Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 38(24): 2798-2811, 2020 08 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32516092

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS: Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing-initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing-was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION: This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Mutación de Línea Germinal/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
2.
World J Urol ; 37(1): 3-13, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30105454

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To update current recommendations on prevention, screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of bladder cancer (BC) based on a thorough assessment of the most recent literature on these topics. METHODS: A non-systematic review was performed, including articles until June 2017. A variety of original articles, reviews, and editorials were selected according to their epidemiologic, demographic, and clinical relevance. Assessment of the level of evidence and grade of recommendations was performed according to the International Consultation on Urological Diseases grading system. RESULTS: BC is the ninth most common cancer worldwide with 430,000 new cases in 2012. Currently, approximately 165,000 people die from the disease annually. Absolute incidence and prevalence of BC are expected to rise significantly during the next decades because of population ageing. Tobacco smoking is still the main risk factor, accounting for about 50% of cases. Smoking cessation is, therefore, the most relevant recommendation in terms of prevention, as the risk of developing BC drops almost 40% within 5 years of cessation. BC screening is not recommended for the general population. BC diagnosis remains mainly based on cystoscopy, but development of new endoscopic and imaging technologies may rapidly change the diagnosis algorithm. The same applies for local, regional, and distant staging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough understanding of epidemiology, risk factors, early detection strategies, diagnosis, and evaluation is essential for correct, evidence-based management of BC patients. Recent developments in endoscopic techniques and imaging raise the hope for providing better risk-adopted approaches and thereby improving clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/epidemiología , Cistoscopía , Dinámica Poblacional , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Fumar Tabaco/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Algoritmos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Incidencia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen de Banda Estrecha , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/prevención & control , Urología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA