INTRODUCTION: Past research has examined civilian and military medical schools' preparation of physicians for their first deployment. Most recently, our research team conducted a large-scale survey comparing physicians' perceptions of their readiness for their first deployment. Our results revealed that military medical school graduates felt significantly more prepared for deployment by medical school than civilian medical school graduates. In order to further investigate these results and deepen our understanding of the two pathways' preparation of military physicians, this study analyzed the open-ended responses in the survey using a qualitative research design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a descriptive phenomenological design to analyze 451 participants' open-ended responses on the survey. After becoming familiar with the data, we coded the participants' responses for meaningful statements. We organized these codes into major categories, which became the themes of our study. Finally, we labeled each of these themes to reflect the participants' perceptions of how medical school prepared them for deployment. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from our data analysis: (1) Civilian medical school equipped graduates with soft skills and medical knowledge for their first deployment; (2) Civilian medical school may not have adequately prepared graduates to practice medicine in an austere environment to include the officership challenges of deployment; (3) Military medical school prepared graduates to navigate the medical practice and operational aspects of their first deployment; and (4) Military medical school may not have adequately prepared graduates for the realism of their first deployment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided insight into the strengths and areas for growth in each medical school pathway for military medical officers. These results may be used to enhance military medical training regardless of accession pathway and increase the readiness of military physicians for future large-scale conflicts.
INTRODUCTION: Mentorship is essential for professional development and advancement within the military. In civilian medicine, the intersection between gender and mentorship holds important implications for research opportunities, academic success, and career progression. However, the intersection of gender and mentorship has not yet been explored within the field of military medicine. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the role of gender in mentorship within the field of military medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated gender and mentorship within military medicine by developing and distributing a 16-item Likert survey to active-duty military physicians. We used the Chi-squared test of independence and the independent samples t-test to examine the role of gender in mentorship among the 16 questions. RESULTS: The male respondents reported more same-gender mentors than females (male [M]: 61.9% vs. female [F]: 33.0%), whereas the female respondents had significantly more mentors of the opposite gender than males (M: 12.4% vs. F: 47.3%). A higher proportion of males indicated no preference compared to females. Conversely, a significant preference for a same-sex mentor was expressed by female respondents compared to male respondents (M: 5.2% vs. F: 30.1%). In contrast, female respondents considered having a mentor more important than their male counterparts (t(206) = -2.26, P = .012, F: 3.86 vs. M: 3.57). Both male and female respondents had significantly more female mentees ($\chi _{\left( 1 \right)}^2$ = 12.92, P < .001, Cramer's V = 0.254). CONCLUSIONS: While the female participants in our study preferred female mentors, the male participants had more same-gender mentors than the female participants. In addition, more females reported that they did not have the time to be mentored. Our results, therefore, suggest that training males to be better mentors to females and providing accessible mentorship training to females may promote equitable career development within military medicine.
BACKGROUND: Whole blood transfusion has been found to increase the likelihood of patient survival within both military and civilian medicine contexts. However, no whole blood transfusion training curriculum currently exists within undergraduate or graduate medical education in the United States. The purpose of our study was to: (1) determine the impact of simulation-based training on medical students' abilities to conduct whole blood transfusions; and (2) determine the impact of simulation-based training on medical students' confidence in conducting whole blood transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed 157 third-year military medical students' ability to conduct whole blood transfusion before and after Operation Gunpowder, a 2-day high-fidelity prolonged casualty care simulation. We conducted a paired samples t-test to compare the students' pre- and post-simulation performance scores as well as self-reported confidence and stress ratings. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in students' scores at the beginning of the course (M = 20.469, SD 6.40675) compared to their scores at the end of the course (M = 30.361, SD = 2.10053); t(155) = -18.833, p < .001. The effect size for this analysis (d = 6.56) was large. There was a significant difference (p < .001) between the pre- and post-ratings for all self-reported confidence and stress survey items. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that simulation-based training is an effective means of training medical students to conduct whole blood transfusiontraining in a limited resource simulated environment where blood inventories may be limited.
INTRODUCTION: Providing resilient Damage Control Resuscitation capabilities as close to the point of injury as possible is paramount to reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes for our nation's warfighters. Emergency Fresh Whole Blood Transfusions (EFWBT) play a critical role in supporting this capability, especially in future large-scale combat operations against peer adversaries with expected large patient volumes, restrictive operating environments, and unreliable logistical supply lines. Although there are service-specific training programs for whole blood transfusion, there is currently no dedicated EFWBT training for future military medical officers. To address this gap, we developed, implemented, and evaluated a training program to enhance EFWBT proficiency in third-year military medical students at the F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine at the USU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After reviewing both the 75th Ranger Regiment Ranger O-Low Titer program and the Marine Corps' Valkyrie program, along with the relevant Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines, we created a streamlined and abbreviated training curriculum. The training consisted of both online preparatory materials as well as a 2-hour in-person training that included didactic and experiential learning components. Participants were 165 active duty third-year medical students at USU. Participants were assessed using a pre- and post-assessment self-reported questionnaire on their confidence in the practical application and administrative oversight requirements of an EFWBT program. Participants' performance was also assessed using a pre/post knowledge assessment consisting of 10 multiple choice questions identified as critical to understanding of the academic principles of EFWBT along with the baseline questionnaire. RESULTS: Differences in the mean scores of the pre- and post-assessment self-reported questionnaire (increased from 2.32 to 3.95) were statistically significant (P < .001). Similarly, there was a statistically significant improvement in student test scores, with the mean score increasing by approximately 3 points or 30%. There was no significant difference in student confidence assessment or test scores based on branch of service. Students who had previously deployed did not show a statistically significant difference in scores compared to students who had not previously deployed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the implementation of streamlined EFWBT training into the undergraduate medical education of future military medical officers offers an efficient way to improve their baseline proficiency in EFWBTs. Future research is needed to assess the impact of this training on real-world applications in forward-deployed environments.
INTRODUCTION: Peer teachers have been found to be effective instructors during simulation-based education. However, there is a lack of research regarding their professional identity development throughout the course of the teaching activity. The purpose of this qualitative study, therefore, was to develop a framework to illustrate how peer teachers develop as educators during a prehospital simulation. METHODS: The participants in our study were 9 second-year medical students serving as peer teachers during a multiday prehospital simulation. We selected the grounded theory tradition of qualitative research to investigate the peer teachers' professional identity development. Our research team interviewed each participant twice during the simulation. We then used open and axial coding to analyze the interview data. We organized these codes into categories and determined connections between each category to construct our grounded theory framework. RESULTS: This framework described how the peer teachers progressed through 4 stages: 1) eager excitement, 2) grounded by challenges, 3) overcoming challenges, and 4) professional identity formation. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that simulation-based education can serve as valuable learning environment not only for medical students, but also for peer teachers. Understanding their progressive development during the simulation will help medical educators focus on maximizing the peer teachers' growth and development during simulation.
BACKGROUND: Blood is a highly valuable medical resource that necessitates strict guidelines to ensure the safety and well-being of the recipient. Since the onset of the war in Ukraine there has been an increased demand for training in emergency fresh whole blood transfusion (EFWBT) to improve damage control resuscitation capabilities. To meet this demand, we developed, implemented, and evaluated a training program aimed at enhancing Ukrainian EFWBT proficiency. METHODS: Eight Ukrainian healthcare professionals (UHPs), including six physicians and two medics, completed our training, derived from the Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines, Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Guidelines, 75th Ranger Regiment Ranger O-Low Titer (ROLO) program, and Marine Corps Valkyrie program. Participants were assessed on their confidence in the practical application and administrative oversight requirements of an EFWBT program. A cross-comparison was conducted between a larger data set of third-year medical students from the Uniformed Services University and the UHPs to determine the statistical significance of the program. RESULTS: The difference in mean scores of UHPs during preand post-training was statistically significant (p<0.001). Additionally, the average rate of improvement was greater for the UHPs compared with the third-year medical students (p=0.000065). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that the application of an EFWBT training program for UHPs can significantly increase confidence in their ability to conduct EFWBTs on the battlefield. Further larger-scale research is needed to determine the impact of this training on performance outcomes.
Because of the diverse backgrounds of their healthcare professionals, Ukrainian military medicine needs expanded and enhanced military medical training to increase their readiness in the war against Russia. During March 2023, eight Ukrainian healthcare professionals participated in Operation Gunpowder, a high-fidelity prolonged casualty care simulation conducted by the USU as a part of its Military Unique Curriculum. In order to evaluate their experiences, we interviewed each healthcare professional and analyzed the data to determine common themes. The participants first described the challenges of operational medicine in Ukraine. They then described the benefits of simulation training such as learning how to navigate a resource-limited operational environment, learning prolonged casualty care, and enhancing leadership and teamwork. Finally, they discussed how they planned to implement training such as Operation Gunpowder in Ukraine in order to increase force readiness. After experiencing the prolonged casualty care simulation training, the Ukrainian participants believed Operation Gunpowder to be a valuable training tool due to its ability to help them overcome the current challenges they are facing in their war against Russia. They described how they would integrate similar training in Ukraine, and follow-up correspondence revealed the success of these efforts. Other universities and institutions are likewise called to use their knowledge and resources to help train Ukrainian health professionals using simulation-based training or other education modalities.
INTRODUCTION: The battle along Antietam Creek in September 1862 was pivotal in shaping future combat medical readiness practices. With the full confidence of his commander, Major (Dr) Jonathan Letterman implemented an innovative ambulance corps system, which contributed immensely to modern-day battlefield medicine. Each year, the Uniformed Services University (USU) holds the Antietam Staff Walk, during which military medical students are engaged by faculty at various "stops" along the 6-mile walk. The four learning objectives for the Antietam Staff Walk are to (1) introduce the role of the "staff ride," (2) orient learners to reading terrain, (3) reinforce the six principles of health service support, and (4) recall the heritage of the military medical officer. The Department of Military and Emergency Medicine at USU commissioned a program evaluation to determine if these course objectives were being met, evaluate the effectiveness of the Antietam Staff Walk as a teaching tool, and make recommendations for improving its educational impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We engaged in qualitative program evaluation to evaluate the Antietam Staff Walk course objectives. Our research team analyzed 156 reflection papers written by second-year military medical students attending Antietam in August 2021. We coded each of the papers, noting important words and phrases that were salient to the students' learning experiences at Antietam. Our research team then compiled each of these codes into a master list and then determined how to divide this list into major categories. We collectively defined each of these categories, which served as the resulting themes of this program evaluation. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: (1) creation of an ambulance corps allows for proximal battlefield medicine, (2) a lack of buddy aid inspires Tactical Casualty Combat Care, and (3) disease/nonbattle injury necessitates preventative medicine. The students foremost gained an appreciation for the impact of the ambulance corps and recognized that the ambulance corps not only impacted medical care, but also the mission as a whole. However, may not have completely understood the long, slow evolution of battlefield care and may have overestimated the knowledge of physicians practicing mid-19th century medicine. We provided recommendations for addressing these learning opportunities during future Antietam Staff Walks at USU. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of the Antietam Staff Ride resulted in several curricular recommendations for enhancing its learning impact. Our program evaluation serves as a model for line units and other military organizations to optimize the impact of the historical staff ride as a teaching tool.
Military Personnel , Students, Medical , Humans , Program Evaluation , Universities , Curriculum
INTRODUCTION: Military health care team cohesion has been linked to improved performance during simulation training. However, there is a gap in current research regarding the processes by which teams become cohesive within simulation training. The purpose of this study was to explore how health care teams evolve during high-fidelity simulation training and the ways in which team cohesion impacts their performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants in our study were fourth-year military medical students participating in a 5-day high-fidelity military medical simulation during Fall 2022.Twenty-three students volunteered to participate in our study. We interviewed each participant twice during the simulation and then transcribed each interview using an automated transcription service. Guided by the grounded theory tradition of qualitative data analysis, we used open, axial, and selective coding to analyze the interview data. RESULTS: Our data analysis revealed that teams went through a process of (1) struggle, (2) adaptation, (3) perceived improvement, (4) gained confidence, and (5) perceived team cohesion. Teams struggled through the various barriers to group cohesion (i.e., power dynamics, role designation and competency, and task failures and low team confidence) in order to understand their weaknesses. As teams adjusted and noticed improvement, they adapted new patterns, protocols, and standards of practice based on previous failures, improving their overall confidence. The participants perceived their teams as successful once they had progressed through these phases and ended the simulation as a cohesive unit. CONCLUSIONS: Our qualitative data analysis provided insight into team cohesion as it was forged by participants in real time as the simulation progressed. The results of our study can be used to promote team cohesion not only during simulation training but also within military health care professional teams in order to enhance their performance in the field.
INTRODUCTION: Military physicians must be prepared to lead health care teams across complex landscapes of war during future small- and large-scale combat operations. This preparation optimally begins in medical school so that early career physicians are fully ready for their first deployment. Past qualitative research has suggested that military physicians who attended civilian medical school are not as well prepared for the operational environment as physicians who attended the Uniformed Services University (USU), our nation's military medical school. However, there is a lack of larger-scale quantitative research comparing the readiness differences between the two medical school pathways. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to quantify any differences in first deployment preparation between students attending USU and civilian medical schools through the Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared USU and HPSP graduates' first deployment experiences by distributing a 14-item Likert survey to active duty military physicians in the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Air Force who graduated within the past 10 years from medical school (USU or civilian). RESULTS: The USU graduates rated themselves significantly higher than the HPSP graduates on their readiness for deployment (3.83 vs. 3.24; P < .001); ability to navigate the operational environment (3.59 vs. 2.99; P < .001); confidence in communicating with their commanding officer (3.59 vs. 2.99; P = .002); navigating the combined role as physician and officer (3.33 vs. 2.84; P = .004); leading a health care team (3.94 vs. 3.43; P = .001); preparation by a medical school (3.78 vs. 2.52; P < .001); and overall readiness compared to peers (4.20 vs. 3.49; P < .001). There was no significant difference between the two pathways regarding their stress level at the beginning of deployment (2.74 vs. 2.68; P = .683); clinical preparation (3.94 vs. 3.76; P = .202); and success of first deployment (3.87 vs. 3.91; P = .792). The largest effect size of the difference between the two pathways was noted on the question "How well did medical school prepare you for your first deployment" (Cohen's d = 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: While both groups believed that they were prepared for their first deployment, USU graduates consistently reported being more prepared by medical school for their first deployment than HPSP graduates. To close this readiness gap, supplemental military unique curricula may help to optimize HPSP students' readiness.
The Advanced Combat Medical Experience (ACME) is a progressive simulation-based training held for second-year medical students at the Uniformed Services University (USU). This study explored the impact of participating in ACME on students' tourniquet application skills. A panel of emergency medicine physician experts developed an assessment to evaluate the participants' performance. Trained raters then scored students' tourniquet application performance before and after participating in ACME. We conducted a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to detect any significant difference in the participants' pretest and posttest ratings as well as time it took them to apply the tourniquet. Our results indicated a significant difference in the pre- and posttest ratings of students as well as the time it took them to apply the tourniquet. This study confirms the effectiveness of progressive simulation-based education for teaching TCCC skills to military medical trainees.
Emergency Medicine , Military Personnel , Simulation Training , Students, Medical , Humans , Tourniquets , Simulation Training/methods , Emergency Medicine/education
INTRODUCTION: Assessing learner performance is a primary focus within simulation-based education in order to prepare students with the knowledge and skills they will need going forward in their careers. In order to properly conduct these assessments of learner performance, faculty must be adequately trained on the scenario, expectations, assessment measures, and debriefing. During Operation Bushmaster, a five-day "deployment" for learners, faculty assess students as they rotate through different leadership roles. The faculty development includes online and in-person training that provides them with an understanding of the scenario; what learners know; the framework used at USU to guide curriculum, development, and assessment; how to assess learners; and how to provide feedback to learners. Research has examined the value of receiving assessment and feedback from a student perspective, but the impact of being the assessor and giving feedback has not been researched from the faculty point of view. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the impact of assessing students in simulation scenarios on faculty's own development as an educator and leader. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through a phenomenological qualitative study, we explored participants' lived experiences as faculty at Operation Bushmaster. Eighteen faculty from a variety of medical specialties and military ranks volunteered to participate. Participants were interviewed in-person using a semi-structured interview. Analyses included individually reading through each transcript; then individually coding and taking notes of terms and phrases used by participants; codes were compiled and organized into categories, which became the themes of our study. RESULTS: The interviews demonstrated the following themes in which providers who serve as faculty of Operation Bushmaster believe they gain from the experience: (1) The experience helps to reground their own thinking; (2) acting as faculty during simulation-based education helps them remain up-to-date on necessary skills; and (3) working with students helps faculty continually develop as an educator and a leader. CONCLUSIONS: This work describes how even when faculty are brought in for learner assessment, they are taking away lessons and experiences that aid in their own development as an educator as well as a leader. Acting as an assessing faculty for students may allow faculty to reground their own thinking, remain up-to-date on necessary skills, and continually develop their skills as an educator and leader. These findings suggest that some faculty involved in simulation events may also gain knowledge, skills, and experiences that can help with their own development even when the focus is on learners.
BACKGROUND: Creating a positive workplace culture affects patient outcomes and force readiness. An inclusive workplace culture is especially important for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) military healthcare professionals, who have historically faced discrimination within the United States military. While research has examined LGBTQ service members' experiences in the military as a whole, there is a gap in the professional literature regarding LGBTQ healthcare workers' experiences within military medicine. METHODS: This qualitative phenomenological study explored the experiences of ten LGBTQ military healthcare professionals. We interviewed each participant for one hour. Our research team then coded each interview and came to a consensus on how to organize these codes into emerging themes. We used reflexivity and member checking to increase the credibility of our results. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from our data analysis: (1) implicit bias; (2) explicit bias; (3) response to discrimination; and (4) recommendations for improving workplace culture. The participants described both the underlying and outright discrimination they faced at work. They made recommendations for reducing this discrimination through education, training, and increased leadership representation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that LGBTQ healthcare professionals continue to face discrimination in the workplace. This discrimination must be addressed to create an inclusive workplace environment within military medicine, which will enhance force readiness.
Military Personnel , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Female , Humans , United States , Sexual Behavior , Health Personnel , Delivery of Health Care
INTRODUCTION: Military medical students enter residency through two main pathways: (1) The Uniformed Services University (USU) and (2) the Armed Services Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP). The purpose of this study was to compare how these two pathways prepare military medical students for residency. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 experienced military residency program directors (PDs) in order to explore their perceptions of the preparedness of USU and HPSP graduates. We used a transcendental phenomenological qualitative research design to bracket our biases and guide our data analysis. Our research team coded each of the interview transcripts. We then organized these codes into themes, which served as the results of our study. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from our data regarding the residents' preparedness: (1) Ability to navigate the military culture, (2) understanding of the military's medical mission, (3) clinical preparation, (4) ability to navigate the Military Health System (MHS), and (5) teamwork. The PDs described how USU graduates better understand the military's medical mission and are more easily able to navigate the military culture and the MHS because of their lived experiences during military medical school. They also discussed the various levels of clinical preparation of HPSP graduates, in contrast to the USU graduates' more consistent skills and abilities. Finally, the PDs believed both groups to be strong team players. CONCLUSIONS: USU students were consistently prepared for a strong start to residency because of their military medical school training. HPSP students often experienced a steep learning curve because of the newness of the military culture and MHS.
Internship and Residency , Military Medicine , Military Personnel , Humans , Fellowships and Scholarships , Military Medicine/education , Health Occupations
INTRODUCTION: Operation Bushmaster is a high-fidelity simulation held for fourth-year medical students at the Uniformed Services University. No past research has examined this multi-day simulation's ability to prepare military medical students for the complexities of their first deployment. This qualitative study, therefore, explored Operation Bushmaster's impact on military medical student deployment readiness. METHODS: We interviewed 19 senior military medical personnel serving as faculty members at Operation Bushmaster during October 2022 in order to explore how Operation Bushmaster prepares students for their first deployment. These interviews were recorded and transcribed. Each research team member then coded the transcripts and came to a consensus on the themes and patterns that emerged from the data. RESULTS: The following themes described the ways in which Operation Bushmaster prepares military medical students for their first deployment: (1) primes them for the stress of the operational environment; (2) teaches them to navigate austere conditions; (3) facilitates their leadership development; and (4) provides them with a deeper understanding of the military's medical mission. CONCLUSION: Operation Bushmaster immerses students in a realistic, stressful operational environment, challenging them to develop an adaptive mindset and efficacious leadership skills that they will utilize during future deployments.
Medical Missions , Military Personnel , Students, Medical , Humans , Qualitative Research , Leadership
INTRODUCTION: Operation Bushmaster is a high-fidelity military medical field practicum for fourth-year medical students at the Uniformed Services University. During Operation Bushmaster, students treat live-actor and mannequin-based simulated patients in wartime scenarios throughout the five-day practicum. This study explored the impact of participating in Operation Bushmaster on students' decision-making in a high-stress, operational environment, a crucial aspect of their future role as military medical officers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of emergency medicine physician experts used a modified Delphi technique to develop a rubric to evaluate the participants' decision-making abilities under stress. The participants' decision-making was assessed before and after participating in either Operation Bushmaster (control group) or completing asynchronous coursework (experimental group). A paired-samples t-test was conducted to detect any differences between the means of the participants' pre- and posttest scores. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Uniformed Services University #21-13079. RESULTS: A significant difference was detected in the pre- and posttest scores of students who attended Operation Bushmaster (P < .001), while there was no significant difference in the pre- and posttest scores of students who completed online, asynchronous coursework (P = .554). CONCLUSION: Participating in Operation Bushmaster significantly improved the control group participants' medical decision-making under stress. The results of this study confirm the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation-based education for teaching decision-making skills to military medical students.
Emergency Medicine , Students, Medical , Humans , Educational Status , Clinical Decision-Making , Computer Simulation
INTRODUCTION: Formative feedback is critical for trainees' growth and development. However, there is a gap in the professional literature regarding the ways in which formative feedback affects student performance during simulation. This grounded theory study addresses this gap by exploring the ways in which medical students received and integrated ongoing formative feedback throughout a multiday, high-fidelity military medical simulation, Operation Bushmaster. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our research team interviewed 18 fourth-year medical students in order to investigate how they processed formative feedback during the simulation. Guided by the grounded theory tradition of qualitative research, our research team used open coding and axial coding to categorize the data. We then used selective coding to determine the casual relationships between each of the categories that emerged from the data. These relationships determined our grounded theory framework. RESULTS: Four phases emerged from the data and provided a framework to delineate the process in which students received and integrated formative feedback throughout the simulation: (1) ability to self-assess, (2) self-efficacy, (3) leadership and teamwork, and (4) appreciation of feedback for personal and professional growth. The participants first focused on feedback related to their individual performance but then shifted to a teamwork and leadership mindset. Once they adapted this new mindset, they began to intentionally provide feedback to their peers, increasing their team's performance. At the end of the simulation, the participants recognized the benefits of formative feedback and peer feedback for ongoing professional development throughout their careers, signifying a growth mindset. CONCLUSIONS: This grounded theory study provided a framework for determining how medical students integrated formative feedback during a high-fidelity, multiday medical simulation. Medical educators can use this framework to intentionally guide their formative feedback in order to maximize student learning during simulation.
Students, Medical , Humans , Formative Feedback , Grounded Theory , Computer Simulation , Leadership
INTRODUCTION: Team building is a real-world necessity in military and civilian health care settings. Interprofessional education (IPE) is therefore an essential component of health care education. At the Uniformed Services University, there are continued, deliberate attempts for IPE to occur to successfully prepare students to work together and adapt to ever-changing contexts. Although past quantitative research has analyzed interprofessional collaboration among military medical students, this study explores the interprofessional experiences of family nurse practitioner (FNP) students during a military medical field practicum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was reviewed by the Uniformed Services University Human Research Protections Program Office (Protocol DBS.2021.257). We used the qualitative transcendental phenomenological approach to design our study. We analyzed the reflection papers of 20 family nurse practitioner students who participated in Operation Bushmaster in order to explore their interprofessional experiences. Our research team coded and categorized the data, developing textural and structural descriptions of these categories, which served as the results of our study. RESULTS: We present the study's three key findings that students expressed and include perspectives from their viewpoints to illustrate each theme. The three themes related to IPE are (1) quality of integration determines perception of experience, (2) challenges inspire continued growth, and (3) increased self-awareness of one's own strengths. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for educators and leaders to find ways to allow for positive team integration and cohesion so that students do not feel overwhelmed by their perceived lack of knowledge or experience. Educators can use that perception to motivate a growth mindset so that they can continually seek out ways to improve and grow. Additionally, educators can prepare students with adequate knowledge to ensure that each team member meets mission success. Finally, to continually develop, students need to have awareness of their own strengths as well as areas for growth to enhance their own performance as well as that of the military interprofessional health care teams.
Family Nurse Practitioners , Military Personnel , Students, Medical , Humans , Emotions , Health Education
INTRODUCTION: Decision-making is a critical competence that all medical students must develop before becoming independently licensed physicians. One aspect of the decision-making process is confidence, which has not been extensively studied in undergraduate medical education. Intermittent simulation has been found to improve medical students' self-confidence across a wide range of clinical scenarios; however, no research to date has examined how a more extensive medical and operational simulation impacts miltary medical students' confidence in their decision-making abilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted online through the Uniformed Services University and in person at Operation Bushmaster, a multiday, out-of-hospital, high-fidelity, immersive simulation held at Fort Indiantown Gap, PA. This investigation focused on examining the impacts of asynchronous coursework and simulation-based learning on improving decision-making confidence for senior medical students 7 months before graduation. Thirty senior medical students volunteered. Each completed a 10-point confidence scale before and after either accomplishing asynchronous online coursework (control group) or attending a medical field practicum (experimental group). We conducted a repeated-measures analysis of variance to examine any change in students' confidence scores before and after completing each educational modality. RESULTS: The results of the analysis of variance indicated a significant time effect for our students' confidence in both the experimental and control groups as measured on our confidence scale, suggesting that Operation Bushmaster and asynchronous coursework both possessed the potential to increase students' confidence in their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Both simulation-based learning and asynchronous online learning can increase students' decision-making confidence. Future larger-scale research is needed to calculate the impact of each modality on military medical students' confidence.
Education, Distance , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Military Personnel , Students, Medical , Humans , Computer Simulation
INTRODUCTION: Simulation is a key aspect of the military unique curriculum at the Uniformed Services University (USU). The Department of Military and Emergency Medicine conducts rigorous high-fidelity simulations for military medical students during each year of their medical school training: Patient Experience (first year), Advanced Combat Medical Experience (second year), Operation Gunpowder (third year), and Operation Bushmaster (fourth year). There is currently a gap in the professional literature regarding students' progression through each of these simulations. This study, therefore, explores the experiences of military medical students at USU in order to understand how they learn and develop as they progress through these high-fidelity simulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a grounded theory approach to qualitative research design, we analyzed qualitative data from 400 military medical students across all four years of military school who participated in the four high-fidelity simulations during 2021-2022. Our research team used open and axial coding to categorize the data and to make connections between each of these categories, which we articulated in a theoretical framework and illustrated in a consequential matrix. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board at USU. RESULTS: During Patient Experience, the first-year medical students described the stress, chaos, and lack of resources that military physicians face as they experienced the realism of the operational environment. Later at Advanced Combat Medical Experience, the second-year medical students practiced their medical skills hands-on for the first time in the simulated stressful operational environment. As a result, they gained confidence and began to formulate their professional identity. Next, at Operation Gunpowder, the third-year medical students advanced to more complex tactical field care as they performed prolonged casualty care, forward resuscitative care, forward resuscitative surgical care, and en route care as a team, often revealing gaps in their knowledge that needed to be filled. During the capstone simulation, Operation Bushmaster, the fourth-year medical students closed these gaps and solidified their professional identity as leaders and physicians, culminating in a strong confidence regarding their readiness for their first deployment. CONCLUSIONS: Each of the four high-fidelity simulations impacted the students in unique ways as they were incrementally challenged to practice and build upon their knowledge, skills, and abilities related to combat casualty care, teamwork, and leadership in the operational environment. As they completed each of the simulations, their skills improved, confidence grew, and professional identity solidified. Therefore, completing these rigorous simulations progressively over the course of 4 years of medical school appears to be a vital process and foundation for the deployment readiness of early-career military physicians.
High Fidelity Simulation Training , Military Personnel , Students, Medical , Humans , Computer Simulation , Curriculum
