Peripheral Nerve Block to Treat Pain Caused by Daboia palaestinae Envenomation.

Snakebite pain can be challenging to control. We describe our experience managing intolerable pain after conventional treatment failed. A 35-year-old man, presented after a viper snakebite, suffering from intolerable pain in the affected extremity. He had no significant past medical history. All attempts to control the pain conventionally were unsuccessful. Treatment with a supraclavicular nerve block resulted in immediate relief. After the block receded, only a dull pain remained, which later disappeared without recurrence. This experience illustrates the need for personalized pain treatment to avoid subsequent complications.

Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Who Presented with Cardiogenic Shock versus Patients Who Developed Cardiogenic Shock during Hospitalization.

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) continues to be a severe and fatal complication of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). CS patients have a high mortality rate despite significant progress in primary reperfusion, the management of heart failure and the expansion of mechanical circulatory support strategies. The present study addressed the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of ACS patients complicated with CS. Methods: We performed an observational study, using the 2000-2013 Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) database and identified hospitalizations of ACS patients complicated with CS. Patients' demographics and clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes were evaluated. We assessed the outcomes of ACS patients with CS at arrival (on the day of admission) compared with ACS patients who arrived without CS and developed CS during hospitalization. Results: The cohort included 13,434 patients with ACS diagnoses during the study period. Of these, 4.2% were complicated with CS; 224 patients were admitted with both ACS and CS; while 341 ACS patients developed CS only during the hospitalization period. The latter patients had significantly higher rates of MACEs compared with the group of ACS patients who presented with CS at arrival (73% vs. 51%; p < 0.0001). Similarly, the rates of in-hospital mortality (55% vs. 36%; p < 0.0001), 30-day mortality (64% vs. 50%; p = 0.0013) and 1-year mortality (73% vs. 59%; p = 0.0016) were higher in ACS patients who developed CS during hospitalization vs. ACS patients with CS at admission. There was a significant decrease in 1-year mortality trends during the 13 years of this study presented in ACS patients from both groups. Conclusions: Patients who developed CS during hospitalization had higher mortality and MACE rates compared with those who presented with CS at arrival. Further studies should focus on this subgroup of high-risk patients.

Long-Term Prognosis in Young Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a young age is uncommon. Limited data regarding the long-term follow-up and prognosis in this population are available. Our objectives were to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients presenting with ACS at a young age and to assess factors that predict long-term prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive young patients (male below 40 and female below 50 years old) that were admitted with ACS and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between the years 1997 and 2009. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes including major cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality were analyzed. Multivariable cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify predictors of long-term prognosis. RESULTS: One-hundred sixty-five patients were included with a mean follow-up of 9.1±4.6 years. Most patients were men (88%), and mean age (years) was 36.8±4.2. During follow-up, 15 (9.1%) died, 98 (59.4%) patients had at least one major CV event, 22 (13.3%) patients had more than two CV events, and the mean number of recurrent CV events was 1.4±1.48 events per patient. In multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of major CV events and/or mortality were coronary intervention without stent insertion (HR1.77; 95% CI 1.09-2.9), LAD artery involvement (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.04-2.44) and hypertension (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.6). CONCLUSION: Patients with ACS in young age are at high risk for major CV and/or mortality in long-term follow-up with a high rate of recurrent CV events. Close follow-up and risk factor management for secondary prevention have a major role, particularly in this population.

Management strategies of the interaction between direct oral anticoagulant and drug-metabolizing enzyme inducers.

Little is known regarding the management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with enzyme-inducing drugs (EID). The use of EID may lead to sub-therapeutic concentrations of DOACs and to treatment failure. Thus, many patients on EIDs cannot benefit from the advantages of DOACs. This was a retrospective study, evaluating the management of hospitalized patients with DOACs. Characteristics of hospitalized patients with a prescription for DOACs, with and without EIDs, were summarized and evaluated, and management strategies addressing the potential interaction were documented, including the use of DOAC concentration monitoring. During the period evaluated, 1596 hospitalized patients with prescriptions for DOACs were identified. Most patients received apixaban (n = 1227, 77%), followed by rivaroxaban (240, 15%), and dabigatran (129, 8%). Twenty-two patients (1.4%) had concomitant EIDs. Demographic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with DOACs were similar in those receiving EID and those not. Management strategies included stopping DOAC or EID (41%), and DOAC dose increase (14%). During management of these interactions, DOAC concentrations were measured for 11 of 22 patients and were below the 5th percentile of expected concentration for six of these patients. The management of patients with DOAC concentration measurement differed significantly from those without (p = 0.005), as they were much less likely to have one of the medications stopped and more often had the DOACs' dose increased. Among hospitalized patients with DOACs, EIDs are not rare. DOAC concentrations are often low in the presence of EIDs. DOAC concentration monitoring may be useful in settings requiring both DOAC and EIDs.

Managing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiepileptic Medication.

Current guidance recommends avoiding concomitant use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants and enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs because of theoretical drug interactions potentially leading to subtherapeutic drug concentrations and treatment failure. We describe a case documenting a significant interaction between phenobarbital and rivaroxaban, and then apixaban. This case illustrates and supports the concerns regarding concomitant use of these medications. Additionally, in this case the interaction was managed with concentration-guided dosing of apixaban, suggesting this approach may represent a feasible strategy for managing patients requiring treatment with direct-acting oral anticoagulants and enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs.