Management of Seymour Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Seymour fractures are injuries with a potentially high risk of infection and osteomyelitis. The optimal management of this pediatric open fracture is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the best evidence for these fractures and determine their optional management based on primary clinical studies. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, and gray literature databases (from May 1966 to April 15, 2020). Studies describing patients under the age of 18 years with Seymour fractures were included. Treatment was grouped based on debridement and antibiotic status as well as the timing of these interventions. The primary outcome was infection. The secondary outcomes included malunion, physeal disturbance, and nail dystrophy. RESULTS: The searches helped identify 56 records, of which 10 nonrandomized studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising 352 patients and 355 fractures. Early (<48 hours) debridement was associated with significantly less risk of infection (risk ratio [RR] = 0.28 [95% CI, 0.12-0.64]) and malunion (RR = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07-0.99]). Prophylactic (<24 hours) antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of infection (RR = 0.21 [95% CI, 0.10-0.43]). In addition, prophylactic antibiotics and debridement were associated with a 70% reduction in the risk of infection (RR = 0.30 [95% CI, 0.11-0.83]). Over one-third of patients with delayed presentation (median 8.5 days) were infected at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The high-risk nature of Seymour fractures may be mitigated by prompt recognition and early, basic interventions, which can usually be performed in any setting. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The optimal management of Seymour fractures in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Seymour fractures are open, displaced juxta-epiphyseal fractures of the distal phalanx, with an overlying nail bed laceration that occur in children and adolescents with an open physis. This fracture occurs rarely, but its potential consequences are clinically significant. Due to anatomical particulars and proximity to the growth plate, this open fracture may result in soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis, leading to growth arrest and persistent mallet deformity. At present, there is no consensus as to the optimal management of Seymour fractures. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate the existing evidence on the management of Seymour fractures in children and adolescents and to establish what are the most important factors pertaining to an uncomplicated recovery. METHODS: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from inception to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases. Grey literature will be identified through searching Open Grey and dissertation databases using an exhaustive search strategy. All clinical studies examining the management of Seymour fractures will be included. The interventions (irrigation and debridement; prophylactic antibiotics) and their timings (early vs late) will be compared to no antibiotics and no debridement. Primary outcome measures will be the incidence of superficial and deep infection. Secondary outcomes will include other adverse events such mal-union, non-union, need for re-operation, physeal disturbance and nail dystrophy/atrophy. Two independent reviewers will screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. A narrative synthesis will be performed. If data permits, we will conduct random-effects meta-analysis where appropriate. DISCUSSION: This review will provide evidence for the management of Seymour fractures, based on a cumulation of existing smaller studies. Due to the rarity of this fracture pattern, included studies are expected to be mainly observational and prone to bias; however, there is value in summarising the evidence to guide clinicians. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020153726.

Defining Normal Parameters for the Male Nipple-Areola Complex: A Prospective Observational Study and Recommendations for Placement on the Chest Wall.

BACKGROUND: The nipple-areola complex (NAC) is important aesthetically and functionally for both sexes. Methods for positioning the NAC in males are less well established in the literature compared to females but are just as important. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the normal parameters for the male NAC, to review literature, and to present a reliable method for preoperative placement. METHODS: Normal male patients, with no prior chest wall conditions, were prospectively recruited to participate. General demographics and chest wall dimensions were recorded-sternal notch to nipple (SNND), internipple (IND), anterior axillary folds distances (AFD), NAC, and chest circumference were measured. Comparisons were made using t test and ANOVA. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were recruited (age range, 18-90 years); mostly (86.7%) with normal or overweight BMI. The IND averaged 249.4 mm, the SNND averaged 204.2 mm, and the AFD averaged 383.8 mm. Areola diameter averaged 26.6 mm and for the nipple, 6.9 mm. The IND:AFD ratio was 0.65. There was no statistical difference in the IND:AFD ratio, SNND, or NAC parameters comparing different ethnic groups. The SNND increased with greater BMI (P ≤ 0.001). Using these data, we suggest ideal NAC dimensions and devised a simple method for positioning of the NAC on the male chest wall. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study, with the widest range in age and BMI, to date on this topic. Although fewer men than women undergo surgery to the breast, there is a growing awareness for enhancing the appearance of the male chest wall.

Learning from lawsuits: Ten-years of NHS litigation authority claims against 11 surgical specialities in England.

INTRODUCTION: Medico-legal claims are a drain on NHS resources and promote defencive practice. The litigious burden of surgery in England has not been previously described. This paper describes trends over ten years of claims made against the NHS across 11 surgical specialities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were requested for all claims received by the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) from 2004 to 2014. Surgical specialities included cardiothoracic, general, neurosurgery, obstetric, oral and maxillofacial (OMFS), orthopaedic, otorhinolaryngology, paediatric, plastic, urology and vascular surgery. A literature review of peer-reviewed publications was performed with search terms 'NHSLA' and 'Surgery'. RESULTS: The NHS paid out approximately £1.5 billion across 11 surgical specialities from 2004 to 2014. Orthopaedic, obstetric and general surgery received the largest number of claims per year, and paediatric surgery the least. The mean time from registration of claim with the NHSLA to settlement was 25.5 months (range 17.8 months-35 months). Neurosurgery was responsible for the highest average amount paid per claim, and OMFS the lowest. Failure/delay in treatment and/or diagnosis and failure to warn/adequately consent were the three leading types of claim. 806 never events were successfully claimed for during the ten-year period. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Sharing information and good practice should be a priority for surgical professionals. Lessons learnt from medico-legal claims are transferrable in strategic planning. This pan-speciality report has demonstrated considerable burden on the NHS and should promote improvement in practice on an individual level in addition to providing systems based recommendations to NHS and international organisations.

Growth in children with choledochal malformations: effect of the Roux loop.

PURPOSE: Excision and biliary reconstruction using a Roux loop is the current standard for choledochal malformation (CM). This is un-physiological, delivering bile beyond the duodenum and excluding a significant length of the jejunum from intestinal absorption. We investigated whether this had an effect on post-operative growth. METHODS: Retrospective case-note analysis of children surgically treated for CM. Growth variables were converted to standard deviation scores (SDS) and compared against population norms. P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2014, 135 children (<16 years) were identified. Median age at surgery was 3.3 (IQR 1.5-7) years. Morphology included: type 1 Cystic (n = 54, 40%), type 1 Fusiform (n = 58, 43%) and type 4 (intra and extra-hepatic) (n = 22, 16%). There was pre-operative growth failure [median weight SDS = -0.4 (-1.2 - 0.4), P = 0.0004] with a similar trend for height [SDS = -0.38 (-1.2 - 0.5), P = 0.08)]. This correlated with presentation bilirubin (r s = -0.24, P = 0.004), GGT (r s = -0.27, P = 0.002) and AST (r s = -0.27, P = 0.002) but not morphology (P = 0.82) or presentation (P = 0.4). Median follow-up was 1.9 (0.6-4.7) years, during which time both height (P = 0.73) and weight (P = 0.45) reverted to normal. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of growth in children with CM following a Roux-loop reconstruction and showed pre-operative growth failure probably attributed to a period of biliary obstruction but catch-up growth when corrected.