Diagnosis, prevention, and management of delirium in the intensive cardiac care unit.

Delirium is a frequent complication in patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units (ICCU) with potentially severe consequences including increased risks of mortality, cognitive impairment and dependence at discharge, and longer times on mechanical ventilation and hospital stay. Delirium has been widely documented and studied in general intensive care units and in patients after cardiac surgery, but it has barely been studied in acute nonsurgical cardiac patients. Moreover, delirium (especially in its hypoactive form) is commonly misdiagnosed. We propose a protocol for delirium prevention and management in ICCUs. A daily comprehensive assessment to improve detection should be done using validated scales (ie, confusion assessment method). Preventive measures are particularly relevance and constitute the basis of treatment as well, acting on reversible risk factors, including environmental interventions, such as quiet time, sleep promotion, family support, communication, and adequate treatment of pain and dyspnea. Pharmacological prophylaxis is not indicated with the exception of patients at risk of withdrawal syndrome but should only be used in patients with confirmed delirium. Dexmedetomidine is the drug of choice in patients with severe agitation, and those weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. As the complexity of ICCUs increases, clinical scenarios posing challenges for the management of delirium become more frequent. Efforts should be done to improve the identification of patients at risk during admission in order to establish preventive interventions to avoid this complication. Patient-centered protocols will increase the awareness of the healthcare professionals for better prevention and earlier diagnosis and will positively impact on prognosis.

Planning secondary prevention: Room for improvement.

The prognosis of patients after acute coronary syndromes is still suboptimal, mainly due to the risk of recurrent adverse coronary events, which is greatest during the first year, but persists over one's lifetime. Meaningful progress in preventing cardiovascular events has been achieved. However, there remains much room for improvement by embracing innovative therapies and investing in multidisciplinary approaches. Pharmacological interventions focused on optimising antithrombotic and lipid-lowering therapies are both pillars of secondary prevention that have seen recent ground-breaking advances. Moreover, new approaches in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease and new targets for anti-inflammatory treatment may significantly improve prevention strategies in the future. However, pharmacological treatments are expensive and can have significant side effects. Developing better tools in order to identify high-risk patients and promote more personalised strategies for each patient should be an absolute priority. Furthermore, adherence to medication is still low and represents a real challenge; several strategies to improve low adherence to treatment are currently under discussion. Non-pharmacological interventions are also essential. Improving communication with patients and advanced surveillance for those secondary risk factors that may negatively impact prognosis are crucial. Encouraging multidisciplinary teams that work effectively to optimise all aspects of secondary prevention, including a cardiac rehabilitation programme, is the optimal approach. Current secondary prevention strategies and suggestions for areas of improvement are discussed in this manuscript. However, the question remains: will research in secondary prevention continue to focus on stronger and more expensive drugs, or is it time for us to embrace a more patient-centred clinical and research model?