Real-World Evidence of the Top 100 Prescribed Drugs in the USA and Their Potential for Drug Interactions with Nirmatrelvir; Ritonavir.

Nirmatrelvir (coadministered with ritonavir as PAXLOVIDTM) reduces the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and all-cause death in individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk of progression to severe disease. Ritonavir is coadministered as a pharmacokinetic enhancer. However, ritonavir may cause drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to its interactions with various drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein transporters. To better understand the extent of DDIs (or lack thereof) of nirmatrelvir; ritonavir in a clinical setting, this study used real-world evidence (RWE) from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database to identify the top 100 drugs most commonly prescribed to US patients at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19 disease. The top 100 drugs were identified based on total counts associated with drugs prescribed to high-risk patients (i.e., ≥ 1 medical condition associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19) who were continuously enrolled in the database throughout 2019 and had ≥ 1 prescription claim. Each of the 100 drugs was then assessed for DDI risk based on their metabolism, excretion, and transport pathways identified from available US prescribing and medical literature sources. Seventy drugs identified were not expected to have DDIs with nirmatrelvir; ritonavir, including many cardiovascular agents, anti-infectives, antidiabetic agents, and antidepressants. Conversely, 30 drugs, including corticosteroids, narcotic analgesics, anticoagulants, statins, and sedatives/hypnotics, were expected to cause DDIs with nirmatrelvir; ritonavir. This RWE analysis is complementary to the prescribing information and other DDI management tools for guiding healthcare providers in managing DDIs.

Quantification of brain voriconazole levels in healthy adults using fluorine magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Voriconazole is more effective for aspergillosis infections with central nervous system involvement than other antifungal agents. The clinical efficacy of voriconazole for central nervous system infections has been attributed to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, pharmacokinetic studies are limited to plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, so it remains unclear how much of the drug enters the brain. Fluorinated compounds such as voriconazole can be quantified in the brain using fluorine-19 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Twelve healthy adult males participated in a pharmacokinetic analysis of voriconazole levels in the brain and plasma. Open-label voriconazole was dosed per clinical protocol with a loading dose of 400 mg every 12 h on day 1, followed by 200 mg every 12 h administered orally over a 3-day period. MRS was performed before and after dosing on the third day. Voriconazole levels in the brain exceeded the MIC for Aspergillus. The brain/plasma ratios were 3.0 at steady state on day 3 (predose) and 1.9 postdose. We found that voriconazole is able to penetrate the brain tissue, which can be quantified using a noninvasive MRS technique. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00300677.).

Influence of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite.

AIMS: This study reports the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir, its active metabolite, M8, and active moiety (nelfinavir + M8) in volunteers genotyped for CYP2C19 as extensive metabolizer (*1*1; n = 38), heterozygous poor metabolizer (PM) (*1*2; n = 22) and homozygous PM (*2*2; n = 6). METHODS: Subjects received nelfinavir at normal dose (3.5 days of 1250 mg q12h) or high dose (1250 mg q12h for 3 days and single dose of 3125 mg on day 4). Steady-state plasma samples were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet assay to determine pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: At steady state, the mean C(max) was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19, 69] and 63% (95% CI 20, 122) higher, and mean AUC was 51% (95% CI 24, 83) and 85% (95% CI 32, 159) higher for *1*2 and *2*2 compared with *1*1 subjects, respectively. For M8, the mean C(max) and AUC were 35% (95% CI 6, 55) and 33% (95% CI -3, 56), respectively, lower for *1*2 compared with *1*1 subjects. M8 was not detectable in *2*2 subjects. The mean C(max) and AUC values for the active moiety were higher by 30-35% for the *1*2 and *2*2 compared with *1*1 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Mutation in CYP2C19 increased the systemic exposure of nelfinavir and reduced the exposure of M8. No significant differences were noted among the heterozygous (*1*2) and homozygous (*2*2) PMs. These changes are not considered to be clinically relevant and hence the use of nelfinavir does not require prior assessment of CYP2C19 genotype.

Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in plasma and sinus mucosal tissue following administration of extended-release or immediate-release formulations in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

This study compared the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin (AZI) following administration of extended-release (ER) and immediate-release (IR) formulations in plasma and sinus mucosa in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients (n=71) were randomised 1:1 to receive a single dose of AZI-ER 2g or up to three doses of AZI-IR 500 mg daily. Paired plasma and sinus tissue samples were taken during endoscopic sinus surgery at 2-168 h (four patients per time point) after the first dose. Samples were measured by a validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry assay. Pharmacokinetics were determined using composite concentration-time profiles. Comparison between formulations showed that within the first 24 h, the AZI area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(24)) for ER was 5.2- and 7.0-fold higher than IR in plasma and sinus tissue, respectively. Comparison between matrices showed that the AUC(24) and AUC(168) in sinus tissue were 28.2- and 62.2-fold higher than in plasma for the ER formulation, whilst the AUC(24) in sinus tissue was 21.1-fold higher than in plasma for IR formulation. These results indicated that AZI has good penetration into sinus tissue regardless of formulation; however, dosing of AZI-ER (2 g) increased AZI exposure within the first 24 h compared with the Day 1 dose of 500 mg IR regimen.

In vitro and in vivo studies to characterize the clearance mechanism and potential cytochrome P450 interactions of anidulafungin.

Anidulafungin is a novel semisynthetic echinocandin with potent activity against Candida (including azole-resistant isolates) and Aspergillus spp. and is used for serious systemic fungal infections. The purpose of these studies was to characterize the clearance mechanism and potential for drug interactions of anidulafungin. Experiments included in vitro degradation of anidulafungin in buffer and human plasma, a bioassay for antifungal activity, in vitro human cytochrome P450 inhibition studies, in vitro incubation with rat and human hepatocytes, and mass balance studies in rats and humans. Clearance of anidulafungin appeared to be primarily due to slow chemical degradation, with no evidence of hepatic-mediated metabolism (phase 1 or 2). Under physiological conditions, further degradation of the primary degradant appears to take place. The primary degradation product does not retain antifungal activity. Anidulafungin was not an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes commonly involved in drug metabolism. Mass balance studies showed that anidulafungin was eliminated in the feces predominantly as degradation products, with only a small fraction (10%) eliminated as unchanged drug; fecal elimination likely occurred via biliary excretion. Only negligible renal involvement in the drug's elimination was observed. In conclusion, the primary biotransformation of anidulafungin is mediated by slow chemical degradation, with no evidence for hepatic enzymatic metabolism or renal elimination.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of voriconazole and a combination oral contraceptive co-administered in healthy female subjects.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Voriconazole, a broad-spectrum antifungal drug, is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 isozymes. * Ethinyl oestradiol and norethindrone, components of the combination oral contraceptive drug Ortho-Novum 1/35, also are substrates of cytochrome P450 CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 isozymes. * Because co-administration of voriconazole and Ortho-Novum 1/35 could potentially result in pharmacokinetic interactions that increase systemic exposure of one or both drugs to unsafe levels, clinical studies are needed to define better the two-way pharmacokinetic interaction between these drugs. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * Although co-administered voriconazole and oral contraceptive did result in increased systemic exposures of all three drugs relative to respective monotherapy, co-administered treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. * It is recommended, however, that patients receiving co-administered voriconazole and oral contraceptives be monitored for the development of adverse events commonly associated with these medications. AIM: To assess the two-way pharmacokinetic interaction between voriconazole and Ortho-Novum 1/35, an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone 1 mg and ethinyl oestradiol 35 microg. METHODS: In this open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study, 16 healthy females received voriconazole (400 mg q12 h, day 1; 200 mg q12 h, days 2-4) (period 1), oral contraceptive (q24 h, days 12-32) (period 2), and combination voriconazole (400 mg q12 h, day 57; 200 mg q12 h, days 58-60) and oral contraceptive (q24 h, days 40-60) (period 3). RESULTS: Voriconazole geometric mean AUC(tau) and C(max) increased 46% (12 682-18 495 ng h ml(-1); 90% confidence interval [CI] 32, 61) and 14% (2485-2840 ng ml(-1); 90% CI 3, 27), respectively, when co-administered with oral contraceptive vs. voriconazole alone. Ethinyl oestradiol geometric mean AUC(tau) and C(max) increased 61% (1031-1657 ng h ml(-1); 90% CI 50, 72) and 36% (119-161 ng ml(-1); 90% CI 28, 45), respectively, and norethindrone geometric mean AUC(tau) and C(max) increased 53% (116-177 ng h ml(-1); 90% CI 44, 64) and 15% (18-20 ng ml(-1); 90% CI 3, 28), respectively, during voriconazole co-administration vs. oral contraceptive alone. Neither ethinyl oestradiol nor norethindrone levels were reduced in subjects following voriconazole co-administration. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild, occurring less in subjects receiving voriconazole alone (36 events) vs. oral contraceptive alone (88 events) or combination treatment (68 events); four subjects experienced a severe AE. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of voriconazole and oral contraceptive increased systemic exposures of all analytes relative to respective monotherapy. Although generally safe and well tolerated, it is recommended that patients receiving co-administered voriconazole and oral contraceptive be monitored for development of AEs commonly associated with these medications.

Significant decrease in nelfinavir systemic exposure after omeprazole coadministration in healthy subjects.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of omeprazole on the multiple-dose (steady-state) pharmacokinetics and safety of nelfinavir, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nelfinavir when administered alone and with omeprazole. DESIGN: Open-label, two-period, single-fixed-sequence study. SETTING: Clinical research unit of a large, teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy volunteers (mean age 26 +/- 9 yrs, range 18-48 yrs). Intervention. Subjects received nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours for 4 days (period 1). After a 7-day washout period, subjects were coadministered nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours and omeprazole 40 mg every 24 hours for 4 days (period 2). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were determined on day 4 of both periods. Plasma samples were assayed by a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method for nelfinavir and M8 concentrations, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by using analytical software. In the presence of omeprazole, nelfinavir area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC(tau)), maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)), and minimum observed plasma concentration (C(min)) were reduced by an average of 36%, 37%, and 39%, respectively, relative to administration of nelfinavir alone. The AUC(tau), C(max), and C(min) of M8 were reduced by an average of 92%, 89%, and 75%, respectively. The slopes of the terminal elimination phase of nelfinavir and M8 plasma concentration-time curves were similar between treatments. Nelfinavir was well tolerated when administered alone and when coadministered with omeprazole. CONCLUSION: The observed reduction in the systemic exposure to both nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 after coadministration with omeprazole could result in loss of virologic control and potential emergence of drug resistance. Hence, omeprazole should not be coadministered to patients taking nelfinavir.

Distribution of radioactivity in bone and related structures following administration of [14C]dalbavancin to New Zealand white rabbits.

Penetration of dalbavancin into noninfected bone and joint tissues was assessed after an intravenous dose of 20 mg/kg (of body weight) [(14)C]dalbavancin given to rabbits. Drug-derived radioactivity, determined over 14 days by either liquid scintillation counting or autoradiography, remained above the MIC for common gram-positive pathogens that cause bone and joint infections.

Pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in infants and children.

Gatifloxacin is an 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone effective against a broad spectrum of pathogens common in pediatric infections. The safety and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of gatifloxacin were studied in pediatric patients from 6 months to 16 years of age. Seventy-six pediatric patients (average age, 6.7 +/- 5.0 years) were administered a single oral dose of gatifloxacin suspension (5, 10, or 15 mg/kg of body weight; 600-mg maximum) in a dose-escalating manner. Subjects were stratified by age into 4 groups. An additional 12 children, greater than 6 years of age, received gatifloxacin as the tablet formulation at a dose of approximately 10 mg/kg. Gatifloxacin's apparent clearance and half-life were 5.5 +/- 2.1 ml/min/kg and 5.1 +/- 1.4 h. The maximum concentration of drug in plasma and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased in a manner approximately proportional to the dose. At the 10-mg/kg dose, the bioavailability was similar between the suspension and tablet formulation. The apparent oral clearance of gatifloxacin, normalized for body weight, exhibited a small but statistically significant decrease with increasing age. In all subjects receiving gatifloxacin at 10 mg/kg, the AUC exceeded 20 microg . h/ml (estimated free AUC/MIC ratio of > or =34 for MIC of < or =0.5 microg/ml). These data suggest that gatifloxacin at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 24 h will achieve therapeutic concentrations in plasma in infants and children.

Bioequivalence of two formulations of didanosine, encapsulated enteric-coated beads and buffered tablet, in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected subjects.

Didanosine is an acid labile drug and hence has been given with buffering agents. To avoid the need for concurrent administration with antacids, an encapsulated enteric-coated bead formulation of didanosine was developed. The objective of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of the encapsulated enteric-coated beads compared to the buffered tablet. Two separate open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies were conducted, one in healthy subjects and the other in HIV-infected subjects (with CD4 cell counts > 200 cells/mm3). All subjects received a 400-mg dose of the buffered tablet (reference formulation) and the encapsulated enteric-coated beads (test formulation). Blood samples were collected over 12 hours, and plasma levels of didanosine were determined using a validated assay. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the geometric means of log-transformed Cmax and AUCinfinity values were used to assess bioequivalence between the two formulations using the equivalence interval of 0.80 and 1.25. In healthy volunteers (n = 46), the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax and AUCinfinity values were 0.58 (0.52, 0.64) and 1.02 (0.95, 1.01), respectively. In HIV-infected subjects (n = 30), the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax and AUCinfinity values were 0.64 (0.56, 0.72) and 0.95 (0.86, 1.06), respectively. Median t(max) value increased significantly from 0.67 hours for the buffered tablet in both studies to 2.33 hours (in healthy subjects) or 2.0 hours (in HIV-infected subjects) for the enteric-coated beads. The mean half-life of didanosine was similar between treatments and ranged between 1.60 and 1.70 hours across healthy and HIV-infected subjects. It was concluded that the encapsulated enteric-coated bead formulation of didanosine is equivalent to the buffered tablet in the extent of exposure but differs in the rate of absorption. The pharmacokinetic profile of the enteric formulation appears to be similar in healthy and HIV-infected subjects.

Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads.

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of food and timing of meals on the bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads. Four different independent, open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover studies were conducted in healthy subjects (n = 20-30). Didanosine (400 mg) was given concomitantly with a high-fat meal, light meal, yogurt, and applesauce. In addition, didanosine was given 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 hours before and 2 hours after a light meal. Statistical comparison with fasting conditions was made using the equivalence approach for Cmax (70%-143%) and AUC (80%-125%). The high-fat meal, light meal, yogurt, and applesauce decreased the Cmax by 46%, 22%, 30%, and 24%, respectively, and lowered the AUC by 19%, 27%, 20%, and 18%, respectively; statistical analyses indicated an indeterminate food effect, except for the Cmax for the high-fat meal. For 1 hour before meal, Cmax and AUC were lower by 15% and 24% and, for 2 hours after meal, were lower by 15% and 10%, respectively. There was an indeterminate food effect for 1 hour before the meal treatment; in addition, 2 hours after the meal, treatment approached statistical equivalence, missing narrowly on the lower bounds. For 1.5, 2, and 3 hours before meal treatments, Cmax values were unchanged, but AUC was lower by 10%, 4%, and 0%, respectively; lack of food effect was observed for all three treatments. Across studies, median time to Cmix ranged from 1.67 to 2.67 hours but was delayed by 2.5 to 3 hours with high-fat and light meals compared to fasting conditions. The half-life of didanosine was 1.5 to 2 hours. It was concluded that the bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads was reduced by approximately 20% to 25% with food, which can be circumvented by taking didanosine on an empty stomach. The clinical significance of such moderate reductions in didanosine exposure with food, especially as part of a highly active antiretroviral therapy, is not clear.

Lack of effect of simultaneously administered didanosine encapsulated enteric bead formulation (Videx EC) on oral absorption of indinavir, ketoconazole, or ciprofloxacin.

Didanosine formulation that contains a buffer to prevent it from acid-mediated degradation can result in a significant decrease in the oral absorption of certain drugs because of interactions with antacids. An enteric formulation of didanosine is unlikely to cause such drug interactions because it lacks antacids. This study was undertaken to determine whether the enteric bead formulation of didanosine (Videx EC) influences the bioavailability of indinavir, ketoconazole, and ciprofloxacin, three drugs that are representative of a broader class of drugs affected by interaction with antacids. Healthy subjects of either gender were enrolled in three separate open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover studies. Subjects were randomized to treatment A (800 mg of indinavir, 200 mg of ketoconazole, or 750 mg of ciprofloxacin) or treatment B (same dose of indinavir, ketoconazole, or ciprofloxacin, but with 400 mg of didanosine as an encapsulated enteric bead formulation). A lack of interaction was concluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the geometric means of log-transformed C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) values (i.e., values for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) of indinavir, ketoconazole, and ciprofloxacin were contained entirely between 0.75 and 1.33. For indinavir (n = 23), the point estimate (90% CI; minimum, maximum) of the ratios of C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) values were 0.99 (0.91, 1.06) and 0.96 (0.91, 1.02), respectively. In the ketoconazole study, 3 of 24 subjects showed anomalous absorption of ketoconazole (i.e., an approximately 8-fold-lower AUC compared to historical data), which was the reference treatment. A post hoc analysis performed after these three subjects were excluded indicated that the point estimates (90% CI) of the ratios of C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) values were 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) and 0.97 (0.85, 1.10), respectively. For ciprofloxacin (n = 16), the point estimate (90% CI) of the ratios of C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) values were 0.92 (0.79, 1.07) and 0.91 (0.76, 1.08), respectively. All three studies clearly indicated a lack of interaction. The T(max) and t(1/2) for indinavir, ketoconazole, and ciprofloxacin were similar between treatments. Our results showed that the lack of interaction of didanosine encapsulated enteric bead formulation with indinavir, ketoconazole, and ciprofloxacin indicates that this enteric formulation of didanosine can be concomitantly administered with drugs whose bioavailability is known to be reduced by interaction with antacids.