Plasma concentrations of endogenous hormones during one regular treatment cycle with a low-dose oral contraceptive and during two cycles with deliberate omission of two tablets.

In this open, prospective, phase-I study we closely monitored levels of endogenous progesterone, 17beta-estradiol, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone in six healthy women. We determined plasma concentrations every 1-3 days during one untreated baseline cycle and during the first treatment cycle with regular pill intake of an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol plus 75 microg gestodene. During the following two treatment cycles, two tablets were deliberately omitted (in cycle 2 on days 6/7 and in cycle 3 on days 11/12). All but possibly one volunteer ovulated in the untreated pre-cycle, as concluded from LH peaks followed by marked increases of progesterone. During the regular first treatment cycle and even after deliberate omission of two tables in treatment cycles 2 and 3, the progesterone and estradiol levels remained low, so that we concluded that no ovulation took place. However, two volunteers showed some sort of LH peak in the first regular treatment cycle and all women showed LH increases of > 40 microg/ml in at least one omission cycle. In ten out of 12 cycles, omissions of pill intake were followed by an episode of intermenstrual bleeding. In conclusion, we have shown that, after omission of two consecutive oral contraceptive tables, the endogenous hormone parameters did not provide evidence for ovulation. Although this provides confirmation of the robustness of this oral contraceptive towards non-compliance, the widely published practical recommendations should be followed.

A 3-year double-blind, randomized, controlled study on the influence of two oral contraceptives containing either 20 microg or 30 microg ethinylestradiol in combination with levonorgestrel on bone mineral density.

In this first prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study we evaluated the influence of two combined oral contraceptives on bone mineral density (BMD) and metabolic bone parameters. One dose-reduced preparation contained 20 microg ethinylestradiol (EE) in combination with 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) (20/100) was compared with the reference preparation which contained 30 microg EE in combination with 150 microg LNG (30/150). Data from 48 volunteers aged 20-35 years were obtained over an observation period of 36 treatment cycles. The direction of the change (increase or decrease) in all investigated bone-related variables was similar in both treatment groups. As compared to baseline, bone mineral density decreased by 0.4% in the 20/100 group and by 0.8% in the 30/150 group after 36 treatment cycles. These changes were not significantly different between the two treatment groups (p = 0.902). For bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, we measured a mean increase of 55.4% (20/100 group) and of 113.2% (30/150 group) after 36 treatment cycles. The two treatments did not differ statistically significantly (p = 0.522). With respect to cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTx), we detected a decrease of the mean NTx urine concentrations of 21.1% (20/100) and of 13.4% (30/150). These changes also did not significantly differ between the two treatments (p = 0.613). Both study treatments were safe and well-tolerated by all volunteers participating in the study. In conclusion, BMD did not change during the 3-year observation period. Thus, both trial preparations containing either 20 or 30 microg EE in combination with LNG were capable of maintaining BMD in young fertile women. There is no reason to assume that the EE dose reduction had any negative impact on BMD. Because there were no differences in BMD between the treatment groups, it can be assumed that even lower dosages than 20 microg EE might be sufficient for bone protection. Biochemical markers provided evidence for a reduced bone resorption.

Recommendation for confidence interval and sample size calculation for the Pearl Index.

A new guideline on the clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women, which has been released by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), calls for the calculation of a confidence interval for the Pearl Index, a widely used measure to describe the effectiveness of a contraceptive method. However, the interpretation of the Pearl Index as a statistical parameter, for which a confidence interval can be calculated, needs further clarification. The guideline does not provide the necessary definitions. In this paper, two statistical models, the Bernoulli model and the Poisson model, are compared; both can be used for the calculation of the Pearl Index and its upper confidence limit. The Poisson model proved to be more suitable, because it can accommodate incomplete treatment cycles. Unambiguous definitions and statistical formulae for the calculation of overall Pearl Index and the Method Failure Pearl Index are given. Finally, the sample sizes required to fulfill the EMEA's guideline are given.

A meta-analysis on the correlation between ovarian activity and the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding during low-dose oral contraceptive use.

We aimed to evaluate potential correlation between ovarian activity during use of combined oral contraceptives and the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding. Data from seven prospective clinical studies with five different combined low-dose oral contraceptives were retrospectively analyzed to determine ovarian activity measured by the Hoogland Score (follicle diameter and endogenous hormone levels) and cycle control. A total of 227 young fertile women were evaluated over three treatment cycles each. Women with intermenstrual bleeding had statistically significantly higher estradiol levels than those without intermenstrual bleeding. Also, women with intermenstrual bleeding had significantly larger follicle-like structures than those without intermenstrual bleeding. For example, in the second treatment cycle the difference of the mean follicle diameters between women without intermenstrual bleeding (12.5 mm) and women with spotting (16.9 mm) or breakthrough bleeding (16.1 mm) was statistically significant (p = 0.0179). Less than 17% of women with Hoogland Score 1, 2 or 3 (low ovarian activity) reported intermenstrual bleeding. On the other hand, 35.2% of women with Hoogland Score 4 (active follicle-like structures) reported intermenstrual bleeding. The association between bleeding and Hoogland Score was statistically significant (p < 0.0011). The findings of this retrospective analysis provide evidence that high ovarian suppression is positively correlated with improved cycle control in terms of less frequent intermenstrual bleeding - slight and heavy.

An open label, comparative study of the effects of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg levonorgestrel on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables.

In this open label, randomized study we compared the influence of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 100 microg levonorgestrel (20 EE) with a reference preparation containing 30 microg EE and 150 microg levonorgestrel (30 EE) on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables. Data from 48 volunteers were obtained. The direction of the change (increase or decrease) in most of the hemostatic variables were similar in both treatment groups. In particular, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 increased during treatment, reaching a median percent change of 40% in the 20 EE group and of 17% in the 30 EE group after one year. D-Dimer fibrin split products remained virtually unchanged, with no change at Cycle 13. The median HDL2 cholesterol levels decreased by 26% in the 20 EE group and by 39.8% in 30 EE group (p = 0.0045 for group difference) after one year. The median one year change for LDL cholesterol was 3.23% in the 20 EE group, compared to 25% in the 30 EE group, for VLDL 11.1% compared to 38.8%, respectively, and for total triglycerides 10.0% compared to 37.5%, respectively. The median absolute change for the area under the curve (AUC)(0-3h) for glucose at treatment Cycle 13 was 41.25 mmol/L x min in the 20 EE group and 73.50 mmol/L x min in the 30 EE group. The AUC(0-3h) insulin at treatment Cycle 13 decreased in the 20 EE group by 1635.0 pmolL x min and increased in the 30 EE group by 11797.5 pmolL x min (p = 0.0491 for group difference). Both study treatments were safe and well tolerated by the volunteers. In conclusion, the balanced one-third dose reduction in this new oral contraceptive evoked similar effects on the hemostatic variables, but favorable results for the lipid and carbohydrate profiles.

A double-blind comparative study of the effects of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene and a 21-day regimen with 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene on hemostatic variables, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism.

In this double-blind study we compared the influence of two oral contraceptives, a 23-day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene (23-day 20/75) and a 21-day regimen with 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene (21-day 30/75), on hemostatic variables, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism. The volunteers received the preparations daily for six 28-day cycles. Hemostatic variables and lipids were measured at baseline and after six treatment cycles. Carbohydrate metabolism was assessed by determination of the area under the curve (AUC) of carbohydrate parameters after oral glucose tolerance tests performed at baseline and after three treatment cycles. Data from 33 volunteers in each group were obtained. No significant differences between the effects of both treatments on the hemostatic system were detected. Neither the overall change of all hemostatic variables from baseline to treatment Cycle 6 [defined as primary target variable in the study] nor the change of any of the individual hemostatic parameters differed significantly between the treatment groups. Likewise, no significant nor clinically relevant differences in the effects of both treatments on the volunteers' lipid profiles were detected. The data on carbohydrate variables suggested a slightly more favorable influence of the 23-day 20/75 regimen. The increase of the glucose AUCs after three cycles tended to be stronger with the 21-day 30/75 regimen than with the 23-day 20/75 regimen. In addition, the AUCs for insulin and C-peptide were slightly reduced after three cycles with the 23-day 20/75 regimen but slightly increased with the 21-day 30/75 regimen. Both study treatments were safe and well tolerated by the volunteers as shown by the nature and frequency of adverse events, the routine laboratory examinations, and the physical and gynecological examinations. Both preparations provided adequate contraceptive reliability. The only pregnancy during treatment was attributable to intake errors. In conclusion, the prolongation of the treatment phase of an oral contraceptives with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol does not evoke more pronounced metabolic effects than a conventional 21-day regimen with 30 microg ethinyl estradiol.

Impact of oral contraceptive use on APC-resistance: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with three low-dose preparations.

The evaluation of the study was of the impact of oral contraceptive (OC) use on activated protein C (APC-resistance). Eight hundred eighteen young fertile women were screened for a study designed to compare three different marketed OC preparations. The women could have used either other oral contraceptive preparations before switching to the study medications (switchers) or were not using hormonal contraceptives (new starters) before the study began. Prior to study drug intake and during treatment, APC-resistance was determined with three different tests. Forty-one of 809 women evaluated (5.07%) carried the Factor V Leiden mutation. Twenty-two further participants (2.72%) had a positive screening test, but did not provide samples for the confirmatory mutation test. Two women with homozygous Factor V Leiden mutations and 39 women with heterozygous mutations were identified. The homozygous carriers were identified in all three of the screening tests employed, whereas none of the tests detected all 39 heterozygotes. In the pretreatment screening tests, previous OC users (switchers) had slightly lower APC ratios than the women using non-hormonal birth control methods (starters). During treatment the difference between starters and switchers was no longer apparent, but the APC ratio values of the screening tests slightly increased for both. The homozygous carriers were not treated. Differences in APC-resistance between users of the three different oral contraceptive preparations were not found. In conclusion, laboratory screening for APC-resistance using Coatest APC, ProC Global, or ProC APC-FV-Leiden clearly identifies homozygous mutant carriers. However, with regard to heterozygous mutant carriers, the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, especially during OC intake, is limited. The results of APC screening tests should have, at present, no impact on contraceptive counseling because the predictive value for thromboembolic risk of the test results and even the mutant status is low.

Double-blind, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day versus a 21-day low-dose oral contraceptive regimen containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene.

This prospective, double-blind, randomized study was conducted to compare the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day versus a 21-day oral contraceptive regimen containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene. Participants took trial medication daily for 28 days, either 23 tablets with active substances plus 5 placebo tablets or 21 tablets with active substances plus 7 placebo tablets. Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of seven cycles. Efficacy data gathered from 4,878 treatment cycles (23-day regimen: 2,362 cycles; 21-day regimen: 2,516 cycles) were obtained from 703 participants (23-day regimen, n = 342; 21-day regimen, n = 361). Both preparations proved to be effective contraceptives and provided good cycle control. One pregnancy because of method failure was recorded in each treatment group. This resulted in a study Pearl Index of 0.5 for each treatment. For the 23-day regimen, 36.0% of participants reported at least one intracyclic bleeding episode during Cycles 2-4 (primary target) compared to 37.1% in the 21-day regimen. In the 23-day regimen group, intracyclic bleeding episodes were reported by 42.4% of the participants in Cycle 1 but only in 14% in Cycle 7 and in the 21-day regimen group by 44.6% in Cycle 1 and only 17.3% in Cycle 7. Overall, intracyclic bleeding was reported in 21.9% of the 23-day regimen cycles and in 22.7% of the 21-day regimen cycles.A greater number of 23-day regimen participants had shorter withdrawal bleeding periods than with the 21-day regimen. In significantly (p <0.0001) more cycles in the 23-day regimen group, participants reported withdrawal bleeding periods that lasted only 1-4 days compared to the 21-day regimen group. For the majority of the treatment cycles, the median number of bleeding days in the 23-day regimen group was 4 days and in the 21-day regimen group 5 days. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar adverse events pattern. The discontinuation rate because of adverse events was low (23-day regimen, 6%; 21-day regimen, 4%). No serious vascular adverse events were reported. More than 75% of the women in both groups either lost more than 2 kg of weight or did not gain weight during the study. The treatment effect on blood pressure was negligible. There were no appreciable changes in mean laboratory values over the course of the study.

Open, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene and a 21-day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 150 microg desogestrel.

This prospective, open, randomized study was conducted to compare the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 75 microg gestodene (GSD) and a 21-day regimen with 20 microg EE and 150 microg desogestrel (DSG). Participants took either 23 tablets with active substances plus 5 placebo tablets (23-day EE/GSD) or 21 tablets with active substances followed by 7 days without pill-taking (21-day EE/DSG). Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of seven cycles. Efficacy data gathered from 5967 treatment cycles (23-day EE/GSD: 2975 cycles; 21-day EE/DSG: 2992 cycles) were obtained from 890 participants (445 in each group). Both preparations proved to be effective contraceptives and provided good cycle control. No pregnancy during treatment was recorded. This resulted in a study Pearl Index of 0.0 for both treatments. For 23-day EE/GSD, 32.4% of participants reported at least one intracyclic bleeding episode during Cycles 2-4 (primary target) compared to 31.5% for 21-day EE/DSG. In the 23-day EE/GSD group, intracyclic bleeding episodes were reported by 48.8% of the participants in Cycle 1 but in only 15.1% in Cycle 7, and in the 21-day regimen group by 43.4% in Cycle 1 and only 14.2% in Cycle 7. Overall, intracyclic bleeding was reported in 20.9% of cycles for both treatments.A greater number of 23-day EE/GSD participants had shorter withdrawal bleeding periods than with 21-day EE/DSG. In significantly (p <0.0001) more cycles in the 23-day EE/GSD group participants reported withdrawal bleeding periods that lasted only 1-4 days compared to the 21-day EE/DSG group. For the majority of the treatment cycles, the median number of bleeding days in the 23-day EE/GSD group was 4 days and in the 21-day EE/DSG group 5 days. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar adverse events pattern. The discontinuation rate because of adverse events was low (23-day EE/GSD: 6.1%; 21-day EE/DSG: 5.6%). No serious vascular adverse events were reported. More than 82% in the 23-day EE/GSD group and 79% in the 21-day EE/DSG group either lost more than 2 kg of weight or did not gain weight during the study. The treatment effect on blood pressure was negligible. There were no appreciable changes in mean laboratory values over the course of the study compared to baseline.

Blood pressure stability in a normotensive population during intake of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 g gestodene.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the impact of a monophasic gestodene-based oral contraceptive on blood pressure in a population that was normotensive at baseline. METHODS: Data on blood pressure were retrospectively analyzed from four large prospective clinical phase III trials with an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene. A total of 1342 young fertile women were evaluated after 12 treatment cycles. RESULTS: The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure did not change during treatment. Approximately 89% of women were normotensive at baseline and 93% at the end of the treatment period. Only a few women (< or = 1%) were hypertensive at baseline; an increase in this prevalence was not found after 12 cycles of oral contraceptive use. The number of women who experienced a blood pressure increase was almost identical to the number who experienced a decrease. Approximately 90% of women had either a negligible blood pressure change of maximal +/- 10 mmHg or a decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this retrospective analysis confirm that monophasic gestodene has a negligible effect on blood pressure in users who were normotensive before treatment began.

Body weight change during use of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene with a comparison of the women who completed versus those who prematurely discontinued intake.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the impact of an oral contraceptive on body weight with a comparison ofwomen who completed versus women who prematurely discontinued intake. METHODS: Data on body weight were retrospectively analyzed from four large prospective clinical trials with an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene (EE/GSD). A total of 1971 young fertile women were included in the evaluation, and 1467 completed 12 cycles. RESULTS: We found no clinically relevant change of body weight during treatment with an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene in the vast majority of users after 12 treatment cycles. The mean change of body weight was less than 0.3 kg in this time period for all users. Nearly 70% of women experienced a minor change in their body weight of +/- 2 kg. An additional 13% lost more than 2 kg body weight in the course of 12 treatment cycles. A total of 11% increased their weight by 2-4 kg. A total of 1255 (85.5%) of women had a body mass index (BMI) of < or = 25 at baseline compared to 1253 (85.4%) after 12 cycles of treatment. There was no significant difference in the change ofbody weight between the women completing 12 cycles of treatment and those who prematurely discontinued EE/GSD. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis confirms that there was only a negligible change of body weight during intake of an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene. There was no difference in weight change between the women completing the study or discontinuing intake.

Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives in a multicenter clinical study.

This study compares the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of two oral contraceptive preparations containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol combined with either 75 micrograms of gestodene (EE/GSD) or 150 micrograms of desogestrel (EE/DSG). Women received the trial preparations daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day pill-free interval. Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of 12 cycles. Efficacy data of 14,700 treatment cycles (EE/GSD: 7299; EE/DSG: 7401) were obtained from 1476 women (EE/GSD, n = 740; EE/DSG, n = 736). Both preparations provided effective contraception and good cycle control with a similarly low incidence of both spotting and breakthrough bleeding. The spotting rates in both treatment groups decreased from 35.1% (EE/GSD) and 37.5% (EE/DSG) in the first treatment cycle to approximately 10% in the fourth treatment cycle. The spotting incidence as percent of the total number of cycles was 12.7% for EE/GSD and 14.3% for EE/DSG. The breakthrough bleeding incidence was 5.2% of all cycles for EE/GSD and 6.0% of all cycles for EE/DSG. For 84.7% of the cycles in the gestodene group and for 82.5% of the cycles in the desogestrel group, neither spotting nor breakthrough bleeding were recorded. Overall, the spotting and breakthrough bleeding incidence tended to be lower with EE/GSD than with EE/DSG. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Amenorrhea was recorded in 2.7% of the cycles with EE/GSD and in 2.9% with EE/DSG. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar pattern of adverse events. More than 83% of the women in both groups either did not gain weight or lost more than 2 kg. Both preparations had a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhea. Both regimens provided reliable contraception and good cycle control. The incidence of adverse events was relatively low and both preparations were well tolerated.

PIP: This study compares the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of two oral contraceptive preparations containing 20 mcg of ethinyl estradiol combined with either 75 mcg of gestodene (EE/GSD) or 150 mcg of desogestrel (EE/DSG). Women received the trial preparations daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day pill-free interval. Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of 12 cycles. Efficacy data of 14,700 treatment cycles (EE/GSD: 7299; EE/DSG: 7401) were obtained from 1476 women (EE/GSD, n = 740; EE/DSG, n = 736). Both preparations provided effective contraception and good cycle control with a similarly low incidence of both spotting and breakthrough bleeding. The spotting rates in both treatment groups decreased from 35.1% (EE/GSD) and 37.5% (EE/DSG) in the first treatment cycle to approximately 10% in the fourth treatment cycle. The spotting incidence as percent of the total number of cycles was 12.7% for EE/GSD and 14.3% for EE/DSG. The breakthrough bleeding incidence was 5.2% of all cycles for EE/GSD and 6.0% of all cycles for EE/GSD. For 84.7% of the cycles in the gestodene group and for 82.5% of the cycles in the desogestrel group, neither spotting nor breakthrough bleeding were recorded. Overall, the spotting and breakthrough bleeding incidence tended to be lower with EE/GSD than with EE/DSG. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Amenorrhea was recorded in 2.7% of the cycles with EE/GSD and in 2.9% with EE/DSG. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar pattern of adverse events. More than 83% of the women in both groups either did not gain weight or lost more than 2 kg. Both preparations had a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhea. Both regimens provided reliable contraception and good cycle control. The incidence of adverse events was relatively low and both preparations were well tolerated.

A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene, with respect to efficacy, cycle control, and tolerance.

The aim of this study was to compare contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerance of an oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 75 micrograms gestodene (GSD), with a reference preparation containing a similar dose of gestodene but in combination with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol. A higher incidence of intermenstrual bleeding was apparent under the 20 micrograms EE2 oral contraceptive. For the 20 micrograms EE2 preparation, 47.4% of all women reported spotting at least once over a period of 12 treatment cycles, whereas this figure was 35.5% for the 30 micrograms EE2 pill (p < 0.05). However, the incidence was within a range that corresponds to that of other OCs. The cumulative breakthrough bleeding rates (at least once during the one year of treatment) of 14.5% (20 micrograms EE2) and 11.8% (30 micrograms EE2) of women were not significantly different. In relation to all cycles, the intermenstrual bleeding rates were remarkably lower, indicating that the majority of the volunteers experienced such events only in few cycles under treatment: the spotting rate was 11.5% (20 micrograms EE2) and 7.2% (30 micrograms EE2) of all cycles, and the breakthrough bleeding rate was 2.6% and 1.6% of all cycles, respectively. Three pregnancies were recorded during the study (one in the 20 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD group, two in the 30 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD group). All three could be explained either by intake irregularities or by circumstances impairing the contraceptive effect. The influence of both treatments on the blood pressure and body weight proved to be extremely slight. Adverse events in both groups were rare and differences in the frequency of adverse events were not apparent. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events, including intermenstrual bleeding, was low (9.8% for 20 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD, and 7.2% for 30 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD) and was in the lower range known for other oral contraceptives. Both preparations were well accepted by the volunteers. The data obtained demonstrate clinically acceptable cycle control, good tolerance, and a high standard of contraceptive reliability for both drugs. Prescription of the 20 micrograms EE2 preparation could be the first-line therapy in order to provide the lowest amount of EE2 possible. In case of persistent cycle control problems, a switch to the 30 micrograms EE2 drug should be considered.

PIP: A double-blind, comparative study of oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 75 mcg of gestodene and either 20 mcg or 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol (EE2) indicates that the lower-dose formulation neither compromises contraceptive effectiveness nor produces unacceptable cycle control. Study subjects included 649 randomly selected healthy women requesting contraception from 10 family planning centers in Germany; the 20 mcg EE2 pill was evaluated in 428 women for a total of 4470 cycles, while the 30 mcg preparation was tested in 221 women for 2377 cycles. During the 12-month study period, the incidence of at least 1 episode of intermenstrual bleeding (generally in the first cycle) was significantly greater in the 20 mcg EE2 group (47.4%) than in the 30 mcg group (35.5%); however, the cumulative breakthrough bleeding rates (14.5% and 11.8%, respectively) were not dissimilar. In relation to the sum of all cycles, the spotting rates were 11.5% for the 20 mcg EE2 OC and 7.2% for the 30 mcg OC, and the breakthrough bleeding rates were 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively. The 3 pregnancies that occurred all involved user failure. The discontinuation rates due to side effects, including spotting, were 9.8% in the 20 mcg EE2 group and 7.2% in the 30 mcg group. 66.6% of women in the former group and 71.0% of those in the latter group never complained of an adverse effect during the study. The incidences of spotting and discontinuation were well within the range reported for other OCs. These findings indicate that the 20 mcg EE2 preparation should be prescribed first; if cycle control problems persist, a 30 mcg EE2 OC can be considered.

Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development.

The objective of the study was to determine the suppressive effect on ovarian activity of 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 75 micrograms gestodene administered for 21 or 23 days. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial in 60 women. A pre-treatment cycle, three treatment cycles and a post-treatment period were monitored by ovarian ultrasound and by LH, FSH, 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone measurements every other day. No ovulation and no luteinized, unruptured follicle were observed. Suppression of ovarian activity was more pronounced by the 23-day regimen. 17 beta-Estradiol serum levels during the last six days of a cycle and during the first six days of the next cycle were significantly less (p < 0.05) in the 23-day regimen. The superiority of the 23-day regimen in comparison to the 21-day regimen with regard to the suppression of ovarian activity was shown in this study. The observed differences in the 17 beta-estradiol levels and follicular development between a 21-day and 23-day preparation combine to suggest that shortening the pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives may increase the contraceptive safety margin in women on low-dose formulations.

PIP: The objective of a double-blind randomized multicenter trial enrolling 60 women was to determine the suppressive effect on ovarian activity of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol plus 75 mcg gestodene administered for 21 or 23 days. The sites were at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Manchester, UK, and the Institute for Sterility Treatment, Vienna, Austria. The 60 women were healthy volunteers 19-35 years old, and they were randomized with 30 subjects each entering the treatment phase for either the 21-day regimen or the 23-day regimen. A pre-treatment cycle, 3 treatment cycles, and a post-treatment period were monitored by ovarian ultrasound and by measurements of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), 17-beta-estradiol, and progesterone every other day. Two women on the 21-day regimen forgot to take 1 pill each. Side effects were minor including breast tension, vomiting, nausea, acne, and weight loss or weight gain. Withdrawal bleeding commenced in the 23-day group 2 days later than in the 21-day group. The frequency of intracyclic bleeding decreased when progressing from treatment cycle 1 to 3. No ovulation and no luteinized, unruptured follicle were observed. After stopping the medication, spontaneous ovulations were observed in all volunteers in the 23-day regimen. Suppression of ovarian activity was more pronounced in the 23-day regimen. 17-beta-estradiol serum levels during the last 6 days of a cycle and during the first 6 days of the next cycle were significantly less (p 0.05) in the 23-day regimen. The superiority of the 23-day regimen in comparison to the 21-day regimen with regard to the suppression of ovarian activity was shown. The observed differences in the 17-beta-estradiol levels and follicular development between the 21-day and 23-day preparations suggest that shortening the pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives may increase the contraceptive safety margin in women on low-dose formulations.

A comparative study of the effects of the hemostatic system of two monophasic gestodene oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol.

The effects of two oral contraceptives, containing gestodene and either 20 micrograms or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol, on hemostatic parameters was investigated in a six-month randomized study involving a total of 40 healthy women between the ages of 18 and 30 years. A large number of hemostatic parameters were measured, which were categorized as either pro-coagulatory, anti-coagulatory, profibrinolytic, anti-fibrinolytic or indicative of fibrin turnover. Additionally, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) were measured before and after venous occlusion and delta and ratio values calculated. Pro-coagulatory factors as well as reaction products reflecting in vivo coagulatory activity (thrombin-antithrombin III complex, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) were found to increase. Among the anti-coagulatory parameters, only protein S concentration and protein S activity decreased, most notably in the 30 micrograms EE group. There was a corresponding increase in fibrinolytic activity reflected by reaction products of in vivo fibrinolysis (plasmin-antiplasmin 2-complex, fibrin-degradation products). Measurement of t-PA and PAI-1, before and after venous occlusion, revealed that the fibrinolytic response was more pronounced in the 20 micrograms EE group. There was also an increase in the threshold of fibrinolytic inhibition (ratio PAI-1) in both groups, which was less pronounced in the 20 micrograms EE group. Apart from isolated measurements, all parameters remained within their normal ranges and values returned to baseline in the follow-up cycle. It is concluded that both preparations had a balanced effect on the hemostatic system stimulating both pro-coagulant and fibrinolytic activity. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups; however, there was a trend towards greater fibrinolytic capacity in the 20 micrograms EE group.

PIP: In Germany, 40 healthy women aged 18-30 with no contraindications to combined oral contraceptives (OCs) participated in a comparative study (2 pre-treatment cycles, 6 treatment cycles, and 1 post-treatment follow-up cycle). It aimed to assess the effect of the new low-dose monophasic OCs containing 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 75 mcg gestodene on the hemostatic system, the effect of reducing the EE dose from 30 mcg to 20 mcg, and the effect of this OC and another combined OC with 30 mcg EE on the fibrinolytic capacity at the vessel wall. Both OCs increased coagulatory and fibrinolytic parameters, except for isolated measurements, which remained within their normal ranges. The effect occurred as early as four days after beginning OC treatment. There was a general trend towards increased change during treatment. Within 14 days after stopping OC treatment, most parameters returned to baseline values. Protein C activity increased somewhat in both groups. Protein S activity was reduced in both groups, but the reduction was less in the 20 mcg EE group than in the 30 mcg EE group. There was a tendency towards greater plasminogen activator activity and lower plasminogen activator inhibitor activity in the 20 mcg EE group than in the 30 mcg EE group, suggesting increased fibrinolytic activity in the 20 mcg EE group. In both groups, an increase in the threshold of fibrinolytic inhibition occurred, but the increase was lower in the 20 mcg EE group. These findings suggest that both OC preparations have a balance effect on hemostasis, stimulating both pro-coagulant, anti-coagulant, and fibrinolytic activity. The 20 mcg EE OC tended to have a greater fibrinolytic activity than the 30 mcg EE OC, however.

A three-year clinical investigation into efficacy, cycle control and tolerability of a new low-dose monophasic oral contraceptive containing gestodene.

This long-term, open-label multicenter study investigated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene. A total of 670 women between the ages of 18 and 45 years received the trial preparation over a 3-year period, giving 19,095 evaluable cycles. Of the 670 participants in the study, 75% completed at least 24 cycles with the trial preparation and 46% remained in the study for the full 3 years. One pregnancy occurred during the study which was considered by the investigator to be the result of misuse of the drug, giving an uncorrected Pearl Index of 0.07. Cycle control with the trial preparation was good, especially in women who did not miss any pills. By cycle 3, only 10.2% of women who had not missed pills reported intermenstrual bleeding (scanty or medium/excessive bleeding) and this decreased to 2.3% by cycle 36. The preparation was well tolerated, with a low incidence of unprompted adverse events. There were no clinically significant changes in mean body weight or blood pressure. Over the 3 years of the study, 10% of women withdrew from the study for reasons related mostly to mild adverse events. Results from this study demonstrate that the trial preparation is a reliable and well-tolerated oral contraceptive that provides good cycle control.

A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/150 micrograms desogestrel, with respect to efficacy, cycle control and tolerance.

The aim of this study was to compare contraceptive reliability, cycle control and tolerance of an oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene, with a reference preparation containing the same dose of estrogen combined with 150 micrograms desogestrel. This article presents interim data from centers in France and Austria, involving a total of 479 women and 4,991 cycles. Contraceptive reliability was good with both preparations. Two pregnancies occurred in the gestodene group, but neither were due to method failure. In the desogestrel group there were also two pregnancies, of which one was due to method failure. With respect to cycle control, there is a trend towards a lower incidence of intermenstrual bleeding in the gestodene group. The incidence of spotting (scanty bleeding) during the important first three cycles was 3.5% lower in the gestodene group, and over the first six cycles, it was 7.6% lower. Amenorrhea was similar in both groups, but the incidence of dysmenorrhea was significantly lower in the gestodene group (p=0.001). Adverse events were similar in both groups, with headache, breast tension and nausea the most frequently reported symptoms. Body weight remained relatively constant during treatment in both groups, and no hypertension was reported for any woman during the course of the study. In each treatment group, 19 women discontinued because of adverse events. It is concluded that both preparation are reliable and well tolerated oral contraceptives are reliable and well tolerated oral contraceptives; however, there is a more favourable effect on dysmenorrhea by the gestodene formulation.

Hormonal oral contraceptives, urinary porphyrin excretion and porphyrias.

The influence of hormonal oral contraceptives on the urinary porphyrin excretion of 40 healthy females has been studied. Two different hormonal oral contraceptives (combinations of gestoden or desogestrel, respectively, and ethinylestradiol) were applied for half a year. In each case twenty women received one of these two combinations. Porphyrin precursors delta-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen were normal in all subjects as well as the mean of uroporphyrin and coproporphyrin. One healthy female developed a mild secondary coproporphyrinuria. In this case coproporphyrin isomer I was slightly enhanced and isomer III slightly lowered. Furthermore it could be shown that three females with repeated premenstrual clinical expression of an acute hepatic porphyria (acute intermittent porphyria and hereditary coproporphyria) could be treated successfully with a hormonal oral contraceptive or other exogenous hormones to stabilize the latent, subclinical phase of the disease.

PIP: At clinics in Marburg and Berlin, Germany, physicians conducted a double-blind study to elucidate the effectiveness of two low-dose hormonal contraceptives on parameters of heme-biosynthesis in urine. After a menstrual cycle without exogenous hormones (cycle 0), 40 healthy women took an oral contraceptive (OC) containing either 75 mcg gestodene and 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol daily (EE2) for 21 days or 150 mcg desogestrel and 30 mcg EE2. They took no hormones for the first seven days of the next cycle. They used the OCs for six cycles. In all cases, porphyrin precursors delta-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen and the mean of uroporphyrin and coproporphyrin fell within normal parameters. Only one woman developed mild secondary porphyrinuria without clinical or pathological significance. The coproporphyrin isomer I was moderately higher than the normal range (17-31% vs. 32% at cycle 0 and 43% at cycle 6) and isomer III was moderately lower (69-83% vs. 68% and 57%, respectively). Three women had repeated premenstrual symptoms of an acute hepatic porphyria (acute intermittent porphyria and hereditary coproporphyria). Treatment with the OCs successfully stabilized the latent phase of premenstrual forms of acute hepatic porphyrias. This study demonstrates that low-dose OCs do not affect urinary porphyrin excretion.

The effect on blood pressure of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene.

To obtain an overview of the effect of monophasic gestodene on blood pressure and to determine the frequency of "OC elevated BP/hypertension," the results of blood pressure monitoring from four clinical studies of contraceptive efficacy and safety have been retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1930 women took part in the studies, which recorded BP for up to 24 cycles. Analysis of results revealed that 97 women (5.0%) showed an increase in blood pressure from previously normal to elevated values while taking monophasic gestodene, with only 26 (1.35%) fulfilling the criteria of "OC elevated BP/hypertension." Only four women dropped out of the trials due to hypertensive blood pressure values, while 67 women (3.5%) experienced a normalization of previously elevated blood pressure measurements. In conclusion, this analysis has confirmed that gestodene has a negligible effect on blood pressure, with increased BP a relatively rare event.

PIP: Schering AG (manufacturer of a monophasic oral contraceptive [OC] containing 75 mcg gestodene plus 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol) in Berlin, Germany, conducted a retrospective analysis of blood pressure measurements from 4 clinical trials of the contraceptive efficacy and safety of monophasic gestodene to examine gestodene's effect on blood pressure and the incidence of OC-related blood pressure/ hypertension. (OC-related blood pressure/hypertension is defined as: women with neither history of hypertension nor elevated blood pressure before OC use develop increased blood pressure or hypertension that is reversible once OC use ceases.) The clinical trials recorded the blood pressure of 1930 women for up to 24 cycles. Most women (89.9%) experienced no change in their blood pressure during OC use. 97 women (5%) experienced an increase in blood pressure. 26 women (1.35%) had OC-elevated blood pressure/hypertension. Four women left the trials due to hypertension. 67 women (3.5%) who had elevated blood pressure before OC use attained normalization of blood pressure during OC use. These results show that the gestodene-containing OC had an insignificant effect on blood pressure and that elevated blood pressure rarely occurred.

Inhibition of ovulation by a triphasic gestodene-containing oral contraceptive.

The minimal effective dose of gestodene for inhibition of ovulation was studied in 30 female volunteers. Daily doses of 10 micrograms to 50 micrograms gestodene were given orally for 21 days. A control cycle prior to treatment and a treatment cycle were monitored for LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone and cervical score. At a daily dose of 40 micrograms of gestodene, 6/7 volunteers exhibited inhibition of ovulation and 1/7 had a cycle with luteal insufficiency. Ovulation was inhibited in all volunteers on 50 micrograms gestodene, suggesting that the minimum dose required to inhibit ovulation was 40 micrograms gestodene. Cervical score was blunted even at 10 micrograms gestodene. Similarly, 20 volunteers were treated with coated tablets containing ethinylestradiol/gestodene at 30/50 micrograms for 6 days, 40/70 micrograms for 5 days and 30/100 micrograms for 10 days. This triphasic gestodene-containing preparation inhibited ovulation in all 20 females. In one cycle in which follicle development was observed only 43 pg estradiol/ml was secreted. Data from this investigation suggest that this triphasic gestodene-containing OC has a high contraceptive efficacy.