RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic acute aortic dissection (IAAD) type A is a rare but potentially fatal complication of cardiac surgery. METHODS: The purpose of this article is to review the literature since the first reports of IAAD in 1978, examining its clinical characteristics and describing operative details and surgical outcomes. Moreover, we reviewed the recent literature to identify current trends and risk factors for IAAD in minimally invasive cardiac surgery procedures, often related to femoral artery cannulation for retrograde perfusion. RESULTS: We found that IAAD ranges from 0.04 to 0.29% of cardiac patients in overall trials and ranged from 0.12 to 0.16% between 1978-1990, before the minimally invasive surgical era. And we concluded that since the first cases to the recent reports, the incidence of IAAD has not significantly changed. As minimally invasive procedures are on the rise, some authors think that the incidence of IAAD could increase in the future; we think that using all the precaution - such a strict monitoring of perfusion pressure throughout the intervention, avoiding extremely high jet pressures using vasodilators, repositioning of arterial cannula, or splitting perfusion in both femoral arteries -, this complication can be extremely reduced. Finally, we describe a very singular case occurring during mitral valve replacement followed by spontaneous dissection of left anterior descending artery one month later. CONCLUSION: The present article adds to the literature a more detailed clinical picture of this entity, including patients' characteristics, the mechanism, timing, and localization of the tear, and mortality details.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Válvula MitralRESUMEN
Abstract Introduction: Iatrogenic acute aortic dissection (IAAD) type A is a rare but potentially fatal complication of cardiac surgery. Methods: The purpose of this article is to review the literature since the first reports of IAAD in 1978, examining its clinical characteristics and describing operative details and surgical outcomes. Moreover, we reviewed the recent literature to identify current trends and risk factors for IAAD in minimally invasive cardiac surgery procedures, often related to femoral artery cannulation for retrograde perfusion. Results: We found that IAAD ranges from 0.04 to 0.29% of cardiac patients in overall trials and ranged from 0.12 to 0.16% between 1978-1990, before the minimally invasive surgical era. And we concluded that since the first cases to the recent reports, the incidence of IAAD has not significantly changed. As minimally invasive procedures are on the rise, some authors think that the incidence of IAAD could increase in the future; we think that using all the precaution - such a strict monitoring of perfusion pressure throughout the intervention, avoiding extremely high jet pressures using vasodilators, repositioning of arterial cannula, or splitting perfusion in both femoral arteries -, this complication can be extremely reduced. Finally, we describe a very singular case occurring during mitral valve replacement followed by spontaneous dissection of left anterior descending artery one month later. Conclusion: The present article adds to the literature a more detailed clinical picture of this entity, including patients' characteristics, the mechanism, timing, and localization of the tear, and mortality details.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Válvula MitralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The use of minimally invasive or transcatheter interventions rather than standard full sternotomy operations to treat tricuspid valve (TV) disease is increasing. The debate however is still open regarding venous drainage management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and wheatear or not superior and inferior vena cava should be occluded during the opening of the right atrium to avoid air entrance in the venous line. The aim of the present study is to report operative outcomes and midterm follow-up results of minimally invasive TV surgery performed without caval occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective outcome evaluation from institutional records was performed with prospective data entry. Considered were consecutive patients who underwent right mini-thoracotomy TV surgery isolated or combined with mitral valve surgery during the period from June 2013 to February 2020. A telephone and echocardiographic follow-up was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 68 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive TV surgery without occlusion of cava veins. The mean age was 69 ± 14 years and 48 (70%) were female. All operations were performed safely without air-lock during CPB. A perioperative cerebral stroke occurred in one patient. The survival at a 5- and 8-year follow-up was 100% and 79%, respectively. No severe tricuspid regurgitation was evident at echocardiographic follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results show that performing tricuspid surgery without caval occlusion is safe. The air was captured by the active vacuum drainage system without causing damage. Midterm follow-up data confirm that a minimally invasive approach does not alter the quality of surgery.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toracotomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Cardiac surgery induces a systemic inflammatory reaction that has been associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity. Many studies have characterized this reaction through laboratory biomarkers while clinical studies generally are lacking. This study aimed to assess the incidence of postoperative systemic inflammation after cardiac surgery, and the association of postoperative systemic inflammation with preoperative patients' characteristics and postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Analysis of the overall population and of propensity-matched subgroups. SETTING: Cardiac surgery intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between June 2016 and June 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Mixed cardiac surgery operations on CPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 502 patients underwent cardiac surgery with CPB. One hundred forty-two patients (28.3%) fulfilled SIRS criteria at 24 hours. After performing a multivariate analysis to adjust for the procedure type and preoperative systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome (SIRS) parameters, the occurrence of SIRS was associated inversely with age and extracardiac arteriopathy, and it was associated positively with preoperative white blood cell count. Vasopressors were used more frequently in SIRS patients who further experienced longer mechanical ventilation time and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). The incidence of a composite outcome including death, transient ischemic attack/stroke, renal replacement therapy, bleeding, postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion, and a length of stay in ICU >96 hours was more frequent in SIRS-positive patients. There was no difference between overall and matched subgroups for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the clinical signs of SIRS were detected in a substantial percentage of patients who underwent cardiac surgery. The postoperative SIRS criteria were associated with a more complicated postoperative course and higher postoperative morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has increasingly been used for patients with valvular pathology. Two techniques of aortic occlusion are utilized with this technique: transthoracic aortic clamp (TTC) and endoaortic balloon occlusion (EAO). Both possibilities present peculiar advantages and limitations whose current evidence is based on few observational studies. We performed an analysis with the primary objective to evaluate outcomes and the incidence of major complications of these two techniques. METHODS: The data of 258 patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right mini-thoracotomy from January 2013 to July 2018 were reviewed. One hundred sixty-five patients were operated on with TTC and in 93 cases EAO was used. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of adverse outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 60.4±13.9 years, patients with TTC were significantly older and had higher EuroSCORE II and reoperations were carried out mostly with EAO. Isolated mitral valve surgery was mostly performed (74%) and in 26% of the cases, other procedures were combined. No differences were detected in terms of types of operation, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times between the two techniques. Similar postoperative troponin I and CK-Mb values were recorded. Twenty-four patients (11%) suffered at least one complication. Of note, a new neurologic deficit occurred in six patients; in four cases a cerebral stroke, with all patients in the EAO group (P=0.06). There was no case of aortic dissection, no patient suffered peripheral ischemia nor femoral vessels complications. Thirty-day mortality was 1.9% (TTC 1.2% vs. EAO 3.2%; P=0.51), 30-day mortality excluding reoperations was 1.2% (TTC 1.2% vs. EAO 1.1%; P=0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques proved to be safe. Although non-statistically significant, there was a higher rate of cerebral stroke in the EAO group. However, EAO system shows technical advantages in avoiding tissue dissection and remains our choice in redo operations.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the efficacy of 2 new percutaneous devices specifically designed to be placed through the right internal jugular vein, therefore named "necklines," for achieving retrograde cardioplegia and pulmonary venting in the setting of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR). DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University-affiliated private hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing MIAVR. INTERVENTIONS: Necklines were placed by the anesthesiologist using transesophageal electrocardiography, with pressure guidance before the surgical procedure was initiated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The records of 51 consecutive patients who underwent MIAVR with necklines placement were reviewed retrospectively. The access for MIAVR was through either a J-hemisternotomy or a right anterior thoracotomy. The efficacy of the 2 catheters, successful placement rate, time needed to deploy catheters, and perioperative complications were recorded. Necklines were placed successfully in all patients in 23±13 minutes. A total of 110 doses of retrograde cardioplegia were delivered at a mean flow rate of 173±35 mL/min and a mean pressure of 41±6 mmHg. The pulmonary catheter ensured venting of the heart that was graded by surgeons as "excellent" in 33 patients, "sufficient" in 12 patients, and "not adequate" in 2 patients. There were no major adverse events or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Necklines ensure effective retrograde cardioplegia and venting of the heart, provide optimal surgical vision and access during MIAVR, and allow surgeons to operate in an unobstructed surgical field. Nevertheless, additional studies are required to determine whether the use of necklines is associated with better outcomes than those with conventional methods.