Real-World Experience With Avacopan in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Introduction: Postmarketing data on outcomes of avacopan use in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are lacking. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 92 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV who received therapy with avacopan. The coprimary outcome measures were clinical remission at 26 and 52 weeks. We use descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression to assess outcomes and predictors of remission, respectively. Results: Of the 92 patients, 23% (n = 21) had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 10% on kidney replacement therapy at baseline. Among those with kidney involvement, mean (SD) enrollment eGFR was 33 (27) ml/min per 1.73 m2 with a mean (SD) change of +12 (25) and +20 (23) ml/min per 1.73 m2 at weeks 26 and 52, respectively. In addition to avacopan, 47% of patients received combination therapy of rituximab and low-dose cyclophosphamide, and 14% of patients received plasma exchange (PLEX). After induction, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to start avacopan was 3.6 (2.1-7.7) weeks, and the median time to discontinue prednisone after starting avacopan was 5.6 (3.3-9.5) weeks. Clinical remission was achieved in 90% of patients at week 26 and 84% of patients at week 52. Of the patients, 20% stopped avacopan due to adverse events, with the most common being elevated serum aminotransferases (4.3%). Conclusion: A high rate of remission and an acceptable safety profile were observed with the use of avacopan in the treatment of AAV in this postmarketing analysis, including the populations excluded from the ADVOCATE trial.

Maintenance of remission of ANCA vasculitis by rituximab based on B cell repopulation versus serological flare: a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two long-term remission maintenance strategies for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of patients with ANCA vasculitis in remission after completing at least 2 years of fixed-schedule rituximab. In the B cell arm, rituximab was reinfused upon B cell repopulation; in the ANCA arm, rituximab was reinfused upon significant rise in ANCA level. Evaluations were conducted every 3 months. The primary endpoint was clinical relapse, defined as a modified BVAS/WG >0 by 36 months. Secondary endpoints included serious adverse events (SAEs) and rituximab exposure. RESULTS: 115 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 4.1 years (IQR 2.5-5.0). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 4.1% (95% CI 1.0 to 15.6) of patients had a clinical relapse in the B cell arm, compared with 20.5% (95% CI 11.9 to 34.1) in the ANCA arm, at 3 years after study entry (log-rank p=0.045). Total SAEs, including infectious SAEs, and deaths did not differ. The number of SAEs due to COVID-19 was higher in the B cell arm (p=0.049). In the B cell arm, patients received a mean of 3.6 (SD 2.4) infusions (3.6 g) per person over the median study follow-up time of 4.1 years, compared with 0.5 (SD 1.4) infusions (0.5 g) per patient in the ANCA arm (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab dosed for B cell repopulation results in fewer clinical relapses than when dosed for a rise in ANCA level in maintenance of remission for ANCA vasculitis. Overall safety was equivalent; SAEs due to COVID-19 and rituximab exposure were higher with the B cell strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02749292.

Renal Recovery for Patients with ANCA-Associated Vasculitis and Low eGFR in the ADVOCATE Trial of Avacopan.

Introduction: In the 330-patient ADVOCATE trial of avacopan for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, in which 81% of patients had renal involvement, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased on average 7.3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the avacopan group and 4.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the prednisone group (P = 0.029) at week 52. This new analysis examines the results in the patient subgroup with severe renal insufficiency at enrollment into the trial, i.e., eGFR ≤20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Methods: eGFR was determined at baseline and over the course of the trial. Changes in eGFR were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: In ADVOCATE, 27 of 166 patients (16%) in the avacopan group and 23 of 164 patients (14%) in the prednisone group had a baseline eGFR ≤20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. At week 52, eGFR increased on average 16.1 and 7.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the avacopan and prednisone groups, respectively (P = 0.003). The last eGFR value measured during the 52-week treatment period was ≥2-fold higher than baseline in 41% of patients in the avacopan group compared to 13% in the prednisone group (P = 0.030). More patients in the avacopan group versus prednisone group had increases in eGFR above 20, 30, and 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 27 patients (48%) in the avacopan group and 16 of 23 patients (70%) in the prednisone group. Conclusion: Among patients with baseline eGFR ≤20 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ADVOCATE trial, eGFR improved more in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group.

Shorter versus longer corticosteroid duration and recurrent immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI), but the optimal duration of therapy has not been established. Prolonged use of corticosteroids can cause numerous adverse effects and may decrease progression-free survival among patients treated with ICPis. We sought to determine whether a shorter duration of corticosteroids was equally efficacious and safe as compared with a longer duration. METHODS: We used data from an international multicenter cohort study of patients diagnosed with ICPi-AKI from 29 centers across nine countries. We examined whether a shorter duration of corticosteroids (28 days or less) was associated with a higher rate of recurrent ICPi-AKI or death within 30 days following completion of corticosteroid treatment as compared with a longer duration (29-84 days). RESULTS: Of 165 patients treated with corticosteroids, 56 (34%) received a shorter duration of treatment and 109 (66%) received a longer duration. Patients in the shorter versus longer duration groups were similar with respect to baseline and ICPi-AKI characteristics. Five of 56 patients (8.9%) in the shorter duration group and 12 of 109 (11%) in the longer duration group developed recurrent ICPi-AKI or died (p=0.90). Nadir serum creatinine in the first 14, 28, and 90 days following completion of corticosteroid treatment was similar between groups (p=0.40, p=0.56, and p=0.89, respectively). CONCLUSION: A shorter duration of corticosteroids (28 days or less) may be safe for patients with ICPi-AKI. However, the findings may be susceptible to unmeasured confounding and further research from randomized clinical trials is needed.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Combination of Rituximab, Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide, and Prednisone for Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Case Series With Extended Follow Up.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: B-cell depletion with rituximab has emerged as a first-line therapy for primary membranous nephropathy (MN). However, most patients do not achieve complete remission with rituximab monotherapy. In this case series, we report longer-term remission and relapse rates, anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody levels, B-cell levels, and serious adverse events in patients with primary MN who received rituximab combined with an initial short course of low-dose oral cyclophosphamide and a course of rapidly tapered prednisone. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 60 consecutive patients with primary MN treated with the combination of rituximab, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and prednisone at the Vasculitis and Glomerulonephritis Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital. FINDINGS: After treatment initiation, median follow-up was 38 (interquartile range [IQR], 25-62) months; 100% of patients achieved partial remission, defined as a urinary protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 3 g/g and a 50% reduction from baseline, at a median of 3.4 months. By 2 years after treatment initiation, 83% achieved complete remission, defined as a UPCR < 0.3 g/g. The median time to complete remission was 12.4 months. Immunologic remission (defined by an anti-PLA2R titer < 14 RU/mL) was achieved by 86% and 100% of anti-PLA2R seropositive patients (n = 29) at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after treatment initiation. After 1 year, the median UPCR fell from 8.4 (IQR, 5.0-10.7) to 0.3 (IQR, 0.2-0.8) g/g (P < 0.001). No patient relapsed throughout the duration of B-cell depletion. Relapse occurred in 10% of patients at 2 years after the onset of B-cell reconstitution following the last rituximab dose. Over a combined follow-up time of 228 patient-years, 18 serious adverse events occurred. One death occurred unrelated to treatment or primary MN, and 1 patient progressed to kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy. LIMITATIONS: Absence of a comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with primary MN treated with combination therapy achieved partial remission and most achieved a durable complete remission with an acceptable safety profile.

Incidence, Clinical Features, and Outcomes of Late-Onset Neutropenia From Rituximab for Autoimmune Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Late-onset neutropenia (LON) is an underrecognized complication of rituximab treatment. We undertook this study to describe its incidence, risk factors, clinical features, management, and recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 738 adult patients with autoimmune disease who were treated with rituximab to induce continuous B cell depletion. The primary outcome measure was LON, defined as an unexplained absolute neutrophil count of <1,000 cells/µl during B cell depletion. Secondary outcome measures included incidental diagnosis, fever, sepsis, filgrastim use, and recurrent LON. We assessed predictors of LON using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 107 episodes of LON in 71 patients. The cumulative incidence at 1 year of B cell depletion therapy was 6.6% (95% CI 5.0-8.7). The incidence rate during the first year was higher compared to thereafter (7.2 cases per 100 person-years [95% CI 5.4-9.6] versus 1.5 cases per 100 person-years [95% CI 1.0-2.3]). Systemic lupus erythematosus and combination therapy with cyclophosphamide were each independently associated with an increased risk of LON (adjusted HR 2.96 [95% CI 1.10-8.01] and 1.98 [95% CI 1.06-3.71], respectively). LON was not observed in minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The majority of episodes (59.4%) were asymptomatic. Fever and sepsis complicated 31.3% and 8.5% of episodes, respectively. Most patients (69%) were treated with filgrastim. Rituximab rechallenge occurred in 87% of patients, of whom 21% developed recurrent LON. CONCLUSION: LON is common and often incidental. Most cases are reversible and respond well to filgrastim. However, LON can be associated with serious infections and thus warrants vigilant monitoring.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing recognition of the importance of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI, data on this complication of immunotherapy are sparse. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of 138 patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI, defined as a ≥2-fold increase in serum creatinine or new dialysis requirement directly attributed to an immune checkpoint inhibitor. We also collected data on 276 control patients who received these drugs but did not develop AKI. RESULTS: Lower baseline eGFR, proton pump inhibitor use, and combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy were each independently associated with an increased risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI. Median (interquartile range) time from immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation to AKI was 14 (6-37) weeks. Most patients had subnephrotic proteinuria, and approximately half had pyuria. Extrarenal immune-related adverse events occurred in 43% of patients; 69% were concurrently receiving a potential tubulointerstitial nephritis-causing medication. Tubulointerstitial nephritis was the dominant lesion in 93% of the 60 patients biopsied. Most patients (86%) were treated with steroids. Complete, partial, or no kidney recovery occurred in 40%, 45%, and 15% of patients, respectively. Concomitant extrarenal immune-related adverse events were associated with worse renal prognosis, whereas concomitant tubulointerstitial nephritis-causing medications and treatment with steroids were each associated with improved renal prognosis. Failure to achieve kidney recovery after immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI was independently associated with higher mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge occurred in 22% of patients, of whom 23% developed recurrent associated AKI. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study identifies insights into the risk factors, clinical features, histopathologic findings, and renal and overall outcomes in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity: Update 2020.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have transformed the landscape of oncology, but are associated with a variety of autoimmune adverse events, including AKI. ICPI-associated AKI (ICPI-AKI) is emerging as an increasingly frequent cause of AKI in patients with cancer, and poses unique diagnostic and management challenges to clinicians who care for these patients. In this review, we describe the incidence and risk factors for ICPI-AKI, including proton pump inhibitor use, CKD, and combination immunotherapy. We discuss the limitations of the various definitions used for ICPI-AKI in prior studies, and propose a novel classification system (definite, probable, and possible ICPI-AKI) that recognizes the diagnostic uncertainty inherent in many cases. We discuss the key clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies for ICPI-AKI, including the role of kidney biopsy versus empirical treatment with steroids. We also explore the under-studied area of ICPI use in the setting of solid organ transplantation, where nephrologists and oncologists must balance the risk of rejection versus treating the underlying malignancy. Finally, we summarize existing data on the role of ICPI rechallenge after an episode of ICPI-AKI.

The Incidence, Causes, and Risk Factors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in oncology is increasing rapidly. We sought to determine the frequency, severity, cause, and predictors of AKI in a real-world population receiving checkpoint inhibitors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We included all patients who received checkpoint inhibitor therapy from May 2011 to December 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Baseline serum creatinine, averaged 6 months before checkpoint inhibitor start date, was compared with all subsequent creatinine values within 12 months of starting therapy. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria for fold changes in creatinine from baseline. Sustained AKI events lasted at least 3 days and was our primary outcome. The cause of sustained AKI was determined by chart review. Cumulative incidence and subdistribution hazard models were used to assess the relationship between baseline demographics, comorbidities, and medications, and sustained AKI and potential checkpoint inhibitor-related AKI. RESULTS: We included 1016 patients in the analysis. Average age was 63 (SD 13) years, 61% were men, and 91% were white. Mean baseline creatinine was 0.9 mg/dl (SD 0.4 mg/dl), and 169 (17%) had CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) at baseline. A total of 169 patients (17%) experienced AKI, defined by an increase in creatinine at least 1.5 times the baseline within 12 months; 82 patients (8%) experienced sustained AKI and 30 patients (3%) had potential checkpoint inhibitor-related AKI. The first episode of sustained AKI occurred, on average, 106 days (SD 85) after checkpoint inhibitor initiation. Sixteen (2%) patients experienced stage 3 sustained AKI and four patients required dialysis. Proton pump inhibitor use at baseline was associated with sustained AKI. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is common in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The causes of sustained AKI in this population are heterogenous and merit thorough evaluation. The role of PPI and other nephritis-inducing drugs in the development of sustained AKI needs to be better defined.

Phospholipase A2 receptor-associated membranous nephropathy in a patient with IgG4-related disease: A case report.

RATIONALE: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a multiorgan disease of unestablished prevalence that is characterized histopathologically by a dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate enriched with IgG4-expressing plasma cells and associated with storiform fibrosis. Tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) is the most common renal manifestation of IgG4-RD, but membranous nephropathy (MN) has also been described and often occurs in the context of concurrent TIN. Patients with IgG4-related MN have been characteristically negative for autoantibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). PATIENT CONCERNS: A 45-year-old man presented with abdominal pain and lower extremity edema. DIAGNOSIS: Histopathological evaluation of pancreas and liver biopsies established a diagnosis of IgG4-RD. Renal biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of PLA2R-associated MN without evidence of concurrent TIN. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with rituximab, a short course of low-dose, oral cyclophosphamide, and a rapid glucocorticoid taper. OUTCOMES: The patient achieved remission of MN after 8 months of therapy and maintained remission of IgG4-RD. LESSONS: PLA2R-associated MN may be a rare manifestation of IgG4-RD. Systematic evaluation of larger cohorts of IgG4-RD patients for the presence of PLA2R autoantibodies and the investigation of PLA2R-associated MN cohorts for evidence of IgG4-RD would facilitate the understanding of the nature of the relationship between these observations.

Continuous B-cell depletion in frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with frequently relapsing (FR), steroid-dependent (SD) and steroid-resistant (SR) nephrotic syndrome are a therapeutic challenge with limited treatment options. Here, we retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of rituximab-induced continuous B-cell depletion in these populations. METHODS: Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age and had FR, SD or SR minimal change disease (MCD) or primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and were treated with a strategy of continuous B-cell depletion. Partial remission (PR) was defined as a urinary protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) of ≤3.5 g/g and a 50% reduction in the UPCR from baseline. Complete remission (CR) was defined as a UPCR ≤0.3 g/g. RESULTS: We identified 20 patients with MCD (n = 13) or FSGS (n = 7) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All patients had either SD (n = 12), SR (n = 7) or FR (n = 1) disease. Patients received a median of nine rituximab doses [interquartile range (IQR) 7.5, 11] and were treated for a median time of 28 months (IQR 23, 41). Prednisone was weaned from a median of 60 mg daily (IQR 40, 60) at rituximab initiation to 4.5 mg daily (IQR 0, 5.5) by 12 months. All patients achieved PR. CR occurred in 11 of 13 patients with FR or SD disease, but only 1 of 7 patients with SR disease (logrank P = 0.01). Four relapses occurred, all in patients with SR disease. Three serious infections occurred over 70.3 patient-years. CONCLUSION: Continuous B-cell depletion is a therapeutic option in the management of complicated nephrotic syndrome. Additional studies are needed to clarify the utility of this strategy.

Renal Involvement in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) is the most common cause of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. ANCAs play an important role in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of AAV. The classic renal lesion in AAV is a pauci-immune necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Treatment is divided into 2 phases: (1) induction of remission to eliminate disease activity and (2) maintenance of remission to prevent disease relapse. AAV patients with end-stage renal disease require modification of immunosuppressive strategies and consideration for kidney transplantation. An improved understanding of disease pathogenesis has led to new treatment strategies being tested in clinical trials.

Patient Outcomes in Renal-Limited Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Vasculitis With Inactive Histology.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the anticipated disease course for individuals who present with renal-limited antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis but who lack inflammation on a kidney biopsy. The impact of immunosuppression on renal and overall survival is unknown. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 2005 to 2016 from 8 centers worldwide (N = 16) for this descriptive study. All had positive ANCA, elevated serum creatinine with active urine sediment, histologic evidence of pauci-immune glomerulonephritis without active lesions, and had no evidence of extrarenal vasculitis. We describe the characteristics of this cohort and the differences in the clinical, histologic, and therapeutic parameters of those who developed primary outcomes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and vasculitis relapse. RESULTS: The cohort was 63% Caucasian, and 75% were men, with a median age of 62 years. At entry, the mean ± SD estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 24 ± 20 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 5 patients required dialysis. Twelve patients received immunosuppressive therapy, 25% experienced disease relapse, and 38% developed ESRD. Patients who developed ESRD had lower baseline eGFRs (8 ± 5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 vs. 35 ± 18 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.001) and more often required dialysis at presentation (83% vs. 0%; P = 0.001). Patients who relapsed were less likely to receive immunosuppression (25% for the relapsed group vs. 92% for the nonrelapsed group; relative risk: 0.27, risk difference: 67%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Among these patients, lower initial eGFR and dialysis dependence at presentation might increase the risk for ESRD. Immunosuppression did not affect renal outcomes in this sample of patients but was associated with a reduced risk for vasculitis relapse. More information is needed on factors that predict treatment response in this high-risk group.