RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness is associated with excess morbidity and mortality. Continuous feeding may suppress muscle protein synthesis as a result of the muscle-full effect, unlike intermittent feeding, which may ameliorate it. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does intermittent enteral feed decrease muscle wasting compared with continuous feed in critically ill patients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a phase 2 interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 121 mechanically ventilated adult patients with multiorgan failure were recruited following prospective informed consultee assent. They were randomized to the intervention group (intermittent enteral feeding from six 4-hourly feeds per 24 h, n = 62) or control group (standard continuous enteral feeding, n = 59). The primary outcome was 10-day loss of rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area determined by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included nutritional target achievements, plasma amino acid concentrations, glycemic control, and physical function milestones. RESULTS: Muscle loss was similar between arms (-1.1% [95% CI, -6.1% to -4.0%]; P = .676). More intermittently fed patients received 80% or more of target protein (OR, 1.52 [1.16-1.99]; P < .001) and energy (OR, 1.59 [1.21-2.08]; P = .001). Plasma branched-chain amino acid concentrations before and after feeds were similar between arms on trial day 1 (71 µM [44-98 µM]; P = .547) and trial day 10 (239 µM [33-444 µM]; P = .178). During the 10-day intervention period the coefficient of variation for glucose concentrations was higher with intermittent feed (17.84 [18.6-20.4]) vs continuous feed (12.98 [14.0-15.7]; P < .001). However, days with reported hypoglycemia and insulin usage were similar in both groups. Safety profiles, gastric intolerance, physical function milestones, and discharge destinations did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Intermittent feeding in early critical illness is not shown to preserve muscle mass in this trial despite resulting in a greater achievement of nutritional targets than continuous feeding. However, it is feasible and safe. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02358512; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/terapia , Síndrome Debilitante/prevención & control , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/complicaciones , Respiración Artificial , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is little consensus on the role of training in bedside ultrasound skills for medical students or junior doctors early in their careers. METHODS: We trained 20 Foundation Year 1 doctors in the use of ultrasound as an adjunct to peripheral venous cannulation and following an assessment of competence gave them access to an ultrasound machine to assist with difficult cannulations in their clinical practice. Self-reported confidence and competence were assessed using pre- and post-training questionnaires, with competence objectively assessed immediately post-training and at one and three months follow up. Clinical use of ultrasound was studied over three months. RESULTS: Improvements in self-reported confidence and competence were observed post-training and retained at three months. 85% (17/20) of participants were objectively assessed as competent immediately post-training, with retention of competence demonstrated in 80% (16/20) and 75% (15/20) at one and three months, respectively. There were 33 separate uses of ultrasound during the three month study period with a 73% (24/33) success rate and no adverse incidents. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that doctors in their first post-graduate year can be trained in the use of ultrasound as an adjunct to peripheral venous cannulation, retain the skill over time and use it safely in their clinical practice.