A Comparison of Currently Available and Investigational Fecal Microbiota Transplant Products for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an intestinal infection that causes morbidity and mortality and places significant burden and cost on the healthcare system, especially in recurrent cases. Antibiotic overuse is well recognized as the leading cause of CDI in high-risk patients, and studies have demonstrated that even short-term antibiotic exposure can cause a large and persistent disturbance to human colonic microbiota. The recovery and sustainability of the gut microbiome after dysbiosis have been associated with fewer CDI recurrences. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) refers to the procedure in which human donor stool is processed and transplanted to a patient with CDI. It has been historically used in patients with pseudomembranous colitis even before the discovery of Clostridioides difficile. More recent research supports the use of FMT as part of the standard therapy of recurrent CDI. This article will be an in-depth review of five microbiome therapeutic products that are either under investigation or currently commercially available: Rebyota (fecal microbiota, live-jslm, formerly RBX2660), Vowst (fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk, formerly SER109), VE303, CP101, and RBX7455. Included in this review is a comparison of the products' composition and dosage forms, available safety and efficacy data, and investigational status.

Management and Outcomes of Patients at a Specialty Clinic for Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Vancomycin and fidaxomicin taper regimens were the most common treatment strategies employed but nearly half of patients (40/83) referred to our Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) clinic did not require further treatment. The overall 60-day CDI recurrence rate was 16.9% (11/65). CDI management at a dedicated clinic may improve clinical outcomes.

A review of fecal microbiota, live-jslm for the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: To review the composition, preparation, proposed mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and current place in therapy of Rebyota (fecal microbiota, live-jslm). SUMMARY: As the first agent in a new class of drugs, live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), fecal microbiota, live-jslm offers another therapeutic approach for the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). LBPs are given following antibiotic therapy for C. difficile to reintroduce certain bacteria present in the normal microbiome, as a means to reconstitute the microbiome of infected individuals. This review provides a summary of phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, product information, discussion of data limitations, and recommendations for place in therapy. High efficacy rates compared to placebo with sustained response up to 24 months after administration have been reported. The majority of adverse events identified were mild to moderate without significant safety signals. CONCLUSION: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm has consistently been shown in randomized trials to be safe and effective in reducing rCDI. Its approval marks the culmination of decades of work to identify, characterize, and refine the intestinal microbiome to create pharmaceutical products.

Commonly Reported Mosquito-Borne Viruses in the United States: A Primer for Pharmacists.

Mosquito-borne diseases are a public health concern. Pharmacists are often a patient's first stop for health information and may be asked questions regarding transmission, symptoms, and treatment of mosquito borne viruses (MBVs). The objective of this paper is to review transmission, geographic location, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of MBVs. We discuss the following viruses with cases in the US in recent years: Dengue, West Nile, Chikungunya, LaCrosse Encephalitis, Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus, and Zika. Prevention, including vaccines, and the impact of climate change are also discussed.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefiderocol for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections.

INTRODUCTION: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic and first of its kind approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) in patients 18 years or older caused by susceptible organisms. Cefiderocol's unique mechanism of iron chelation improves Gram-negative membrane penetration as the bacteria's iron uptake mechanism recognizes the chelated iron antibiotic and iron for entry. This also allows for the evasion of cefiderocol from cell entry-related resistance mechanisms. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the mechanism of action, resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics in various patient populations, and pharmacodynamics. Relevant literature evaluating efficacy and safety are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Limited treatment options are available for the treatment of carbapenem-resistantorganisms. Clinical trials have demonstrated that cefiderocol is no worse than alternative treatment options for cUTIs and HABP/VABP, but more data are currently available to support the use of beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor agents, where susceptible. Mortality differences demonstrated in patients with pneumonia and bloodstream infections must further be explored and logistical and practical considerations regarding susceptibility testing and use as monotherapy vs. combination therapy must be considered prior to confidently recommending cefiderocol for regular use in systemic infections.

A Tapered-pulsed Fidaxomicin Regimen Following Treatment in Patients With Multiple Clostridioides difficile Infection Recurrences.

We treated 46 patients with multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (mrCDI) using a tapered-pulsed (T-P) fidaxomicin regimen, the majority of whom failed prior T-P vancomycin treatment. Sustained clinical response rates at 30 and 90 days were 74% (34/46) and 61% (28/46). T-P fidaxomicin shows promise for management of mrCDI.

Candida auris Urinary Tract Infections and Possible Treatment.

Candida auris is a globally emerging pathogen that has been identified in urinary tract infections (UTIs) worldwide. The novel pathogen is characterized by common misidentification, difficult eradication, and multidrug resistance. To date, there is a paucity of data to guide the optimal management of C. auris UTIs. This review provides an overview of C. auris as an etiologic agent of UTIs, a comprehensive review of published data on C. auris UTIs, and a proposed treatment algorithm based on patient clinical status, the presence or absence of clinical infection, comorbidities, infection, and therapy history. Echinocandin and liposomal amphotericin B are recommended as first-line agents for most patients with C. auris isolated in the urine, with a focus on infection control measures and appropriate follow-up criteria. A variety of combination therapies, flucytosine, and amphotericin B bladder irrigations are offered as potential alternatives in the event of infection persistence or recurrence. The treatment approach centers on the aggressive treatment of C. auris in most patients, with the goal of preventing subsequent invasive spread, multi-drug resistance, and ultimate mortality. Published literature on C. auris urinary isolation and treatment is imperative for the future evolution of evidence-based treatment recommendations for this unique pathogen of concern.

Development of a 51-hospital Chicagoland regional antibiogram and comparison to local hospital and national surveillance data.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a regional antibiogram within the Chicagoland metropolitan area and to compare regional susceptibilities against individual hospitals within the area and national surveillance data. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility data from 2017 and comparison to local institutions and national surveillance data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analysis included 51 hospitals from the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Metropolitan Statistical Area within the state of Illinois. Overall, 18 individual collaborator hospitals provided antibiograms for analysis, and data from 33 hospitals were provided in aggregate by the Becton Dickinson Insights Research Database. METHODS: All available antibiogram data from calendar year 2017 were combined to generate the regional antibiogram. The final Chicagoland antibiogram was then compared internally to collaborators and externally to national surveillance data to assess its applicability and utility. RESULTS: In total, 167,394 gram-positive, gram-negative, fungal, and mycobacterial isolates were collated to create a composite regional antibiogram. The regional data represented the local institutions well, with 96% of the collaborating institutions falling within ±2 standard deviations of the regional mean. The regional antibiogram was able to include 4-5-fold more gram-positive and -negative species with ≥30 isolates than the median reported by local institutions. Against national surveillance data, 18.6% of assessed pathogen-antibiotic combinations crossed prespecified clinical thresholds for disparity in susceptibility rates, with notable trends for resistant gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Developing an accurate, reliable regional antibiogram is feasible, even in one of the largest metropolitan areas in the United States. The biogram is useful in assessing susceptibilities to less commonly encountered organisms and providing clinicians a more accurate representation of local antimicrobial resistance rates compared to national surveillance databases.

Development of High-Level Echinocandin Resistance in a Patient With Recurrent Candida auris Candidemia Secondary to Chronic Candiduria.

OBJECTIVE: Candida auris is a globally emerging pathogen associated with significant mortality. This pathogen frequently is misidentified by traditional biochemical methods and is resistant to commonly used antifungals. The echinocandins currently are recommended as the first-line treatment for C. auris infections. The objective of this work is to demonstrate the challenges associated with C. auris in the real-world setting. METHODS: A 54-year-old male presented to our institution for concerns of sepsis on multiple occasions over a 5-month period. Eleven urine cultures were positive over this timeframe for yeast (9 unidentified Candida isolates and 2 C. lusitaniae isolates). On day 27, the patient developed echinocandin-susceptible candidemia, which was initially identified as C. haemulonii but later accurately identified as C. auris at an outside mycology reference laboratory. Approximately 10 weeks later, the patient had a recurrence of candidemia, this time caused by an echinocandin-resistant C. auris strain. RESULTS: Genomic DNA sequencing performed at the outside mycology reference laboratory identified a single serine to proline base pair change at position 639 (S639P) in the hotspot 1 region of the FKS1 gene of the echinocandin-resistant strain. CONCLUSIONS: Our experiences highlight 4 major concerns associated with C. auris: misidentification, persistent colonization, infection recurrence despite the receipt of appropriate initial therapy, and development of resistance.

Efficacy of oritavancin alone and in combination against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci in an in-vivo Galleria mellonella survival model.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal therapy for serious enterococcal infections, especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), remains unclear, although combination therapy is often recommended. Oritavancin has demonstrated in-vitro activity against VRE, but data evaluating oritavancin in combination with other agents and in in-vivo systems are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oritavancin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone, daptomycin, gentamicin, linezolid and rifampin against vancomycin-susceptible enterococci and VRE in an in-vivo Galleria mellonella survival model. METHODS: Five enterococcal strains were used: three clinical isolates (VRE S38141, VRE H19570, VRE W21579), Enterococcus faecium ATCC 700221 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. G. mellonella larvae were inoculated with the test strain followed by the test drug at humanized weight-based dose alone or in combination within 1 h of inoculation. After injection, larvae were incubated at 37°C and survival was measured daily for 7 days. Survival was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were determined via the log-rank test. Mean survival times were also determined. RESULTS: Each single agent improved survival significantly compared with the untreated control strain. Oritavancin was the most efficacious single agent, and led to a significant increase in survival compared with ceftriaxone, gentamicin and daptomycin. Compared with oritavancin alone, none of the oritavancin combinations tested were significantly better, and mean survival times were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Oritavancin monotherapy had the highest survival rate at 7 days, and none of the combinations tested showed improved survival over oritavancin alone. These data add to the body of literature rebutting the routine use of combination therapy with oritavancin for the treatment of infections due to VRE.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem and vaborbactam for the treatment of urinary tract infection.

INTRODUCTION: Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) represents the first carbapenem and ß-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam is a novel boronic acid, ß-lactamase inhibitor with a high affinity for serine ß-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). This combination, Vabomere™, was approved in August 2017 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cUTIs in patients 18 years or older, including pyelonephritis, caused by the following susceptible microorganisms: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae species complex. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability will be discussed. Expert opinion: Current treatment options for KPC-producing infections such as aminoglycosides, polymyxins, fosfomycin, and tigecycline are associated with concerns regarding efficacy, toxicities, optimal dosing, and/or development of resistance. Additionally, resistance to the new combination product of ceftazidime/avibactam has also emerged. Current clinical evidence supporting the use of M/V for KPC-producing infections is limited to an open-label, randomized, phase III study in a small number of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Although M/V is not approved for KPC-producing infections, we believe that M/V will become a preferred agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of two repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated in 18 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses, or vice versa, in a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period-crossover study. Serial blood (n = 11) and urine (n = 4 collection intervals) samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5, along with predose concentrations on days 3 and 7. PK parameters were similar between days 1 and 5 within and between dosing regimens. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) PK parameters for fosfomycin in plasma on day 5 during the respective QOD and QD dosing regimens were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) = 24.4 ± 6.2 versus 23.8 ± 5.6 µg/ml, time to Cmax (Tmax) = 2.2 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.4 h, apparent volume of distribution (V/F) = 141 ± 67.9 versus 147 ± 67.6 liters, apparent clearance (CL/F) = 21.4 ± 8.0 versus 20.4 ± 5.3 liters/h, renal clearance (CLR) = 7.5 ± 4.1 versus 7.3 ± 3.5 liters/h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) = 151.6 ± 35.6 versus 156.6 ± 42.5 µg · h/ml, and elimination half-life (t1/2) = 4.5 ± 1.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.7 h. Urine concentrations peaked at approximately 600 µg/ml through the 0- to 8-h urine collection intervals but displayed significant interindividual variability. Roughly 35 to 40% of the 3-g dose was excreted in the urine by 24 h postdose. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The proportion of diarrhea-free days during the study was significantly lower with the QD regimen than with the QOD regimen (61% versus 77%; P < 0.0001). Further studies to establish the clinical benefit/risk ratio for repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine are warranted. (This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02570074.).

Impact of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint changes on susceptibility rates of cephalosporins in uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae.

Breakpoint changes may impact cephalosporin susceptibility rates in uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Applying the ≤16-mg/L breakpoint to urine cultures from adult women in an academic health system resulted in cefazolin being the most active uUTI antimicrobial, with 86.9% susceptibility, compared to levofloxacin (80%), nitrofurantoin (76.5%), and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (72.6%).

Clinical use of the polymyxins: the tale of the fox and the cat.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify practice patterns of polymyxin use, quantify gaps in knowledge, and recognize areas of persistent confusion. METHODS: A structured electronic survey was distributed to physicians, pharmacists and microbiologists. Demographic information was obtained, along with data regarding availability, stewardship principles, therapeutic usage, dosing, microbiological testing, and knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding the polymyxins. RESULTS: In total, there were 420 respondents with a median of 8 (interquartile range 4-15) years of experience in infectious diseases (52.5%) and critical care (35%). Of the respondents who reported that only one polymyxin was available for use, 17.1% used polymyxin B. Over half (52.5%) of the respondents utilized a loading dose very often/always, and 66.8% dosed both polymyxins in milligrams, with the most common doses of colistin and polymyxin B being 2.5 mg/kg twice daily (60.3%) and 1.5 mg/kg twice daily (65%), respectively, for patients with normal renal function. Polymyxins were most often used for respiratory infections (63%) in combination with a carbapenem (63.6%). Approximately 85% of respondents reported their knowledge level to be fair, good or very good, although 34.9% answered two of the three knowledge questions incorrectly. More than 70% of respondents agreed that confusion exists in all surveyed areas of polymyxin use. Almost all respondents (91.2%) agreed that a polymyxin guideline would be a helpful resource. CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed objective and subjective variability in the use and perception of the polymyxins, and identified several areas in which they were being used contrary to the available evidence. The information provided herein lays the framework to harmonize clinical practice, guide future research and shape consensus guidelines.

Pharmacokinetics of Telavancin at Fixed Doses in Normal-Body-Weight and Obese (Classes I, II, and III) Adult Subjects.

A recommended total-body-weight (TBW) dosing strategy for telavancin may not be optimal in obese patients. The primary objective of this study was to characterize and compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of telavancin across four body size groups: normal to overweight and obese classes I, II, and III. Healthy adult subjects (n = 32) received a single, weight-stratified, fixed dose of 500 mg (n = 4), 750 mg (n = 8), or 1,000 mg (n = 20) of telavancin. Noncompartmental PK analyses revealed that subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥40 kg/m2 had a higher volume of distribution (16.24 ± 2.7 liters) than subjects with a BMI of <30 kg/m2 (11.71 ± 2.6 liters). The observed area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) ranged from 338.1 to 867.3 mg · h/liter, with the lowest exposures being in subjects who received 500 mg. AUC0-∞ values were similar among obese subjects who received 1,000 mg. A two-compartment population PK model best described the plasma concentration-time profile of telavancin when adjusted body weight (ABW) was included as a predictive covariate. Fixed doses of 750 mg and 1,000 mg had similar target attainment probabilities for efficacy as doses of 10 mg/kg of body weight based on ABW and TBW, respectively. However, the probability of achieving a target area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h of ≥763 mg · h/liter in association with acute kidney injury was highest (19.7%) with TBW-simulated dosing and lowest (0.4%) at the 750-mg dose. These results suggest that a fixed dose of 750 mg is a safe and effective alternative to telavancin doses based on TBW or ABW for the treatment of obese patients with normal renal function and Staphylococcus aureus infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02753855.).

Clinical and economic impact of the introduction of a nucleic acid amplification assay for Clostridium difficile.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes and cost implications of a diagnostic shift from an EIA- to PCR-based assay for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have not been completely described in the literature. METHODS: The impact of the PCR-based assay on the incidence and duration of CDI therapy was compared to the EIA assay for patients with a negative CDI diagnostic result. Secondary clinical and economic outcomes were also evaluated. Independent predictors of receipt of antibiotic therapy were assessed via logistic regression. RESULTS: 141 EIA and 140 PCR patients were included. Significantly more patients were started or continued on anti-CDI antibiotic therapy after a known negative assay result in the EIA group (26 patients vs. 8 patients, P = 0.002). Duration of antibiotic therapy after a known negative result was significantly shorter in the PCR group (1 vs. 4 days, P = 0.029) and a 23% reduction in the number of tests obtained per patient was observed (1.41 ± 0.86 vs. 1.82 ± 1.35, P = 0.007). The over fourfold difference in per-test cost of the EIA assay ($8.33 vs. $42.86, P < 0.0001) was offset by the overall medication costs required for the increased treatment in the EIA group ($546.60 vs. $188.96, P = 0.191). Utilization of the EIA-based CDI assay was associated with increased odds of CDI treatment after a negative test (aOR 4.71, 95% CI 1.93-11.46, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The transition from an EIA to PCR-based assay for diagnosing CDI resulted in a significant decrease in the number of patients treated and the duration of treatment in response to a negative test result. This significant decrease in treatment resulted in decreased costs offsetting the utilization of a more expensive molecular test for patients with a negative CDI diagnostic result.

Economic Barriers in the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection With Oral Vancomycin.

Vancomycin is an increasingly important option for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, but economic barriers to its use remain significant in the outpatient setting. Generic vancomycin capsules are still inexplicably expensive and not universally covered by insurers. This report highlights the potential adverse consequences of cost-related nonadherence to vancomycin therapy and the challenges that clinicians face when prescribing oral vancomycin.

Compatibility of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam with Vancomycin in Dextrose 5% in Water.

Objectives: The compatibility of vancomycin with existing and novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors at clinically relevant concentrations in 5% dextrose in water has not been fully explored to date. Methods: Vancomycin concentrations tested ranged from 5 to 20 mg/mL. Ceftazidime-avibactam was tested at 8, 20, and 40 mg/mL, ceftolozane-tazobactam at 15 mg/mL, and piperacillin-tazobactam at 28 mg/mL. Compatibility of drug admixtures were tested via both simulated and actual y-site infusion. For the simulated y-site compatibility assessment, 1:1 mixtures of each respective drug were analyzed over 24 hours. Actual y-site infusion followed a 4-hour extended-infusion protocol, with aliquots tested hourly for 4 hours. At all time points, the compatibility of each admixture was determined using 6 different methods: visual, microscopic, Tyndall beam, nephelometric, pH, and microbiologic bioassay assessment. If any admixture failed any one of these 6 assays, it was considered incompatible. Any combination deemed incompatible was filtered through a 0.22 µm filter and reanalyzed to assess impact of particle size. Results: There were no differences in compatibility categorizations between simulated and actual y-site infusion. There were no changes in compatibility over the time course of any experiment. Ceftazidime-avibactam at 8 mg/mL was incompatible with vancomycin at 5 mg/mL. The maximum compatible vancomycin concentrations were 5 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL with 20 and 40 mg/mL of ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. Ceftolozane-tazobactam 15 mg/mL was compatible with vancomycin concentrations up to 10 mg/mL. The maximum compatible vancomycin concentration with piperacillin-tazobactam 28 mg/mL was 5 mg/mL. None of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors tested were compatible with 15 or 20 mg/mL of vancomycin. None of the admixtures considered incompatible by other methods displayed any decrease in antimicrobial activity as assessed by bioassay. After filtration, all admixtures originally deemed incompatible maintained their visual turbidity and microscopic particulate matter. Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam prepared at the lowest concentration recommended in the package insert is incompatible with vancomycin. Ceftolozane-tazobactam did not display incompatibility until vancomycin concentrations above 10 mg/mL were tested. Piperacillin-tazobactam at a typical extended-infusion concentration is compatible with vancomycin in D5W. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess compatibility of antibiotic admixtures via direct measurement of antimicrobial activity. The lack of any decrement in antibacterial activity of any apparently incompatible admixture and maintenance of incompatibility after passage through a 0.22 µm filter may suggest a lack of clinically relevant adverse effects when co-administered. Future compatibility studies should incorporate appropriate methods to accurately assess both efficacy and safety of co-administered drug products.

Pharmacokinetics and Dialytic Clearance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Critically Ill Patient on Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration.

Ceftazidime-avibactam administered at 1.25 g every 8 h was used to treat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in a critically ill patient on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Prefiltration plasma drug concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h along with postfiltration and ultrafiltrate concentrations at h 2 and h 6. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftazidime and avibactam, respectively, were as follows: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), 61.10 and 14.54 mg/liter; minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), 31.96 and 8.45 mg/liter; half-life (t1/2), 6.07 and 6.78 h; apparent volume of distribution at the steady state (Vss), 27.23 and 30.81 liters; total clearance at the steady state (CLss), 2.87 and 2.95 liters/h; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8), 347.87 and 85.69 mg · h/liter. Concentrations of ceftazidime in plasma exceeded the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC (6 mg/liter) throughout the 8-h dosing interval. Mean CVVH extraction ratios for ceftazidime and avibactam were 14.44% and 11.53%, respectively, and mean sieving coefficients were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. The calculated mean clearance of ceftazidime by CVVH was 1.64 liters/h and for avibactam was 1.59 liters/h, representing 57.1% of the total clearance of ceftazidime and 54.3% of the total clearance of avibactam. Further data that include multiple patients and dialysis modes are needed to verify the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam dosing strategy during critical illness and CVVH.