Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Seed Allergy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sunflower seed is one of the most common edible seeds and its consumption is growing. Case reports of sunflower seed allergy have been described since the 1970s. However, there are few data on the prevalence and clinical manifestations of sunflower seed allergy. To improve understanding of sunflower seed allergy. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical and immunological features of patients with sunflower seed allergy diagnosed in the Allergy Department of a tertiary hospital in Madrid over a 5-years period. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients reported adverse reactions after ingestion of sunflower seed and had specific sensitization to sunflower seed determined by skin prick test (median 8 mm) or specific IgE (median 1.10 kUA/L). Most had an adult-onset reaction to sunflower seed preceded by a history of atopy and other food allergies, predominantly to peach, peanut and nuts. Clinical presentation of sunflower seed allergy ranged from mild to severe, with a high proportion of patients suffering severe reactions, often undertreated. A variability in the severity of symptoms was seen on repeated exposures to sunflower seed on a same patient. Levels of sunflower seed IgE were strongly correlated with levels of IgE to non-specific lipid transfer proteins, while no significant differences were found in the severity of the reactions according to sensitization to those proteins. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal a variability of clinical presentations of sunflower seed allergy on repeated exposures and an underuse of epinephrine in anaphylaxis. We highlight the importance of strict avoidance of sunflower seed and accurate prescription and administration of epinephrine in allergic patients.

Thermal Degradation Kinetics of ZnO/polyester Nanocomposites.

ZnO particles were synthetized by the sol-gel method and subsequent heat treatment of 400, 500 and 600 °C was applied. The nano ZnO particles were incorporated to the unsaturated polyester resin by solution blending at 0.05 wt % concentration. X-ray diffraction detected the formation of a wurtzite-like structure. Viscoelastic behavior of neat polyester and nanocomposites revealed the nano ZnO particles does not promote better mechanical properties because of a weak interaction and the glass transition temperature of the polyester was favored by the presence of a higher quantity of nano-size ZnO particles. Thermogravimetric analysis at 5, 10 and 20 °C/min allowed determining the degradation kinetic parameters based on the Friedman and Kissinger models for neat polyester and nanocomposites. Heating rates promoted an increase in the temperature degradation and the addition of ZnO particles promoted a catalyst effect that reduce the amount of thermal energy needed to start the thermal degradation.

Renal allografts from donors older than 70 years are useful for single transplantation.

Kidney transplantation has been related in elderly recipients to a greater longevity compared with dialysis. Due to the scarcity of donors, transplantation of older patients depends on the acceptance of older donors. We compared the characteristics and evolution of transplants from donors >or=70 years (n = 53) with those from donors >55-<70 years (n = 201). Group D >or=70 included older recipients (65.37 +/- 4.9 vs 55.92 +/- 9.66 years; P = .000) and more women (62.3% vs 45.3%; P = .02), with more peripheral arterial disease (10.9% vs 2.4%; P = .011). No differences in donor characteristics were observed. Induction treatment with thymoglobulin or basiliximab was more common in D >or=70 (81.1% vs 57.3%; P = .006), with no differences in other immunosuppressive drugs. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was similar (P = .82), with a trend to a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes among D>or=70 (11.8% vs 22.5%; P = 0.09). Serum creatinine and proteinuria levels did not differ during follow-up (P > .05). Patients in D >or=70 displayed more episodes of urinary sepsis (19.1% vs 6.4%; P = .008), but no differences were observed in cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (P = .629), neoplasia (P = .118), ischemic cardiopathy (P = .642), or hospital readmission due to infections (P = .567). Graft survivals at 5 years were 70% and 75% (P = .279) among groups D >or=70 and D>55-<70, respectively, and patient survivals at 5 years were 88% and 88% (P = .63), respectively. In conclusion, our study showed that selected kidneys from donors older than 70 years were followed with excellent graft and patient survivals, permitting older patients on renal replacement therapy to benefit from renal transplantation.

Beginning hemodialysis: do patients with a failed renal transplant start in worse condition?

OBJECTIVE: Predialysis management of patients with kidney transplant failure is a topic of growing interest. Herein we have reviewed a group of patients with a failed kidney transplant who returned to dialysis to compare them with patients with native kidney failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 25 patients who returned to dialysis after a failed renal transplant (group A) and 38 patients initiating dialysis after native kidney failure (group B). RESULTS: We did not observe significant differences in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), potassium, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and hemoglobin levels between the 2 groups at the beginning of dialysis. Erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) was higher in group A. Progression of renal disease in the 2 years before dialysis was faster in group A, with a greater monthly decline in GFR and higher levels of systolic blood pressure. Renal transplant patients needed more evaluations in the 6 months before initiating dialysis: 1.75 +/- 0.97 vs 0.70 +/- 2.61 evaluations/month (P = .000). Also, the number of hospitalizations during the years before and after dialysis initiation was higher among group A. Patient survival after return to dialysis at 1 year was 75% in group A and 97% in group B (log-rank; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a failed kidney allograft initiated dialysis in similar condition to those with native kidney failure. The faster GFR decline may be related to immunosuppressive treatment. Transplant patients needed more frequent evaluations and more hospitalizations before and after dialysis initiation, indicating a higher morbidity rate.

Cytomegalovirus infection renal transplant recipients: risk factors and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral infection after allotransplantation; it can be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to analyze the main risk factors that lead to development of CMV infection and disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who received a renal allograft from May 2003 to December 2007. Three patients (D-/R-) were excluded. CMV infection was defined by the detection of 2 or more positive tests for pp65 antigenemia and CMV disease by evidence of attributable symptoms in need of antiviral treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (15.7%) presented active CMV infections and another 35 (17.2%), CMV disease. The mean follow-up was 27.8 +/- 17 months. Prior to transplantation, 9.2% of patients were seronegative (D+/R-) and 77.9% seropositive (D+/R+). Compared with noninfected patients, those with CMV infection/disease were older and received an allograft from an older donor. Upon logistic regression analysis, recipient age older than 55 years, induction therapy with Thymoglobulin, and maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine were the major risk factors to develop CMV disease. An early acute rejection episode was more frequent and renal function measured by serum creatinine poorer until 18 months posttransplantation among CMV-infected versus noninfected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that CMV infection is a common complication after kidney transplantation associated with older age, induction treatment with antilymphocyte globulin, worse renal function, and increased patient morbidity.

[Diagnosing neoplasia in a kidney transplant unit]. / Diagnóstico de neoplasias en una consulta de trasplante renal.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cancer is one of the major causes of death with functioning allograft among renal transplant patients. The increasing age of patients in the waiting list has derived in a higher risk of cancer in this population. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of cancer in the waiting list and kidney transplant patients. METHODS: Between November/1996 and November/2007 we assisted 825 patients in the outpatient renal transplant clinic, 467 were transplanted, 120 remained in the waiting list and 238 have been removed from the waiting list or died. RESULTS: During this period, 97 malignancies were diagnosed, 33 of 32 kidney transplant candidates and 64 of 62 renal transplant patients. The comparative analysis between this two groups showed that candidates had higher frequency of solid organ tumours compared with a higher incidence of skin cancer in transplanted patients. Mean time between transplant and cancer diagnosis was 42.6 +/- 32.7 months, 48% of malignancies were diagnosed within the first three years postransplant. When comparing kidney transplant patients with and without cancer diagnosis, the formers were older and had worse patient survival at five years. Allograft survival was similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: we want to emphasize the extreme importance of a detailed screening in the renal transplant candidates and transplanted patients due to a higher incidence of malignancies in this population.

Immunoglobulin E recognition patterns to purified Kiwifruit (Actinidinia deliciosa) allergens in patients sensitized to Kiwi with different clinical symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Green kiwifruit allergy is on the rise. However, no surveys testing purified major kiwi allergens have been carried out in a large population, including both kiwi-sensitized [skin prick test (SPT)-positive] and truly kiwi-allergic patients. OBJECTIVE: To isolate major kiwifruit allergens, and to explore their relevance by in vitro and in vivo methods in a large kiwi-sensitized and -allergic population. METHODS: A large group (n=92) of kiwi-sensitized patients with different clinical symptoms were selected, and double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges to kiwi were performed in 52 of them. The three major IgE-binding proteins from kiwifruit extracts were isolated and characterized by N-terminal amino acid sequencing and molecular size and glycosylation analysis. The allergenic potency of the three kiwi allergens, and of avocado Pers a 1 as a model allergen associated with the latex-fruit syndrome, was tested by specific IgE quantitation, immunodetection assays and SPTs. RESULTS: The isolated kiwifruit allergens were identified as actinidin Act d 1, glycosylated thaumatin-like Act d 2 and a novel 40 kDa glycoprotein designated as Act d 3.02. Specific IgE to each of the three allergens was found in over 60% of sera from kiwi-sensitized patients, and Act d 1 and Act d 2 induced positive SPT responses in over 50% of the tested patients. A significant link between IgE levels to Act d 1 and Act d 3 and anaphylaxis was uncovered. Avocado Pers a 1 showed an in vitro sensitization prevalence of around 45%, but a low in vivo reactivity. CONCLUSION: Act d 1, Act d 2 and Act d 3 are major allergens in the population studied. Severe symptoms after kiwi ingestion are associated with high IgE levels to Act d 1 and Act d 3.

Natural rubber latex and chestnut allergy: cross-reactivity or co-sensitization?

BACKGROUND: Chestnut and natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy are often associated in the latex-fruit syndrome. AIM OF THE STUDY: To establish whether the concurrent NRL and chestnut IgE antibody reactivity are the results of co-sensitization or cross-reactivity. METHODS: Sera from 19 patients with chestnut- and NRL-specific IgE were selected and tested for reactivity with recombinant (r) latex allergens. Cross-reactivity was explored by IgE-inhibition experiments using chestnut or NRL allergens as solid phase on ImmunoCAP. RESULTS: IgE-antibodies were detected to rHev b 6.01 (prohevein) in 58% of the sera, to rHev b 5 in 32%, to rHev b 12 in four of 13 sera, to rHev b 7.02 and rHev b 11 in four, and to rHev b 1 in two of 19 sera. rHev b 8-IgE antibodies were found in nine sera (47%), whereas six displayed mono-sensitization to rHev b 8 with regard to our test panel. Three of 16 sera showed IgE to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. In most sera recognizing rHev b 5 and/or rHev b 6.01 as major allergens the IgE-reactivity to NRL remained unaffected by chestnut extract and chestnut-IgE remained unaffected by NRL extract. Conversely, in sera with rHev b 8 as dominant allergen IgE-binding to NRL was nearly completely inhibited by chestnut and vice versa. IgE-binding to rHev b 8 was abolished by chestnut extract. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients have concomitant IgE antibody reactivity to chestnut and NRL, cross-reactivity could be demonstrated mainly in those patients with IgE to Hev b 8 (profilin) from NRL.

Risk factors and prognosis for proteinuria in renal transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Proteinuria in renal transplant recipients has been recognized as a risk factor of progression of chronic allograft nephropathy and for cardiovascular disease, the main causes of transplant failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the risk factors for persistent proteinuria (>0.5 g/day) among 337 kidney allograft recipients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, among a series of 375 transplants performed during a decade, as well as their association with allograft and patient survivals. Patients with proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/d were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and/or angiotensin-receptor blockers. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 53.35 +/- 52.63 months, 68 patients (20.17%) had persistent proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/d. Female patients (P = .012), body mass index (BMI) >25 (P = .008), pretransplant HLA sensitization (P = .039), and delayed graft function (DGF; P = .001) were associated with proteinuria. Induction treatment with antithymocyte globulin (P = .030) and treatment with tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine (P = .046) were associated with an increased risk of proteinuria. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent value of DGF (RR = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 4.07; P = .009) and BMI >25 (RR = 1.968; 95% CI 1.05 to 3.68; P = .035) to predict postransplant proteinuria. The mean values of serum creatinine (P = .000) and systolic blood pressure (P < .05) were persistently higher from the early stages after transplantation in the proteinuric group. Graft survival at 5 years was 69% among patients who developed proteinuria and 93% in those without proteinuria (P = .000), with no differences in patient survival (P = .062). CONCLUSION: Proteinuria in renal transplant recipients was related to immunological and nonimmunological factors, some of which, such as hypertension and obesity could be modifiable. Proteinuria in renal transplant recipients predicted a worse allograft survival despite of intensive treatment of hypertension including ACEI/angiotensin-receptor blockers.

Benefits derivated from late steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients.

Because corticosteroids have adverse metabolic effects, inducing bone-mineral imbalance and contributing to infections among renal transplant recipients, many withdrawal trials have been attempted to reduce adverse events and improve quality of life. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of late steroid withdrawal, after the first posttransplant year, among a selected group of kidney allograft recipients. In 42 low immunological risk allograft recipients, among 382 patients transplanted during a decade, corticosteroids were progressively reduced and completely withdrawn. The evolution of clinical and biochemical parameters after the withdrawal were analyzed. Corticosteroid withdrawal was performed as a mean of 52.16 +/- 28.41 months posttransplant, with subsequent follow-up without steroid treatment of 18.13 +/- 16.11 months. Comparing the most recent evaluation with the data previous to steroid withdrawal, patients showed a significant decreases in diastolic pressure (P = .039), total cholesterol (P = .000), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P = .039), but not in triglyceride levels (P = .33). Body weight did not change (P = .77), but increased fasting glucose levels were noted (P = .03), in absence of new diagnosed diabetes mellitus. A significant reduction in cyclosporine Neoral (P = .01) or tacrolimus doses were detected (P = .01). At the last visit, serum creatinine in the whole group remained stable (P = .06). Only five patients showed an increase in serum creatinine more than 20% (from 1.44 +/- 0.41 to 1.94 +/- 0.45 mg/dL P = .04) and proteinuria did not increase (P = .94). No patient was diagnosed with a rejection episodes or required corticosteroid resumption. Graft and patient survivals were 100% at the end of follow-up. In conclusion, our data showed that late corticosteroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients of low immunological risk is safe and is followed by an improvement in their metabolic profile and in blood pressure.

Gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant recipients: MITOS study.

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: An epidemiologic multicenter study was performed to evaluate the prevalence and management of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in solid organ transplant patients. A total of 1788 recipients were included, 1132 of which corresponded to renal transplanted patients. RESULTS: The mean age for the renal transplanted patients was 52 +/- 13.2 years. The mean time from the transplantation was 5.4 +/- 5.4 years. 17.7% showed some pretransplant GI disease, while 53% presented this type of complication in the posttransplant period. Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI complication (51.5%) and digestive perforation was the GI disorder that affected the patients daily living the most. From the patients with GI complications, 71% received pharmacological treatment, using gastric protectors in 91.3% of the cases. Regarding immunosuppressive drugs, in 30.9% of the cases the dose of the drug was reduced, in 9.3% discontinued temporarily and in 7.5% discontinued permanently. These changes mainly affected the MMF (89%, 83% and 74% for dose change, temporary and permanent discontinuation, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of GI complications in renal transplant exceeded 50%, and affected patients' daily living. The management of these complications was based on treatment with gastric protectors, dose reduction and/or partial or definitive MMF discontinuation.

Effect of overweight on kidney transplantation outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a prevalent problem in renal transplant recipients that is followed by reduced graft and patient survivals. Because the prevalence of overweight (OW) is increasing in the renal transplant population, we studied the influence of OW on graft and recipient evolution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed a series of 337 patients with renal allografts having a mean follow-up of 53.4 +/- 30.6 months. We excluded 39 patients obese at transplantation. We compared the evolution of 134 OW patients (45.5%), and 160 patients (54.4%) with a body mass index <25 (NW group). RESULTS: OW patients were older (P = .000) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (P = .028), left ventricular hypertrophy (P = .014), and dyslipidemia (P = .001). They had received kidneys from older donors (P = .019). OW patients showed a higher incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (P = .006), without a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes (P = .756). Postransplant diabetes mellitus was more frequent (P = .000), and systolic blood pressure (P < .05), total cholesterol (P < .05), and tryglicerides were higher (P < .05) in the OW group. Serum creatinine at 6 months (P = .007) and proteinuria >0.5 g/24 hours, (P = .023) were higher among the OW group. Graft survival was not different between groups, but patient survival was lower in the OW group (P = .002). A logistic regression analysis showed that the recipient age (RR: 5.243) and the presence of OW (RR: 1.100) were independent prognostic factors for patient death. CONCLUSIONS: OW was a common situation among renal transplant candidates. It was associated with worse cardiovascular and metabolic profiles. OW patients showed worse allograft function and lower patient survival. A major effort must be exerted to avoid excessive weight gain, particularly among those OW at transplantation.