Imprecision of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays at the female 99th-percentile.

BACKGROUND: An analytical benchmark for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays is to achieve a coefficient of variation (CV) of ≤ 10.0 % at the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) used for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Few prospective multicenter studies have evaluated assay imprecision and none have determined precision at the female URL which is lower than the male URL for all cardiac troponin assays. METHODS: Human serum and plasma matrix samples were constructed to yield hs-cTn concentrations near the female URLs for the Abbott, Beckman, Roche, and Siemens hs-cTn assays. These materials were sent (on dry ice) to 35 Canadian hospital laboratories (n = 64 instruments evaluated) participating in a larger clinical trial, with instructions for storage, handling, and monthly testing over one year. The mean concentration, standard deviation, and CV for each instrument type and an overall pooled CV for each manufacturer were calculated. RESULTS: The CVs for all individual instruments and overall were ≤ 10.0 % for two manufacturers (Abbott CVpooled = 6.3 % and Beckman CVpooled = 7.0 %). One of four Siemens Atellica instruments yielded a CV > 10.0 % (CVpooled = 7.7 %), whereas 15 of 41 Roche instruments yielded CVs > 10.0 % at the female URL of 9 ng/L used worldwide (6 cobas e411, 1 cobas e601, 4 cobas e602, and 4 cobas e801) (CVpooled = 11.7 %). Four Roche instruments also yielded CVs > 10.0 % near the female URL of 14 ng/L used in the United States (CVpooled = 8.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The number of instruments achieving a CV ≤ 10.0 % at the female 99th-percentile URL varies by manufacturer and by instrument. Monitoring assay precision at the female URL is necessary for some assays to ensure optimal use of this threshold in clinical practice.

Resource use and cost associated with computerized decision support system and usual care in managing patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis of IMPACT-AF randomized trial data.

BACKGROUND: IMPACT-AF is a prospective, randomized, cluster design trial comparing atrial fibrillation (AF) management with a computerized decision support system (CDS) to usual care (control) in the primary care setting of Nova Scotia, Canada. The objective of this analysis was to compare the resource use and costs between CDS and usual care groups. METHODS: Case costing data, 12-month self-administered questionnaires, and monthly diaries from IMPACT-AF were used in this analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to compare costs and resource use between groups. All costs are presented in 2021 Canadian dollars and cover the 12-month period of participation in the study. RESULTS: A total of 1,145 patients enrolled in the trial. Case costing data were available for 466 participants (41.1%), 12-month self-administered questionnaire data for 635 participants (56.0%) and monthly diary data for 223 participants (19.7%). Emergency department visits and hospitalizations comprised the most expensive component of AF care. Across all three datasets, there were no statistically significant differences in costs or resource use between CDS and usual care groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no significant differences in resource use or costs among CDS and usual care groups in the IMPACT-AF trial, this study provides insight into the methodology and practical challenges of collecting economic data alongside a trial. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT01927367, date of registration: 2013-08-20).

Rhythm Control Vs Rate Control in a Contemporary Ambulatory Atrial Fibrillation Cohort: Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT-AF Trial.

Background: We examined the characteristics and outcomes in a contemporary ambulatory population of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), comparing rate control with rhythm control. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized trial (Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation [IMPACT-AF]) in ambulatory AF patients from 2016 to 2018, which compared use of a clinical decision support tool for general practitioners to usual care. This analysis compared patients managed with rate vs rhythm control, at entry into the study. Outcomes included AF-related emergency department (ED) visits, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, and bleeding events at 12 months. Results: A total of 870 patients were included in this analysis, 99 (11.4%) in the rhythm-control group, and 40% women. In the rhythm-control group, the mean age was younger (70 ± 11.4 vs 72.7 ± 9.5 years, P = 0.03), a higher number were paroxysmal (80% vs 43%, P < 0.001), and CHADS2 scores were lower. The rate of AF-related ED visits was higher in the rhythm-control group (17.2 vs 7.3%, P = 0.003), and repeat visits (rate ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval [1.99-4.52], P < 0.001). The number of repeat ED visits was independently associated with female sex and being in the rhythm-control group. Conclusions: Both rate- and rhythm-control patients have recurrent ED visits, with a higher rate in patients treated with rhythm control. These findings are observational, but taken in the context of current guidelines could help develop further therapies aimed at improving symptom burden in both rhythm- and rate-control patients to broadly improve healthcare utilization in the AF population.

Contexte: Nous avons examiné les caractéristiques et le devenir de patients ambulatoires contemporains atteints de fibrillation auriculaire (FA) dans le cadre d'une comparaison entre la maîtrise de la fréquence cardiaque et la maîtrise du rythme cardiaque. Méthodologie: Nous avons effectué une analyse a posteriori d'un essai à répartition aléatoire par grappes ( I ntegrated M anagement P rogram A dvancing C ommunity T reatment of A trial F ibrillation [IMPACT-AF]) mené de 2016 à 2018 chez des patients ambulatoires atteints de FA en vue de comparer un outil d'aide à la décision clinique destiné aux omnipraticiens avec les soins habituels. Notre analyse a permis d'établir une comparaison entre les patients pris en charge par une maîtrise de la fréquence cardiaque et ceux pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque lors de leur inscription à l'essai. Les paramètres d'évaluation comprenaient les consultations aux urgences liées à la FA, les hospitalisations imprévues ayant des causes cardiovasculaires et les épisodes hémorragiques à 12 mois. Résultats: Au total, 870 patients ont été inclus dans cette analyse; 99 (11,4 %) faisaient partie du groupe pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque, et 40 % étaient de femmes. Dans le groupe pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque, l'âge moyen était moindre (70 ± 11,4 ans vs 72,7 ± 9,5 ans, P = 0,03), un plus grand nombre de patients présentaient une FA paroxystique (80 % vs 43 %, P < 0,001) et les scores CHADS2 étaient moins élevés. Le taux de consultations aux urgences liées à la FA était plus élevé dans le groupe pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque (17,2 vs 7,3 %, P = 0,003) tout comme le taux de consultations répétées aux urgences (rapport des taux de 3,03, intervalle de confiance à 95 % de 1,99 à 4,52, P < 0,001). Le nombre de consultations répétées aux urgences était indépendamment associé au sexe féminin et à l'inclusion dans le groupe pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque. Conclusions: Des consultations répétées aux urgences ont été notées tant chez les patients pris en charge par une maîtrise de la fréquence cardiaque que chez ceux pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque quoique plus fréquemment chez ces derniers. Nos constats sont de type observationnel. Néanmoins, dans le contexte des lignes directrices actuelles, ils pourraient contribuer à la mise au point d'autres traitements visant à atténuer le fardeau des symptômes tant chez les patients pris en charge par une maîtrise du rythme cardiaque que chez ceux pris en charge par une maîtrise de la fréquence cardiaque et ainsi permettre globalement une meilleure utilisation des soins de santé chez les patients atteints de FA.

The association between anticoagulation and adverse outcomes after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test among older outpatients: A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulation may improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19 when started early in the course of illness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study using linked administrative datasets of outpatients aged ≥65 years old testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between January 1 and December 31, 2020 in Ontario, Canada. The key exposure was anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants before COVID-19 diagnosis. We calculated propensity scores and used matching weights (MWs) to reduce baseline differences between anticoagulated and non-anticoagulated patients. The primary outcome was a composite of death or hospitalization within 60 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence functions to estimate risk of the primary and component outcomes at 60 days. RESULTS: We studied 23,159 outpatients (mean age 78.5 years; 13,474 [58.2%] female), among whom 3200 (13.8%) deaths and 3183 (13.7%) hospitalizations occurred within 60 days of the SARS-CoV-2 test. After application of MWs, the 60-day risk of death or hospitalization was 29.2% (95% CI 27.4%-31.2%) for anticoagulated individuals and 32.1% (95% CI 30.7%-33.5%) without anticoagulation (absolute risk difference [ARD], -2.9%; p = 0.005). Anticoagulation was also associated with a lower risk of death: 18.6% (95% CI 17.0%-20.2%) with anticoagulation and 20.9% (95% CI 19.7%-22.2%) in non-anticoagulated patients (ARD -2.3%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Among outpatients aged ≥65 years, oral anticoagulation at the time of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was associated with a lower risk of a composite of death or hospitalization within 60 days.

Lessons learned from Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): a pragmatic clinical trial of computerized decision support in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF) was a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool in primary care, Nova Scotia, Canada. We evaluated if CDS software versus Usual Care could help primary care providers (PCPs) deliver individualized guideline-based AF patient care. METHODS: Key study challenges including CDS development and implementation, recruitment, and data integration documented over the trial duration are presented as lessons learned. RESULTS: Adequate resources must be allocated for software development, updates and feasibility testing. Development took longer than projected. End-user feedback suggested network access and broadband speeds impeded uptake; they felt further that the CDS was not sufficiently user-friendly or efficient in supporting AF care (i.e., repetitive alerts). Integration across e-platforms is crucial. Intellectual property and other issues prohibited CDS integration within electronic medical records and provincial e-health platforms. Double login and data entry were impediments to participation or reasons for provider withdrawal. Data integration challenges prevented easy and timely data access, analysis, and reporting. Primary care study recruitment is resource intensive. Altogether, 203 PCPs and 1145 of their patients participated, representing 25% of eligible providers and 12% of AF patients in Nova Scotia, respectively. The most effective provider recruitment strategy was in-office, small group lunch-and-learns. PCPs with past research experience or who led patient consent were top recruiters. The study office played a pivotal role in achieving patient recruitment targets. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid growth in healthcare data is leading to widespread development of CDS. Our experience found practical issues to address for such applications to succeed. Feasibility testing to assess the utility of any healthcare CDS prior to implementation is recommended. Adequate resources are necessary to support successful recruitment for future pragmatic trials. CDS tools that integrate multiple co-morbid guidelines across eHealth platforms should be pursued. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01927367. Registered on August 22, 2013.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT-AF Clinical Trial.

Background The IMPACT-AF (Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a prospective, randomized, cluster design trial comparing atrial fibrillation management with a computerized clinical decision support system with usual care (control) in the primary care setting of Nova Scotia, Canada. The objective of this analysis was to assess and compare patient-reported health-related quality of life and patient-reported experience with atrial fibrillation care between clinical decision support and control groups. Methods and Results Health-related quality of life was measured using the EuroQol 5-dimensional 5-level scale, whereas patient-reported experience was assessed using a self-administered satisfaction questionnaire, both assessed at baseline and 12 months. Health utilities were calculated using the Canadian EuroQol 5-dimensional 5-level value set. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations were used to compare between groups. Among 1145 patients enrolled in the trial, 717 had complete EuroQol 5-dimensional 5-level data at baseline. The mean age of patients was 73.53 years, and 61.87% were men. Mean utilities at baseline were 0.809 (SD, 0.157) and 0.814 (SD, 0.157) for clinical decision support and control groups, respectively. At baseline, most patients in both groups reported being "very satisfied" with the care received for their atrial fibrillation. There were no statistically significant differences in utility scores or patient satisfaction between groups at 12 months. Conclusions Health-related quality of life of patients remained stable over 12 months, and there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction or utility scores between clinical decision support and control groups. Registration information clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01927367.

Surveillance for Outcomes Selected as Atrial Fibrillation Quality Indicators in Canada: 10-Year Trends in Stroke, Major Bleeding, and Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Whether advances in identification and management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (collectively, AF) have led to improved outcomes is unclear. We sought to study trends in clinical outcomes selected as quality indicators for nonvalvular AF in Canada. METHODS: We identified hospitalized patients with a first diagnosis of nonvalvular AF between April 2006 and March 2015, in all of Canada except Quebec. We assessed trends in 1-year incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding, and initial heart failure (HF) hospitalization. RESULTS: The cohort included 466,476 patients. The median age was 77 years (interquartile range, 68-84 years), 46% were female, and 68% had a Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age (≥75 years), Diabetes, Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack, Vascular Disease, Age (65-74 years), Sex (Female) (CHA2DS2-VASc) score > 3. Within 1 year of discharge, 3.5% were hospitalized for stroke or SSE, 1.6% for major bleeding, and 8.6% for new HF. Over the study period, the crude rate of SSE declined from 3.6% to 3.3% (P = 0.002), whereas the rates of hospitalization for new HF and for major bleeding did not significantly change. After adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASc score, the yearly rates of incident SSE (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99; P = 0.002) and HF (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.001) declined ≤ 1% absolute, whereas major bleeding remained unchanged (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized patients with nonvalvular AF in Canada, the rate of SSE and new HF decreased modestly over a 10-year period, with no significant change in major bleeding. Efforts to study process-based quality indicators, with increased focus on HF prevention, are needed.

CONTEXTE: On ne sait pas si les avancées en matière de détection et de prise en charge de la fibrillation auriculaire et du flutter auriculaire (collectivement appelés « FA ¼ ci-après) ont permis d'améliorer les résultats pour les patients. Nous avons donc étudié les tendances à l'égard de résultats cliniques particuliers pris comme indicateurs de qualité relatifs à la FA non valvulaire au Canada. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons recensé les patients hospitalisés au Canada (sauf au Québec) entre avril 2006 et mars 2015 en raison d'une FA non valvulaire nouvellement diagnostiquée. Nous avons évalué les tendances quant à la survenue d'un accident vasculaire cérébral ou d'une embolie systémique (AVC/ES), d'une hémorragie majeure et d'une première hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque. RÉSULTATS: La cohorte comprenait 466 476 patients, dont l'âge médian était de 77 ans (intervalle interquartile : 68 à 84 ans); 46 % des patients étaient des femmes, et 68 % avaient un score CHA2DS2-VASc ( C ongestive Heart Failure [insuffisance cardiaque congestive], hypertension, âge [≥ 75 ans], diabète, S troke/Transient Ischemic Attack [AVC/accident ischémique transitoire] ­ maladie vasculaire, âge [65-74 ans], sexe [femmes]) supérieur à 3. Dans l'année suivant la sortie de l'hôpital, 3,5 % des patients ont été hospitalisés en raison d'un AVC ou d'un AVC/ES, 1,6 %, en raison d'une hémorragie majeure et 8,6 %, en raison d'une nouvelle insuffisance cardiaque. Au cours de la période étudiée, le taux brut d'AVC/ES est passé de 3,6 % à 3,3 % (p = 0,002), tandis que les taux d'hospitalisation en raison d'une nouvelle insuffisance cardiaque ou d'une hémorragie majeure n'ont pas changé de manière significative. Après correction pour tenir compte du score CHA2DS2-VASc, les taux annuels de survenue d'un AVC/ES (rapport des risques de 0,99; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 0,98 à 0,99; p = 0,002) et d'une insuffisance cardiaque (rapport des risques de 0,99; IC à 95 % : de 0,99 à 1,00; p = 0,001) ont diminué de ≤ 1 % en valeur absolue, tandis que le taux de survenue d'une hémorragie majeure n'a pas changé (rapport des risques : 1,00; IC à 95 % : de 0,99 à 1,00; p = 0,28). CONCLUSIONS: Parmi les patients hospitalisés au Canada en raison d'une FA non valvulaire, les taux d'AVC/ES et de nouvelle insuffisance cardiaque ont affiché une réduction modeste sur une période de 10 ans, tandis que le taux d'hémorragie majeure n'a pas changé de manière significative. D'autres études évaluant les indicateurs de qualité fondés sur les procédés, notamment en matière de prévention de l'insuffisance cardiaque, s'imposent.

Detecting Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network: First Steps.

BACKGROUND: A recent feasibility assessment of quality indicators for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (NVAF/AFL) identified the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, a national outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) system, as a data source for measurement. As a first step, we adapted and validated an existing EMR case definition. METHODS: A diagnosis of NVAF/AFL was defined using International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes (427.3) in either the physician billing, encounter diagnosis, or health condition fields. We identified all presumed cases in a single clinical site with the algorithm and selected a random sample of those who were presumed NVAF/AFL negative with the same algorithm. A chart audit diagnosis of "definite" NVAF/AFL was confirmed by electrocardiogram and nonvalvular diagnosis confirmed after echocardiogram, attending physician, or specialist letter review. To demonstrate face validity, clinical characteristics were compared for patients with and without NVAF/AFL. RESULTS: The case definition identified a possible 184 patients with and 184 without NVAF/AFL. The case validation resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 100-100), specificity of 84.3% (95% CI, 78.8-89.9), and positive and negative predictive value of 74.7% (95% CI, 66.4-83.2) and 100% (95% CI 100-100), respectively. Patients with NVAF/AFL were older (63 vs 42 years) and had a higher proportion of cardiovascular comorbidities and relevant medications. CONCLUSIONS: We think it is possible that with further validation work, NVAF/AFL can be accurately identified using this large pan-Canadian EMR system and used as a future tool to measure quality of care in the outpatient setting.

CONTEXTE: Dans le cadre d'une étude récente visant à déterminer s'il est possible d'utiliser des indicateurs de qualité pour évaluer les soins prodigués en cas de fibrillation auriculaire (FA) non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire, le Réseau canadien de surveillance sentinelle en soins primaires, un système national regroupant des données provenant des dossiers médicaux électroniques (DME) de patients vus en contexte de soins ambulatoires, a été retenu comme source de données pour une telle évaluation. Dans un premier temps, nous avons adapté et validé une définition de cas existante dans les DME. MÉTHODOLOGIE: On considérait qu'il y avait diagnostic de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire si le code de la Classification internationale des maladies (9e révision, Modification clinique) correspondant (code 427.3) figurait dans un des champs de facturation des actes médicaux, des diagnostics de consultation ou des problèmes de santé du DME. Nous avons relevé tous les cas de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire présumés d'une même clinique à l'aide de l'algorithme établi et constitué un échantillon aléatoire de patients qui, selon le même algorithme, ne présentaient pas de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire. On a ensuite vérifié les dossiers pour confirmer le diagnostic; le cas de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire était « certain ¼ si le dossier comprenait un électrocardiogramme positif et un diagnostic confirmé par échocardiographie, ou une note du médecin traitant ou d'un spécialiste confirmant le diagnostic. Pour démontrer la validité apparente de l'algorithme, les caractéristiques cliniques des patients atteints de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire ont été comparées à celles des patients sans FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire. RÉSULTATS: La définition de cas a permis de repérer 184 patients ayant possiblement une FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire, et 184 autres patients sans FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire. À l'issue de la validation, la sensibilité de la définition de cas s'établissait à 100 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 100 à 100), sa spécificité, à 84,3 % (IC à 95 % : 78,8 à 89,9), et ses valeurs prédictives positive et négative, à respectivement 74,7 % (IC à 95 % : 66,4 à 83,2) et 100 % (IC à 95 % : 100 à 100). Les patients atteints de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire étaient plus âgés (63 vs 42 ans) et recevaient un traitement pour des affections cardiovasculaires concomitantes dans une plus forte proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Nous croyons qu'en approfondissant les travaux de validation, il serait possible de repérer avec précision les cas de FA non valvulaire/flutter auriculaire à partir des données de ce système pancanadien de surveillance des DME et de les utiliser pour évaluer la qualité des soins aux patients vus en contexte ambulatoire.

Temporal Trends in Population Rates of Incident Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter Hospitalizations, Stroke Risk, and Mortality Show Decline in Hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is common and results in substantial cost burden. Current national data trends for the incidence, stroke risk profiles, and mortality of hospitalization for NVAF and atrial flutter (AFL) are sparse. METHODS: The Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database was used to identify patients ≥ 20 years with incident NVAF/AFL (NVAF, ICD-9 code 427.3 or ICD-10 I48) in any diagnosis field from 2006 to 2015 in Canada, except Québec. National and provincial trends in rate over time (rate ratio, 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for age-sex standardized hospitalizations. Trends in stroke risk profiles and in-hospital mortality rates adjusted for stroke risk factors were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 578,947 patients were hospitalized with incident NVAF/AFL. The median age was 77 years (interquartile range: 68-84), 82% were ≥ 65 years, 54% were men, 54% had a CHADS2 ≥ 2, and 69% had a CHA2DS2-Vasc ≥ 3. The overall age- and sex-standardized rate of NVAF/AFL hospitalization was 315 per 100,000 population and declined by 2% per year (P < 0.001). There was an annual rate decline in NVAF/AFL hospitalizations in every province. The majority of hospitalized patients are at high risk of stroke, and this risk remained unchanged. The average adjusted in-hospital mortality was 8.80 per 100 patients 95% CI, 8.80-8.81 with a 2% annual decline in rate (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Between 2006 and 2015, we found national and provincial hospitalization rates for incident NVAF/AFL are declining. The majority of patients are at high risk for stroke. In-hospital mortality has declined but remains substantial.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): A cluster randomized trial of a computerized clinical decision support tool.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) tools designed to digest, filter, organize, and present health data are becoming essential in providing clinical and cost-effective care. Many are not rigorously evaluated for benefit before implementation. We assessed whether computerized CDS for primary care providers would improve atrial fibrillation (AF) management and outcomes as compared to usual care. METHODS: Overall, 203 primary care providers were recruited, randomized, and then cluster stratified by location (urban, rural) to usual care (n = 99) or CDS (n = 104). Providers recruited 1,145 adult patients with AF to participate. The intervention was access to an evidenced-based, point-of-care computerized CDS designed to support guideline-based AF management. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations and AF-related emergency department visits; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, both over 1 year. Patients were the units of intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: No significant effects on the primary efficacy (130 control, 118 CDS, hazard ratio: 0.98 [95% CI 0.71-1.37], P = .926) or safety (n = 7 usual care, n = 8 CDS, 1.3% total, P = .939) outcomes were observed at 12-months. CONCLUSIONS: IMPACT-AF rigorously assessed a CDS tool in a highly representative sample of primary care providers and their patients; however, no impact on outcomes was observed. Considering the proliferating use of CDS applications, this study highlights the need for efficacy assessments prior to adoption and clinical implementation.

Association Between Patient and Physician Sex and Physician-Estimated Stroke and Bleeding Risks in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Physicians treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) assess stroke and bleeding risks when deciding on anticoagulation. The agreement between empirical and physician-estimated risks is unclear. Furthermore, the association between patient and physician sex and anticoagulation decision-making is uncertain. METHODS: We pooled data from 2 national primary care physician chart audit databases of patients with AF (Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation and Coordinated National Network to Engage Physicians in the Care and Treatment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Chart Audit) with a combined 1035 physicians (133 female, 902 male) and 10,927 patients (4567 female and 6360 male). RESULTS: Male physicians underestimated stroke risk in female patients and overestimated risk in male patients. Female physicians estimated stroke risk well in female patients but underestimated the risk in male patients. Risk of bleeding was underestimated in all. Despite differences in risk assessment by physician and patient sex, > 90% of patients received anticoagulation across all subgroups. There was modest agreement between physician estimated and calculated (ie, CHADS2 score) stroke risk: Kappa scores were 0.41 (0.35-0.47) for female physicians and 0.34 (0.32-0.36) for male physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to examine the association between patient and physician sex influences and stroke and bleeding risk estimation in AF. Although there were differences in agreement between physician estimated stroke risk and calculated CHADS2 scores, these differences were small and unlikely to affect clinical practice; further, despite any perceived differences in the accuracy of risk assessment by sex, most patients received anticoagulation.

An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a national level. METHODS: The working group reconvened in 2017 to review the relevance of previously proposed QIs, identify opportunities to develop new QIs, and propose an initial strategy for measuring and reporting. RESULTS: Two additional priority QIs were added to the previous 3: proportion of patients with nonvalvular (NV) AF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and annual rate of hospitalization for a new heart failure diagnosis. An environmental scan was undertaken to determine the potential of existing databases to provide national and provincial estimates. On the basis of validated administrative codes, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database can be used for inpatients. In collaboration with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, 2 of the 5 QIs can be assessed in outpatients (patients with NVAF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and high risk for stroke NVAF/AFL receiving oral anticoagulation). Stroke prevention therapy can be further measured in selected provinces with linked databases including prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This first step could provide a better initial understanding of the quality of AF/AFL care in Canada, but important gaps in the meaningful measurement of QIs remain. The AF/AFL QI working group has limited capacity to make progress without national level leadership and the resources to support data aggregation, data analysis, and pan-Canadian reporting.

CONTEXTE: En 2010, le groupe de travail des indicateurs de qualité (IQ) de la Société canadienne de cardiologie sur la fibrillation auriculaire (FA) et le flutter auriculaire (FLA) a été mis sur pied pour élaborer des IQ et évaluer la faisabilité d'utiliser ces IQ comme outils de mesure. Après un examen approfondi, trois IQ prioritaires ont été sélectionnés, mais aucun n'a pu être mesuré à l'échelle nationale. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le groupe de travail s'est réuni à nouveau en 2017 afin d'examiner la pertinence des IQ proposés au départ, de recenser des occasions d'élaborer de nouveau IQ et de proposer une stratégie initiale de mesure et de production de rapports à cet égard. RÉSULTATS: Deux IQ prioritaires supplémentaires ont été ajoutés aux trois premiers : la proportion de patients atteints de FA non valvulaire (FANV) ou de FLA ayant fait l'objet d'un tri selon la strate de risque d'AVC et le taux annuel d'hospitalisations attribuables à un nouveau diagnostic d'insuffisance cardiaque. Une analyse de l'environnement a été réalisée afin de déterminer si les bases de données existantes pouvaient fournir des estimations nationales et provinciales. Dans le cas de patients hospitalisés, on peut utiliser la Base de données sur les congés des patients de l'Institut canadien d'information sur la santé en se servant de codes administratifs validés. Dans le cas de patients non hospitalisés (patients atteints de FANV/FLA, triés par strate de risque, exposés à un risque élevé d'AVC en raison d'une FANV ou d'un FLA et recevant une anticoagulation orale), on peut mesurer deux des cinq IQ, en collaboration avec le Réseau canadien de surveillance sentinelle en soins primaires. Le traitement préventif de l'AVC peut continuer à faire l'objet de mesures dans certaines provinces grâce aux bases de données interreliées, comme les bases de données sur les ordonnances. CONCLUSIONS: Cette première étape a permis d'obtenir une meilleure compréhension initiale de la qualité de la prise en charge de la FA et du FLA au Canada, mais d'importantes lacunes restent à combler pour rendre pertinente la mesure des IQ. Le groupe de travail des IQ sur de la FA et le FLA n'a pas toutes les capacités requises pour réaliser des progrès en l'absence de leadership national et de ressources permettant de soutenir le regroupement et l'analyse des données, ainsi que la production de rapports à l'échelle pancanadienne.

Optimizing primary care management of atrial fibrillation: The rationale and methods of the Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF) study.

The Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF) is an investigator designed, prospective, randomized, un-blinded, cluster design clinical trial, conducted in the primary care setting of Nova Scotia, Canada. Its aim is to evaluate whether an electronic Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) designed to assist both practitioners and patients with evidence-based management strategies for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) can improve process of care and outcomes in a cost-efficient manner as compared to usual AF care. At least 200 primary care providers are being recruited and randomized at the level of the practice to control (usual care) or intervention (eligible to access to CDSS) cohorts. Over 1,000 patients of participating providers with confirmed AF will be managed per their provider's respective assignment. The targeted primary clinical outcome is a reduction in the composite of unplanned cardiovascular (CV) or major bleeding hospitalizations and AF-related emergency department visits. Secondary clinical outcomes, process of care, patient and provider satisfaction as well as economic costs at the system and patient levels are being examined. The trial is anticipated to report in 2018.

Where you Live in Nova Scotia Can Significantly Impact Your Access to Lifesaving Cardiac Care: Access to Invasive Care Influences Survival.

BACKGROUND: Invasive cardiac care is the preferred method of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). In Nova Scotia, invasive cardiac care is only available in Halifax at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII-HSC). METHODS: All consecutive patients diagnosed with ACS and CS in 2009-2013 in Nova Scotia were included. Data were obtained from the clinical database of Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients with ACS and CS were admitted to the hospital. Access to invasive care was limited to 309 (73.9%) of these patients. For those who presented elsewhere in the province, 64.2% were transferred to the QEII-HSC. The mortality rate among the 309 patients with access to invasive care was significantly lower than that among the 109 patients who did not have access (41.7% vs 83.5%; P < 0.0001). Unadjusted mortality was lowest among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (33.1%). After adjustment for clinical differences, access to cardiac catheterization remained an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.36). Heat map analysis revealed that access was lowest in regions furthest from Halifax. CONCLUSIONS: ACS complicated by CS has a high mortality rate. We demonstrate that access to health care centres offering cardiac catheterization is independently associated with survival, and public health initiatives that improve access should be considered. Patients presenting furthest from Halifax were the least likely to be transferred, suggesting that geography remains an important barrier to livesaving care.

Use of Evidence-Based Therapy for Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Canadian Outpatients With Atrial Fibrillation: From the Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (FREEDOM AF) and Co-ordinated National Network to Engage Physicians in the Care and Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (CONNECT AF).

Using data collected from 2 national atrial fibrillation (AF) primary care physician chart audits (Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation [FREEDOM AF] and Co-ordinated National Network to Engage Physicians in the Care and Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [CONNECT AF]), we evaluated the frequency of, and factors associated with, the use of cardiovascular (CV) evidence-based therapies in Canadian AF outpatients with at least 1 CV risk factor or co-morbidity. Of the 11,264 patients enrolled, 9,495 (84.3%) were eligible for one or more CV evidence-based therapies. The proportions of patients with AF receiving all eligible guideline-recommended therapies were 40.8% of patients with coronary artery disease, 48.9% of patients with diabetes mellitus, 40.2% of patients with heart failure, 96.7% of patients with hypertension, and 55.1% of patients with peripheral arterial disease. Factors that were independently associated with nonreceipt of all indicated evidence-based therapies included sinus rhythm rather than AF at baseline and liver disease. In conclusion, although most Canadian outpatients with AF have CV risk factors or co-morbidities, a substantial portion of these patients did not receive all guideline-recommended therapies. These findings suggest that there is an opportunity to improve the quality of care for patients with AF in Canada.