Implementation of depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists in the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, depression is one of the most common mental health disorders. Ambulatory care pharmacists play a critical role in assisting with medication and dosage selection, identifying and managing drug interactions and adverse effects, and increasing medication adherence. Existing data on depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists trained in primary care is limited and outdated. OBJECTIVES: This study provides insight into current practices for depression management by primary care pharmacy specialists within an academic health center and how pharmacist interventions may impact functional outcomes of depression. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 27 patients with a primary care physician within the health system who were seen by an ambulatory care pharmacist for depression. Subjects were excluded if they were under 18 years old, pregnant, or had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia. The primary outcome was characterization of pharmacist interventions for treatment of depression. Secondary outcomes included change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the patient health questionnaire (PHQ), characterization of adverse effects correlated with medications for depression, and utilization of pharmacogenomics testing and results. RESULTS: Of 27 patients seen by a pharmacist for depression management, 38 total interventions were made, with an average of 1.77 interventions per patient. The most common intervention was new medication initiation (32%). Average PHQ-9 scores dropped from 14.9 to 7.3 twelve weeks following the initial pharmacist visit. Only 6 patients reported adverse effects to a current antidepressant during their visit with the pharmacist, and only 2 of these cases warranted a change in therapy. Ten patients obtained pharmacogenomic testing with pharmacist facilitation. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in the primary care setting are positioned to be an additional resource for depression management and can offer a wide variety of interventions to improve patient health.

Higher NT-proBNP levels and the risk of intradialytic hypotension at hemodialysis initiation.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a potent predictor of adverse outcomes in hemodialysis initiation. These patients often experience intradialytic hypotension, which may partially reflect cardiac dysfunction, but the association of NT-proBNP with intradialytic hypotension is not clear. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial that tested mannitol versus placebo in 52 patients initiating hemodialysis (NCT01520207). NT-proBNP was measured prior to the first and third sessions (n = 87). Mixed-effects models (adjusting for randomized treatment, sex, race, age, diabetes, heart failure, catheter use, pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure, pre-dialysis weight, ultrafiltration volume, serum sodium, bicarbonate, urea nitrogen, phosphate, albumin, hemoglobin, and session length) were fit to examine the association of NT-proBNP with systolic blood pressure decline (pre-dialysis minus nadir systolic blood pressure). Additionally, mixed-effects Poisson models were fit to examine the association with intradialytic hypotension (≥20 mmHg decline in systolic blood pressure). FINDINGS: Mean age was 55 ± 16 years; 33% had baseline heart failure. The median NT-proBNP was 5498 [25th-75th percentile 2011, 14,790] pg/mL; 26 sessions (30%) were complicated by intradialytic hypotension. In adjusted models, each unit higher log-NT-proBNP was associated with 6.0 mmHg less decline in systolic blood pressure (95%CI -9.2 to -2.8). Higher pre-dialysis NT-proBNP, per log-unit, was associated with a 52% lower risk of intradialytic hypotension (IRR 0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.97), without evidence for effect modification by randomized treatment (P-interaction = 0.17). DISCUSSION: In patients initiating hemodialysis, higher NT-proBNP is associated with less decline in intradialytic systolic blood pressure and lower risk of intradialytic hypotension. Future studies should investigate if higher pre-dialysis NT-proBNP levels may identify patients who might tolerate more aggressive ultrafiltration.

Temporal Changes in Electrolytes, Acid-Base, QTc Duration, and Point-of-Care Ultrasound during Inpatient Hemodialysis Sessions.

Background: Of the more than 550,000 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD) in the United States, each has an average of 1.6 admissions annually (>880,000 inpatient HD sessions). Little is known about the temporal changes in laboratory values, ECGs, and intravascular and extravascular volume during inpatient HD sessions. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of hospitalized HD patients, we assessed intradialytic laboratory values (metabolic panels, blood gases, ionized calcium levels), ECGs, and sonographic measures of volume status. Results: Among 30 participants undergoing HD (mean age 62 years; 53% men, 43% Black) laboratory values had the largest changes in the first hour of HD. There was no significant change in ionized calcium levels pre- to post-HD (change: -0.01±0.07, P=0.24); 12 of 30 and 17 of 30 patients had levels below the lower reference limit at the beginning and end of HD, respectively. The mean pH increased pre- to post-HD (change: 0.06±0.04, P<0.001); 21 of 30 had a pH above the upper reference limit post-HD. There was a trend toward longer median QTc duration from pre- to post-HD (change: 7.5 msec [-5 msec, 19 msec], P=0.07). The sum of B lines on lung ultrasound decreased from pre- to post-HD (median decrease: 3 [1, 7], P<0.01). The collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava increased pre- to post-HD (median increase: 4.8% [1.5%, 13.4%], P=0.01), whereas internal jugular vein diameter did not change (P=0.24). Conclusions: Among hospitalized patients undergoing HD, we found dynamic changes in laboratory values, QTc duration, and volume status. Further research is required to assess whether HD prescriptions can be tailored to alter these variations to potentially improve patient outcomes.

A randomized controlled trial of two dialysate sodium concentrations in hospitalized hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Several large dialysis organizations have lowered the dialysate sodium concentration (DNa) in an effort to ameliorate hypervolemia. The implications of lower DNa on intra-dialytic hypotension (IDH) during hospitalizations of hemodialysis (HD) patients is unclear. METHODS: In this double-blind, single center, randomized controlled trial (RCT), hospitalized maintenance HD patients were randomized to receive higher (142 mmol/L) or lower (138 mmol/L) DNa for up to six sessions. Blood pressure (BP) was measured in a standardized fashion pre-HD, post-HD and every 15 min during HD. The endpoints were: (i) the average decline in systolic BP (pre-HD minus lowest intra-HD, primary endpoint) and (ii) the proportion of total sessions complicated by IDH (drop of ≥20 mmHg from the pre-HD systolic BP, secondary endpoint). RESULTS: A total of 139 patients completed the trial, contributing 311 study visits. There were no significant differences in the average systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline between the higher and lower DNa groups (23 ± 16 versus 26 ± 16 mmHg; P = 0.57). The proportion of total sessions complicated by IDH was similar in the higher DNa group, compared with the lower DNa group [54% versus 59%; odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.36-1.44; P = 0.35]. In post hoc analyses adjusting for imbalances in baseline characteristics, higher DNa was associated with 8 mmHg (95% CI 2-13 mmHg) less decline in SBP, compared with lower DNa. Patient symptoms and adverse events were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT for hospitalized maintenance of HD patients, we found no difference in the absolute SBP decline between those who received higher versus lower DNa in intention-to-treat analyses. Post hoc adjusted analyses suggested a lower risk of IDH with higher DNa; thus, larger, multi-center studies to confirm these findings are warranted.