Cancer Vaccines, Treatment of the Future: With Emphasis on HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women. With improvements in early-stage diagnosis and targeted therapies, there has been an improvement in the overall survival rate in breast cancer over the past decade. Despite the development of targeted therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as monoclonal antibodies and their toxin conjugates, all metastatic tumors develop resistance, and nearly one-third of HER2+ breast cancer patients develop resistance to all these therapies. Although antibody therapy has shown promising results in breast cancer patients, passive immunotherapy approaches have limitations and need continuous administration over a long period. Vaccine therapy introduces antigens that act on cancer cells causing prolonged activation of the immune system. In particular, cancer relapse could be avoided due to the presence of a longer period of immunological memory with an effective vaccine that can protect against various tumor antigens. Cancer vaccines are broadly classified as preventive and therapeutic. Preventive vaccines are used to ward off any future infections and therapeutic vaccines are used to treat a person with active disease. In this article, we provided details about the tumor environment, different types of vaccines, their advantages and disadvantages, and the current status of various vaccine candidates with a focus on vaccines for breast cancer. Current data indicate that therapeutic vaccines themselves have limitations in terms of efficacy and are used in combination with other chemotherapeutic or targeting agents. The majority of breast cancer vaccines are undergoing clinical trials and the next decade will see the fruitfulness of breast cancer vaccine therapy.

The role of elotuzumab in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety, cost, and place in therapy of elotuzumab for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) are reviewed. SUMMARY: Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) protein SLAMF7 and facilitates an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity interaction between myeloma cells and natural killer cells. Elotuzumab has U.S. marketing approval for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received 1-3 previous therapies; this regimen is among the preferred regimens for relapsed or refractory MM recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). A Phase III trial involving 321 patients demonstrated a median progression-free survival duration of 19.4 months with elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus 14.9 months with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.85; p < 0.001). Common adverse effects of elotuzumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy include hematologic toxicities, fatigue, pyrexia, diarrhea, constipation, muscle spasms, and cough. Elotuzumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone is an NCCN-recommended alternative option for relapsed or refractory MM. CONCLUSION: While elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a promising regimen for patients with MM, it is only one of several regimens recommended by NCCN for relapsed or refractory MM. Key factors in patient selection for elotuzumab therapy include adverse effects, prior treatments received, and cost considerations.

Role of obinutuzumab in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy, and place in therapy of obinutuzumab in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are reviewed. SUMMARY: Obinutuzumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 receptor on mature B cells, was recently approved for use in combination with chlorambucil in patients with previously untreated CLL. In a Phase III clinical trial including 671 patients with CLL and significant comorbidities, patients who received obinutuzumab-chlorambucil combination therapy had longer median progression-free survival than those who received rituximab plus chlorambucil (26.7 months versus 15.2 months, p < 0.001) or chlorambucil alone (11.1 months, p < 0.001). Overall survival was also improved with the use of obinutuzumab-chlorambucil versus chlorambucil alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.41, p = 0.002) and similar to survival with the use of rituximab plus chlorambucil. The main type of adverse effect reported in association with obinutuzumab use is infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which occurred in 66% of patients in the Phase III trial, with 20% of reactions categorized as grade 3 or 4; IRR risk can be reduced with appropriate dosing, premedication, patient monitoring, and immediate treatment of IRRs. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the effects of obinutuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed or treatment-refractory CLL. CONCLUSION: In patients who are elderly or who have multiple comorbidities, the use of obinutuzumab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody, in combination with chlorambucil is an efficacious regimen for treatment-naive patients with symptomatic CLL.

Ponatinib: A new tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, adverse effects, and formulary considerations of ponatinib, a pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). DATA SOURCES: A literature search of articles published between January 1966 and June 2013 was performed using PubMed with the following search terms: ponatinib, AP24534, and Iclusig. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc, was contacted for unpublished information. Other sources included American Society of Hematology abstracts, the Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Web site, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Included articles and abstracts were published in English and contain information about ponatinib, particularly in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). DATA SYNTHESIS: Following the phase II PACE trial, ponatinib was approved for the treatment of patients with chronic-phase (CP), accelerated-phase (AP), or blast-phase (BP) CML or Ph+ ALL who have become intolerant or resistant to previous therapy. Unlike other BCR-ABL TKIs, ponatinib was designed to overcome the T315I mutation. At 15.3 months, 46% of patients with CP-CML achieved a complete cytogenetic response, and 34% achieved a major molecular response. Complete hematologic responses occurred in 47% of patients with AP-CML, 21% with BP-CML, and 34% with Ph+ ALL after 1 year. Severe toxicities included myelosuppression, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, and arterial thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ponatinib is a potent TKI that can overcome several resistance mechanisms in previously treated patients with CML and Ph+ ALL. Ponatinib should be reserved for patients who have failed first-line therapy, have the T315I mutation, or have progressed.