = 16).
Asunto(s)
Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vía de Señalización Wnt/efectos de los fármacos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Gemcitabina , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
LESSONS LEARNED: Itacitinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors including pancreatic cancer.The results support future studies of itacitinib as a component of combination regimens with other immunologic and targeted small molecule anticancer agents. BACKGROUND: Cytokine-mediated signaling via JAK/STAT is central to tumor growth, survival, and systemic inflammation, which is associated with cancer cachexia, particularly in pancreatic cancer. Because of their centrality in the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia and progression, JAK isozymes have emerged as promising therapeutic targets. Preclinical studies have demonstrated antiproliferative effects of JAK/STAT pathway inhibition in both in vitro and in vivo models of cancer, including pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This phase Ib/II dose-optimization study assessed itacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in adults with treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic disease (Part 1) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Parts 2/2A; NCT01858883). Starting doses (Part 1) were itacitinib 400 mg, nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. Additional dose levels incorporated were granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, de-escalations of itacitinib to 300 mg once daily (QD), nab-paclitaxel to 100 mg/m2, and gemcitabine to 750 mg/m2. RESULTS: Among 55 patients in Part 1, 6 developed seven hematologic dose-limiting toxicities (Cycle 1). Itacitinib 300 mg plus nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was tolerated and expanded in Part 2. Treatment discontinuation and grade 3/4 neutropenia rates prompted itacitinib de-escalation to 200 mg QD in Part 2A. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue and neutropenia. Partial responses occurred across all itacitinib doses and several tumor types (overall response rate, 24%). CONCLUSION: Itacitinib plus chemotherapy demonstrated acceptable safety and clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors including pancreatic cancers. This study was terminated early (sponsor's decision) based on negative phase III results for a JAK1/2 inhibitor in previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Janus Quinasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel form of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has shown clinical benefit in the global, phase III RECOURSE trial, regardless of patient age. Here, we report the safety and tolerability profile of FTD/TPI from an expanded-access program (EAP) in the US patients with mCRC whose disease has progressed on the standard therapies. METHODS: A total of 549 patients (≥ 18 years) with histologically confirmed mCRC following two or more regimens of standard therapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 participated in this open-label EAP. During the 28-day treatment cycle, patients took FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 twice daily for 5 days followed by 2 days of rest for 2 weeks, with a 14-day rest period. Data were collected for therapy duration, treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. Age-based post hoc analysis was performed to determine the safety of FTD/TPI in elderly (≥ 65 years) versus younger (< 65 years) patients. RESULTS: FTD/TPI-treated patients in this EAP had a similar therapy duration and time to treatment discontinuation to those in the RECOURSE trial. The safety profile in elderly patients was consistent with that in younger patients, with no unexpected safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: This USA-based, open-label EAP has confirmed a similar safety and tolerability profile for FTD/TPI to that observed in the RECOURSE trial. Furthermore, FTD/TPI is well tolerated and can be considered as a treatment option in elderly patients with mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02286492.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Trifluridina/uso terapéutico , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Pirrolidinas , Proyectos de Investigación , Timina , Trifluridina/administración & dosificación , Trifluridina/efectos adversos , Uracilo/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been shown to decrease abdominal toxicity in patients undergoing chemoradiation (CRT) for pancreatic cancer. We evaluated whether IMRT impacts the rates of hematologic toxicity and chemotherapy dose intensity in patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing CRT between 2006 and 2012. Exclusion criteria included receipt of non-gemcitabine therapy, chemotherapy before CRT, or abnormal baseline hematologic indices. Endpoints included total gemcitabine dose received, dose intensity, unplanned dose reductions, and hematologic toxicity (WBC, ANC, platelet, and hemoglobin). Patient/treatment factors were evaluated for their relationship to the above endpoints during CRT and within the first 3 months post-CRT. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test and regression models. Because of the multiple comparisons in the presented analysis, a false discovery rate adjustment was performed at the 5% false discovery rate level. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight (68.2%) patients received treatment with IMRT, and 27 (31.8%) patients were treated with 3D-conformal radiation. During CRT, there was no relationship between radiation technique and gemcitabine dose received, dose intensity, or hematologic grade 3+ toxicity. Post-CRT, there was no relationship between radiation technique and total gemcitabine dose received, dose intensity, or dose reduction. Patients receiving IMRT were more likely to have ANC grade 3+ toxicity (P=0.007) post-CRT, although this was no longer statistically significant after correction. There were no other relationships between treatment technique and hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT technique may be associated with higher hematologic toxicity in patients undergoing CRT for pancreatic cancer. Given the expanding use of CRT, additional study is needed to identify the impact of IMRT on myelosuppression in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Enfermedades Hematológicas/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Instituciones Oncológicas , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Enfermedades Hematológicas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Hematológicas/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/fisiopatología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Imexon is a cyanoaziridine-derived iminopyrrolidone which has synergistic cytotoxicity with gemcitabine. A phase 1 study of the combination demonstrated good tolerance with encouraging clinical activity and thus we conducted this randomized phase II study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, metastatic, treatment-naive pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1 to receive gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m days 1, 8, and 15 with either imexon, 875 mg/m or placebo days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and response rate. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were randomized, 72 to the imexon containing arm and 70 to the placebo arm. Patients in the imexon arm received an average of 3.6 cycles (range, 1 to 23) compared with 4.4 (range, 1 to 21) in the placebo arm. There was no increased rate of ≥grade 3 toxicity in the imexon arm. Seven patients had objective responses in the imexon arm (13.7%), whereas 9 did in the placebo arm (17%). In the imexon arm, 23 patients had ≥50% reduction in CA 19-9 from baseline (33%), whereas 22 did in the placebo arm (31.4%). The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months in the imexon arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-4.1 m) and 3.8 months in the placebo arm (95% CI, 2.2-4.7 m), P=0.504. The median overall survival time in the imexon arm was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.7 m) as compared with 6.8 m (95% CI, 4.9-8.5 m) in the placebo arm, P=0.6822. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of imexon and gemcitabine does not result in improved outcome as initial therapy of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Hexanonas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Gemcitabina , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
Purpose The objectives were to evaluate dosing schedules of labetuzumab govitecan, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) for tumor delivery of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), in an expanded phase II trial of patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with at least one prior irinotecan-containing therapy received labetuzumab govitecan once weekly at 8 and 10 mg/kg, or two times per week at 4 and 6 mg/km on weeks 1 and 2 of 3-week repeated cycles. End points were safety, response, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Results Eighty-six patients who had undergone a median of five prior therapies (range, one to 13) were each enrolled into one of the four cohorts. On the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, 38% of these patients had a tumor as well as plasma carcinoembryonic antigen reduction from baseline after labetuzumab govitecan treatment; one patient achieved a partial response with a sustained response spanning > 2 years, whereas 42 patients had stable disease as the best overall response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.6 and 6.9 months, respectively. The major toxicities (grade ≥ 3) among all cohorts were neutropenia (16%), leukopenia (11%), anemia (9%), and diarrhea (7%). The antibody-drug conjugate's mean half-life was 16.5 hours for the four cohorts. Anti-drug/anti-antibody antibodies were not detected. The two once-weekly dose schedules, showing comparable toxicity and efficacy, were chosen for further study. Conclusion Monotherapy with labetuzumab govitecan demonstrated a manageable safety profile and therapeutic activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, all with prior irinotecan therapy. Further studies of labetuzumab govitecan treatment alone or in combination with other therapies in earlier settings are indicated.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Irinotecán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) often benefit from receiving 90Y-microsphere radioembolization (RE) administered via the hepatic arteries. Prior to delivery of liver-directed radiation, standard laboratory tests may assist in improving outcome by identifying correctable pre-radiation abnormalities. METHODS: A database containing retrospective review of consecutively treated patients of mCRC from July 2002 to December 2011 at 11 US institutions was used. Data collected included background characteristics, prior chemotherapy, surgery/ablation, radiotherapy, vascular procedures, 90Y treatment, subsequent adverse events and survival. Kaplan-Meier estimates compared the survival of patients across lines of chemotherapy. The following values were obtained within 10 days prior to each RE treatment: haemoglobin (HGB), albumin, alkaline phosphatase (Alk phosph), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin and creatinine. Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAEs) 3.0 grade was assigned to each parameter and analysed for impact on survival by line of chemotherapy. Consensus Guidelines were used to categorize the parameter grades as either within or outside guidelines for treatment. RESULTS: A total of 606 patients (370 male; 236 female) were studied with a median follow-up was 8.5 mo. (IQR 4.3-15.6) after RE. Fewer than 11% of patients were treated outside recommended RE guidelines, with albumin being the most common, 10.5% grade 2 (<3-2.0 g/dL) at time of RE. All seven parameters showed statistically significant decreased median survivals with any grade >0 (P<0.001) across all lines of prior chemotherapy. Compared to grade 0, grade 2 albumin decreased overall survival 67%; for grade 2 total bilirubin a 63% drop occurred, and grade 1 HGB resulted in 66% lower median survival. CONCLUSIONS: Review of pre-RE laboratory parameters may aid in improving median survivals if correctable grade >0 values are addressed prior to radiation delivery. HGB <10 g/dL is a well-known negative factor in radiation response and is easily corrected. Improving other parameters is more challenging. These efforts are important in optimizing treatment response to liver radiotherapy.