RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral posterior external rotation contractures and scapular winging are frequently overlooked problems in residual neonatal brachial plexus injury (NBPI). Recent attention has emphasized their impact on vital functions such as feeding and hygiene. This study aims to present the epidemiology of posterior glenohumeral (GH) contractures in a significant pediatric NBPI population and explore contributing factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from January 2019 to November 2022, involving a case series of 262 children with residual NBPI. The data included demographics, palsy level, prior surgical history, and the modified Mallet scale. Glenohumeral passive internal rotation in abduction (IRABD) and cross-body adduction (CBADD) angles were measured bilaterally. Subjects were categorized into 'Belly-' (Mallet Hand-to-Belly <3) and 'Belly+' (Mallet Hand-to-Belly ≥3) groups. RESULTS: Median participant age was 7.9 years (range: 3.5 - 21 years). Extension injury patterns included Erb's palsy (56.5%), extended Erb's palsy (28.6%), and global palsy (14.9%). Contractures exceeding 10, 20, and 30 degrees were prevalent in both IRABD and CBADD angles. The 'Belly-' group (9.5%) demonstrated a significant reduction in both angles compared to the 'Belly+' group. Weak correlations were found between IRABD (r=0.390, p<0.0001) or CBADD (r=0.163, p=0.0083) angles and Mallet hand-to-abdomen item. Glenohumeral reduction and Hoffer procedures led to a notable decrease in CBADD angle, without affecting 'Belly-' prevalence. Global injuries exhibited decreased angles compared to Erb's group. CONCLUSIONS: External rotation glenohumeral contractures are prevalent in residual NBPI, impacting midline access. Surprisingly, history of glenohumeral procedures or extensive injuries did not increase the likelihood of losing the ability to reach the belly. ROC analysis suggests specific thresholds for maintaining this ability.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Outcomes for silver coated megaprostheses (SC-MP) used in cases of end-stage periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have not been clearly defined. Although attractive, concerns over implant longevity and the risk of infection relapse exist among the scientific community. Therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of silver coating in lower-extremity MPs used in such difficult-to-treat scenarios. The study's primary hypothesis was that the periprosthetic infection control rate would be higher in patients with silver-coated implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-interventional retrospective study with a historical comparison group. We identified all consecutive end-stage hip and knee PJI cases at our center managed with exchange arthroplasty using a silver-coated megaprosthesis from January 2016 to March 2021, these cases were compared with a historical cohort of end-stage PJI cases managed with uncoated megaprostheses. The main outcome studied was infection control rate. Secondarily, we analyzed the short-to-medium-term survivorship of this type of silver-coated implant. RESULTS: Fifty-nine megaprostheses used in cases of end-stage PJI were included in this study. We identified 30 cases of chronic hip or knee PJI in which a silver-coated modular megaprosthesis was implanted. Our non-coated megaprosthesis (NC-MP) historical group included 29 patients. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. We found no statistically significant differences in infection control rate (80% vs. 82.8%, p = 0.47) or implant survivorship (90% vs. 89.65%, p = 1) after a mean follow-up for SC-MP of 46.43 months, and 48 months for the non-coated MP group. In relapsed cases, there were no differences in infection eradication after DAIR (66% SC-MP vs. 60% NC-MP success rate, p = 1). During the follow-up we observed one case of skin argyria without further repercussion. CONCLUSION: We were unable to confirm our initial hypothesis that use of silver-coated implants in end-stage PJI scenarios may be associated with better outcomes in terms of infection control or implant survivorship.
Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Prótesis de Cadera , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Plata , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Diseño de Prótesis , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with above-knee amputations (AKA) are normally treated with the traditional socket-mounted prosthesis (SMP), which is associated with a high incidence of problems. Osseointegration has been proposed as a promising option for avoiding many common SMP drawbacks. Several concerns have arisen regarding amputee osseointegration, however, mainly with respect to infection. We report on the safety of a single-stage osseointegration protocol using an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel to coat the intramedullary implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all AKA cases treated at our center between January 2019 and April 2022, in which a transcutaneous osseointegrated implant was used in a single-stage strategy, together with a rapid-resorbable hydrogel loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin. The specific protocol used, infection rate, implant osseointegration rate and implant survivorship were determined after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Eleven osseointegration cases were included in the study, with an average of 16 years post-amputation (range: 3-35 years). After a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12-49 months) no patient had suffered any implant-related infection. Osseointegration of the implant had been achieved in all cases. The mid-term survivorship of the implant in our series was 100 % at the end of follow-up. Radiographs of all cases showed no loosening of the implant. Further, 91 % of the series patients were able to walk without restrictions after the rehabilitation process. CONCLUSIONS: The single-stage osseointegration protocol for AKA, using a rapid-resorbable hydrogel loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin, yields low rates of implant-related deep infection. This protocol consistently delivers high rates of radiological osseointegration, with no hydrogel-associated complications.
Asunto(s)
Miembros Artificiales , Oseointegración , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Hidrogeles , Resultado del Tratamiento , Amputación Quirúrgica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , GentamicinasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze changes in tendency of etiology and of antimicrobial resistance patterns to most common local and systemic antibiotics in chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia (COM-T) in a Level I trauma center over an 11-year period. METHODS: A retrospective review including all patients with COM-T who were surgically treated from January 2009 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two period groups: 2009-2014 and 2015-2019. Microbiologic etiology was analyzed. Bacterial resistance patterns evaluation was based on the Magiorakos et al. classification, including proportions of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs, acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pan drug-resistant (PDR) organisms encountered. RESULTS: A total of 173 episodes of COM-T were identified. Monomicrobial infections represented 47.4% of all cases, while 28.3% had polymicrobial infections. Negative deep-bone cultures were identified in 24.3% of the patients. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (24.5%) and S. aureus (20.5%). No differences were found when comparing Gram-positive infections between periods (58.3% for 2009-2014 vs. 46.7% for 2015-2019; p = 0.10). Findings were similar for Gram-negative infections (37% vs. 33.7%; p = 0.62), although more polymicrobial infections were detected (24.7% vs. 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.359). MDROs were involved in 15% of the cases, with an upward trend when comparing both periods (12.8% vs. 23.6%; p = 0.07). The most-used combination of local antibiotics-glycopeptide (vancomycin) plus aminoglycoside (gentamicin or tobramycin)-was met with low rates of resistance in the most frequently isolated microorganisms. CONCLUSION: According to the results of the present study, rates of Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections remained consistent during the two study periods, but with an upward trend in MDRO and polymicrobial infections detected. The local combination of a glycopeptide plus an aminoglycoside was effective in treating the most frequently isolated microorganisms.
Asunto(s)
Coinfección , Osteomielitis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus , Tibia/cirugía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Vancomicina/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aminoglicósidos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty. Its management consists of both: a radical debridement and implant retention or exchange (depending on the timing of symptoms) and directed antibiotic therapy. Thus, the isolation of atypical microorganisms implies a challenge, where anaerobes are responsible for only 4% of cases. However, Odoribacter splanchnicus has not been reported as a cause of PJI yet. We present an 82 year-old woman who was diagnosed with hip PJI. A radical debridement, prosthetic withdrawal, and spacer introduction was performed. Despite the directed antibiotic therapy against E. coli which was first isolated, the patient persisted clinically febrile. An anaerobic Gram-negative rod was isolated and finally, Odoribacter splanchnicus was identified and confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Then, antibiotic bitherapy with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole was started until 6 weeks after surgery. The patient had no signs of infection recurrence after then. This case report also shows the importance of genomic identification of rare microorganisms causing PJI, and also allows setting a directed antibiotic therapy which is crucial for infection eradication.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Escherichia coli , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Desbridamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgical approach can impact the reliability of the debridement after a chronic total knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a factor of utmost importance to eradicate the infection. The most adequate knee surgical approach in cases of PJI is a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of performing a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in a two-stage exchange protocol for knee PJI treatment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study examining patients managed with two-stage arthroplasty due to chronic knee PJI (2010-2019). Performance and timing of the TTO were collected. Primary end-point was infection control with a minimum FU of 12 months and according to internationally accepted criteria. Correlation between TTO timing and reinfection rate was reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-two cases were finally included. Overall success (average follow-up: 46.2 months) was 90.4%. Treatment success was significantly higher among cases addressed using TTO during the second stage (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p value 0.03). Only 4.8% of the patients relapsed after performing a sequential repeated TTO, that is, during both first and second stages, compared to 23.1% cases in which TTO was not done (p value 0.28). No complications were observed among patients in the TTO group with a significant decrease in soft tissue necrosis (p: 0.052). CONCLUSION: Sequential repeated tibial tubercle osteotomy during a two-stage strategy is a reasonable option and offers high rates of infection control in complex cases of knee PJI with a low rate of complications.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Reoperación , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Osteotomía/métodos , Artritis Infecciosa/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Use of prefabricated mobile spacers in end-stage cases of hip periprosthetic joint infection (HPJI) is hindered when large bone defects exist. In such cases, prefabricated custom-made antibiotic spacers (P-CMAS) offer an alternative. Such spacers are individually designed according to the size and anatomical characteristics of the bone defect. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate the use of such patient-specific spacers in a two-stage strategy to treat end-stage HPJI cases, and to report on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study identified all patients with end-stage HPJIs from January 2015 through December 2019, treated using a P-CMAS. Primary outcome: infection eradication rate. Secondary outcomes: spacer-related complications and patient satisfaction. Minimum follow-up: 12 months after the second-stage surgery. RESULTS: A total of 7 end-stage cases (mean of 6.7 previous surgical procedures) were included. Mean bone defect size was 191.57 (range 47-304) mm. Polymicrobial infection was detected in 42.86% of these cases. During the spacer stage there were no periprosthetic fractures, spacer dislocations or breakages, nor spacer-drug-related complications. All patients proceeded with the second stage uneventfully, with an average time between stages of 178 (range 119-326) days. In 5 cases a total femur arthroplasty was the reconstructive procedure performed. After a mean follow-up of 27.29 (range 14-49) months the infection was clinically eradicated in all patients, despite their difficult-to-treat scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Industrially custom-made spacers offer an effective and safe option in performing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty in cases of end-stage HPJI with extensive bone defects.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Artritis Infecciosa/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acute tibial fracture-related infection (FRI) is one of the most feared and challenging complications after a tibial fracture. The most appropriate treatment in this scenario is far from a resolved topic. Circular external fixators (CEFs) offer multiplanar control and minimize soft tissue injury using temporary implants far from the infected area. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of two different types of CEFs (Ilizarov and hexapod) in the treatment of a series of acute tibial FRIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study at two specialized limb reconstruction centres identified all patients with an acute tibial FRI (≤4 weeks after index procedure) definitively treated with a CEF from January 2015 to December 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: fracture healing and infection eradication rate with a minimum FU of 12 months after frame removal. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: to investigate the differences between the two types of circular frames regarding final post-treatment deformity magnitude. RESULTS: We included 31 patients with acute tibial FRIs: 18 treated with hexapod-type and 13 with Ilizarov-type CEFs. Average age was 45.5±16.56 years. Fracture healing and infection eradication were achieved in all patients (31/31) after a mean follow-up of 24.7 months (range 12.1-55.3). Patients treated with an Ilizarov-type fixator presented shorter time to fracture union (5.5±2.2 months vs. 9.2±6.0 months; p-value 0.021) and shorter duration of external fixation (p-value 0.001). Regarding residual post-treatment deformity, the hexapod system presented significantly less residual coronal translation deformity (p-value 0.034) and better callus quality. Fixator-related complications were similar when comparing the two groups. No significant differences were seen in pain (p-value 0.25), RTW rate (35% vs. 45%; p-value 0.7) or functionality (p-value 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Definitive circular external fixation is an excellent treatment for acute tibial FRI. Both Ilizarov and hexapod systems offer a very high rate of fracture healing and infection eradication. Although both presented very low radiological post-operative residual deformity, the hexapod system showed less residual coronal translation deformity and better callus quality.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de la Tibia , Adulto , Fijadores Externos/efectos adversos , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Managing critical-sized tibial defects is one of the most complex challenges orthopedic surgeons face. This is even more problematic in the presence of infection and soft-tissue loss. The purpose of this study is to describe a comprehensive three-stage surgical protocol for the reconstruction of infected tibial injuries with combined bone defects and soft-tissue loss, and report the clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study at a specialized limb reconstruction center identified all patients with infected tibial injuries with bone and soft-tissue loss from 2010 through 2018. Thirty-one patients were included. All cases were treated using a three-stage protocol: (1) infected limb damage control; (2) soft-tissue coverage with a vascularized or local flap; (3) definitive bone reconstruction using distraction osteogenesis principles with external fixation. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: limb salvage rate and infection eradication. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: patient functional outcomes and satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients in this series of chronically infected tibias had been operated upon 3.4 times on average before starting our limb salvage protocol. The mean soft-tissue and bone defect sizes were 124 cm2 (6-600) and 5.4 cm (1-23), respectively. A free flap was performed in 67.7% (21/31) of the cases; bone transport was the selected bone-reconstructive option in 51.7% (15/31). Local flap failure rate was 30% (3/10), with 9.5% for free flaps (2/21). Limb salvage rate was 93.5% (29/31), with infection eradicated in all salvaged limbs. ASAMI bone score: 100% good/excellent. Mean VAS score was 1.0, and ASAMI functional score was good/excellent in 86% of cases. Return-to-work rate was 83%; 86% were "very satisfied" with the treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: A three-stage surgical approach to treat chronically infected tibial injuries with combined bone and soft-tissue defects yields high rates of infection eradication and successful limb salvage, with favorable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Fracturas de la Tibia , Infección de Heridas , Humanos , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de Heridas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugíaRESUMEN
Candida periprosthetic joint infection (CPJI) is a rare and very difficult to treat infection, and high-quality evidence regarding the best management is scarce. Candida spp. adhere to medical devices and grow forming biofilms, which contribute to the persistence and relapse of this infection. Typically, CPJI presents as a chronic infection in a patient with multiple previous surgeries and long courses of antibiotic therapy. In a retrospective series of cases, the surgical approach with higher rates of success consists of a two-stage exchange surgery, but the best antifungal treatment and duration of antifungal treatment are still unclear, and the efficacy of using an antifungal agent-loaded cement spacer is still controversial. Until more evidence is available, focusing on prevention and identifying patients at risk of CPJI seems more than reasonable.
RESUMEN
We review antibiotic and other prophylactic measures to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) surgery in proximal femoral fractures (PFFs). In the absence of specific guidelines, those applied to these individuals are general prophylaxis guidelines. Cefazolin is the most widely used agent and is replaced by clindamycin or a glycopeptide in beta-lactam allergies. A personalized antibiotic scheme may be considered when colonization by a multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDRO) is suspected. Particularly in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization or a high prevalence of MRSA-caused PJIs a glycopeptide with cefazolin is recommended. Strategies such as cutaneous decolonization of MDROs, mainly MRSA, or preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment have also been addressed with debatable results. Some areas of research are early detection protocols in MDRO colonizations by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), the use of alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis, and antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in HHA. Given that published evidence addressing PJI prophylactic strategies in PFFs requiring HHA is scarce, PJIs can be reduced by combining different prevention strategies after identifying individuals who will benefit from personalized prophylaxis.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treatment to reduce early-periprosthetic joint infections (early-PJIs) after hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for fracture. METHODS: Open-label, multicenter RCT comparing fosfomycin-trometamol versus no intervention with a parallel follow-up cohort without ASB. PRIMARY OUTCOME: early-PJI after HHA. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-four patients enrolled (mean age 84.3); 152(25%) with ASB (77 treated with fosfomycin-trometamol/75 controls) and 442(75%) without. Despite the study closed without the intended sample size, ASB was not predictive of early-PJI (OR: 1.06 [95%CI: 0.33-3.38]), and its treatment did not modify early-PJI incidence (OR: 1.03 [95%CI: 0.15-7.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Neither preoperative ASB nor its treatment appears to be risk factors of early-PJI after HHA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: Eudra CT 2016-001108-47.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Bacteriuria/microbiología , Artropatías/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Asintomáticas/terapia , Bacteriuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriuria/etiología , Femenino , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Artropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Artropatías/etiología , Masculino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Trometamina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infected post-traumatic distal femur defects remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-biological reconstruction offers an option for avoiding complex biological knee arthrodesis procedures. The Compressâ implant is an alternative to the traditional distal femur stemmed megaprosthesis. The aim of this study is to analyse the first patients treated with a distal femur Compressâ prosthesis to manage massive infected post-traumatic defects of the distal femur with joint involvement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with massive infected defects of the distal femur where this implant was used in a two-stage strategy, together with an antibacterial coating hydrogel (DACâ). The specific protocol, microbiological data, clinical and radiological results, complications, functional results and prosthesis survivorship were determined. Follow-up was for a minimum of 12 months, or until implant removal. RESULTS: Ten patients (11 Compressâ implants) with a mean age of 52 years (range 35-73) were included. On average, patients had undergone 4.4 previous surgical procedures before index surgery. The mean bone defect was 14 cm (range 8-21). After a median follow-up of 27 months (range 12-50 months) no patient had presented with recurrence of the infection, and limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Two patients suffered aseptic loosening which required revision of the femoral component. The short-term survivorship of the implant in our series was 81.8% at 4 years, with all failures occurring in the first 7 months. After this 7-month time threshold, we encountered no further loosening. Regarding functional outcomes, patients had a mean knee ROM of -4/86, expressed high overall satisfaction with the procedure according to the SAPS scale, and had an average LEFS of 52.5% (40-72.5%). CONCLUSION: Non-biological reconstruction of the distal femur with the Compressâ implant is a valid option in selected patients with massive infected defects with joint involvement. Survivorship was high, with all loosening occurring in the first months after surgery-representing a failure in the osseointegration of the implant.
Asunto(s)
Fémur , Implantación de Prótesis , Adulto , Anciano , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: The success rates of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infection have evolved since their early description. The implementation of internationally accepted outcome criteria led to the readjustment of such rates. However, patients who do not undergo reimplantation are usually set aside from these calculations. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty when considering those who do not undergo reimplantation, and to investigate the characteristics of this subgroup. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with chronic hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with two-stage revision between January 2010 and October 2018, with a minimum follow-up of one year, were included. Variables including demography, morbidity, microbiology, and outcome were collected. The primary endpoint was the eradication of infection. Patients who did not undergo reimplantation were analyzed in order to characterize this subgroup better. RESULTS: A total of 162 chronic PJIs were included in the study. After a mean follow-up of 57.3 months (12.1 to 115.7), 18 patients (11.1%) did not undergo reimplantation, due either to medical issues (10), the patient's choice (4), or death (4). When only considering those who underwent reimplantation, the success rate was 80.6%. However, when those who did not undergo reimplantation were included, the success rate dropped to 71.6%. Advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≥ III, McPherson's C host, and Gram-negative related PJI were independent risk factors for retention of the spacer. The mortality was higher in the non-reimplanted group. CONCLUSION: The real success rate of two-stage revision may not be as high as previously reported. The exclusion of patients who do not undergo reimplantation resulted in a 9% overestimation of the success rate in this series. Many comorbidity-related risk factors for retention of the spacer were identified, as well as higher death rates in this group. Efforts should be made to optimize these patients medically in order to increase reimplantation and success rates, while decreasing mortality. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1682-1688.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Enfermedad Crónica , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gentamicinas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure used primarily in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). Stable fixation combined with bone-end compression is essential to achieve knee fusion, but providing sufficient stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss. Our hypothesis is that using an external fixation biplanar configuration would bring about a fusion rate superior to that of a monolateral frame. METHODS: This study compares outcomes of biplanar external fixator knee fusion due to non-revisable iTKR with those of a historical cohort control study with patients managed with a monoplanar configuration. Primary endpoints were fusion rate, time to achieve bone fusion and infection eradication rate. Limb-length discrepancy, pain level, patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 29 knee fusion cases were included. In the biplanar group, infection was eradicated in 100% of the patients and fusion was achieved in all cases within an average of 5.24 months. In comparison, in the monolateral group, infection was eradicated in 86% of the cases and fusion was achieved in 81% of the patients after a mean of 10.3 months (p < 0.05). In both groups, postoperative pain was mild and patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction once fusion was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, external fixation knee fusion is a useful limb-salvage procedure in end-stage cases of knee PJI. We conclude that a biplanar configuration can halve the time required to achieve solid bone fusion in such a complex scenario.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/métodos , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artrodesis/efectos adversos , Artrodesis/instrumentación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fijadores Externos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/etiología , Recuperación del Miembro/efectos adversos , Recuperación del Miembro/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Second-stage positive cultures in 2-stage revision arthroplasty are a matter of concern, as their influence in outcomes is not clearly defined. We sought to study reimplantation microbiology when using vancomycin-gentamicin prefabricated cement spacers in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection. The associations of second-stage positive cultures with treatment failures and patient-associated factors were analyzed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, examining patients managed with 2-stage revision arthroplasty due to knee or hip chronic periprosthetic joint infection between 2010 and 2017. Prefabricated vancomycin-gentamicin cement spacers were used during the spacer stage. Intraoperative microbiological culture results after the first and second stages were evaluated. The primary end point was infection eradication or relapse. RESULTS: A total of 108 cases were included (61 hips and 47 knees). And 22.2% of patients had ≥1 second-stage positive culture, while 9.3% had ≥2 positive samples. Overall success, at an average follow-up of 46.4 months, was 77.8%. Treatment failure was higher among cases with positive cultures (15.5% vs 45.8%, P < .01) regardless of the number of positive samples. Diabetes was identified as a risk factor for second-stage positive cultures (P = .03); use of cement loaded with extra antibiotics for spacer fixation showed a protective effect (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Second-stage positive cultures were related to a higher failure rate when using vancomycin-gentamicin cement spacers. Diabetes increased the likelihood of second-stage positive cultures. The use of extra-antibiotic-loaded cement for spacer fixation during the first stage showed a protective effect.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Cementos para Huesos , Gentamicinas , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Reoperación , Reimplantación , Estudios Retrospectivos , VancomicinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Nonunion is a common complication of lateral condyle humeral (LCH) fractures in children. In situ fixation with a screw and bone grafting is the classically-recommended method of treatment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of obtaining a vascularized periosteal flap obtained from the lateral humerus and based on the posterior collateral radial vessels (PCRV). Second, to report the results after the application in two pediatric cases. METHODS: Periosteal branches of PCRV were studied in ten upper limbs from fresh human cadavers. Then, two children with LCH nonunion were treated with this flap. RESULTS: The PCRV provided mean of 5.3 anterior periosteal branches (range 4-7) with a mean distance between them of 19.1 mm (range 5-29 mm) and 5.7 posterior periosteal branches (range 3-7) with a mean distance between them of 15.9 mm (range 6-33 mm. PCRV distally anastomosed to the interosseous recurrent artery and the radial recurrent artery, creating a vascular net over the lateral condyle and allowing for the design of a reverse vascularized humeral periosteal flap (VHPF). Abundant periosteal callus and rapid consolidation were achieved in both children. No bone fixation or grafting was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: VHPF might be considered a viable biological surgical option to promote bone healing in LCH nonunions in children, while avoiding the need for bone fixation and the donor morbidity associated with bone grafting.