Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol ; 5 Suppl 1: S93-8, 2012 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22701157

OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated ears. METHODS: A retrospective study of cochlear implant recipients from our institution who had previously received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers was performed. A control group with cochlear implants who did not receive radiotherapy was recruited. A review of case records, speech discrimination scores (SDS), and a validated subjective questionnaire in the form of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered to the study group who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Global and category scores in both groups were averaged and statistically compared via non-inferiority (NI) testing. RESULTS: With the control group (n=8) as the reference, the -ΔNI was defined, and a one-tailed lower 95% confidence interval was used for the irradiated group (n=8). The APHAB degree of improvement (%) results were as follows: global, 28.9% (19.32%, -ΔNI=16.3%); ease of communication, 67.0% (58.36%, -ΔNI=37.5%); background noise, 53.2% (44.14%, -ΔNI=26.8%); reverberation, 41.7% (28.85%, -ΔNI=32.7%); and aversiveness, -46.2% (-67.80%, -ΔNI=-56.9%). The SDS was 66.9% (56.02%, -ΔNI=51.0%). From the results, lower 95% confidence interval limits of global APHAB, SDS, ease of communication, and background noise scores of the irradiated group were within the defined -ΔNI boundary and hence are not inferior to the control. The categories of reverberation and aversiveness could not be proven, however. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvements in hearing measured both objectively and subjectively. The overall hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation for post-irradiated patients were not worse than patients who have had no prior irradiation to ear structures.

2.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 76(2): 300-2, 2012 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22204960

We report a case of a deafened child with advanced labyrinthitis ossificans resulting from meningo-encephalitis. She received a cochlear implant in the right ear, following a drill-out procedure. Post-implant hearing outcomes were satisfactory initially, but deteriorated over time as a result of partial electrode migration. The child subsequently received a left auditory brainstem implantation with improvement of hearing outcomes. Post-operatively, a sub-dural hematoma developed not on the side of the operation but on the opposite side. Simultaneous use of the cochlear implant on one side and the acoustic brainstem on the other, aggravated the non-auditory side effects of the ABI and compromised its potential for optimal hearing results.


Auditory Brain Stem Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Deafness/etiology , Deafness/surgery , Meningoencephalitis/complications , Audiometry , Auditory Threshold , Child, Preschool , Combined Modality Therapy , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Labyrinthitis/diagnostic imaging , Labyrinthitis/etiology , Labyrinthitis/surgery , Meningoencephalitis/diagnosis , Meningoencephalitis/therapy , Postoperative Care/methods , Risk Assessment , Speech Perception , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
...