Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Hematol ; 98(7): 1665-1674, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104090

RESUMEN

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), a disease of mostly young patients, also peaks in the elderly. Despite the profound improvement in the outcome of young patients, in the elderly, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates are under 70%. Interim PET-CT (iPET) is known to be highly predictive for PFS in young HL patients, but it has not been sufficiently validated in the elderly patient population. In this multi-center collaboration, all consecutive elderly patients (age ≥ 60) diagnosed with HL between 1998 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and iPET results, classified according to the Deauville score, were recorded and analyzed. We identified 78 elderly HL patients (median age 69) who underwent iPET. ABVD was the treatment regimen in 52 (67%) patients. Eighty-three percent of patients had iPET scores of 1-3 while 17% had scores of 4-5. Patients with iPET scores of 1-3 had 5-year PFS and OS rates of 72% and 82% compared with 25% and 45%, respectively, in patients with scores of 4-5 (p < 0.001). Our findings show that iPET is highly predictive of outcome in elderly HL patients and provide evidence that iPET-guided therapy in this patient population may be key to achieving superior treatment outcome.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 38(2): 127-34, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16751782

RESUMEN

Fluconazole antifungal prophylaxis is standard care in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, but this drug lacks anti-Aspergillus activity, the primary cause of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in many transplantation centers. We performed a randomized trial to compare itraconazole vs fluconazole, for prevention of IFIs in patients with acute leukemia (AL) and HSCT recipients. One hundred and ninety-five patients were randomly assigned to either fluconazole or itraconazole antifungal prophylaxis, after stratification into high-risk and low-risk groups. Antifungal prophylaxis was started at the beginning of chemotherapy and continued until resolution of neutropenia, or until amphotericin B treatment was started. IFI occurred in 11 (11%) of itraconazole, and in 12 (12%) fluconazole recipients. Invasive candidiasis (IC) developed in two (2%) itraconazole and one (1%) fluconazole recipients, while invasive aspergillosis (IA) developed in nine (9%) itraconazole and 11(11%) fluconazole recipients. There was no difference in the incidence of total IFI, IC and IA between the two study arms. However, there was a nonsignificant trend towards reduced mortality among patients who developed IA while receiving itraconazole prophylaxis (3/9=33% vs 8/11=73%, P=0.095).


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis/prevención & control , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Itraconazol/uso terapéutico , Leucemia/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aspergilosis/terapia , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Neutropenia/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA