Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 69
Filtrar
1.
Cell Rep Med ; 5(8): 101681, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127039

RESUMEN

Clinical studies investigating the benefits of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) among critically ill patients are hindered by small patient groups, variability between studies, patient heterogeneity, and inadequate use of TDM. Accordingly, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of TDM remain elusive. To address these challenges, we propose an innovative approach that leverages data-driven methods to unveil the concealed connections between therapy effectiveness and patient data, collected through a randomized controlled trial (DRKS00011159; 10th October 2016). Our findings reveal that machine learning algorithms can successfully identify informative features that distinguish between healthy and sick states. These hold promise as potential markers for disease classification and severity stratification, as well as offering a continuous and data-driven "multidimensional" Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The positive impact of TDM on patient recovery rates is demonstrated by unraveling the intricate connections between therapy effectiveness and clinically relevant data via machine learning.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Aprendizaje Automático , Sepsis , Humanos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Algoritmos , Enfermedad Crítica , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 64(2): 107263, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960209

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers an alternative to inpatient (hospital bed-based) treatment of infections that require intravenous administration of antimicrobials. This meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence available from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of OPAT compared to inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Sciences databases for RCTs comparing outpatient versus inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. We included studies without restrictions on language or publication year. Eligibility was reviewed independently by two assessors, and data extraction was cross validated. We evaluated bias risk via the Cochrane tool and determined the evidence certainty using GRADE. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. The protocol of this review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023460389). RESULT: Thirteen RCTs, involving 1,310 participants were included. We found no difference in mortality (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.54, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.23 to 1.26; P = 0.93), treatment failure (RR 1.0, CI 0.59 to 1.72; P = 0.99), adverse reaction related to antimicrobials (RR 0.89, CI 0.69 to 1.15; P = 0.38), and administration device (RR 0.58, CI 0.17 to 1.98; P = 0.87) between outpatient and inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. The overall body of evidence had a low level of certainty. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests OPAT is a safe and effective alternative to inpatient treatment. Further RCTs are warranted for a thorough comparison of inpatient and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with a high level of certainty.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa , Infusiones Parenterales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos
3.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 64(3): 107266, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971203

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel beta-lactams show activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause severe lung infections. Understanding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of these agents may help optimise outcomes in the treatment of pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: To describe and appraise studies that report pulmonary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Scopus libraries were used for the literature search. Pulmonary population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on adult patients receiving cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Two independent authors screened, reviewed and extracted data from included articles. A reporting guideline for clinical pharmacokinetic studies (ClinPK statement) was used for bias assessment. Relevant outcomes were included, such as population pharmacokinetic parameters and probability of target attainment of dosing regimens. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included. There was heterogeneity in study methods and reporting of results, with diversity across studies in adhering to the ClinPK statement checklist. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most studied agent. Only two studies collected epithelial lining fluid samples from patients with pneumonia. All the other phase I studies enrolled healthy subjects. Significant population heterogeneity was evident among available population pharmacokinetic models. Probabilities of target attainment rates above 90% using current licensed dosing regiments were reported in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although lung pharmacokinetics was rarely described, this review observed high target attainment using plasma pharmacokinetic data for all novel beta-lactams. Future studies should describe lung pharmacokinetics in patient populations at risk of carbapenem-resistant pathogen infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefalosporinas , Combinación de Medicamentos , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , beta-Lactamas , Humanos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , beta-Lactamas/farmacocinética , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/farmacocinética , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Tazobactam/farmacocinética , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Tazobactam/farmacología , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacocinética , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacocinética , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ceftazidima/farmacocinética , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Cefiderocol , Meropenem/farmacocinética , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Meropenem/farmacología , Imipenem/farmacocinética , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem/farmacocinética , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo
4.
JAMA ; 332(8): 638-648, 2024 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864162

RESUMEN

Importance: There is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock. Objective: To determine whether prolonged ß-lactam antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions. Data Sources: The primary search was conducted with MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2, 2024. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing prolonged (continuous or extended) and intermittent infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A bayesian framework was used as the primary analysis approach and a frequentist framework as the secondary approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical cure. Results: From 18 eligible randomized clinical trials that included 9108 critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock (median age, 54 years; IQR, 48-57; 5961 men [65%]), 17 trials (9014 participants) contributed data to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio for all-cause 90-day mortality for prolonged infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics compared with intermittent infusions was 0.86 (95% credible interval, 0.72-0.98; I2 = 21.5%; high certainty), with a 99.1% posterior probability that prolonged infusions were associated with lower 90-day mortality. Prolonged infusion of ß-lactam antibiotics was associated with a reduced risk of intensive care unit mortality (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.70-0.97; high certainty) and an increase in clinical cure (risk ratio, 1.16; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.31; moderate certainty). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults in the intensive care unit who had sepsis or septic shock, the use of prolonged ß-lactam antibiotic infusions was associated with a reduced risk of 90-day mortality compared with intermittent infusions. The current evidence presents a high degree of certainty for clinicians to consider prolonged infusions as a standard of care in the management of sepsis and septic shock. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023399434.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Antibióticos Betalactámicos , Adulto , Humanos , Antibióticos Betalactámicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crítica , Esquema de Medicación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo
5.
JAMA ; 332(8): 629-637, 2024 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864155

RESUMEN

Importance: Whether ß-lactam antibiotics administered by continuous compared with intermittent infusion reduces the risk of death in patients with sepsis is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether continuous vs intermittent infusion of a ß-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) results in decreased all-cause mortality at 90 days in critically ill patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: An international, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in 104 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia, Belgium, France, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Recruitment occurred from March 26, 2018, to January 11, 2023, with follow-up completed on April 12, 2023. Participants were critically ill adults (≥18 years) treated with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for sepsis. Intervention: Eligible patients were randomized to receive an equivalent 24-hour dose of a ß-lactam antibiotic by either continuous (n = 3498) or intermittent (n = 3533) infusion for a clinician-determined duration of treatment or until ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure up to 14 days after randomization; new acquisition, colonization, or infection with a multiresistant organism or Clostridioides difficile infection up to 14 days after randomization; ICU mortality; and in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 7202 randomized participants, 7031 (mean [SD] age, 59 [16] years; 2423 women [35%]) met consent requirements for inclusion in the primary analysis (97.6%). Within 90 days, 864 of 3474 patients (24.9%) assigned to receive continuous infusion had died compared with 939 of 3507 (26.8%) assigned intermittent infusion (absolute difference, -1.9% [95% CI, -4.9% to 1.1%]; odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.01]; P = .08). Clinical cure was higher in the continuous vs intermittent infusion group (1930/3467 [55.7%] and 1744/3491 [50.0%], respectively; absolute difference, 5.7% [95% CI, 2.4% to 9.1%]). Other secondary outcomes were not statistically different. Conclusions and Relevance: The observed difference in 90-day mortality between continuous vs intermittent infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics did not meet statistical significance in the primary analysis. However, the confidence interval around the effect estimate includes the possibility of both no important effect and a clinically important benefit in the use of continuous infusions in this group of patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03213990.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Meropenem , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Sepsis , Antibióticos Betalactámicos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crítica , Esquema de Medicación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Meropenem/administración & dosificación , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/administración & dosificación , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Antibióticos Betalactámicos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
6.
Appl Clin Inform ; 15(2): 388-396, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754464

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients is challenging and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) software may be used to optimize dosing in these patients. However, few intensive care units (ICU) currently adopt MIPD software use. OBJECTIVES: To determine the usability of MIPD software perceived by ICU clinicians and identify implementation barriers and enablers of software in the ICU. METHODS: Clinicians (pharmacists and medical staff) who participated in a wider multicenter study using MIPD software were invited to participate in this mixed-method study. Participants scored the industry validated Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ, assessing software usability) and Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2, assessing factors impacting software acceptance) survey. Semistructured interviews were used to explore survey responses. The framework approach was used to identify factors influencing software usability and integration into the ICU from the survey and interview data. RESULTS: Seven of the eight eligible clinicians agreed to participate in the study. The PSSUQ usability scores ranked poorer than the reference norms (2.95 vs. 2.62). The TAM2 survey favorably ranked acceptance in all domains, except image. Qualitatively, key enablers to workflow integration included clear and accessible data entry, visual representation of recommendations, involvement of specialist clinicians, and local governance of software use. Barriers included rigid data entry systems and nonconformity of recommendations to local practices. CONCLUSION: Participants scored the MIPD software below the threshold that implies good usability. Factors such as availability of software support by specialist clinicians was important to participants while rigid data entry was found to be a deterrent.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Programas Informáticos , Humanos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 64(2): 107192, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an effective method for individualising antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients. The 2021 ADMIN-intensive care unit survey studied a wide range of intensive care unit clinicians worldwide to gain their perspectives on antimicrobial TDM. This article reports the responses from this survey relating to TDM access, utilisation, and barriers. METHODS: An online survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert scales. The survey examined respondent's access to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results, drug assays, and dosing software, as well as barriers to TDM. RESULTS: The survey included 538 clinicians from 409 hospitals in 45 countries, with 71% physicians and 29% pharmacists. Despite most respondents having access to assays, 21% and 26% of respondents lacked access to vancomycin and aminoglycosides, respectively. In lower-income countries, almost 40% reported no access. Delayed drug assay turnaround time was the most significant barrier to TDM, particularly in lower-income countries. Routine access to MIC results was unavailable for 41% of respondents, with 25% of lower-income country respondents having no access to MIC or susceptibility reports. CONCLUSIONS: This global survey indicated that consistent TDM usage is hindered by assay access in some sites and the timeliness of assay results in others. Addressing barriers to TDM, particularly in low-income countries, should be a priority to ensure equitable access to affordable TDM.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Enfermedad Crítica , Monitoreo de Drogas , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Humanos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Adulto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Salud Global
9.
Intensive Care Med ; 50(4): 539-547, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478027

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Early recognition and effective treatment of sepsis improves outcomes in critically ill patients. However, antibiotic exposures are frequently suboptimal in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We describe the feasibility of the Bayesian dosing software Individually Designed Optimum Dosing Strategies (ID-ODS™), to reduce time to effective antibiotic exposure in children and adults with sepsis in ICU. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective, non-randomised interventional trial in three adult ICUs and one paediatric ICU. In a pre-intervention Phase 1, we measured the time to target antibiotic exposure in participants. In Phase 2, antibiotic dosing recommendations were made using ID-ODS™, and time to target antibiotic concentrations were compared to patients in Phase 1 (a pre-post-design). RESULTS: 175 antibiotic courses (Phase 1 = 123, Phase 2 = 52) were analysed from 156 participants. Across all patients, there was no difference in the time to achieve target exposures (8.7 h vs 14.3 h in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively, p = 0.45). Sixty-one courses in 54 participants failed to achieve target exposures within 24 h of antibiotic commencement (n = 36 in Phase 1, n = 18 in Phase 2). In these participants, ID-ODS™ was associated with a reduction in time to target antibiotic exposure (96 vs 36.4 h in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively, p < 0.01). These patients were less likely to exhibit subtherapeutic antibiotic exposures at 96 h (hazard ratio (HR) 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.05, p < 0.01). There was no difference observed in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing software may reduce the time to achieve target antibiotic exposures. It should be evaluated further in trials to establish its impact on clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Sepsis , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Teorema de Bayes , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Programas Informáticos
10.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(2): e0306523, 2024 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193658

RESUMEN

We aimed to evaluate the performance of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing from positive blood culture (BC) broths for bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility prediction. Patients with suspected sepsis in four intensive care units were prospectively enrolled. Human-depleted DNA was extracted from positive BC broths and sequenced using ONT (MinION). Species abundance was estimated using Kraken2, and a cloud-based system (AREScloud) provided in silico predictive antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) from assembled contigs. Results were compared to conventional identification and phenotypic AST. Species-level agreement between conventional methods and AST predicted from sequencing was 94.2% (49/52), increasing to 100% in monomicrobial infections. In 262 high-quality AREScloud AST predictions across 24 samples, categorical agreement (CA) was 89.3%, with major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates of 10.5% and 12.1%, respectively. Over 90% CA was achieved for some taxa (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus) but was suboptimal for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In 470 AST predictions across 42 samples, with both high quality and exploratory-only predictions, overall CA, ME, and VME rates were 87.7%, 8.3%, and 28.4%. VME rates were inflated by false susceptibility calls in a small number of species/antibiotic combinations with few representative resistant isolates. Time to reporting from sequencing could be achieved within 8-16 h from BC positivity. Direct sequencing from positive BC broths is feasible and can provide accurate predictive AST for some species. ONT-based approaches may be faster but significant improvements in accuracy are required before it can be considered for clinical use.IMPORTANCESepsis and bloodstream infections carry a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Rapid identification and susceptibility prediction of causative pathogens, using Nanopore sequencing direct from blood cultures, may offer clinical benefit. We assessed this approach in comparison to conventional phenotypic methods and determined the accuracy of species identification and susceptibility prediction from genomic data. While this workflow holds promise, and performed well for some common bacterial species, improvements in sequencing accuracy and more robust predictive algorithms across a diverse range of organisms are required before this can be considered for clinical use. However, results could be achieved in timeframes that are faster than conventional phenotypic methods.


Asunto(s)
Secuenciación de Nanoporos , Sepsis , Humanos , Cultivo de Sangre/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Sepsis/microbiología , Antibacterianos , Cuidados Críticos
11.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 449, 2023 11 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37981676

RESUMEN

Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is one of the most common of invasive candidiasis observed in critically ill patients. It is associated with high mortality, with up to 50% of deaths attributable to delays in source control and/or the introduction of antifungal therapy. Currently, there is no comprehensive guidance on optimising antifungal dosing in the treatment of IAC among the critically ill. However, this form of abdominal sepsis presents specific pharmacokinetic (PK) alterations and pharmacodynamic (PD) challenges that risk suboptimal antifungal exposure at the site of infection in critically ill patients. This review aims to describe the peculiarities of IAC from both PK and PD perspectives, advocating an individualized approach to antifungal dosing. Additionally, all current PK/PD studies relating to IAC are reviewed in terms of strength and limitations, so that core elements for the basis of future research can be provided.


Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal , Candidiasis Invasiva , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 42(6): 101296, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579945

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Broad-spectrum antibiotics such as beta-lactams and vancomycin are frequently used to treat critically ill patients, however, a significant number do not achieve target exposures. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) combined with Bayesian forecasting dosing software may improve target attainment in these patients. This study aims to describe the efficiency of dosing software for achieving target exposures of selected beta-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin in critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was undertaken in an adult intensive care unit (ICU). Patients prescribed vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were included if they exhibited a subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic exposure informed by TDM. The dosing software, ID-ODS™, was used to generate dosing recommendations which could be either accepted or rejected by the treating team. Repeat antibiotic TDM were requested to determine if target exposures were achieved. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and December 2021, 70 were included in the analysis. Software recommendations were accepted for 56 patients (80%) with 50 having repeated antibiotic measurements. Forty-three of the 50 patients (86%) achieved target exposures after one software recommendation, with 3 of the remaining 7 patients achieving target exposures after 2. Forty-seven patients out of the 50 patients (94%) achieved the secondary outcome of clinical cure. There were no antibiotic exposure-related adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: The use of TDM combined with Bayesian forecasting dosing software increases the efficiency for achieving target antibiotic exposures in the ICU. Clinical trials comparing this approach with other dosing strategies are required to further validate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Teorema de Bayes , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Programas Informáticos
15.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 241, 2023 06 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, numerous dosing studies have been conducted to optimize therapeutic antibiotic exposures in patients with serious infections. These studies have led to the inclusion of dose optimization recommendations in international clinical practice guidelines. The last international survey describing dosing, administration and monitoring of commonly prescribed antibiotics for critically ill patients was published in 2015 (ADMIN-ICU 2015). This study aimed to describe the evolution of practice since this time. METHODS: A cross-sectional international survey distributed through professional societies and networks was used to obtain information on practices used in the dosing, administration and monitoring of vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and aminoglycosides. RESULTS: A total of 538 respondents (71% physicians and 29% pharmacists) from 409 hospitals in 45 countries completed the survey. Vancomycin was mostly administered as an intermittent infusion, and loading doses were used by 74% of respondents with 25 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg the most favoured doses for intermittent and continuous infusions, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem were most frequently administered as an extended infusion (42% and 51%, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was undertaken by 90%, 82%, 43%, and 39% of respondents for vancomycin, aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, respectively, and was more frequently performed in high-income countries. Respondents rarely used dosing software to guide therapy in clinical practice and was most frequently used with vancomycin (11%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed numerous changes in practice since the ADMIN-ICU 2015 survey was conducted. Beta-lactams are more commonly administered as extended infusions, and therapeutic drug monitoring use has increased, which align with emerging evidence.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Humanos , Adulto , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Meropenem , Estudios Transversales , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Aminoglicósidos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Piperacilina
16.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(10): e445-e453, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37348517

RESUMEN

The silent pandemic of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is a leading cause of death worldwide, prolonging hospital stays and raising health-care costs. Poor incentives to develop novel pharmacological compounds and the misuse of antibiotics contribute to the bacterial antimicrobial resistance crisis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) based on blood analysis can help alleviate the emergence of bacterial antimicrobial resistance and effectively decreases the risk of toxic drug concentrations in patients' blood. Antibiotic tissue penetration can vary in patients who are critically or chronically ill and can potentially lead to treatment failure. Antibiotics such as ß-lactams and glycopeptides are detectable in non-invasively collectable biofluids, such as sweat and exhaled breath. The emergence of wearable sensors enables easy access to these non-invasive biofluids, and thus a laboratory-independent analysis of various disease-associated biomarkers and drugs. In this Personal View, we introduce a three-level model for TDM of antibiotics to describe concentrations at the site of infection (SOI) by use of wearable sensors. Our model links blood-based drug measurement with the analysis of drug concentrations in non-invasively collectable biofluids stemming from the SOI to characterise drug concentrations at the SOI. Finally, we outline the necessary clinical and technical steps for the development of wearable sensing platforms for SOI applications.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Infecciones Bacterianas , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Monitoreo de Drogas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamas , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico
17.
Ther Drug Monit ; 45(5): 631-636, 2023 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199397

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the achievement of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) exposure targets for vancomycin using a newly developed dosing guideline with product-information-based dosing in the treatment of adult patients with serious infections. METHODS: In silico product-information- and guideline-based dosing simulations for vancomycin were performed across a range of doses and patient characteristics, including body weight, age, and renal function at 36-48 and 96 hours, using a pharmacokinetic model derived from a seriously ill patient population. The median simulated concentration and area under the 24-hour concentration-time curve (AUC 0-24 ) were used to measure predefined therapeutic, subtherapeutic, and toxicity PK-PD targets. RESULTS: Ninety-six dosing simulations were performed. The pooled median trough concentration target with guideline-based dosing at 36 and 96 hours was achieved in 27.1% (13/48) and 8.3% (7/48) of simulations, respectively. The pooled median AUC 0-24 /minimum inhibitory concentration ratio with guideline-based dosing at 48 and 96 hours was attained in 39.6% (19/48) and 27.1% (13/48) of simulations, respectively. Guideline-based dosing simulations yielded improved trough target attainment compared with product-information-based dosing at 36 hours and significantly less subtherapeutic drug exposure. The toxicity threshold was exceeded in 52.1% (25/48) and 0% (0/48) for guideline- and product-information-information-based dosing, respectively ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A Critical care vancomycin dosing guideline appeared slightly more effective than standard dosing, as per product information, in achieving PK-PD exposure associated with an increased likelihood of effectiveness. In addition, this guideline significantly reduced the risk of subtherapeutic exposure. The risk of exceeding toxicity thresholds, however, was greater with the guideline, and further investigation is suggested to improve dosing accuracy and sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Humanos , Adulto , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Peso Corporal , Área Bajo la Curva , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
18.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(5)2023 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237706

RESUMEN

While the relevance of inter-ethnic differences to the pharmacokinetic variabilities of antimicrobials has been reported in studies recruiting healthy subjects, differences in antimicrobial pharmacokinetics between Asian and non-Asian patients with severe pathologic conditions require further investigation. For the purpose of describing the potential differences in antimicrobial pharmacokinetics between Asian and non-Asian populations, a systematic review was performed using six journal databases and six theses/dissertation databases (PROSPERO record CRD42018090054). The pharmacokinetic data of healthy volunteers and non-critically ill and critically ill patients were reviewed. Thirty studies on meropenem, imipenem, doripenem, linezolid, and vancomycin were included in the final descriptive summaries. In studies recruiting hospitalised patients, inconsistent differences in the volume of distribution (Vd) and drug clearance (CL) of the studied antimicrobials between Asian and non-Asian patients were observed. Additionally, factors other than ethnicity, such as demographic (e.g., age) or clinical (e.g., sepsis) factors, were suggested to better characterise these pharmacokinetic differences. Inconsistent differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between Asian and non-Asian subjects/patients may suggest that ethnicity is not an important predictor to characterise interindividual pharmacokinetic differences between meropenem, imipenem, doripenem, linezolid, and vancomycin. Therefore, the dosing regimens of these antimicrobials should be adjusted according to patients' demographic or clinical characteristics that can better describe pharmacokinetic differences.

19.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(5)2023 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237773

RESUMEN

Beta-lactams are an important family of antibiotics used to treat infections and are commonly used in critically ill patients. Optimal use of these drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU) is important because of the serious complications from sepsis. Target beta-lactam antibiotic exposures may be chosen using fundamental principles of beta-lactam activity derived from pre-clinical and clinical studies, although the debate regarding optimal beta-lactam exposure targets is ongoing. Attainment of target exposures in the ICU requires overcoming significant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) challenges. For beta-lactam drugs, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to confirm if the desired exposure targets are achieved has shown promise, but further data are required to determine if improvement in infection-related outcomes can be achieved. Additionally, beta-lactam TDM may be useful where a relationship exists between supratherapeutic antibiotic exposure and drug adverse effects. An ideal beta-lactam TDM service should endeavor to efficiently sample and report results in identified at-risk patients in a timely manner. Consensus beta-lactam PK/PD targets associated with optimal patient outcomes are lacking and should be a focus for future research.

20.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(5)2023 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis is responsible for a large variety of severe infections. This study is a case series reporting our experience in the treatment of E. faecalis invasive infections with ampicillin in combination with ceftobiprole (ABPR). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all the medical records of patients admitted to the University Hospital of Udine from January to December 2020 with a diagnosis of infective endocarditis or primary or non-primary complicated or uncomplicated bacteremia caused by E. faecalis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in the final analysis. The clinical success rate was very high, accounting for 81% of patients, and microbiological cure was obtained in 86% of patients. One relapse was recorded in one patient who did not adhere to the partial oral treatment prescribed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was always performed for ampicillin and ceftobiprole, and serum concentrations of both drugs were compared to the MICs of the different enterococcal isolates. CONCLUSIONS: ABPR is a well-tolerated antimicrobial regimen with anti-E. faecalis activity. TDM can help clinicians optimize medical treatments to achieve the best possible efficacy with fewer side effects. ABPR might be a reasonable option for the treatment of severe invasive infections caused by E. faecalis due to the high level of enterococcal penicillin-binding protein (PBP) saturation.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA