Comparison of effects of Otago exercise program vs gaze stability exercise on balance and fear of fall in older adults: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Fall occurrences and the associated risk of injury are debilitating and major health concerns in the older population. Several interventions have been investigated and implemented to address the needs of balance impairments and to reduce the increased risk of falls. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Otago exercise program (OEP) and gaze stability exercises (GSE) on balance and the risk of falls in older adults residing at an old age home facility. METHODS: Thirty elderly participants were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups: Group OEP received the OEP, and group GSE received GSE for 8 weeks (thrice a week). In addition, both groups also performed core muscle-strengthening exercises. The outcome measures were the Berg balance scale (BBS) and the Fall efficacy scale-International (FES-I). RESULTS: The interventions resulted in significant improvements (P < .001) in both outcome measures in both groups. The mean pretest BBS scores of groups OEP and GSE increased from 40.4 and 39.2 to the mean post-test scores of 48 and 45.2, respectively. Similarly, the mean pretest FES-I scores of groups OEP and GSE also improved from 39.47 and 40.4 to the mean post-test scores of 32.73 and 36.07. The between-group comparison showed greater improvement (P < .05) in OEP group in both variables. CONCLUSIONS: OEP and GSE were found to be beneficial rehabilitation programs in improving balance and fear of falls in healthy older adults. However, the OEP was found to be a more effective intervention and may allow better balance and fall prevention improvements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT05781776; on 23/03/2023).

Effects of modified sleeper stretch and modified cross-body stretch on upper limb functions and shoulder ROM in tennis players: a randomized trial.

Tennis players often experience posterior shoulder pain due to restricted internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint. No research has compared the effects of modified sleeper stretch (MSS) versus modified cross-body stretch (MCBS) on tennis players' upper limb functions and IR ROM. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of modified sleeper and cross-body adduction stretch in improving shoulder IR ROM and upper limb functions in tennis players. Thirty male lawn tennis players (aged 20 to 35 years) with more than 15° glenohumeral IR deficiency on the dominant side compared to the non-dominant side were recruited and divided into two groups: Modified sleeper stretch group (MSSG) and modified cross-body stretch group (MCBSG). MSSG received MSS, and MCBSG received MCBS, 3-5 repetitions once daily for 4 weeks. Upper limb functions were measured using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scale, and the IR ROM of the shoulder joint was measured using a universal goniometer. Both groups observed significant (p < 0.05) DASH scores and IR ROM improvements. DASH scores decreased by 85% in MSSG and 79.60% in MCBSG. IR ROM increased by 94.64% in MSSG and 89.52% in MCBSG. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in post-intervention DASH scores and IR ROM values between both groups. MSS and MCBS improved upper limb functions and IR ROM of the shoulder joint in the selected sample population of lawn tennis players. No difference was observed between both stretching techniques in improving upper limb functions and IR ROM of the shoulder joint.