Ovarian stimulation 2.0.

Ovarian stimulation (OS) has been the single most effective measure ever taken for enhancing ART outcome. In the past decade, we have seen a flurry of various new protocols used for OS in ART. In light of the important differences that characterize these new approaches for OS, we felt is was timely to review the relative merit of each and every new protocol.

Programing the onset of ovarian stimulation: From early follicular phase start to oral contraceptive (OC) pill, to luteal phase E2, Duo-Stim and random start OS protocols.

Ovarian stimulation has been the single most efficient measure ever taken in ART for improving outcome by harvesting multiple oocytes and ultimately, embryos. Today, ovarian stimulation protocols consist in administrating exogenous gonadotropins in order to override the natural mechanisms which controls the ovulatory quota to one in humans. For practicality issues, there has been numerous attempts to control, or 'program', when ovarian stimulation are initiated in order to improve functionality and in turn efficacy for ART programs. The different options for controlling the onset of ovarian stimulation currently available are discussed here, as well as the novel possibility of using progestins for blocking premature ovulation.

Let's not abandon programmed frozen embryo transfers yet: a countercurrent perspective.

The countercurrent opinion given in this paper is that the optimal management of frozen embryo transfers (FET) is not a one-size-fits-all matter, but rather one that should be decided after considering all the various parameters and options. This choice should notably encompass patients' individual characteristics - including variable risks of obstetric complications - and weigh out the respective advantages of each FET option in each case. While there may be real advantages for natural-cycle FET in many cases, these need to be balanced against both practical and clinical issues. Contrary to several prevailing, sometimes loudly expressed suggestions, there is not a one single effective approach when it comes to choosing a mode of scheduling FET.

Patient experience of social and medical fertility preservation fully reimbursed in France.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review patient experience with social fertility preservation (sFP), as compared to medical fertility preservation (mFP), in a context where sFP is fully reimbursed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation for mFP between 2017 and 2023 and sFP between 2022 and 2023 at a large ART single center. Additionally, we surveyed patients undergoing sFP and mFP, regarding their experiences, intentions, awareness, and financial consideration. RESULTS: A total of 97 oocyte retrievals were performed for sFP in 75 women, and 155 were performed in mFP (127 women). Median ages were 36.4 years for sFP and 28.9 years for mFP. Median oocytes retrieved per session were 10 for sFP and 8 for mFP. Ninety-seven percent of of mFP participants were informed by healthcare professionals, while half of sFP participants learned through personal acquaintances. The primary motivation for sFP was a desire for pregnancy while being single. Most respondents in both groups knew that 15-20 oocytes are typically needed for a successful birth. None were aware of the "DuoStim" option, but interest was expressed by most women. Surprisingly, despite full reimbursement for sFP in France, 78% expressed willingness to pay if necessary. CONCLUSION: Many women choose sFP due to concerns about declining fertility, often informed by non-medical sources. Free access to sFP can help mitigate the global decline in natality by allowing women to anticipate age-related fertility decline. This study should be considered by other countries as they may increasingly cover sFP costs in the future.

Clinical Management of Infertility Associated with Endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review recent data that affected the clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: We completed a PubMed review of all articles that included the following keywords: endometriosis, infertility, IVF, and ART. STUDY SELECTION: A study was selected based on the pertinence of the topic addressed in relation to the study's set objectives. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: All identified articles were first assessed based on a review of the abstract. Pertinent articles were reviewed in depth. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis interferes with natural conception primarily by altering the quality of gametes-oocytes and sperm-and early-stage embryos. On the contrary, recent data indicate that gametes and early-stage embryos are not altered in the case of ART. Surgery-a classical approach in yesteryears-does appear to improve ART outcomes and may affect ovarian reserve and the number of oocytes retrieved in ART. Surgery is thus more rarely opted for today and only when necessary; proceeding to fertility preservation prior to surgery is recommended. When ART is performed in women with endometriosis, it is recommended to use an antagonist or progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation approach followed by deferred embryo transfer. In this case, GnRH (gonadotropin releasing hormone) agonist is preferred for triggering ovulation, as it limits the risk of cyst formation as well as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Frozen embryo transfers are best performed in E2 (estradiol) and progesterone replacement cycle.

Bacterial infection in endometriosis: a silver-lining for the development of new non-hormonal therapy?

The pathogenesis of endometriosis is a hotly debated topic, yet still cloaked in multiple layers of hypothetical theories. A recent report raises the possibility that bacterial infection, especially those of the genus Fusobacterium, may be the cause of endometriosis, at least in certain women. More importantly, the demonstration that treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics significantly reduced the size of lesions in a mouse endometriosis model rekindles the hope for new non-hormonal treatments. The development of new therapies has been plagued by strings of unsuccessful clinical trials over the last two decades. Is this antibiotic therapy, a silver lining for the research and development of non-hormonal drugs for endometriosis?

Live Birth After Oocyte Donation In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in Women With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Although multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the infertility related to endometriosis, there are no conclusive data on the association of endometriosis with endometrial receptivity. The oocyte donation model in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles can clarify this issue. Objective: To explore the association of a history of endometriosis with ART outcomes in recipients of oocyte donation. Data Sources: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases were searched from inception until August 31, 2023, using combinations of relevant keywords. Moreover, we retrieved data from the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the United Kingdom. Study Selection: Observational studies were included if they investigated the impact of endometriosis on ART outcomes with donor oocytes. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Publicly available data related to ART from various sources were gathered, and a retrospective aggregate and nonaggregate analysis using registries of in vitro fertilization cycles with oocyte or embryo donation was conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) following oocyte donor cycles. The effect measures of comparisons between groups are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI. Results: This study analyzed 7212 oocyte donation cycles from 4 studies for the meta-analysis, along with 162 082 cycles from 2 registries (137 182 from SART and 24 900 from HFEA). No significant differences between the groups were observed in the meta-analysis of published data after adjusting for confounding factors (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.19-1.57). A statistically significant lower LBR was identified in women with endometriosis when analyzing the aggregate data from SART and HFEA databases (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found a modest decrease in LBR among women with a history of endometriosis, although only results from the pooled analysis of registry data and not those from the meta-analysis reached statistical significance. These findings suggest that a marginal impairment of uterine receptivity may contribute to infertility mechanisms in women affected by endometriosis.

Fertility preservation counseling: old indications, novel perspectives.

Fertility preservation for cancer has existed for three decades. The advent of highly effective oocyte cryopreservation by vitrification has paved the way for social fertility preservation. The options are discussed.

Telomere length: a marker for reproductive aging?

The improvements accomplished in assisted reproductive technology have emphasized more than ever the role played by chronological age, notably for predicting oocyte quality. Studies in cellular aging have directed research on telomere length measurements as possible markers of functional aging and, notably, female reproductive outcomes. Although further research is still needed, encouraging results are already available on the possibility that leucocyte telomere length may be a useful parameter for assessing reproductive potential in aging women.

Subcutaneous progesterone administration provides a similar ongoing pregnancy rate compared with intramuscular progesterone administration in hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Objective: To compare the ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) for subcutaneous progesterone (SC-P) to intramuscular progesterone (IM-P) in hormone replacement therapy used in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Design: Prospective nonrandomized cohort study. Setting: Private fertility clinic. Patients: The study enrolled 224 patients scheduled for hormone replacement therapy (HRT)-FET cycles with SC-P (n = 133) or IM-P (n = 91). The route of P administration was decided according to the patient's preference and accessibility to the hospital. In the first FET cycle of a freeze-all cycle using single blastocyst transfers, a woman aged ≤35 was included. Main Outcomes: Ongoing pregnancy (OP). Results: The demographic, cycle, and embryologic characteristics were similar between groups. The clinical pregnancy rates (86/133[64.7%] vs. 57/91[62.6%]); miscarriage rates (21/86 [24.4%] vs. 10/57 [17.5%]), and OPR (65/133 [48.9%] vs. 47/91 [51.6%]) were comparable between the SC-P and IM-P groups. Binary logistic regression for OP as the dependent factor revealed that blastocyst morphology was found to be a significant independent prognosticator (for poor quality embryos adjusted odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.029-0.427) and progesterone route (SC-P vs. IM-P) was an insignificant prognosticator (adjusted odds ratio, 0.694; 95% confidence interval, 0.354-1.358). Conclusions: The OPR for SC-P administration was similar to that for IM-P in HRT-FET cycles. The effect of ET-day P levels may vary regarding the administration route. Randomized controlled trials comparing different P administration routes are needed, and large-scale prospective trials are warranted to evaluate the ET-day P levels on pregnancy outcome.