Honorary Authorships in Surgical Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Honorary authorship (HA) is defined as an enlisted co-author who did not make sufficient contributions to merit being included as a co-author according to the ICMJE guidelines on authorship. It is unknown if HA is present in the surgical literature. METHODS: We analysed studies published in 2016 in five journals with the highest impact factor in general surgery. All original articles, reviews and clinical trials with more than one author were included. Corresponding authors of these manuscripts received an online survey by email. The survey consisted of three parts focussing on demographics, knowledge and application of the ICMJE guidelines, and deciding authorship. RESULTS: In total, 320 of the 1037 surveys were completed (30.9%). Two hundred and seventy-two (88.6%) of the corresponding authors were aware of the ICMJE authorship guidelines, and 203 (66.3%) were aware of the general issue of honorary authorship. One hundred and thirty-five (44.0%) responders reported at least one co-author who only performed tasks which should not merit actual authorship according to the ICMJE guidelines. Furthermore, only 46 (15.0%) of the responders believed that a co-author listed for their article did not make sufficient contribution to merit being included as co-author. No significant differences were found between the journals investigated. CONCLUSION: Despite ICMJE guidelines to reduce HA, the prevalence may still exist to a higher level than preferable. The authors plead for more transparent authorship systems in which journal editors and senior department members take more responsibility into enforcement of the ICMJE guidelines.

Hidradenitis suppurativa treated with wide excision and second intention healing: a meaningful local cure rate after 253 procedures.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an important treatment modality for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Various methods of HS surgery have been described. Even though wide excision is a common surgical procedure for HS, data on the recurrence rate and patient satisfaction are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the recurrence rate and patient satisfaction of HS lesional wide excision (complete excision) with secondary intention healing. METHODS: A single centre retrospective study. Hundred and twenty eligible patients were identified from our medical files, and an individualized questionnaire was sent. RESULTS: Eighty-six patents responded to our questionnaire (71.7%). Of whom, 84 patients underwent in total 253 procedures. The mean follow-up time per procedure was 36.2 months. In 37.6% of the procedures, recurrence occurred within a mean follow-up period of 3 years (after a median of 6.0 months). Total remission of an anatomical area was achieved in 49% of the procedures, whereas natural disease progression occurred in 13%. The genital region was the most prone to recurrence. The majority of the patients were glad that they had undergone the procedure and would recommend the surgical procedure to other HS patients. CONCLUSION: Lesional wide excision (complete excision) with secondary intention healing yields a meaningful local cure rate for HS and is well tolerated.