Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and culture assays to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis using OMNIgene-sputum processed stool among adult TB presumptive patients in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Stool is a potential sample for diagnosing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in patients with difficulty in expectorating. However, high mycobacterial culture contamination rates and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test error rates on stool samples have limited its use. OMNIgene SPUTUM (OM-S) is a sample transport reagent with characteristics of sputum decontamination while maintaining viable Mtb. We evaluated the impact of OM-S on Mtb diagnostic yield from stool using smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and culture among presumptive TB patients. METHODS: Paired stool and expectorated sputum samples were collected from consecutive Ugandan adults undergoing diagnostic evaluation for pulmonary TB between June 2018 and June 2019. Stool was divided into 2 portions: one was homogenized in OM-S (OM-S stool) and the other in PBS (PBS stool) as control. Both sputum and processed stool were tested for Mtb using concentrated smear fluorescence microscopy (CFM), Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for each test were calculated against sputum MGIT culture as the reference standard. RESULTS: Of the 200 participants, 120 (60%) were male, 73 (37%) were HIV positive (median CD4 120 cells/uL (IQR 43-297)) and 128 (64%) had confirmed pulmonary TB by sputum MGIT culture. Seven (4%) OM-S stool Xpert samples reported errors while 47 (25%) and 103 (61%) were contaminated on OM-S stool MGIT and PBS stool MGIT, respectively. OM-S stool MGIT was able to accurately diagnose 56 of the contaminated PBS stool MGIT samples compared to only 5 of the contaminated OM-S stool MGIT samples diagnosed by PBS stool MGIT. Sensitivity (95% Confidence Interval, CI) 89% (83-94) for OM-S stool Xpert was higher compared to that of OM-S stool MGIT 60% (51-69) and PBS stool MGIT 42% (32-52). Specificity (95%CI) 91% (82-97) was also higher for OM-S stool Xpert compared to OM-S stool MGIT 64% (51-75) and PBS stool MGIT 26% (16-38). CONCLUSION: Stool processed with OM-S showed potential to improve Mtb diagnostic yield and reduce rates of indeterminate results when tested on Xpert and MGIT culture. The method may thus be of value in Mtb detection among patients with difficulty to expectorate.

Implementation science to improve the quality of tuberculosis diagnostic services in Uganda.

Nucleic acid amplification tests such as Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) have the potential to revolutionize tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics and improve case finding in resource-poor settings. However, since its introduction over a decade ago in Uganda, there remain significant gaps along the cascade of care for patients undergoing TB diagnostic evaluation at peripheral health centers. We utilized a systematic, implementation science-based approach to identify key reasons at multiple levels for attrition along the TB diagnostic evaluation cascade of care. Provider- and health system-level barriers fit into four key thematic areas: human resources, material resources, service implementation, and service coordination. Patient-level barriers included the considerable costs and time required to complete health center visits. We developed a theory-informed strategy using the PRECEDE framework to target key barriers by streamlining TB diagnostic evaluation and facilitating continuous quality improvement. The resulting SIMPLE TB strategy involve four key components: 1) Single-sample LED fluorescence microscopy; 2) Daily sputum transport to Xpert testing sites; 3) Text message communication of Xpert results to health centers and patients; and 4) Performance feedback to health centers using a quality improvement framework. This combination of interventions was feasible to implement and significantly improved the provision of high-quality care for patients undergoing TB diagnostic evaluation. We conclude that achieving high coverage of Xpert testing services is not enough. Xpert scale-up should be accompanied by health system co-interventions to facilitate effective implementation and ensure that high quality care is delivered to patients.

Outcomes of a clinical diagnostic algorithm for management of ambulatory smear and Xpert MTB/Rif negative HIV infected patients with presumptive pulmonary TB in Uganda: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic guidelines for Tuberculosis (TB) in HIV infected patients previously relied on microscopy where the value of initial antibiotic treatment for exclusion of pulmonary TB (PTB) was limited. New guidelines rely on the Xpert MTB Rif test (Xpert). However, the value of the antibiotic treatment remains unclear particularly in individuals who are smear-negative and Xpert-negative-given Xpert has only moderate sensitivity for smear-negative PTB. We assessed an algorithm involving initial treatment with antibiotics prior empiric TB treatment in HIV patients with presumptive PTB who were both smear and Xpert negative. METHODS: We performed a prospective study with six month follow-up to establish patient response to a course of broad spectrum antibiotics prior empiric TB treatment between March 2012 and June 2013. We calculated the proportion of patients who responded to the antibiotic treatment and those who did not. We computed the crude and adjusted odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals, for response to the antibiotic treatment on various patient characteristics. We report treatment outcomes for patients who received broad spectrum antibiotics only or who were initiated empiric TB treatment. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 162 smear-negative and Xpert-negative patients, of whom 59% (96 of 162) were female, 81% (131 of 162) were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for a median of 8.7 months. Overall, 88% (141 of 160) responded to the antibiotic treatment, 8% (12 of 160) got empiric TB treatment and 4% (7 out of 160) were treated for other respiratory disease. The odds of improvement on antibiotics were lower in patients with advanced HIV disease than in patients with early HIV disease. Adjusted odds ratios were significant for HIV clinical stage (AOR; 0.038,) and duration on ART (AOR; 1.038,). CONCLUSION: The majority of HIV patients with presumptive PTB with smear-negative and Xpert negative results improved on the antibiotic treatment and did not require empiric TB treatment. Initial antibiotic treatment appeared more successful in patients with less advanced HIV disease. Findings from our study suggest it is useful to initiate HIV infected patients with presumptive PTB having smear and Xpert negative results on an initial course of antibiotic treatment prior empiric TB treatment.