Exposure-response analysis of Camidanlumab tesirine in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) exposure-response (E-R) relationships, using an integrated population pharmacokinetic model, for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma enrolled in an open-label, phase 1 study (NCT02432235). METHODS: Exploratory analyses investigated relationships between exposure measures (Cmaxss, Cminss, and Cavgss) and the occurrence of binary variables (overall response rate [ORR] and selected adverse events [AEs]) and nonbinary variables (overall survival [OS]). RESULTS: Exploratory analyses showed a significant, positive relationship between exposure and ORR/OS. The final model showed this effect was non-significant due to the covariate effects. Cami exposures were higher in patients with selected grade ≥ 2 AEs at cycle 6 (the anticipated steady-state exposure level), confirmed in the final E-R models. CONCLUSIONS: Based on univariate results, Cmaxss was used as the exposure measure in all models, except for the autoimmune AE full E-R model in which Cavgss was used. The positive relationship between exposure and ORR/OS (higher exposure significantly associated with higher probabilities of ORR/OS) was not statistically significant in the final models. The final safety E-R models demonstrated a significant positive association between Cami exposure and selected grade ≥ 2 AEs, with higher exposures associated with higher probabilities of experiencing the grade ≥ 2 AEs at cycle 6. The results identify preliminary predictors of efficacy and safety and provide a basis for a dosing rationale and benefit-risk profile of Cami in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL.

Population pharmacokinetics analysis of camidanlumab tesirine in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The objective of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to characterize camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) pharmacokinetics based on the phase 1 study in relapsed/refractory lymphoma (NCT02432235). METHODS: An initial PPK model was developed based on a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination pathways. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated for correlation with potential demographic covariates; significant covariates were retained in the final model. RESULTS: In the final PPK model, baseline weight effects were included on clearance (CL), intercompartmental clearance (Q), and the volumes of distribution in the central (V1) and peripheral (V2) compartments. The baseline soluble CD25 (sCD25) effect was included on CL and maximum velocity of saturable clearance (Vmax); sex effect was included on CL and V1; and ethnicity effect was included on deconjugation clearance (CLdec). For a typical patient, CL and CLdec were 0.516 and 0.21 L/day, respectively (tAb elimination half-life: 18.72 days); V1 and V2 were 4.41 and 2.67 L, respectively; Vmax was 0.49 mg/day; the Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) was 0.409 µg/mL; and the first-order rate for decrease of Vmax (KDES) was 0.0197/day. Cami exposure was higher for patients with low baseline sCD25, higher body weight, and females. CONCLUSIONS: The final model described the observed data well, estimates of PK parameters were obtained, and covariates with significant effects on Cami exposure were identified. Altogether, this final PPK model provides a robust basis for analysis of Cami exposure-response relationships and further supports identification of the optimal Cami dosing schedule for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Camidanlumab tesirine in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study.

BACKGROUND: Novel approaches are required to improve outcomes in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We aimed to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine, an anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugate, in this patient population. METHODS: This was a phase 1, dose-escalation (part 1), dose-expansion (part 2), multicentre trial done in 12 hospital sites (seven in the USA and five in the UK). Adults (≥18 years old) with pathologically confirmed relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, who had no therapies available to them with established clinical benefit for their disease stage were enrolled. Camidanlumab tesirine was administered intravenously (3-150 µg/kg) once every 3 weeks. Primary objectives were to assess dose-limiting toxicity, determine maximum tolerated dose and recommended expansion dose(s), and assess safety of camidanlumab tesirine. Safety was assessed in all treated patients; antitumour activity was assessed in patients with one or more valid baseline and post-baseline disease assessment and in those who had disease progression or died after first study-drug dose. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02432235. FINDINGS: Between Oct 5, 2015, and Jun 30, 2019, 133 patients were enrolled (77 [58%] had classical Hodgkin lymphoma and 56 (42%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Median follow-up was 9·2 months (IQR 4·2-14·3). Eight dose-limiting toxicities were reported in five (6%) of 86 patients who were evaluable; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended doses for expansion were 30 µg/kg and 45 µg/kg for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and 80 µg/kg for patients with T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. No recommended doses for expansion were defined for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events (reported by ≥10% of the 133 patients) included increased γ-glutamyltransferase (20 [15%] patients), maculopapular rash (16 [12%]), and anaemia (15 [11%]); 74 (56%) patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly pyrexia (16 [12%]). One (1%) fatal treatment-emergent adverse event and two (2%) deaths outside the reporting period were considered at least possibly study-drug related. Antitumoural activity was seen in classical Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas; notably in all patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, the overall response was 71% (95% CI 60-81). INTERPRETATION: These results warrant evaluation of camidanlumab tesirine as a potential treatment option for relapsed or refractory lymphoma, particularly in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. FUNDING: ADC Therapeutics.

Camidanlumab tesirine, an antibody-drug conjugate, in relapsed/refractory CD25-positive acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A phase I study.

There is a significant need for improved therapeutics in older patients with acute leukemia. Camidanlumab tesirine is an antibody-drug conjugate against CD25, an antigen expressed in several malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT02588092) assessed the safety, activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of camidanlumab tesirine in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL/AML. A total of 35 patients (34 AML and 1 ALL) were enrolled and received camidanlumab tesirine intravenously at 3-92 µg/kg once every three weeks (Q3W, n = 26) or 30 or 37.5 µg/kg every week (QW, n = 9). One dose-limiting toxicity of maculopapular rash occurred in the 30 µg/kg QW group; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. No additional safety concerns or adverse events (AEs) of interest were identified. The most common (>10 % of patients) Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were febrile neutropenia (25.7 %), lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or fatigue (all 14.3 %), pneumonia, increased gamma-glutamyltransferase, and hypophosphatemia (each 11.4 %). No signal for serious immune-related AEs such as Guillain-Barré syndrome/polyradiculopathy was observed and there was no evidence of immunogenicity. PK showed rapid clearance with apparent half-life <2 days for conjugated and total antibody, suggesting that Q3W dosing may be insufficient for therapeutic efficacy, and prompting exploration of a QW schedule. Two patients achieved complete responses with incomplete hematologic recovery; one each at 30 and 37.5 µg/kg QW. The trial was terminated during dose escalation due to programmatic reasons other than safety. Hence, recommended dose was not determined.

Biomarker-guided clinical development of the first-in-class anti-inflammatory FPR2/ALX agonist ACT-389949.

AIMS: The main objectives of these two phase I studies were to investigate safety and tolerability as well as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of the novel potent and selective formyl peptide receptor type 2 (FPR2)/Lipoxin A4 receptor (ALX) agonist ACT-389949. A challenge model was used to assess the drug's anti-inflammatory potential, with the aim of selecting a dosing regimen for future patient studies. METHODS: Two double-blind, randomized phase I studies investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ACT-389949 at different doses and dosing regimens. Drug exposure was correlated with target engagement markers such as receptor internalization and cytokine measurements. The effect of FPR2/ALX agonism on neutrophil migration was studied in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inhalation model. RESULTS: ACT-389949 was well tolerated. Maximum concentrations were reached around 2 h after dosing, with a mean terminal half-life of 29.3 h [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.5, 33.7]. After multiple-dose administration, exposure increased by 111% (95% CI 89, 136), indicating drug accumulation. Administration of ACT-389949 resulted in a dose-dependent, long-lasting internalization of FPR2/ALX into leukocytes. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were dose-dependently but transiently upregulated only after the first dose. No pharmacological effect on neutrophil count was observed in the LPS challenge test performed at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: FPR2/ALX agonism with ACT-389949 was shown to be safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects. Receptor internalization and downstream mediators pointed towards a desensitization of the system, which may explain the lack of effect on neutrophil recruitment in the LPS challenge model.

Pharmacokinetics of the novel oral prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to explore the effect of hepatic or renal dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability and safety of selexipag, an orally active prostacyclin receptor agonist. METHODS: Two prospective, open-label studies evaluated the PK of selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679 in healthy subjects and in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment or severe renal function impairment (SRFI). A single dose of 200 µg or 400 µg was administered. The PK parameters were derived from plasma concentration-time profiles. RESULTS: Exposure increased with the severity of hepatic impairment. Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) for selexipag and ACT-333679 increased 2.1-fold (1.7-2.6) and 1.2-fold (0.9-1.6) in subjects with mild hepatic impairment, and 4.5-fold (3.4-5.8) and 2.2-fold (1.7-2.8) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment when compared with healthy subjects. The two subjects with severe hepatic impairment showed similar dose-normalized exposure to that of subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. A 1.7-fold increase in the AUC0-∞ of selexipag and ACT-333679 was observed with SRFI compared with healthy subjects. Although exposure to selexipag and/or ACT-333679 was higher in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or SRFI vs. healthy subjects, no safety concerns were raised in these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these observations, the PK data suggest that the clinically used starting dose needs no adjustments in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or SRFI. However, doses should be up-titrated with caution in these patients. The small number of subjects limits the interpretation of selexipag PK in subjects with severe hepatic impairment.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, and desipramine.

Almorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) with sleep-enabling effects in humans. Insomnia is often associated with mental health problems, including depression. Hence, potential interactions with antidepressants deserve attention. Desipramine was selected as a model drug because it is mainly metabolized by CYP2D6, which is inhibited by almorexant in vitro. A single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 20 healthy male subjects was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between almorexant and desipramine. Almorexant 200mg or matching placebo (double-blind) was administered orally once daily in the morning for 10 days, and a single oral dose of 50mg desipramine (open-label) was administered on Day 5. Almorexant increased the exposure to desipramine 3.7-fold, suggesting that almorexant is a moderate inhibitor of desipramine metabolism through inhibition of CYP2D6. Conversely, desipramine showed no relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of almorexant. Pharmacodynamic evaluations indicated that almorexant alone reduced visuomotor coordination, postural stability, and alertness, and slightly increased calmness. Desipramine induced a reduction in subjective alertness and an increase in pupil/iris ratio. Despite the increase in exposure to desipramine, almorexant and desipramine in combination showed the same pharmacodynamic profile as almorexant alone, except for prolonging reduced alertness and preventing the miotic effect of almorexant. Co-administration also prolonged the mydriatic effect of desipramine. Overall, repeated administration of almorexant alone or with single-dose desipramine was well tolerated. The lack of a relevant interaction with antidepressants, if confirmed for other DORAs, would be a key feature for a safer class of hypnotics.

Assessment of the abuse liability of a dual orexin receptor antagonist: a crossover study of almorexant and zolpidem in recreational drug users.

BACKGROUND: Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) enable initiation and maintenance of sleep in patients with primary insomnia. Blockade of the orexin system has shown reduction of drug-seeking behavior in animal studies, supporting the role of orexin antagonism as a novel approach for treating substance abuse. Since hypnotics are traditionally associated with misuse, a lack of abuse liability of DORAs would offer significant benefits over current therapies for sleep disorders. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover, proof-of-concept study, single oral doses of the DORA almorexant (200, 400, and 1,000 mg) were administered to healthy subjects with previous non-therapeutic experience with central nervous system depressants and were compared with placebo and single oral doses of zolpidem (20 and 40 mg), a benzodiazepine-like drug. Subjective measures of abuse potential (visual analog scales [VAS], Addiction Research Center Inventory, and Subjective Drug Value) and objective measures (divided attention [DA]) were evaluated over 24 h post-dose in 33 evaluable subjects. RESULTS: Drug Liking VAS peak effect (E max; primary endpoint) was significantly higher for all doses of almorexant and zolpidem compared with placebo (p<0.001). Almorexant 200 mg showed significantly less 'Drug Liking' than both zolpidem doses (p<0.01), and almorexant 400 mg had smaller effects than zolpidem 20 mg (p<0.05), while almorexant 1,000 mg was not different from either zolpidem dose. Results were similar for other subjective measures, although almorexant generally showed smaller negative and perceptual effects compared with zolpidem. Almorexant also showed less cognitive impairment compared with zolpidem on most DA endpoints. CONCLUSION: This study in humans investigating single doses of almorexant is the first to explore and show abuse liability of a DORA, a class of compounds that is not only promising for the treatment of sleep disorders, but also of addiction.

Absence and rescue of morphine withdrawal in GIRK/Kir3 knock-out mice.

Although morphine induces both analgesia and dependence through mu-opioid receptors (MORs), the respective contributions of the intracellular effectors engaged by MORs remain unknown. To examine the contribution of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK, Kir3) channels to morphine dependence and analgesia, we quantified naloxone-precipitated withdrawal behavior and morphine analgesia using GIRK knock-out ((-/-)) mice. The morphine withdrawal syndrome was strongly attenuated, whereas morphine analgesia was mostly preserved in mice lacking both GIRK2 and GIRK3 (GIRK2/3(-/-) mice). In acute slices containing the locus ceruleus (LC) from GIRK2/3(-/-) mice, the increase in spontaneous firing typically associated with morphine withdrawal was absent. Moreover, although morphine elicited normal presynaptic inhibition in the LC, postsynaptic GIRK currents were completely abolished in GIRK2/3(-/-) mice. Altogether, these data suggested that morphine-evoked postsynaptic inhibition of the LC was required for the induction of dependence. Consistent with this hypothesis, morphine withdrawal behavior was rescued in GIRK2/3(-/-) mice by ablation of adrenergic fibers using the neurotoxin N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine. Our data suggest that inhibition of adrenergic tone is required for the induction of dependence, and that channels containing GIRK2 and GIRK3 serve as an inhibitory gate.

RGS2 modulates coupling between GABAB receptors and GIRK channels in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area.

Agonists of GABA(B) receptors exert a bi-directional effect on the activity of dopamine (DA) neurons of the ventral tegmental area, which can be explained by the fact that coupling between GABA(B) receptors and G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels is significantly weaker in DA neurons than in GABA neurons. Thus, low concentrations of agonists preferentially inhibit GABA neurons and thereby disinhibit DA neurons. This disinhibition might confer reinforcing properties on addictive GABA(B) receptor agonists such as gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and its derivatives. Here we show that, in DA neurons of mice, the low coupling efficiency reflects the selective expression of heteromeric GIRK2/3 channels and is dynamically modulated by a member of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein family. Moreover, repetitive exposure to GHB increases the GABA(B) receptor-GIRK channel coupling efficiency through downregulation of RGS2. Finally, oral self-administration of GHB at a concentration that is normally rewarding becomes aversive after chronic exposure. On the basis of these results, we propose a mechanism that might underlie tolerance to GHB.

Applications of two-photon microscopy in the neurosciences.

Thanks to deep tissue penetration of infrared light (IR), two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) has become an important tool in modern neuroscience. Examples range from the high-resolution visualization of dendritic spines in single neurons to the monitoring of intracellular Ca++ transients in small neural networks. In the present review we give an overview of the current achievements and discuss emerging applications of the technique.

Bi-directional effects of GABA(B) receptor agonists on the mesolimbic dopamine system.

The rewarding effect of drugs of abuse is mediated by activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system, which is inhibited by putative anti-craving compounds. Interestingly, different GABA(B) receptor agonists can exert similarly opposing effects on the reward pathway, but the cellular mechanisms involved are unknown. Here we found that the coupling efficacy (EC(50)) of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK, Kir3) channels to GABA(B) receptor was much lower in dopamine neurons than in GABA neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), depending on the differential expression of GIRK subunits. Consequently, in rodent VTA slices, a low concentration of the canonical agonist baclofen caused increased activity, whereas higher doses eventually inhibited dopamine neurons. At behaviorally relevant dosages, baclofen activated GIRK channels in both cell types, but the drug of abuse gamma-hydroxy-butyric acid (GHB) activated GIRK channels only in GABAergic neurons. Thus GABA(B) receptor agonists exert parallel cellular and behavioral effects due to the cell-specific expression of GIRK subunits.