Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of 2542 Patients with Spinal Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to systematically analyze the data on the clinical features, surgical treatment, and outcomes of spinal schwannomas. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of bibliographic databases from January 1, 2001, to May 31, 2021, yielded 4489 studies. Twenty-six articles were included in our final qualitative systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of 2542 adult patients' data from 26 included studies showed that 53.5% were male, and the mean age ranged from 35.8 to 57.1 years. The most common tumor location was the cervical spine (34.2%), followed by the thoracic spine (26.2%) and the lumbar spine (18.5%). Symptom severity was the most common indicator for surgical treatment, with the most common symptoms being segmental back pain, sensory/motor deficits, and urinary dysfunction. Among all patients analyzed, 93.8% were treated with gross total resection, which was associated with better prognosis and less chance of recurrence than subtotal resection. The posterior approach was the most common (87.4% of patients). The average operative time was 4.53 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.18-6.48); the average intraoperative blood loss was 451.88 mL (95% CI, 169.60-1203.95). The pooled follow-up duration was 40.6 months (95% CI, 31.04-53.07). The schwannoma recurrence rate was 5.3%. Complications were particularly low and included cerebrospinal fluid leakage, wound infection, and the sensory-motor deficits. Most of the patients experienced complete recovery or significant improvement of preoperative neurological deficits and pain symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that segmental back pain, sensory/motor deficits, and urinary dysfunction are the most common symptoms of spinal schwannomas. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice with overall good reported outcomes and particularly low complication rates. gross total resection offers the best prognosis with the slightest chance of tumor recurrence and minimal risk of complications.

The 5-item modified frailty index predicts spinal osteotomy outcomes better than age in adult spinal deformity patients: an ACS - NSQIP analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) as compared to chronological age in predicting outcomes of spinal osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) patients. METHODS: Using Current Procedural and Terminology (CPT) codes, the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for adult patients undergoing spinal osteotomy from 2015 to 2019. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline frailty status, measured by mFI-5 score, and chronological age on postoperative outcomes. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to analyze the discriminative performance of age versus mFI-5. RESULTS: A total of 1,789 spinal osteotomy patients (median age 62 years) were included in the analysis. Among the patients assessed, 38.5% (n = 689) were pre-frail, 14.6% frail (n = 262), and 2.2% (n = 39) severely frail using the mFI-5. Based on the multivariate analysis, increasing frailty tier was associated with worsening outcomes, and higher odds ratios (OR) for poor outcomes were found for increasing frailty tiers as compared to age. Severe frailty was associated with the worst outcomes, e.g., unplanned readmission (OR 9.618, [95% CI 4.054-22.818], p < 0.001) and major complications (OR 5.172, [95% CI 2.271-11.783], p < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 score (AUC 0.838) demonstrated superior discriminative performance than age (AUC 0.601) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The mFI5 frailty score was found to be a better predictor than age of worse postoperative outcomes in ASD patients. Incorporating frailty in preoperative risk stratification is recommended in ASD surgery.

Comparison of the Risk Analysis Index and the modified 5-factor frailty index in predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality after spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty's role in preoperative risk assessment in spine surgery has increased in association with the increasing size of the aging population. However, previous frailty assessment tools have significant limitations. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive ability of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) with the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) for postoperative spine surgery morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for adults > 18 years who underwent spine surgery between 2015 and 2019. Multivariate modeling and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, including area under the curve/C-statistic calculations, were performed to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI and mFI-5 on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: In a cohort of 292,225 spine surgery patients, multivariate modeling showed that increasing RAI scores, and not increasing mFI-5 scores, were independent predictors of increased postoperative mortality for the trauma, tumor, and infection subcohorts. In the overall spine cohort, both increasing RAI and increasing mFI-5 scores were associated with increased mortality, but C-statistics indicated that the RAI (C-statistic 0.802 [95% CI 0.800-0.803], p < 0.0001, DeLong test) had superior discrimination compared with the mFI-5 (C-statistic 0.677 [95% CI 0.675-0.679], p < 0.0001, DeLong test). In subgroup analyses, the RAI had superior discriminative ability to mFI-5 for mortality in the trauma and infection groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The RAI demonstrates superior discrimination to the mFI-5 for predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity after spine surgery and the RAI maintains conceptual fidelity to the frailty phenotype. Patients with high RAI scores may benefit from knowing the possibility of increased surgical risk with potential spine surgery.

Frailty predicts worse outcomes for spine surgery patients with interhospital transfer status: Analysis of 295,875 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2015-2019.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of interhospital transfer (IHT) status, age, and frailty on postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent spine surgery. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent spine surgeries from 2015 to 2019 (N = 295,875). Univariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to analyze the effect of IHT on postoperative outcomes and the contribution of baseline frailty status (mFI-5 score stratified into "pre-frail", "frail", and "severely frail") on outcomes in IHT patients. Effect sizes were summarized by odds ratio (OR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of 295,875 patients in the study, 3.3% (N = 9666) were IHT status. On multivariable analysis, controlling for covariates, IHT status was significantly associated with greater likelihood of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 9.3), major complications (OR=5.0), Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade IV complications (OR=7.0), unplanned readmission (OR=2.1), unplanned reoperation (OR=2.6), eLOS (OR=16.1), and discharge to non-home destination (OR=12.7) (all P < 0.001). Increasing frailty was significantly associated with poor outcomes in spine surgery patients with IHT status compared to chronological age. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that IHT status is associated with poor outcomes in spine surgery patients. Furthermore, increasing frailty more than increasing age was a robust predictor of poor outcomes among IHT spine surgical patients. Baseline frailty status, as measured by the mFI-5, may be utilized for preoperative risk stratification of patients with IHT status with anticipated spine surgery.

Association of baseline frailty status and age with outcomes in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis of 5818 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2015-2019.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of frailty, as measured by the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), with that of age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for intracranial meningiomas, using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2015-2019) was queried to analyze data from patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection (N = 5,818). Univariate and multivariate analyses of age and mFI-5 score were performed for 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, extended hospital length of stay (eLOS), and discharge to a non-home destination. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted for sex, body mass index, transfer status, smoking, and operative time) demonstrated that mFI-5 and age were significant predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients with intracranial meningioma. However, based on odds ratios (OR) and effect sizes, increasing frailty tiers were better predictors than age of adverse outcomes. Severely frail patients showed highest effects sizes for all postoperative outcome variables [OR 11.17 (95% CI 3.45-36.19), p<0.001 for mortality; OR 4.15 (95% CI 2.46-6.99), p<0.001 for major complications; OR 4.37 (95% CI 2.68-7.12), p<0.001 for unplanned readmission; OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.17-4.55), p<0.001 for unplanned reoperation; OR 4.28 (95% CI 2.74-6.68), p<0.001 for eLOS; and OR 9.34 (95% CI 6.03-14.47, p<0.001) for discharge other than home. CONCLUSION: In this national database study, baseline frailty status was a better independent predictor for worse postoperative outcomes than age in patients with intracranial meningioma.

Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline frailty status (as measured by modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]) versus age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect spinal tumor resection patients' data from 2015 to 2019 (n = 4,662). Univariate and multivariate analyses for age and mFI-5 were performed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge to a nonhome destination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative performance of age versus mFI-5. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that mFI-5 was a more robust predictor of worse postoperative outcomes as compared to age. Furthermore, based on categorical analysis of frailty tiers, increasing frailty was significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. 'Severely frail' patients were found to have the highest risk, with odds ratio 16.4 (95% confidence interval [CI],11.21-35.44) for 30-day mortality, 3.02 (95% CI, 1.97-4.56) for major complications, and 2.94 (95% CI, 2.32-4.21) for LOS. In ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 score (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.743) achieved superior discrimination compared to age (AUC = 0.594) for mortality. CONCLUSION: Increasing frailty, as measured by mFI-5, is a more robust predictor as compared to age, for poor postoperative outcomes in spinal tumor surgery patients. The mFI-5 may be clinically used for preoperative risk stratification of spinal tumor patients.

Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs). METHODS: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients.

Care Transitions in the Psychiatric Hospital: Focus on Older Adults.

Patients undergoing a care transition are vulnerable to duplication of services, conflicting care recommendations, and errors in medication reconciliation. Older adults may be more vulnerable to care transitions given their relatively higher medical burden, cognitive impairment, and frequent polypharmacy. In this Treatment in Geriatric Mental Health: Research in Action article, we first present the results of a quality improvement study examining the frequency of care transitions to and from the medical hospital among patients admitted to a university-affiliated psychiatric hospital. Among a sample of 50 geriatric adults and 50 nongeriatric adults admitted to the psychiatric hospital, we tallied the number of care transitions to and from the medical hospital. We found that the geriatric cohort was significantly more likely to experience this type of care transition (p = 0.012, Fisher's exact test) compared to the nongeriatric cohort. In the second part of this article, we use a clinical vignette to illustrate the types of medical errors that can occur as a vulnerable and frail older adult moves between acute psychiatric and medical settings. Finally, we list provider-level and systems-level evidence-based recommendations for how care of the patient in the vignette could be improved. The quality improvement study and clinical vignette demonstrate how older adults are at greater risk for care transitions to and from the acute medical setting during psychiatric hospitalization, and that creative solutions are required to improve outcomes.

Hydrocarbons in Upland Groundwater, Marcellus Shale Region, Northeastern Pennsylvania and Southern New York, U.S.A.

Water samples from 50 domestic wells located <1 km (proximal) and >1 km (distal) from shale-gas wells in upland areas of the Marcellus Shale region were analyzed for chemical, isotopic, and groundwater-age tracers. Uplands were targeted because natural mixing with brine and hydrocarbons from deep formations is less common in those areas compared to valleys. CH4-isotope, predrill CH4-concentration, and other data indicate that one proximal sample (5% of proximal samples) contains thermogenic CH4 (2.6 mg/L) from a relatively shallow source (Catskill/Lock Haven Formations) that appears to have been mobilized by shale-gas production activities. Another proximal sample contains five other volatile hydrocarbons (0.03-0.4 µg/L), including benzene, more hydrocarbons than in any other sample. Modeled groundwater-age distributions, calibrated to 3H, SF6, and 14C concentrations, indicate that water in that sample recharged prior to shale-gas development, suggesting that land-surface releases associated with shale-gas production were not the source of those hydrocarbons, although subsurface leakage from a nearby gas well directly into the groundwater cannot be ruled out. Age distributions in the samples span ∼20 to >10000 years and have implications for relating occurrences of hydrocarbons in groundwater to land-surface releases associated with recent shale-gas production and for the time required to flush contaminants from the system.