Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 22
1.
Hematol Oncol ; 42(1): e3235, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37942762

Watchful waiting is an acceptable management strategy for advanced-stage, low tumor burden (LTB) patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). However, the prediction of how long this treatment-free observation period will last remains imperfect. We explored whether total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and other positron emission tomography parameters were predictive of time to first treatment (TTFT). We analyzed 97 grade 1-3A advanced-stage LTB FL patients and found that a high TMTV was associated with other tumor burden features at diagnosis. Patients with a TMTV above our established cutoff of 50 mL had a significantly shorter median duration of observation (2.6 vs. 8.8 years; p = 0.001). At 5 years, 77% of patients with a high TMTV and 46% of patients with a low TMTV required treatment. In the multivariable analysis, a high TMTV was the only independent factor predicting TTFT (hazard ratio = 2.09; p = 0.017). Overall, TMTV is a strong predictor of the duration of observation in LTB FL patients. Upon validation of our cutoff in external series and standardization of the methodology, the TMTV could become an additional factor to consider deferring or initiating treatment in otherwise LTB patients.


Lymphoma, Follicular , Humans , Lymphoma, Follicular/therapy , Tumor Burden , Prognosis , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Proportional Hazards Models , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Retrospective Studies
2.
Am J Hematol ; 98(12): 1856-1868, 2023 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772428

In this retrospective international multicenter study, we describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and related disorders (small lymphocytic lymphoma and high-count monoclonal B lymphocytosis) infected by SARS-CoV-2, including the development of post-COVID condition. Data from 1540 patients with CLL infected by SARS-CoV-2 from January 2020 to May 2022 were included in the analysis and assigned to four phases based on cases disposition and SARS-CoV-2 variants emergence. Post-COVID condition was defined according to the WHO criteria. Patients infected during the most recent phases of the pandemic, though carrying a higher comorbidity burden, were less often hospitalized, rarely needed intensive care unit admission, or died compared to patients infected during the initial phases. The 4-month overall survival (OS) improved through the phases, from 68% to 83%, p = .0015. Age, comorbidity, CLL-directed treatment, but not vaccination status, emerged as risk factors for mortality. Among survivors, 6.65% patients had a reinfection, usually milder than the initial one, and 16.5% developed post-COVID condition. The latter was characterized by fatigue, dyspnea, lasting cough, and impaired concentration. Infection severity was the only risk factor for developing post-COVID. The median time to resolution of the post-COVID condition was 4.7 months. OS in patients with CLL improved during the different phases of the pandemic, likely due to the improvement of prophylactic and therapeutic measures against SARS-CoV-2 as well as the emergence of milder variants. However, mortality remained relevant and a significant number of patients developed post-COVID conditions, warranting further investigations.


COVID-19 , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Hematol Oncol ; 15(1): 116, 2022 08 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36028857

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to COVID-19 related poor outcomes, including thrombosis and death, due to the advanced age, the presence of comorbidities, and the disease and treatment-related immune deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, including patients from 79 centers across 22 countries. Data collection was conducted between April and May 2021. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 on nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Severe cases of COVID-19 were defined by hospitalization and the need of oxygen or admission into ICU. Development and type of thrombotic events, presence and severity of bleeding complications were reported during treatment for COVID-19. Bleeding events were classified using ISTH definition. STROBE recommendations were used in order to enhance reporting. RESULTS: A total of 793 patients from 79 centers were included in the study with 593 being hospitalized (74.8%). Among these, 511 were defined as having severe COVID: 162 were admitted to the ICU while 349 received oxygen supplementation outside the ICU. Most patients (90.5%) were receiving thromboprophylaxis. During COVID-19 treatment, 11.1% developed a thromboembolic event, while 5.0% experienced bleeding. Thrombosis developed in 21.6% of patients who were not receiving thromboprophylaxis, in contrast to 10.6% of patients who were on thromboprophylaxis. Bleeding episodes were more frequent in patients receiving intermediate/therapeutic versus prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) (8.1% vs. 3.8%, respectively) and in elderly. In multivariate analysis, peak D-dimer level and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were poor prognostic factors for thrombosis occurrence (OR = 1.022, 95%CI 1.007‒1.038 and OR = 1.025, 95%CI 1.001‒1.051, respectively), while thromboprophylaxis use was protective (OR = 0.199, 95%CI 0.061‒0.645). Age and LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration were prognostic factors in multivariate model for bleeding (OR = 1.062, 95%CI 1.017-1.109 and OR = 2.438, 95%CI 1.023-5.813, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of thrombosis if thromboprophylaxis is not used, but also at increased risk of bleeding under the LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration.


COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Aged , Anticoagulants , COVID-19 Testing , Hemorrhage , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Hematol Oncol ; 40(4): 588-595, 2022 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35611996

Serum soluble CD23 (sCD23) levels have been acknowledged as a prognostic factor in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but their potential relevance has not been analyzed in recent times. We retrospectively studied 338 CLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma, or CLL-type monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis patients from a single institution, with available sCD23 levels at diagnosis. Baseline features and outcomes were compared between patients with sCD23 ≤/>1000 UI/L. The 140 patients (41%) who had sCD23 > 1000 UI/L showed adverse-risk clinical and biological characteristics. High sCD23 levels were predictive of a shorter time to first treatment (5-year probability of requiring treatment: 60 vs. 20%, p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.72, p = 0.003 in a multivariable model also including the CLL International Prognostic Index and the absolute lymphocyte count), and a poorer 5-year overall survival (70 vs. 82%, p = 0.0009). These data suggest the potential of sCD23 to predict treatment-free survival and to shed light on mechanisms of activity and resistance to CD23-directed therapies.


Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Biomarkers, Tumor , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Proportional Hazards Models , Receptors, IgE , Retrospective Studies
5.
Am J Hematol ; 97(6): 731-739, 2022 06 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35253928

We evaluated outcomes of 18 patients with isolated extramedullary disease (iEMD) relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with the CD19-directed CAR T cells ARI-0001 in two centers (adult and pediatric), including patients treated in the CART19-BE-01 trial and the consecutive compassionate use program. iEMD was detected by PET-CT in 78% (14/18), and/or by cerebrospinal fluid analysis in 28% (5/18). Patients received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by 1 × 106 ARI-0001 cells/kg, initially as a single dose (first patient) and later split into three fractions (10%, 30%, and 60%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 50% (9/18) of patients, with no cases of grade ≥3 CRS, and 1 case (6%) of grade 1 neurotoxicity. Tocilizumab was used in 6% of patients (1/18). Procedure-related mortality was 0% at 2 years. Objective responses were seen in 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-99%) of patients, with complete responses (CR) seen in 78% (95% CI: 52%-94%) of them. Progression-free and overall survival were 49% (95% CI: 30%-79%) and 61% (95% CI: 40%-92%) at 2 years. In conclusion, the use of ARI-0001 cells in patients with R/R ALL and iEMD was associated with a safety and efficacy profile that is comparable with what is observed in patients with marrow involvement and in line with other CART19 products.


Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Antigens, CD19/therapeutic use , Child , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cytokine Release Syndrome/epidemiology , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnostic imaging , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy
6.
Hematol Oncol ; 40(2): 297-301, 2022 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34845733

The FLIPI-L has recently been proposed as a novel prognostic index in follicular lymphoma (FL), combining FLIPI and the presence of lymphopenia. In our single-center validation in 381 FL patients, lymphopenia was less frequent than in the original publication and thus the distribution of risk categories was different. Although it was not able to properly predict time to first treatment, FLIPI-L performed slightly better than FLIPI alone in the prediction of response, early relapse, progression-free and overall survival, and histological transformation. This new tool or others encompassing parameters from the microenvironment might improve upon the prognostic ability of classical scores.


Lymphoma, Follicular , Humans , Lymphoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Follicular/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Tumor Microenvironment
7.
Leukemia ; 35(12): 3444-3454, 2021 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34725454

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to age, disease, and treatment-related immunosuppression. We aimed to assess risk factors of outcome and elucidate the impact of CLL-directed treatments on the course of COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective, international study, collectively including 941 patients with CLL and confirmed COVID-19. Data from the beginning of the pandemic until March 16, 2021, were collected from 91 centers. The risk factors of case fatality rate (CFR), disease severity, and overall survival (OS) were investigated. OS analysis was restricted to patients with severe COVID-19 (definition: hospitalization with need of oxygen or admission into an intensive care unit). CFR in patients with severe COVID-19 was 38.4%. OS was inferior for patients in all treatment categories compared to untreated (p < 0.001). Untreated patients had a lower risk of death (HR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.41-0.72). The risk of death was higher for older patients and those suffering from cardiac failure (HR = 1.03, 95% CI:1.02-1.04; HR = 1.79, 95% CI:1.04-3.07, respectively). Age, CLL-directed treatment, and cardiac failure were significant risk factors of OS. Untreated patients had a better chance of survival than those on treatment or recently treated.


COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/virology , Mortality , Prognosis , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis
8.
Hematol Oncol ; 39(5): 639-649, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494300

With the intention of identifying follicular lymphoma (FL) patients at higher risk of progression, early relapse (POD24), histological transformation (HT) or death, multiple risk scores (RS) have been proposed. However, it has not yet been established whether any of them globally outperforms the others. We evaluated the clinical utility and statistical performance of the five most widely used clinical scores (IPI, ILI, FLIPI, FLIPI2, PRIMA-PI) in a single-center series of 414 grade 1-3A FL patients diagnosed in the rituximab era. Overall concordance (proportion of patients allocated to the same risk category by all five RS) was 24%. FLIPI and FLIPI2 were predictive of time to first treatment. All five scores were predictive of response, POD24, progression-free, and OS, while only FLIPI predicted HT. IPI identified a small subset (7%) of truly high-risk patients (10-year OS of 16%). In subgroup analyses, we showed that ILI is useful in the prognostication of limited-disease patients, and PRIMA-PI is an age-independent score that can identify a high-risk subset of older patients. Performance metrics were slightly better for IPI in terms of calibration (Harrell's c-index 0.73), without major differences among RS regarding other parameters. Although the incorporation of molecular and imaging data will continue to refine the stratification of FL patients, FLIPI remains the most powerful clinical prognostic index in the rituximab era, predicting the greatest number of endpoints.


Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Follicular/pathology , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphoma, Follicular/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
9.
Ann Hematol ; 100(5): 1231-1239, 2021 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629152

Frailty and concurrent medical conditions are crucial factors in the management of follicular lymphoma (FL). We evaluated the impact of age and comorbidity on survival, causes of death, histological transformation (HT), and second malignancies (SM) in a large single-center series of grade 1-3A FL. We studied 414 patients diagnosed in the rituximab era, categorized into three age groups (≤60, 61-70, >70 years) and two comorbidity groups (Charlson Comorbidity Index, CCI, 0-1 and ≥2). Despite a similar cumulative incidence of relapse, older and comorbid patients had a lower 10-year overall survival (OS, 88, 65, and 41% for patients ≤60 years, 61-70 years, and >70 years, P<0.0001; and 76 vs. 51% for CCI 0-1 and ≥2, P<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis for OS, comorbidity retained its prognostic impact (HR=2.5, P=0.0003). The proportion of patients dying due to FL was higher among those ≤60 years (74%) and those with a CCI 0-1 (67%). Furthermore, 10-year excess mortality (survival reduction) was more prominent for patients >70 years (30%) and those with a CCI ≥2 (32%). Patients with a CCI ≥2 also had a higher incidence of SM. These data encourage a comprehensive pre-treatment evaluation and a tailored therapeutic approach for all FL patients.


Lymphoma, Follicular/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prognosis , Survival Analysis
10.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 62(1): 104-111, 2021 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32954916

The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is a prognostic factor in different neoplasms, but its potential importance in follicular lymphoma (FL) is not well defined. We studied 384 FL patients for which the LMR was available at diagnosis. Baseline features and outcomes were compared between patients with an LMR ≤/>2.5. The 76 patients (20%) who had an LMR ≤2.5 were older and had a higher tumor burden. A low LMR was predictive of a lower 10-y progression-free survival (32 vs. 55%, p = .001) and overall survival (35 vs. 78%, p < .0001; HR = 2.3, p = .003 in a 6-element multivariable model). A low LMR was also an independent risk factor for histological transformation (11 vs. 6% at 10 years, p = .01). Likewise, patients with a low LMR had a higher rate of second malignancies. The potential utility of this widely available parameter and its contribution to well-established prognostic scores need to be explored in independent, prospective series.


Lymphoma, Follicular , Monocytes , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Lymphocytes , Lymphoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Follicular/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
11.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 155(4): 152-158, ago. 2020. graf, tab
Article Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-195761

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: La mielofibrosis es una neoplasia mieloproliferativa crónica infrecuente. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características clínico-biológicas, el tratamiento y el curso evolutivo de los pacientes con mielofibrosis en España. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron 1.000 pacientes del Registro Español de Mielofibrosis diagnosticados de mielofibrosis primaria (n=641) o secundaria (n=359). RESULTADOS: La mediana de edad era de 68 años. La frecuencia de sintomatología constitucional, anemia moderada o severa (Hb<10g/dl) y esplenomegalia sintomática fue del 35, 36 y 17%, respectivamente. La incidencia de trombosis y hemorragia fue de 1,96 y 1,6 eventos por 100 años-paciente, respectivamente. La incidencia acumulada de leucemia fue del 15% a los 10 años. Para la anemia se emplearon principalmente agentes eritropoyéticos y danazol. A partir del 2010 se observó un incremento significativo del uso de ruxolitinib. Un 7,5% de los pacientes fue trasplantado. El 42% de los enfermos falleció, debido principalmente al deterioro clínico provocado por la mielofibrosis y a la transformación leucémica. La supervivencia mediana de la serie fue de 5,7 años. El IPSS identificó 4 grupos de riesgo: la supervivencia mediana no se alcanzó en el de bajo riesgo, mientras que fue de 8,8 años, 5,3 años y 2,8 años en los de riesgo intermedio-1, intermedio-2 y alto, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: la mielofibrosis es una enfermedad invalidante que afecta sobre todo a personas de edad avanzada y cuyo tratamiento es fundamentalmente sintomático. A pesar de su heterogeneidad clínica se dispone de modelos pronósticos útiles para la selección de candidatos a trasplante


Background and objective Myelofibrosis: is an infrequent chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm. We aimed to describe the clinico-biological characteristics, treatment, and evolutive course of myelofibrosis patients in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1,000 patients from the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis diagnosed with primary (n=641) or secondary (n=359) myelofibrosis were analysed. RESULTS: Median age was 68 years. The frequency of constitutional symptoms, moderate to severe anaemia (Hb<10g/dL), and symptomatic splenomegaly was 35%, 36%, and 17%, respectively. The rate of thrombosis and haemorrhage was 1.96 and 1.6 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of leukaemia at 10 years was 15%. The most frequent therapies for the anaemia were the erythropoiesis stimulating agents and danazol. From 2010, a progressive increase in the use of ruxolitinib was noticed. A total of 7.5% of patients were transplanted. During the observation period, 42% of patients died mainly due to the clinical deterioration caused by myelofibrosis or leukaemic transformation. The median survival of the series was 5.7 years. Four different risk categories were identified by the IPSS: median survival was not reached in the low risk group and was 8.8 years, 5.3 years, and 2.8 years in the intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Myelofibrosis is a disabling condition mainly affecting elderly people. Its treatment is mostly driven by symptom control. Despite its clinical heterogeneity, several prognostic models are useful to select candidates for transplantation


Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Primary Myelofibrosis/epidemiology , Primary Myelofibrosis/pathology , Spain/epidemiology , Records , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Leukemia/epidemiology , Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/epidemiology , Prognosis , Risk Groups , Survival Rate
12.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(12): 2237-2244, 2020 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32717433

Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P < .001). We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.


Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Primary Myelofibrosis , Humans , Primary Myelofibrosis/therapy , Prognosis , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
13.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 155(4): 152-158, 2020 08 28.
Article En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31980217

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE MYELOFIBROSIS: is an infrequent chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm. We aimed to describe the clinico-biological characteristics, treatment, and evolutive course of myelofibrosis patients in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1,000 patients from the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis diagnosed with primary (n=641) or secondary (n=359) myelofibrosis were analysed. RESULTS: Median age was 68 years. The frequency of constitutional symptoms, moderate to severe anaemia (Hb<10g/dL), and symptomatic splenomegaly was 35%, 36%, and 17%, respectively. The rate of thrombosis and haemorrhage was 1.96 and 1.6 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of leukaemia at 10 years was 15%. The most frequent therapies for the anaemia were the erythropoiesis stimulating agents and danazol. From 2010, a progressive increase in the use of ruxolitinib was noticed. A total of 7.5% of patients were transplanted. During the observation period, 42% of patients died mainly due to the clinical deterioration caused by myelofibrosis or leukaemic transformation. The median survival of the series was 5.7 years. Four different risk categories were identified by the IPSS: median survival was not reached in the low risk group and was 8.8 years, 5.3 years, and 2.8 years in the intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Myelofibrosis is a disabling condition mainly affecting elderly people. Its treatment is mostly driven by symptom control. Despite its clinical heterogeneity, several prognostic models are useful to select candidates for transplantation.


Primary Myelofibrosis , Aged , Humans , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnosis , Primary Myelofibrosis/epidemiology , Prognosis , Registries , Spain/epidemiology , Splenomegaly
14.
Ann Hematol ; 98(10): 2319-2328, 2019 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31396671

Triple-negative primary myelofibrosis (TN-PMF) and other myeloid neoplasms with associated bone marrow fibrosis such as the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS-F) or the myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN-F) are rare entities, often difficult to distinguish from each other. Thirty-four patients previously diagnosed with TN-PMF (n = 14), MDS-F (n = 18), or MDS/MPN-F (n = 2) were included in the present study. After central revision of the bone marrow histology, diagnoses according to the 2016-WHO classification were TN-PMF (n = 6), MDS-F (n = 19), and MDS/MPN-F (n = 9), with TN-PMF genotype representing only 4% of a cohort of 141 molecularly annotated PMF. Genomic classification according to next-generation sequencing and cytogenetic study was performed in 28 cases. Median number of mutations was 4 (range 1-7) in cases with TP53 disruption/aneuploidy or with chromatin-spliceosome mutations versus 1 mutation (range 0-2) in other molecular subgroups (p < 0.0001). The number of mutations and the molecular classification were better than PMF and MDS conventional scoring systems to predict survival and progression to acute leukemia. In conclusion, TN-PMF is an uncommon entity when the 2016 WHO criteria are strictly applied. Genomic classification may help in the prognostic assessment of patients with myeloid neoplasms with bone marrow fibrosis.


Hematologic Neoplasms , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Mutation , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Primary Myelofibrosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/classification , Hematologic Neoplasms/genetics , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/classification , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/classification , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Primary Myelofibrosis/classification , Primary Myelofibrosis/genetics , Primary Myelofibrosis/mortality , Survival Rate
15.
Ann Hematol ; 97(5): 813-820, 2018 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29396714

Prognostic models are widely used in clinical practice for transplant decision-making in myelofibrosis (MF). We have compared the performance of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS), and DIPSS-plus in a series of 544 patients with primary or secondary MF aged ≤ 70 years at the time of diagnosis. The median projected survival of the overall series was 9.46 years (95% confidence interval 7.44-10.59). Median survival for the highest risk groups was less than 4 years in the three prognostic models. By contrast, the projected survival for patients in the intermediate-2 categories by the IPSS, DIPSS, and DIPSS-plus was 6.6, 5.6, and 6.5 years, respectively. The number of patients in the intermediate-2 and high-risk categories was smaller in the DIPSS than in the IPSS or the DIPSS-plus. The IPSS and DIPSS-plus were the best models to discriminate between the intermediate-1 and intermediate-2 risk categories, which is a critical cut-off point for patient selection to transplant. Among patients assigned at diagnosis to the intermediate-2 or high-risk groups by the IPSS, DIPSS, and DIPSS-plus, only 17, 21, and 20%, respectively, were subsequently transplanted. In conclusion, in our contemporary series of younger MF patients only the highest risk categories of the current prognostication systems have a median survival below the 5-year threshold recommended for considering transplantation. Patient selection for transplantation can significantly differ depending on which prognostication model is used for disease risk stratification.


Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnosis , Primary Myelofibrosis/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Myelofibrosis/epidemiology , Prognosis , Registries , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Transplantation, Homologous/methods
18.
Eur J Haematol ; 98(4): 407-414, 2017 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28009442

OBJECTIVE: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat the anemia of myelofibrosis (MF), but information on the predictors of response is limited. METHODS: Results of ESA therapy were analyzed in 163 MF patients with severe anemia, most of whom had inadequate erythropoietin (EPO) levels (<125 U/L) at treatment start. RESULTS: According to the revised criteria of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Treatment and Research, anemia response was achieved in 86 patients (53%). Median response duration was 19.3 months. In multivariate analysis, baseline factors associated with a higher response rate were female sex (P=.007), leukocyte count ≥10×109 /L (P=.033), and serum ferritin <200 ng/mL (P=.002). Patients with 2 or 3 of the above features had a significantly higher response rate than the remainder (73% vs 28%, respectively; P<.001). Over the 373 patient-years of follow-up on ESA treatment, nine patients developed thrombotic complications (six arterial, three venous), accounting for 2.41 events per 100 patient-years. Survival time from ESA start was longer in anemia responders than in non-responders (P=.011). CONCLUSION: Besides the already established predictive value of EPO levels, these data can help to identify which MF patients are more likely to benefit from ESA treatment.


Anemia , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Primary Myelofibrosis , Aged , Anemia/blood , Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Erythropoietin/blood , Female , Ferritins/blood , Hematinics/adverse effects , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Myelofibrosis/blood , Primary Myelofibrosis/drug therapy , Primary Myelofibrosis/mortality , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Survival Rate , Thrombosis/blood , Thrombosis/chemically induced , Thrombosis/mortality
19.
Ann Hematol ; 96(1): 81-85, 2017 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717993

To determine whether a lower imatinib dose could minimize toxicity while maintaining the molecular response (MR), imatinib dose was reduced to 300 mg daily in 43 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in sustained deep molecular response to first-line imatinib 400 mg daily. At the time of dose reduction, median duration of the deep response was 4.1 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.2-5.9) years; molecular response was MR4, MR4.5, and MR5 of the international scale in 6, 28, and 9 patients, respectively. Toxicity grade was 1, 2, and 3 in 28, 8, and 1 patients, respectively; 6 patients underwent dose reduction without having side effects. With a median of 1.6 (IQR 0.7-3.2) years on imatinib 300 mg daily, only one patient lost the deep molecular response to MR3. At the last follow-up, response was MR3, MR4, MR4.5, and MR5 in 1, 3, 9, and 30 patients, respectively. Toxicity improvement was observed in 23 (62.2 %) of the 37 patients with side effects, decreasing to grade 0 in 20 of them. All but one anemic patients improved (p = 0.01), the median Hb increase in this subgroup of patients being 1 g/dL. In CML patients with sustained deep response to the standard imatinib dose, reducing to 300 mg daily significantly improves tolerability and preserves efficacy.


Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/drug therapy , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 9(5): 489-96, 2016 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26891375

Anemia and thrombocytopenia are frequent clinical manifestations of myelofibrosis as well as important prognostic factors of the disease. Concerning the treatment of anemia, the first step should be the correction of reversible contributing factors, such as possible iron, folate and vitamin B12 deficiency. Then, treatment options include erythropoiesis stimulating agents, androgens, immunomodulating drugs, corticosteroids, and splenectomy. Anemia responses may also be observed in some patients treated with JAK inhibitors. However, most patients eventually fail to such therapies and become transfusion dependent. Some of the aforementioned therapies can also improve thrombocytopenia, but the responses are usually observed in patients with moderate platelet count decrease. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only curative treatment of myelofibrosis, can be an alternative for selected patients with cytopenias who are refractory to conventional therapies. However, for the majority of patients, the management of anemia and severe thrombocytopenia remains an unmet need.


Anemia/etiology , Primary Myelofibrosis/complications , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Algorithms , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/epidemiology , Anemia/therapy , Disease Management , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Incidence , Primary Myelofibrosis/therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Splenectomy , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology , Thrombocytopenia/therapy , Transplantation, Homologous
...