Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 5 de 5
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(9): 743-51, 2014 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24806011

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel imaging-guided surgical technique that allows the performance of noninvasive and radiation-free ablation. Presently, computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation, a minimally invasive percutaneous technique, is the standard for treating symptomatic osteoid osteomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of MRgFUS ablation for the treatment of nonspinal osteoid osteomas in terms of technical success, complications, and clinical success through one year of follow-up. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, thirty consecutive patients with a nonspinal osteoid osteoma were enrolled between May 2010 and April 2012 at three different university centers; twenty-nine of the patients were treated with use of MRgFUS. Lesions had been previously diagnosed on the basis of imaging, including dynamic contrast-enhanced MR. The mean number of sonications and energy deposition were determined. Technical success was evaluated through an assessment of complications immediately after treatment. Clinical success was determined on the basis of pain reduction as measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), recurrence, and long-term complications through twelve months. RESULTS: Technical success of MRgFUS was observed for all twenty-nine patients. The mean number of sonications (and standard deviation) was 7 ± 3, and the mean delivered acoustic energy was 1180 ± 736 J. At the twelve-month follow-up, complete clinical success was observed in twenty-six (90%) of the twenty-nine patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84 to 95; mean VAS, 0 ± 0 points). Partial success was observed in three (10%) of the twenty-nine patients (95% CI = 5 to 16; mean VAS score, 5 ± 0 points); two of these patients subsequently underwent CT-guided radiofrequency ablation, and one underwent open surgery. Pain score values showed a significant reduction (p < 0.001) between baseline (mean VAS score, 8 ± 1 points) and post treatment (mean VAS score, 1 ± 2 points). No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS may be an effective and safe alternative approach in the treatment of nonspinal osteoid osteoma. A complete clinical success rate of 90% was demonstrated without adverse events. MRgFUS is totally noninvasive and eliminates radiation exposure.


Bone Neoplasms/therapy , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Osteoma, Osteoid/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/prevention & control , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Neuroradiol J ; 26(3): 347-56, 2013 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23859294

We prospectively assessed the diagnostic criteria of morphologic MRI study (MMS) and the accuracy of DWI and related ADC values (DWI-ADC) versus intervertebral disk volumetric analysis (IDVA) for predicting shrinkage of lumbar disk herniation treated with oxygen-ozone (O2-O3) diskolysis. Sixty-eight patients (36 men and 32 women; mean age 39) with lumbosciatica underwent O2-O3 diskolysis. The six-month MRI follow-up was performed with FSE-T2 and T2-fat, SE-T1 and DWI-weighted images. IDVA was determined using OsiriX(®). Diagnostic criteria and accuracy were evaluated with regards to DWI and related ADC in detecting response to ozone therapy. Fifty-eight of 68 patients had successful outcomes (responders), whereas ten patients showed unsatisfactory outcomes (non-responders). MMS showed that a centrally located herniated disk and grade 1 nerve root compression were more common in the responder group (p < 0.05). DWI-ADC and IDVA showed statistically significant shrinkage in the sixth month of follow-up (p < 0.05) with a mean ADC value reduction of 2.10 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.19 SD in the second month of follow-up (p < 0.05). DWI-ADC had an accuracy of 0.81 in detecting response to therapy around the second month of follow-up. DWI-ADC appear to be useful adjuncts to MMS in the follow-up of patients undergoing O2-O3 diskolysis.


Intervertebral Disc Displacement/therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Ozone/administration & dosage , Adult , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Pain Measurement , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur Radiol ; 21(9): 2004-10, 2011 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21533865

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) followed by Radiotherapy (RT) (RFA-RT) produces better palliation in terms of pain than RT alone in patients with osteolytic bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with solitary bone metastases and a pain score of least 5 or more on the VAS scale were selected. Fifteen patients were treated with RFA-RT (20 Gy delivered in 5 fractions of 4 Gy over 1 week) and were compared with a matched group (30 subjects) treated by RT. RESULTS: A complete response in terms of pain relief at 12 weeks was documented in 16.6% (5/30) and 53.3% (8/15) of the subjects treated by RT or RFA-RT, respectively (p = 0.027). The overall response rate at 12 weeks was 93.3% (14 patients) in the group treated by RFA-RT and 59.9% (18 patients) in the group treated by RT (p = 0.048). Although recurrent pain was documented more frequently after RT (26.6%) than after RFA-RT (6.7%) the difference did not reach statistical significance. The morbidity related to RT did not significantly differ when this treatment was associated with RFA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that RFA-RT is safe and more effective than RT. The findings described here should serve as a framework around which to design future clinical trials.


Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Palliative Care , Radiotherapy/methods , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Confidence Intervals , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Osteolysis/radiotherapy , Osteolysis/surgery , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Pain, Intractable/radiotherapy , Pain, Intractable/surgery , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis
5.
Radiol Med ; 111(5): 709-23, 2006 Aug.
Article En, It | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16791461

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a nonoperative therapeutic option for the management of portal hypertension, variceal bleeding, recurrent ascites, Budd-Chiari syndrome. In view of the many issues surrounding the use of TIPS, in 1994 the US National Digestive Diseases Advisory Board convened a scientific conference to review the current data available and to establish the indications and controindications for this procedure. However there are still unsolved problems especially short primary patency of the shunt due to intimal hyperplasia, which causes a reduction of the shunt lumen thus favoring a return of the portal hypertension with recurrent variceal bleeding. Several study were performed in the last years to evaluate the efficacy of covered stent in order to reduce shunt disfunction secondary to intimal hyperplasia. PTFE seems to be more efficient in the prevention of restenoses. In our experience more then 100 patients were treated with the Viatorr stent-graft. After a follow-up ranging from 1 to 50 months we reported a 1- year primary patency rate of 83.8%. However the use of the stentgraft is correlate with a high rate of hepatic hencefalopathy (46.6 %). In case of hepatic hencefalopathy refractory to the conventional medical therapy, TIPS reduction should be performed.


Liver Diseases/surgery , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/methods , Ascites/surgery , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/surgery , Contraindications , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Patient Selection , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Complications/mortality
...