RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Procedures performed by plastic surgeons tend to generate lower work relative value units (RVUs) compared to other surgical specialties despite their major contributions to hospital revenue. The authors aimed to compare work RVUs allocated to all free flap and pedicled flap reconstruction procedures based on their associated median operative times and discuss implications of these compensation disparities. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of deidentified patient data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed, and relevant CPT codes for flap-based reconstruction were identified from 2011 to 2018. RVU data were assessed using the 2020 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File. The work RVU per unit time was calculated using the median operative time for each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 3991 procedures were included in analysis. With increased operative time and surgical complexity, work RVU per minute trended downward. Free-fascial flaps with microvascular anastomosis generated the highest work RVUs per minute among all free flaps (0.114 work RVU/minute). Free-muscle/myocutaneous flap reconstruction generated the least work RVUs per minute (0.0877 work RVU/minute) among all flap reconstruction procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Longer operative procedures for flap-based reconstruction were designated with higher work RVU. Surgeons were reimbursed less per operative unit time for these surgical procedures, however. Specifically, free flaps resulted in reduced compensation in work RVUs per minute compared to pedicled flaps, except in breast reconstruction. More challenging operations have surprisingly resulted in lower compensation, demonstrating the inequalities in reimbursement within and between surgical specialties. Plastic surgeons should be aware of these discrepancies to appropriately advocate for themselves.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Humanos , Reoperación , Tempo Operativo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Robinow syndrome is characterized by mesomelic limb shortening, hemivertebrae, and genital hypoplasia. Due to low prevalence and considerable phenotypic variability, it has been challenging to definitively characterize features of Robinow syndrome. While craniofacial abnormalities associated with Robinow syndrome have been broadly described, there is a lack of detailed descriptions of genotype-specific phenotypic craniofacial features. Patients with Robinow syndrome were invited for a multidisciplinary evaluation conducted by specialist physicians at our institution. A focused assessment of the craniofacial manifestations was performed by a single expert examiner using clinical examination and standard photographic images. A total of 13 patients with clinical and molecular diagnoses consistent with either dominant Robinow syndrome (DRS) or recessive Robinow syndrome (RRS) were evaluated. On craniofacial examination, gingival hyperplasia was nearly ubiquitous in all patients. Orbital hypertelorism, a short nose with anteverted and flared nares, a triangular mouth with a long philtrum, cleft palate, macrocephaly, and frontal bossing were not observed in all individuals but affected individuals with both DRS and RRS. Other anomalies were more selective in their distribution in this patient cohort. We present a comprehensive analysis of the craniofacial findings in patients with Robinow Syndrome, describing associated morphological features and correlating phenotypic manifestations to underlying genotype in a manner relevant for early recognition and focused evaluation of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples/genética , Anomalías Craneofaciales/genética , Enanismo/genética , Hipertelorismo/genética , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades/genética , Anomalías de la Boca/genética , Anomalías Urogenitales/genética , Anomalías Múltiples/diagnóstico , Anomalías Múltiples/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Anomalías Craneofaciales/complicaciones , Anomalías Craneofaciales/diagnóstico , Anomalías Craneofaciales/fisiopatología , Enanismo/complicaciones , Enanismo/diagnóstico , Enanismo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Genes Dominantes/genética , Genes Recesivos/genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Hipertelorismo/complicaciones , Hipertelorismo/diagnóstico , Hipertelorismo/fisiopatología , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades/complicaciones , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades/diagnóstico , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anomalías de la Boca/complicaciones , Anomalías de la Boca/diagnóstico , Anomalías de la Boca/fisiopatología , Mutación/genética , Fenotipo , Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Anomalías Urogenitales/complicaciones , Anomalías Urogenitales/diagnóstico , Anomalías Urogenitales/fisiopatología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The hands are one of the most visible parts of the body, and prominent dorsal veins and extensor tendons are the most readily recognized signs of the aging process. Fat grafting has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective method of hand rejuvenation by restoration of subcutaneous fat. Despite some variability in the technical approach, fat grafting techniques are consistent in their use of low-pressure injection with standard cannula sizes, small aliquots of graft, and a total volume of graft greater than or equal to 15 mL per hand. While distribution of the fat is an area of debate and a topic of active research, published studies have shown high patient satisfaction rates, suggesting that perhaps the restoration of volume alone is paramount. In this article, we will review the applications of fat grafting to the hand, focusing primarily on its role in hand rejuvenation.
