RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality and disability globally. We examined healthcare service utilization and costs attributable to CVD in Ireland in the period before the introduction of a major healthcare reform in 2016. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from 8 113 participants of the first wave of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing. CVD was defined as having a self-reported doctor's diagnosis of myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation or transient ischaemic attack. Participants self-reported the utilization of healthcare services in the year preceding the interview. Negative binomial regression with average marginal effects (AME) was used to estimate the incremental number of general practitioner (GP) and outpatient department (OPD) visits, accident and emergency department attendances and hospitalisations in population with CVD relative to population without CVD. We calculated the corresponding costs at individual and population levels, by gender and age groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of CVD was 18.2% (95% CI: 17.3, 19.0) Participants with CVD reported higher utilization of all healthcare services. In adjusted models, having CVD was associated with incremental 1.19 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.39) GP and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.93) OPD visits. There were twice as many incremental hospitalisations in males with CVD compared to females with CVD (AME (95% CI): 0.20 (0.16, 0.23) vs 0.10 (0.07, 0.14)). The incremental cost of healthcare service use in population with CVD was an estimated 352.2 million (95% CI: 272.8, 431.7), 93% of which was due to use of secondary care services. CONCLUSION: We identified substantially increased use of healthcare services attributable to CVD in Ireland. Continued efforts aimed at CVD primary prevention and management are required.
RESUMEN
Background: Oral diseases have the highest global prevalence rate among all diseases, with dental caries being one of the most common conditions in childhood. A low political priority coupled with a failure to incorporate oral health within broader health systems has contributed to its neglect in previous decades. In response, calls are emerging for the inclusion of oral health within the universal healthcare domain (UHC). This protocol outlines the methodology for a cross-country comparative analysis of publicly funded oral health systems for children across six European countries, reporting on oral health status in line with the indicators for UHC. Methods: This study will follow Yin's multiple case study approach and employ two strands of data collection, analysis, and triangulation: a systematic documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with elite participants local to each country. The countries chosen for comparison and providing a representative sample of European dental systems are Denmark, Hungary, the Republic of Ireland, Germany, Scotland, and Spain. A systematic search of five electronic databases and four additional electronic resources will be undertaken, in addition to grey literature and other publicly available sources, with the outcomes verified and further informed by local experts. The WHO Universal Health Coverage Cube will be used to guide data collection and analysis. Conclusions: This research will provide policy makers with an in-depth analysis and comparison of publicly funded oral health systems for children in Europe, including consideration of effective preventive strategies, oral health system reform, and indicators of universal oral health coverage. It is anticipated that the outcomes may help in positioning oral health on governmental health agendas and support its integration into wider health systems' reform in an accessible and affordable manner.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Community water fluoridation (CWF), the controlled addition of fluoride to the water supply for the prevention of dental caries (tooth decay), is considered a safe and effective public health intervention. The Republic of Ireland (Ireland) is the only country in Europe with a legislative mandate for the fluoridation of the public water supply, a key component of its oral health policy. However, more recently, there has been an increase in public concern around the relevance of the intervention given the current environment of multiple fluoride sources and a reported increase in the prevalence of enamel fluorosis. The aim of this economic analysis is to provide evidence to inform policy decisions on whether the continued public investment in community water fluoridation remains justified under these altered circumstances. METHODS: Following traditional methods of economic evaluation and using epidemiological data from a representative sample of 5-, 8-, and 12-year-old schoolchildren, this cost-effectiveness analysis, conducted from the health-payer perspective, compared the incremental costs and consequences associated with the CWF intervention to no intervention for schoolchildren living in Ireland in 2017. A probabilistic model was developed to simulate the potential lifetime treatment savings associated with the schoolchildren's exposure to the intervention for one year. RESULTS: In 2017, approximately 71% of people living in Ireland had access to a publicly provided fluoridated water supply at an average per capita cost to the state of 2.15. The total cost of CWF provision to 5-, 8-, and 12-year-old schoolchildren (n = 148,910) was estimated at 320,664, and the incremental cost per decayed, missing, or filled tooth (d3vcmft/D3vcMFT) prevented was calculated at 14.09. The potential annual lifetime treatment savings associated with caries prevented for this cohort was estimated at 2.95 million. When the potential treatment savings were included in the analysis, the incremental cost per d3vcmft/D3vcMFT prevented was -115.67, representing a cost-saving to the health-payer and a positive return on investment. The results of the analysis were robust to both deterministic and probability sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Despite current access to numerous fluoride sources and a reported increase in the prevalence of enamel fluorosis, CWF remains a cost-effective public health intervention for Irish schoolchildren.
Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Fluoruración , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Ireland, over 20,000 people are affected by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The licenced biologic therapies to treat moderate to severe IBD are reported to have similar effectiveness levels but differ in their methods of delivery. Certain therapies are administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in the hospital setting, others are delivered by subcutaneous injection in the community. AIM: To determine the non-drug costs involved in administering an IV biologic infusion in the hospital setting. METHODS: This time-and-motion study was conducted at an Infusion Day Unit (IDU) in an Irish teaching hospital. The sequence and duration of each patient's use of resources was recorded and costed. Bootstrap methods were applied to ensure that robust estimates of the accuracy of the non-parametric population statistics were reliably estimated. RESULTS: The mean time the patient spent at the IDU was 143.78 mins with a mean treatment time of 129.81 min. The main driver of patient time was the drug infusion time (39%), followed by the monitoring period (25%). The mean cost was 224.54 per treatment. Nurse time was the main expenditure driver (37%), followed by laboratory costs (27%) and other healthcare professional's costs (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that the non-drug costs associated with the delivery of an IV biologic in the hospital setting are non-trivial. Given the current budgetary climate of health systems, the compounding prevalence of IBD and the expected increase in patient numbers, it is imperative that physicians also consider the opportunity costs associated with the method of treatment delivery.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Hospitales , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with dementia in the acute setting are generally considered to impose higher costs on the health system compared to those without the disease largely due to longer length of stay (LOS). Many studies exploring the economic impact of the disease extrapolate estimates based on the costs of patients diagnosed using routinely collected hospital discharge data only. However, much dementia is undiagnosed, and therefore in limiting the analysis to this cohort, we believe that LOS and the associated costs of dementia may be overestimated. We examined LOS and associated costs in a cohort of patients specifically screened for dementia in the hospital setting. METHODS: Using primary data collected from a prospective observational study of patients aged ≥70 years, we conducted a comparative analysis of LOS and associated hospital costs for patients with and without a diagnosis of dementia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall length of stay and total costs between those with (µ = 9.9 days, µ = 8246) and without (µ = 8.25 days, µ = 6855) dementia. Categorical data analysis of LOS and costs between the two groups provided mixed results. CONCLUSIONS: The results challenge the basis for estimating the costs of dementia in the acute setting using LOS data from only those patients with a formal dementia diagnosis identified by routinely collected hospital discharge data. Accurate disease prevalence data, encompassing all stages of disease severity, are required to enable an estimation of the true costs of dementia in the acute setting based on LOS.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The recent economic crisis along with changing demographic trends has stimulated an increased interest in the value obtained from social care expenditure so as to ensure the sustainability of systems in the future. In Ireland, the Department of Health, further to a recent review of its disability services, commited to a new approach that will reshape and redesign its service provision. It specifically outlined a reorganisation of financing services, from a model of prospective block grant funding to a system of individualised budgeting based on an assessment of need. This paper examines the relationship between need, service utilisation and cost for high-cost users of adult intellectual disability residential services in an Irish county under the current model of block grant financing. The analysis reported is based on primary data collected from 68 high-cost users of adult intellectual disability residential services in an Irish county in 2013. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the relationship between need and cost, and also to examine the variations in the cost of support between the service provider organisations. Our analysis determined an association between need and cost, with poorer levels of psychological well-being related to higher costs. However, the study found no evident relationship between staff/client ratios, the numbers of staff engaged at the residential units and need. An examination of cost variations between the service provider organisations revealed that agency status; service unit size; client and staff characteristics all contributed to variations in the cost of care. This study supports the development of a national resource allocation framework as being fundamental to the equitable and transparent distribution of scarce resources, as recommended by the Department of Health in Ireland.