Maternal prepregnancy BMI and physical activity and type 1 diabetes in the offspring.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed conflicting results on the association between maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and type 1 diabetes in the offspring, and the role of maternal prepregnancy physical activity is unclear. We aimed to assess whether maternal prepregnancy BMI and physical activity predict type 1 diabetes in their offspring. METHODS: Prospective study including women participating in the Nurses' Health Study II with follow-up from 1989 to 2011. Women repeatedly reported their BMI and physical activity, from which prepregnancy exposures were derived; and retrospectively reported their BMI at age 18 and physical activity at ages 18-22, considered early adulthood exposure. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using generalized estimating equations, adjusted for covariates. Findings at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We identified 276 cases of type 1 diabetes among offspring (n = 70,168) with maternal prepregnancy information and 448 cases among offspring (n = 111,692) with maternal early adulthood information. Prepregnancy and early adulthood maternal BMI and physical activity were not associated with offspring type 1 diabetes. The RR comparing overweight to normal weight mothers was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.73-1.59) and comparing obese to normal weight was 0.94 (95%CI: 0.49-1.79, p-trend: 0.98). Comparing highest to lowest quartile of maternal physical activity the RR was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.61-1.32; p-trend: 0.73). Maternal type 2 diabetes was associated with an increased risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring (RR = 1.87; 95%CI: 1.25-2.80). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support a relationship between maternal prepregnancy BMI or physical activity and the risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring.

Ultra-processed food consumption during childhood and asthma in adolescence: Data from the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diet has been of interest for asthma; however, it remains unknown whether the consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) increases the risk of the disease. Our objective was to investigate whether UPF consumption during childhood was associated with wheeze, asthma, and severe asthma in adolescence. METHODS: We included 2190 11-year-old children from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, without asthma at the age of 6 years. Consumption of UPF was assessed by Food Frequency Questionnaires at 6- and 11-year follow-ups. Wheeze, asthma, and severe asthma data were assessed at 11-year follow-up. We classified foods according to the processing degree in ultra-processed food. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for the association between UPF consumption and the asthma outcomes. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of wheeze and asthma between 6 and 11 years was 12.7% and 23.2%, respectively. In prospective analyses, comparing children in the highest and the lowest quintile of UPF consumption at age 6, we found no association with wheeze (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.54-1.34), asthma (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.58-1.21), or severe asthma (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.62-2.03) in early adolescence. In cross-sectional analyses, comparing adolescents in the highest and lowest quintile of UPF consumption at 11 years, we found no association with wheeze (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.72-1.75), asthma (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.7-1.44), or severe asthma (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.59-1.86). CONCLUSION: Our study provided evidence that UPF consumption during childhood or adolescence is not associated with asthma or wheeze among adolescents.