Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43 Suppl 1: 29-35, 2021 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288441

Vascular endothelial injury is a hallmark of acute infection at both the microvascular and macrovascular levels. The hallmark of SARS-CoV-2 infection is the current COVID-19 clinical sequelae of the pathophysiologic responses of hypercoagulability and thromboinflammation associated with acute infection. The acute lung injury that initially occurs in COVID-19 results from vascular and endothelial damage from viral injury and pathophysiologic responses that produce the COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. Clinicians should continue to focus on the vascular endothelial injury that occurs and evaluate potential therapeutic interventions that may benefit those with new infections during the current pandemic as they may also be of benefit for future pathogens that generate similar thromboinflammatory responses. The current Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) studies are important projects that will further define our management strategies. At the time of writing this report, two mRNA vaccines are now being distributed and will hopefully have a major impact on slowing the global spread and subsequent thromboinflammatory injury we see clinically in critically ill patients.


COVID-19/complications , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombophilia/etiology , Vasculitis/etiology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Child , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/etiology , Endothelium, Vascular/injuries , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Female , Fibrinolysis , Forecasting , Humans , Lung/blood supply , Lung/pathology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/blood , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
2.
J Fam Pract ; 51(12): 1035-40, 2002 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12540329

OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to develop explanatory models to better understand how physicians diagnose and treat acute bronchitis; to describe patient expectations and needs when experiencing an episode of acute bronchitis; and to enhance communication between physician and patient. STUDY DESIGN: We used qualitative, semi-structured, in-depth interviews to generate patient and physician explanatory models. POPULATION: We had a purposeful, homogeneous sample of 30 family physicians and 30 adult patients. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Our multidisciplinary team of investigators used an editing style of analysis to develop patient and physician explanatory models based on the following topics: (1) what caused my illness/etiology, (2) what symptoms I had/onset of symptoms, (3) what my sickness did to me/pathophysiology, (4) how severe is my sickness/course of illness, and (5) what kind of treatment should I receive/treatment. RESULTS: We found that patient and physician models were congruous for symptoms of acute bronchitis and incongruous for etiology and course of illness. Models were congruous for treatment, although for different reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may have a very vague understanding of the process of infection and the difference between bacteria and viruses. Compounding this confusion is frequent miscommunication from physicians regarding the clinical course of untreated illness. These factors and non-communicated expectations from patients and fear of missing something on the part of physicians contribute to the decision to treat with antibiotics.


Bronchitis/diagnosis , Bronchitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Bronchitis/microbiology , Bronchitis/physiopathology , Communication , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
...