RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Iron and folic acid supplementation have been recommended in pregnancy for anaemia prevention, and may improve other maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy, either alone or in combination with folic acid or with other vitamins and minerals, as an intervention in antenatal care. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Registry on 18 January 2024 (including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, conference proceedings), and searched reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials that evaluated the effects of oral supplementation with daily iron, iron + folic acid, or iron + other vitamins and minerals during pregnancy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, ascertained trustworthiness based on pre-defined criteria, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and conducted checks for accuracy. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for primary outcomes. We anticipated high heterogeneity amongst trials; we pooled trial results using a random-effects model (average treatment effect). MAIN RESULTS: We included 57 trials involving 48,971 women. A total of 40 trials compared the effects of daily oral supplements with iron to placebo or no iron; eight trials evaluated the effects of iron + folic acid compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. Iron supplementation compared to placebo or no iron Maternal outcomes: Iron supplementation during pregnancy may reduce maternal anaemia (4.0% versus 7.4%; risk ratio (RR) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.47; 14 trials, 13,543 women; low-certainty evidence) and iron deficiency at term (44.0% versus 66.0%; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.68; 8 trials, 2873 women; low-certainty evidence), and probably reduces maternal iron-deficiency anaemia at term (5.0% versus 18.4%; RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.63; 7 trials, 2704 women; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron supplementation. There is probably little to no difference in maternal death (2 versus 4 events, RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.69; 3 trials, 14,060 women; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain for adverse effects (21.6% versus 18.0%; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.02; 12 trials, 2423 women; very low-certainty evidence) and severe anaemia (Hb < 70 g/L) in the second/third trimester (< 1% versus 3.6%; RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.20; 8 trials, 1398 women; very low-certainty evidence). No trials reported clinical malaria or infection during pregnancy. Infant outcomes: Women taking iron supplements are probably less likely to have infants with low birthweight (5.2% versus 6.1%; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99; 12 trials, 18,290 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron supplementation. However, the evidence is very uncertain for infant birthweight (MD 24.9 g, 95% CI -125.81 to 175.60; 16 trials, 18,554 infants; very low-certainty evidence). There is probably little to no difference in preterm birth (7.6% versus 8.2%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.02; 11 trials, 18,827 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and there may be little to no difference in neonatal death (1.4% versus 1.5%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24; 4 trials, 17,243 infants; low-certainty evidence) or congenital anomalies, including neural tube defects (41 versus 48 events; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.33; 4 trials, 14,377 infants; low-certainty evidence). Iron + folic supplementation compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid Maternal outcomes: Daily oral supplementation with iron + folic acid probably reduces maternal anaemia at term (12.1% versus 25.5%; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64; 4 trials, 1962 women; moderate-certainty evidence), and may reduce maternal iron deficiency at term (3.6% versus 15%; RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.99; 1 trial, 131 women; low-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of iron + folic acid on maternal iron-deficiency anaemia (10.8% versus 25%; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.09; 1 trial, 131 women; very low-certainty evidence), or maternal deaths (no events; 1 trial; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for adverse effects (21.0% versus 0.0%; RR 44.32, 95% CI 2.77 to 709.09; 1 trial, 456 women; low-certainty evidence), and the evidence is very uncertain for severe anaemia in the second or third trimester (< 1% versus 5.6%; RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.63; 4 trials, 506 women; very low-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. Infant outcomes: There may be little to no difference in infant low birthweight (33.4% versus 40.2%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.74; 2 trials, 1311 infants; low-certainty evidence), comparing iron + folic acid supplementation to placebo or no iron + folic acid. Infants born to women who received iron + folic acid during pregnancy probably had higher birthweight (MD 57.73 g, 95% CI 7.66 to 107.79; 2 trials, 1365 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. There may be little to no difference in other infant outcomes, including preterm birth (19.4% versus 19.2%; RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.40 to 6.00; 3 trials, 1497 infants; low-certainty evidence), neonatal death (3.4% versus 4.2%; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.30; 1 trial, 1793 infants; low-certainty evidence), or congenital anomalies (1.7% versus 2.4; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.40; 1 trial, 1652 infants; low-certainty evidence), comparing iron + folic acid supplementation to placebo or no iron + folic acid. A total of 19 trials were conducted in malaria-endemic countries, or in settings with some malaria risk. No studies reported maternal clinical malaria; one study reported data on placental malaria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy may reduce maternal anaemia and iron deficiency at term. For other maternal and infant outcomes, there was little to no difference between groups or the evidence was uncertain. Future research is needed to examine the effects of iron supplementation on other maternal and infant health outcomes, including infant iron status, growth, and development.
Asunto(s)
Sesgo , Suplementos Dietéticos , Ácido Fólico , Hierro , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Hierro/administración & dosificación , Hierro/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Anemia Ferropénica/prevención & control , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anaemia affects approximately 1.8 billion people worldwide; over 60% of anaemia cases globally are due to iron deficiency (ID). Iron deficiency and anaemia contribute to the global burden of disease and affect physical and cognitive development in children, and work productivity and economic well-being in adults. Fortification of food with iron, alone or in combination with other nutrients, is an effective intervention to control ID. Condiments and seasonings are ideal food vehicles for iron fortification in countries where they are commonly used. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects and safety of condiment and seasoning fortification with iron alone or iron plus other micronutrients on iron deficiency, anaemia, and health-related outcomes in the general population. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and other databases up to 24 January 2023. We also searched the International clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP) for any ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (randomisation at individual or cluster level), non-randomised controlled trials, interrupted time series with at least three measure points both before and after intervention, and controlled before-after studies. Participants were populations of any age (including pregnant women), from any country, excluding those with critical illness or severe co-morbidities. We included interventions in which condiments or seasonings have been fortified with any combination of iron and other vitamins and minerals, irrespective of the fortification technology used. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened and assessed the eligibility of studies. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or input from a third review author. Two review authors extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in all the included studies. We followed the methods laid out by Cochrane and used GRADE criteria for assessing certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Our search identified 15,902 records after removal of duplicates. We included 16 studies with 20,512 participants (18,410 participants after adjusting for clustering effects). They were all carried out in upper-middle- and lower-middle-income countries. Three studies were controlled before-after studies, one was non-randomised trial, and 12 were RCTs (including three cluster RCTs). Six studies took place in schools; seven in communities; and one each in a nursery/kindergarten, tea estate, and factory. Three studies involved only women, one study involved both women and their children, and all other studies focused on children and/or adolescents. Nine studies used salt as a vehicle for iron fortification, three used fish sauce, two used soy sauce, one used curry powder, and one a "seasoning powder". The dose of iron received by participants ranged from 4.4 mg to 55 mg/day. The sample sizes in the trials ranged from 123 to 14,398, and study durations ranged from three months to two years. Twelve RCTs contributed data for meta-analysis. Six trials compared iron-fortified condiments versus the unfortified condiment, and six trials provided data comparing iron fortification in combination with other micronutrients versus the same condiment with other micronutrients, but no added iron. In one trial, the fortificant contained micronutrients that may have affected the absorption of iron. Overall no studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. All included studies were assessed to have a high overall risk of bias, with the most concerns being around allocation concealment, blinding, and random sequence generation. There was very high heterogeneity amongst studies in almost all examined outcomes. Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron versus unfortified condiments/seasonings We are uncertain about whether consuming condiments/seasonings fortified with iron in comparison to the same unfortified condiment reduces anaemia at the end of intervention (risk ratio (RR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.65; 2328 participants; 4 studies; very low-certainty of evidence). We are uncertain about whether consuming iron-fortified condiments increases haemoglobin concentrations (mean difference (MD) 6.40 (g/L), 95% CI -0.62 to 13.41; 2808 participants; 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Fortification of condiments/seasonings with iron probably slightly reduces ID (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.01; 391 participants; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about whether fortification with iron increases ferritin concentration (MD 14.81 (µg/L), 95% CI 5.14 to 24.48; 4459 participants; 6 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients versus condiments/seasonings fortified with other micronutrients except iron Consuming condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients may reduce anaemia (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.89; 1007 participants; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about whether fortification of condiments/seasonings with iron plus other micronutrients will improve haemoglobin concentration (MD 6.22 g/dL, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.83; 1270 participants; 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence). It may reduce ID (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.69; 1154 participants; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about whether fortification with iron plus other micronutrients improves ferritin concentration (MD 10.63 µg/L, 95% CI 2.40 to 18.85; 1251 participants; 5 studies; very low -certainty evidence). Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron versus no intervention No trial reported data on this comparison. No studies reported adverse effects. Funding sources do not appear to have distorted the results in any of the assessed trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain whether consuming iron-fortified condiments/seasonings reduces anaemia, improves haemoglobin concentration, or improves ferritin concentration. It may reduce ID. Findings about ferritin should be interpreted with caution since its concentrations increase during inflammation. Consuming condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients may reduce anaemia, and we are uncertain whether this will improve haemoglobin concentration or ferritin concentration. More studies are needed to determine the true effect of iron-fortified condiments/seasonings on preventing anaemia and improving health. The effects of this intervention on other health outcomes like malaria incidence, growth and development are unclear.
ANTECEDENTES: La anemia afecta aproximadamente a 1800 millones de personas en todo el mundo; más del 60% de los casos de anemia en el mundo se deben a la deficiencia de hierro (DH). La deficiencia de hierro y la anemia contribuyen a la carga mundial de morbilidad y afectan al desarrollo físico y cognitivo de los niños, así como a la productividad laboral y el bienestar económico de los adultos. El enriquecimiento de los alimentos con hierro, solo o en combinación con otros nutrientes, es una intervención eficaz para controlar la DH. Los condimentos y sazonadores son vehículos alimentarios ideales para el enriquecimiento con hierro en los países donde se utilizan habitualmente. OBJETIVOS: Determinar los efectos y la seguridad del enriquecimiento de condimentos y aderezos con hierro solo o hierro más otros micronutrientes sobre la deficiencia de hierro, la anemia y los desenlaces relacionados con la salud en la población general. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se realizaron búsquedas en CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL y otras bases de datos hasta el 24 de enero de 2023. También se realizaron búsquedas de ensayos en curso en la Plataforma de registros internacionales de ensayos clínicos (ICTRP). CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se incluyeron ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) (asignación aleatoria a nivel individual o grupal), ensayos controlados no aleatorizados, series temporales interrumpidas con al menos tres puntos de medición tanto antes como después de la intervención, y estudios controlados del tipo antesdespués. Los participantes fueron poblaciones de cualquier edad (incluidas mujeres embarazadas), de cualquier país, excluidos aquellos con enfermedades críticas o comorbilidades graves. Se incluyeron las intervenciones en las que los condimentos o sazonadores se han enriquecido con cualquier combinación de hierro y otras vitaminas y minerales, independientemente de la tecnología de enriquecimiento utilizada. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión seleccionaron y evaluaron de forma independiente la elegibilidad de los estudios. Los desacuerdos se resolvieron mediante debate o aporte de material de un tercer autor de la revisión. Dos autores de la revisión extrajeron los datos y evaluaron el riesgo de sesgo en todos los estudios incluidos. Se siguieron los métodos establecidos por Cochrane y se utilizó el método GRADE para evaluar la certeza de la evidencia. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: La búsqueda identificó 15 902 registros tras eliminar los duplicados. Se incluyeron 16 estudios con 20 512 participantes (18 410 participantes después de ajustar los efectos del conglomerado). Todos ellos se llevaron a cabo en países de ingresos mediosbajos y mediosaltos. Tres estudios fueron controlados del tipo antesdespués, uno fue un ensayo no aleatorio y 12 fueron ECA (incluidos tres ECA grupales). Seis estudios tuvieron lugar en escuelas, siete en comunidades y uno en una guardería, uno en una plantación de té y uno en una fábrica. En tres estudios participaron solo mujeres, en un estudio participaron tanto mujeres como sus hijos, y todos los demás estudios se centraron en niños y/o adolescentes. Nueve estudios utilizaron la sal como vehículo para el enriquecimiento con hierro, tres la salsa de pescado, dos la salsa de soja, uno el curry en polvo y otro un "sazonador en polvo". La dosis de hierro recibida por los participantes osciló entre 4,4 mg y 55 mg/día. El tamaño muestral de los ensayos osciló entre 123 y 14 398, y la duración de los estudios, entre tres meses y dos años. Doce ECA aportaron datos para el metanálisis. Seis ensayos compararon condimentos enriquecidos con hierro versus el condimento no enriquecido, y seis ensayos proporcionaron datos que comparaban el enriquecimiento con hierro en combinación con otros micronutrientes versus el mismo condimento con otros micronutrientes, pero sin hierro agregado. En un ensayo, el fortificante contenía micronutrientes que podrían haber afectado la absorción del hierro. En general, no se evaluó ningún estudio como de riesgo de sesgo bajo. Se evaluó que todos los estudios incluidos tenían un riesgo de sesgo general alto, y las mayores preocupaciones se centraron en la ocultación de la asignación, el cegamiento y la generación de secuencias al azar. Hubo una heterogeneidad muy alta entre los estudios en casi todos los desenlaces examinados. Condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro versus condimentos/sazonadores no enriquecidos Es incierto si el consumo de condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro en comparación con el mismo condimento no enriquecido reduce la anemia al finalizar la intervención (razón de riesgos [RR] 0,34; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 0,18 a 0,65; 2328 participantes; cuatro estudios; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Es incierto si el consumo de condimentos enriquecidos con hierro aumenta las concentraciones de hemoglobina (diferencia de medias [DM] 6,40 g/l; IC del 95%: 0,62 a 13,41; 2808 participantes; cinco estudios; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El enriquecimiento de condimentos/sazonadores con hierro probablemente reduce ligeramente la DH (RR 0,33; IC del 95%: 0,11 a 1,01; 391 participantes; dos estudios; evidencia de certeza moderada). Es incierto si el enriquecimiento con hierro aumenta la concentración de ferritina (DM 14,81 µg/L; IC del 95%: 5,14 a 24,48; 4459 participantes; seis estudios; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro y otros micronutrientes versus condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con otros micronutrientes excepto hierro El consumo de condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro más otros micronutrientes podría reducir la anemia (RR 0,59; IC del 95%: 0,40 a 0,89; 1007 participantes; cuatro estudios; evidencia de certeza baja). Es incierto si el enriquecimiento de condimentos/sazonadores con hierro más otros micronutrientes mejorará la concentración de hemoglobina (DM 6,22 g/dL; IC del 95%: 1,60 a 10,83; 1270 participantes; cinco estudios; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Podría reducir la DH (RR 0,36; IC del 95%: 0,19 a 0,69; 1154 participantes; cuatro estudios; evidencia de certeza baja). Es incierto si el enriquecimiento con hierro más otros micronutrientes mejora la concentración de ferritina (DM 10,63 µg/L; IC del 95%: 2,40 a 18,85; 1251 participantes; cinco estudios; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro versus ninguna intervención Ningún ensayo informó datos sobre esta comparación. Ningún estudio informó efectos adversos. Las fuentes de financiación no parecen haber distorsionado los resultados en ninguno de los ensayos evaluados. CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: Es incierto si el consumo de condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro reduce la anemia, mejora la concentración de hemoglobina o mejora la concentración de ferritina. Podría reducir la DH. Los resultados sobre la ferritina deben interpretarse con cautela, ya que sus concentraciones aumentan durante la inflamación. El consumo de condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro más otros micronutrientes podría reducir la anemia, y no se sabe con certeza si mejorará la concentración de hemoglobina o de ferritina. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar el verdadero efecto de los condimentos/sazonadores enriquecidos con hierro en la prevención de la anemia y la mejora de la salud. Los efectos de esta intervención en otros desenlaces sanitarios como la incidencia del paludismo, el crecimiento y el desarrollo son inciertos.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Deficiencias de Hierro , Femenino , Embarazo , Anemia/prevención & control , Condimentos , Ferritinas , Hemoglobinas , Hierro , PolvosAsunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica , Micronutrientes , Niño , Preescolar , Diarrea , Alimentos Fortificados , Humanos , Lactante , PolvosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vitamin and mineral deficiencies, particularly those of iron, vitamin A, and zinc, affect more than two billion people worldwide. Young children are highly vulnerable because of rapid growth and inadequate dietary practices. Multiple micronutrient powders (MNPs) are single-dose packets containing multiple vitamins and minerals in powder form, which are mixed into any semi-solid food for children six months of age or older. The use of MNPs for home or point-of-use fortification of complementary foods has been proposed as an intervention for improving micronutrient intake in children under two years of age. In 2014, MNP interventions were implemented in 43 countries and reached over three million children. This review updates a previous Cochrane Review, which has become out-of-date. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects and safety of home (point-of-use) fortification of foods with MNPs on nutrition, health, and developmental outcomes in children under two years of age. For the purposes of this review, home fortification with MNP refers to the addition of powders containing vitamins and minerals to semi-solid foods immediately before consumption. This can be done at home or at any other place that meals are consumed (e.g. schools, refugee camps). For this reason, MNPs are also referred to as point-of-use fortification. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases up to July 2019: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and eight other databases. We also searched four trials registers, contacted relevant organisations and authors of included studies to identify any ongoing or unpublished studies, and searched the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs with individual randomisation or cluster-randomisation. Participants were infants and young children aged 6 to 23 months at the time of intervention, with no identified specific health problems. The intervention consisted of consumption of food fortified at the point of use with MNP formulated with at least iron, zinc, and vitamin A, compared with placebo, no intervention, or use of iron-containing supplements, which is standard practice. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies against the inclusion criteria, extracted data from included studies, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. We reported categorical outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 29 studies (33,147 children) conducted in low- and middle-income countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, where anaemia is a public health problem. Twenty-six studies with 27,051 children contributed data. The interventions lasted between 2 and 44 months, and the powder formulations contained between 5 and 22 nutrients. Among the 26 studies contributing data, 24 studies (26,486 children) compared the use of MNP versus no intervention or placebo; the two remaining studies compared the use of MNP versus an iron-only supplement (iron drops) given daily. The main outcomes of interest were related to anaemia and iron status. We assessed most of the included studies at low risk of selection and attrition bias. We considered some studies to be at high risk of performance and detection bias due to lack of blinding. Most studies were funded by government programmes or foundations; only two were funded by industry. Home fortification with MNP, compared with no intervention or placebo, reduced the risk of anaemia in infants and young children by 18% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90; 16 studies; 9927 children; moderate-certainty evidence) and iron deficiency by 53% (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.56; 7 studies; 1634 children; high-certainty evidence). Children receiving MNP had higher haemoglobin concentrations (MD 2.74 g/L, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.53; 20 studies; 10,509 children; low-certainty evidence) and higher iron status (MD 12.93 µg/L, 95% CI 7.41 to 18.45; 7 studies; 2612 children; moderate-certainty evidence) at follow-up compared with children receiving the control intervention. We did not find an effect on weight-for-age (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.07; 10 studies; 9287 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Few studies reported morbidity outcomes (three to five studies each outcome) and definitions varied, but MNP did not increase diarrhoea, upper respiratory infection, malaria, or all-cause morbidity. In comparison with daily iron supplementation, the use of MNP produced similar results for anaemia (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.39; 1 study; 145 children; low-certainty evidence) and haemoglobin concentrations (MD -2.81 g/L, 95% CI -10.84 to 5.22; 2 studies; 278 children; very low-certainty evidence) but less diarrhoea (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.72; 1 study; 262 children; low-certainty of evidence). However, given the limited quantity of data, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Reporting of death was infrequent, although no trials reported deaths attributable to the intervention. Information on side effects and morbidity, including malaria and diarrhoea, was scarce. It appears that use of MNP is efficacious among infants and young children aged 6 to 23 months who are living in settings with different prevalences of anaemia and malaria endemicity, regardless of intervention duration. MNP intake adherence was variable and in some cases comparable to that achieved in infants and young children receiving standard iron supplements as drops or syrups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Home fortification of foods with MNP is an effective intervention for reducing anaemia and iron deficiency in children younger than two years of age. Providing MNP is better than providing no intervention or placebo and may be comparable to using daily iron supplementation. The benefits of this intervention as a child survival strategy or for developmental outcomes are unclear. Further investigation of morbidity outcomes, including malaria and diarrhoea, is needed. MNP intake adherence was variable and in some cases comparable to that achieved in infants and young children receiving standard iron supplements as drops or syrups.
Asunto(s)
Alimentos Fortificados , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante/fisiología , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Avitaminosis/prevención & control , Preescolar , Enfermedades Carenciales , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Lactante , Micronutrientes/deficiencia , Estado Nutricional , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Oligoelementos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Folic acid (0.4 mg) taken prior to and during early pregnancy reduces the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs). Because these birth defects occur early in pregnancy, before women may know they are pregnant, many countries have mandated the addition of folic acid to food staples. In countries where fortification is not possible, and weekly iron folic acid programmes exist to reduce anaemia, the WHO recommends that 2.8 mg (7×0.4 mg) folic acid be given instead of the current weekly practice of 0.4 mg. Currently, there is a lack of evidence to support if the 2.8 mg folic acid per week dose is sufficient to raise erythrocyte folate concentrations to a level associated with a reduced risk of a NTD-affected pregnancy. We aim to conduct a three-arm randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of weekly folic acid with iron on erythrocyte folate, a biomarker of NTD risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit non-pregnant women (n=300; 18-45 years) from Selangor, Malaysia. Women will be randomised to receive either 2.8, 0.4 or 0.0 (placebo) mg folic acid with 60 mg iron weekly for 16 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period. The primary outcome will be erythrocyte folate concentration at 16 weeks and the mean concentration will be compared between randomised treatment groups (intention-to-treat) using a linear regression model adjusting for the baseline measure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia (H18-00768) and Universiti Putra Malaysia (JKEUPM-2018-255). The results of this trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ACTRN12619000818134 and NMRR-19-119-45736.
Asunto(s)
Eritrocitos/química , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Defectos del Tubo Neural , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Malasia , Defectos del Tubo Neural/prevención & control , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rice fortification with vitamins and minerals has the potential to increase the nutrition in rice-consuming countries where micronutrient deficiencies exist. Globally, 490 million metric tonnes of rice are consumed annually. It is the dominant staple food crop of around three billion people. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of rice fortification with vitamins and minerals (iron, vitamin A, zinc or folic acid) on micronutrient status and health-related outcomes in the general population. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and 16 other databases all up to 10 December 2018. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 10 December 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials (with either individual or cluster randomisation) and controlled before-and-after studies. Participants were populations older than two years of age (including pregnant women) from any country. The intervention was rice fortified with at least one micronutrient or a combination of several micronutrients (iron, folic acid, zinc, vitamin A or other vitamins and minerals) compared with unfortified rice or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened studies and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 studies (10,483 participants) and identified two ongoing studies. Twelve included studies were randomised-controlled trials (RCTs), with 2238 participants after adjusting for clustering in two cluster-RCTs, and five were non-randomised studies (NRS) with four controlled before-and-after studies and one cross-sectional study with a control (8245 participants). Four studies were conducted in India, three in Thailand, two in the Philippines, two in Brazil, one each in Bangladesh, Burundi, Cambodia, Indonesia, Mexico and the USA. Two studies involved non-pregnant, non-lactating women and 10 involved pre-school or school-age children. All 17 studies reported fortification with iron. Of these, six studies fortified rice with iron only; 11 studies had other micronutrients added (iron, zinc and vitamin A, and folic acid). One study had one arm each with vitamin A alone and carotenoid alone. Elemental iron content ranged from 0.2 to 112.8 mg/100 g uncooked rice given for a period varying from two weeks to 48 months. Thirteen studies did not clearly describe either sequence generation or allocation concealment. Eleven studies had a low attrition rate. There was no indication of selective reporting in the studies. We considered two RCTs at low overall risk of bias and 10 at high overall risk of bias. One RCT was at high or unclear risk of bias for most of the domains. All controlled before-and-after studies had a high risk or unclear risk of bias in most domains. The included studies were funded by Government, private and non-governmental organisations, along with other academic institutions. The source of funding does not appear to have altered the results. We used the NRS in the qualitative synthesis but we excluded them from the quantitative analysis and review conclusions since they provided mostly contextual information and limited quantitative information. Rice fortified with iron alone or in combination with other micronutrients versus unfortified rice (no micronutrients added) Fortification of rice with iron (alone or in combination with other micronutrients) may make little or no difference in the risk of having anaemia (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.97; I2 = 74%; 7 studies, 1634 participants; low-certainty evidence) and may reduce the risk of iron deficiency (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.84; 8 studies, 1733 participants; low-certainty evidence). Rice fortification may increase mean haemoglobin (mean difference (MD) 1.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.00; I2 = 54%; 11 studies, 2163 participants; low-certainty evidence) and it may make little or no difference to vitamin A deficiency (with vitamin A as one of the micronutrients in the fortification arm) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.29; I2 = 37%; 4 studies, 927 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported that fortification of rice (with folic acid as one of the micronutrients) may improve serum or plasma folate (nmol/L) (MD 4.30, 95% CI 2.00 to 6.60; 215 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported that fortification of rice with iron alone or with other micronutrients may slightly increase hookworm infection (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.70; 785 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of fortified rice on diarrhoea (RR 3.52, 95% CI 0.18 to 67.39; 1 study, 258 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Rice fortified with vitamin A alone or in combination with other micronutrients versus unfortified rice (no micronutrients added) One study had one arm providing fortified rice with vitamin A only versus unfortified rice. Fortification of rice with vitamin A (in combination with other micronutrients) may increase mean haemoglobin (MD 10.00, 95% CI 8.79 to 11.21; 1 study, 74 participants; low-certainty evidence). Rice fortified with vitamin A may slightly improve serum retinol concentration (MD 0.17, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.21; 1 study, 74 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies contributed data to the comparisons of rice fortification versus no intervention. The studies involving folic acid and zinc also involved iron in the fortification arms and hence we reported them as part of the first comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Fortification of rice with iron alone or in combination with other micronutrients may make little or no difference in the risk of having anaemia or presenting iron deficiency and we are uncertain about an increase in mean haemoglobin concentrations in the general population older than 2 years of age. Fortification of rice with iron and other micronutrients such as vitamin A or folic acid may make little or no difference in the risk of having vitamin A deficiency or on the serum folate concentration. There is limited evidence on any adverse effects of rice fortification.
Asunto(s)
Avitaminosis/prevención & control , Alimentos Fortificados , Micronutrientes , Minerales/administración & dosificación , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia Ferropénica/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Micronutrientes/deficiencia , Oryza , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation may result in interaction effects due to competing absorptive pathways of trace elements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of MMN supplementation with or without iron on serum zinc, selenium, and copper concentrations in Cambodian women. METHODS: In a 2 × 2 factorial double-blind randomized 12-wk trial, predominantly anemic, nonpregnant women (aged 18-45 y) received daily 60 mg of iron (Fe; n = 201); 14 other micronutrients including zinc (15 mg), selenium (65 µg), and copper (2 mg), but no iron (MMN; n = 202); 60 mg iron plus MMN (Fe + MMN; n = 206); or a placebo (n = 200). Fasting morning blood was collected at baseline and 12 wk from women in 26 villages in Kampong Chhnang province. Serum zinc, selenium, and copper concentrations (secondary outcomes of the randomized controlled trial) were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Generalized linear regression was used to estimate intervention effects [ß coefficient (95% CI)] for Fe (with or without MMN) and MMN (with or without Fe) after testing for the presence of an Fe × MMN interaction. RESULTS: A total of 760 women completed the trial. Zinc deficiency prevalence at baseline was 45% (inflammation-adjusted serum zinc <10.7 µmol/L). A significant Fe × MMN interaction (P = 0.02) was detected in the 2 × 2 analysis with serum zinc concentration as the outcome: the MMN group had a higher mean serum zinc concentration at 12 wk (12.3 µmol/L; 95% CI: 12.2, 12.4 µmol/L) compared with all other groups, and the Fe + MMN group had a higher mean serum zinc concentration (11.6 µmol/L; 95% CI: 11.5, 11.7 µmol/L) compared with the Fe group (11.0 µmol/L; 95% CI: 10.9, 11.0 µmol/L) and the placebo group (11.2 µmol/L; 95% CI: 11.1, 11.4 µmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of 60 mg iron in the daily MMN formulation may be interfering with the absorption and/or metabolism of supplemental zinc in Cambodian women. This is of particular concern when MMN supplementation is implemented in populations with risk of zinc deficiency. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT-02481375.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Hierro/administración & dosificación , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Zinc/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Cobre/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selenio/sangre , Adulto Joven , Zinc/administración & dosificación , Zinc/deficienciaRESUMEN
Malnutrition in all its forms has risen on global and national agendas in recent years because of the recognition of its magnitude and its consequences for a wide range of human, social, and economic outcomes. Although the WHO, national governments, and other organizations have endorsed targets and identified appropriate policies, programs, and interventions, a major challenge lies in implementing these with the scale and quality needed to achieve population impact. This paper presents an approach to implementation science in nutrition (ISN) that builds upon concepts developed in other policy domains and addresses critical gaps in linking knowledge to effective action. ISN is defined here as an interdisciplinary body of theory, knowledge, frameworks, tools, and approaches whose purpose is to strengthen implementation quality and impact. It includes a wide range of methods and approaches to identify and address implementation bottlenecks; means to identify, evaluate, and scale up implementation innovations; and strategies to enhance the utilization of existing knowledge, tools, and frameworks based on the evolving science of implementation. The ISN framework recognizes that quality implementation requires alignment across 5 domains: the intervention, policy, or innovation being implemented; the implementing organization(s); the enabling environment of policies and stakeholders; the individuals, households, and communities of interest; and the strategies and decision processes used at various stages of the implementation process. The success of aligning these domains through implementation research requires a culture of inquiry, evaluation, learning, and response among program implementers; an action-oriented mission among the research partners; continuity of funding for implementation research; and resolving inherent tensions between program implementation and research. The Society for Implementation Science in Nutrition is a recently established membership society to advance the science and practice of nutrition implementation at various scales and in varied contexts.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anaemia is a condition in which the number of red blood cells is insufficient to meet physiologic needs; it is caused by many conditions, particularly iron deficiency. Traditionally, daily iron supplementation has been a standard practice for preventing and treating anaemia. However, its long-term use has been limited, as it has been associated with adverse side effects such as nausea, constipation, and teeth staining. Intermittent iron supplementation has been suggested as an effective and safer alternative to daily iron supplementation for preventing and reducing anaemia at the population level, especially in areas where this condition is highly prevalent. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of intermittent oral iron supplementation, alone or in combination with other nutrients, on anaemia and its associated impairments among menstruating women, compared with no intervention, a placebo, or daily supplementation. SEARCH METHODS: In February 2018, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, nine other databases, and two trials registers. In March 2018, we also searched LILACS, IBECS and IMBIOMED. In addition, we examined reference lists, and contacted authors and known experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs with either individual or cluster randomisation. Participants were menstruating women; that is, women beyond menarche and prior to menopause who were not pregnant or lactating and did not have a known condition that impeded the presence of menstrual periods. The intervention was the use of iron supplements intermittently (one, two or three times a week on non-consecutive days) compared with placebo, no intervention, or the same supplements provided on a daily basis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies against the inclusion criteria, extracted data from included studies, checked data entry for accuracy, assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, and rated the quality of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 25 studies involving 10,996 women. Study methods were not well described in many of the included studies and thus assessing risk of bias was difficult. The main limitations of the studies were lack of blinding and high attrition. Studies were mainly funded by international organisations, universities, and ministries of health within the countries. Approximately one third of the included studies did not provide a funding source.Although quality across studies was variable, the results consistently showed that intermittent iron supplementation (alone or with any other vitamins and minerals) compared with no intervention or a placebo, reduced the risk of having anaemia (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.87; 11 studies, 3135 participants; low-quality evidence), and improved the concentration of haemoglobin (mean difference (MD) 5.19 g/L, 95% CI 3.07 to 7.32; 15 studies, 2886 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and ferritin (MD 7.46 µg/L, 95% CI 5.02 to 9.90; 7 studies, 1067 participants; low-quality evidence). Intermittent regimens may also reduce the risk of having iron deficiency (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.04; 3 studies, 624 participants; low-quality evidence), but evidence was inconclusive regarding iron deficiency anaemia (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.16; 1 study, 97 participants; very low-quality evidence) and all-cause morbidity (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.52; 1 study, 119 participants; very low-quality evidence). Women in the control group were less likely to have any adverse side effects than those receiving intermittent iron supplements (RR 1.98, 95% CI 0.31 to 12.72; 3 studies, 630 participants; moderate-quality evidence).In comparison with daily supplementation, results showed that intermittent supplementation (alone or with any other vitamins and minerals) produced similar effects to daily supplementation (alone or with any other vitamins and minerals) on anaemia (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.29; 8 studies, 1749 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Intermittent supplementation may produce similar haemoglobin concentrations (MD 0.43 g/L, 95% CI -1.44 to 2.31; 10 studies, 2127 participants; low-quality evidence) but lower ferritin concentrations on average (MD -6.07 µg/L, 95% CI -10.66 to -1.48; 4 studies, 988 participants; low-quality evidence) compared to daily supplementation. Compared to daily regimens, intermittent regimens may also reduce the risk of having iron deficiency (RR 4.30, 95% CI 0.56 to 33.20; 1 study, 198 participants; very low-quality evidence). Women receiving iron supplements intermittently were less likely to have any adverse side effects than those receiving iron supplements daily (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.82; 6 studies, 1166 participants; moderate-quality evidence). No studies reported on the effect of intermittent regimens versus daily regimens on iron deficiency anaemia and all-cause morbidity.Information on disease outcomes, adherence, economic productivity, and work performance was scarce, and evidence about the effects of intermittent supplementation on these outcomes unclear.Overall, whether the supplements were given once or twice weekly, for less or more than three months, contained less or more than 60 mg of elemental iron per week, or given to populations with different degrees of anaemia at baseline did not seem to affect the findings. Furthermore, the response did not differ in areas where malaria was frequent, although very few trials were conducted in these settings. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent iron supplementation may reduce anaemia and may improve iron stores among menstruating women in populations with different anaemia and malaria backgrounds. In comparison with daily supplementation, the provision of iron supplements intermittently is probably as effective in preventing or controlling anaemia. More information is needed on morbidity (including malaria outcomes), side effects, work performance, economic productivity, depression, and adherence to the intervention. The quality of this evidence base ranged from very low to moderate quality, suggesting that we are uncertain about these effects.
Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Hierro de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Menstruación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Ferritinas/efectos adversos , Ferritinas/sangre , Compuestos Ferrosos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Deficiencias de Hierro , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prevalence ranges to classify levels of wasting and stunting have been used since the 1990s for global monitoring of malnutrition. Recent developments prompted a re-examination of existing ranges and development of new ones for childhood overweight. The present paper reports from the WHO-UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring. DESIGN: Thresholds were developed in relation to sd of the normative WHO Child Growth Standards. The international definition of 'normal' (2 sd below/above the WHO standards median) defines the first threshold, which includes 2·3 % of the area under the normalized distribution. Multipliers of this 'very low' level (rounded to 2·5 %) set the basis to establish subsequent thresholds. Country groupings using the thresholds were produced using the most recent set of national surveys. SETTING: One hundred and thirty-four countries. SUBJECTS: Children under 5 years. RESULTS: For wasting and overweight, thresholds are: 'very low' (≈6 times 2·5 %). For stunting, thresholds are: 'very low' (≈12 times 2·5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed thresholds minimize changes and keep coherence across anthropometric indicators. They can be used for descriptive purposes to map countries according to severity levels; by donors and global actors to identify priority countries for action; and by governments to trigger action and target programmes aimed at achieving 'low' or 'very low' levels. Harmonized terminology will help avoid confusion and promote appropriate interventions.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/epidemiología , Trastornos del Crecimiento/epidemiología , Encuestas Nutricionales/normas , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Síndrome Debilitante/epidemiología , Antropometría , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estándares de ReferenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Approximately 800 million women and children have anaemia, a condition thought to cause almost 9% of the global burden of years lived with disability. Around half this burden could be amenable to interventions that involve the provision of iron. Maize (corn) is one of the world's most important cereal grains and is cultivated across most of the globe. Several programmes around the world have fortified maize flour and other maize-derived foodstuffs with iron and other vitamins and minerals to combat anaemia and iron deficiency. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of iron fortification of maize flour, corn meal and fortified maize flour products for anaemia and iron status in the general population. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following international and regional sources in December 2017 and January 2018: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; MEDLINE (R) In Process; Embase; Web of Science (both the Social Science Citation Index and the Science Citation Index); CINAHL Ebsco; POPLINE; AGRICOLA (agricola.nal.usda.gov); BIOSIS (ISI); Bibliomap and TRoPHI; IBECS; Scielo; Global Index Medicus - AFRO (includes African Index Medicus); EMRO (includes Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region); LILACS; PAHO (Pan American Health Library); WHOLIS (WHO Library); WPRO (includes Western Pacific Region Index Medicus); IMSEAR, Index Medicus for the South-East Asian Region; IndMED, Indian medical journals; and the Native Health Research Database. We searched clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for any ongoing or planned studies on 17 January 2018 and contacted authors of such studies to obtain further information or eligible data if available.For assistance in identifying ongoing or unpublished studies, we also contacted relevant international organisations and agencies working in food fortification on 9 August 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included cluster- or individually randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Interventions included (central/industrial) fortification of maize flour or corn meal with iron alone or with other vitamins and minerals and provided to individuals over 2 years of age (including pregnant and lactating women) from any country. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data from included studies and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Trial designs with a comparison group were included to assess the effects of interventions. Trial designs without a control or comparison group (uncontrolled before-and-after studies) were included for completeness but were not considered in assessments of the overall effectiveness of interventions or used to draw conclusions regarding the effects of interventions in the review. MAIN RESULTS: Our search yielded 4529 records. After initial screening of titles and abstracts, we reviewed the full text of 75 studies (80 records). We included 5 studies and excluded 70. All the included studies assessed the effects of providing maize products fortified with iron plus other vitamins and minerals versus unfortified maize flour. No studies compared this intervention to no intervention or looked at the relative effect of flour and products fortified with iron alone (without other vitamins and minerals). Three were randomised trials involving 2610 participants, and two were uncontrolled before-and-after studies involving 849 participants.Only three studies contributed data for the meta-analysis and included children aged 2 to 11.9 years and women. Compared to unfortified maize flour, it is uncertain whether fortifying maize flour or corn meal with iron and other vitamins and minerals has any effect on anaemia (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.40; 2 studies; 1027 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or on the risk of iron deficiency (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.15; 2 studies; 1102 participants; very low-certainty evidence), haemoglobin concentration (mean difference (MD) 1.25 g/L, 95% CI -2.36 to 4.86 g/L; 3 studies; 1144 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or ferritin concentrations (MD 0.48 µg/L, 95% CI -0.37 to 1.33 µg/L; 1 study; 584 participants; very low-certainty evidence).None of the studies reported on any adverse effects. We judged the certainty of the evidence to be very low based on GRADE, so we are uncertain whether the results reflect the true effect of the intervention. We downgraded evidence due to high risk of selection bias and unclear risk of performance bias in one of two included studies, high heterogeneity and wide CIs crossing the line of no effect for anaemia prevalence and haemoglobin concentration. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether fortifying maize flour with iron and other vitamins and minerals reduces the risk of anaemia or iron deficiency in children aged over 2 years or in adults. Moreover, the evidence is too uncertain to conclude whether iron-fortified maize flour, corn meal or fortified maize flour products have any effect on reducing the risk of anaemia or on improving haemoglobin concentration in the population.We are uncertain whether fortification of maize flour with iron reduces anaemia among the general population, as the certainty of the evidence is very low. No studies reported on any adverse effects.Public organisations funded three of the five included studies, while the private sector gave grants to universities to perform the other two. The presence of industry funding for some of these trials did not appear to positively influence results from these studies.The reduced number of studies, including only two age groups (children and women of reproductive age), as well as the limited number of comparisons (only one out of the four planned) constitute the main limitations of this review.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/prevención & control , Harina , Alimentos Fortificados , Hierro de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Oligoelementos/administración & dosificación , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Zea mays/química , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia/sangre , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Anemia Ferropénica/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Ferritinas/sangre , Hemoglobina A/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Incertidumbre , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Health promotion, screening, diagnosis, and disease prevention are essential services of quality routine antenatal care for pregnant adult and adolescent women. Supplementation programmes in pregnancy, generally implemented in the context of antenatal care services, have had less than optimal results in many countries, generally attributed to limited access, low coverage, and reduced adherence to the recommended regimens and counselling. The World Health Organization Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, in collaboration with the United Nations Children's Fund and Nutrition International, convened the technical consultation "Multiple micronutrient supplements in pregnancy: Implementation considerations for successful incorporation into existing programmes." The objectives of the technical consultation were to (a) examine implementation experiences of micronutrient supplementation interventions in pregnant women, lessons learnt, and best practices; (b) discuss programmatic and technical considerations of interventions on multiple micronutrient supplementation in pregnant women in low-, middle-, and high-income countries; and (c) identify implementation considerations that can be useful to scaling up efforts by national policymaker and their advisors considering multiple micronutrient supplementation in pregnant women as part of existing antenatal care programmes as well as other delivery platforms. The consultation was based on presentations of background papers, case studies, and plenary discussions. Country representatives were asked to discuss the context of micronutrient supplementation for their countries and share implementation challenges they faced. This paper provides the background and rationale of the technical consultation, synopsises the presentations, and provides a summary of the main considerations and conclusions reached during plenary discussions.
Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Micronutrientes , Atención Prenatal , África del Sur del Sahara , Asia , Femenino , Humanos , Nicaragua , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/normas , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Despite the potential for improving iron status and child growth in low- and middle-income settings, concerns on the safety of high iron dosages of Micronutrient Powders (MNP currently limit their applicability in programs. We examined the effectiveness and risks of an integrated complementary feeding program with low iron dose (6 mg/serving) MNP among 6â»23-month-old Ethiopian children using a quasi-experimental study design comparing children from five intervention districts (n = 1172) to those from four matched non-intervention districts (n = 1137). Haemoglobin concentrations increased in intervention and decreased in non-intervention children (group-difference +3.17 g/L), but without improvement in iron stores. Intervention children were 2.31 times more likely to have diarrhoea and 2.08 times more likely to have common cold and flu, but these differences decreased towards the end of the intervention. At end line, intervention children had higher mean Height-for-Age Zscore (HAZ) and a 51% reduced odds of being stunted compared to non-intervention children. MNP with low iron dose, when provided combined with other Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) interventions, marginally improved haemoglobin status and resulted in a remarkable improvement in linear growth in 6â»23-month-old children. These benefits likely outweigh the relatively small increase in the risk of diarrhoea.
Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/prevención & control , Desarrollo Infantil , Suplementos Dietéticos , Compuestos Ferrosos/administración & dosificación , Trastornos del Crecimiento/prevención & control , Hierro/administración & dosificación , Hierro/sangre , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Estado Nutricional , Factores de Edad , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Anemia Ferropénica/epidemiología , Anemia Ferropénica/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estatura , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/epidemiología , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Compuestos Ferrosos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Ferrosos/sangre , Trastornos del Crecimiento/sangre , Trastornos del Crecimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos del Crecimiento/fisiopatología , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Hierro/efectos adversos , Masculino , Micronutrientes/efectos adversos , Micronutrientes/sangre , Polvos , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Aumento de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To simulate impact of Ca supplementation on estimated total Ca intakes among women in a population with low dietary Ca intakes, using WHO recommendations: 1·5-2·0 g elemental Ca/d during pregnancy to prevent pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: Single cross-sectional 24 h dietary recall data were adjusted using IMAPP software to simulate proportions of women who would meet or exceed the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) assuming full or partial adherence to WHO guidelines. SETTING: Nationally and regionally representative data, Ethiopia's 'lean' season 2011. SUBJECTS: Women 15-45 years (n 7908, of whom 492 pregnant). RESULTS: National mean usual Ca intake was 501 (sd 244) mg/d. Approximately 89, 91 and 96 % of all women, pregnant women and 15-18 years, respectively, had dietary Ca intakes below the EAR. Simulating 100 % adherence to 1·0, 1·5 and 2·0 g/d estimated nearly all women (>99 %) would meet the EAR, regardless of dosage. Nationally, supplementation with 1·5 and 2·0 g/d would result in intake exceeding the UL in 3·7 and 43·2 % of women, respectively, while at 1·0 g/d those exceeding the UL would be <1 % (0·74 %) except in one region (4·95 %). CONCLUSIONS: Most Ethiopian women consume insufficient Ca, increasing risk of pre-eclampsia. Providing Ca supplements of 1·5-2·0 g/d could result in high proportions of women exceeding the UL, while universal consumption of 1·0 g/d would meet requirements with minimal risk of excess. Appropriately tested screening tools could identify and reduce risk to high Ca consumers. Research on minimum effective Ca supplementation to prevent pre-eclampsia is also needed to determine whether lower doses could be recommended.
RESUMEN
Vitamin D is an essential nutrient for bone health and may influence the risks of respiratory illness, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and chronic diseases of adulthood. Because many countries have a relatively low supply of foods rich in vitamin D and inadequate exposure to natural ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation from sunlight, an important proportion of the global population is at risk of vitamin D deficiency. There is general agreement that the minimum serum/plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (25(OH)D) that protects against vitamin D deficiency-related bone disease is approximately 30 nmol/L; therefore, this threshold is suitable to define vitamin D deficiency in population surveys. However, efforts to assess the vitamin D status of populations in low- and middle-income countries have been hampered by limited availability of population-representative 25(OH)D data, particularly among population subgroups most vulnerable to the skeletal and potential extraskeletal consequences of low vitamin D status, namely exclusively breastfed infants, children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women, and the elderly. In the absence of 25(OH)D data, identification of communities that would benefit from public health interventions to improve vitamin D status may require proxy indicators of the population risk of vitamin D deficiency, such as the prevalence of rickets or metrics of usual UVB exposure. If a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is identified (>20% prevalence of 25(OH)D < 30 nmol/L) or the risk for vitamin D deficiency is determined to be high based on proxy indicators (e.g., prevalence of rickets >1%), food fortification and/or targeted vitamin D supplementation policies can be implemented to reduce the burden of vitamin D deficiency-related conditions in vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Luz Solar , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Alimentos Fortificados , Humanos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estado Nutricional , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Inadequate folate status in women of reproductive age (WRA) can lead to adverse health consequences of public health significance, such as megaloblastic anemia (folate deficiency) and an increased risk of neural tube defect (NTD)-affected pregnancies (folate insufficiency). Our review aims to evaluate current data on folate status of WRA. We queried eight databases and the World Health Organization Micronutrients Database, identifying 45 relevant surveys conducted between 2000 and 2014 in 39 countries. Several types of folate assays were used in the analysis of blood folate, and many surveys used folate cutoffs not matched to the assay. To allow better comparisons across surveys, we attempted to account for these differences. The prevalence of folate deficiency was >20% in many countries with lower income economies but was typically <5% in countries with higher income economies. Only 11 surveys reported the prevalence of folate insufficiency, which was >40% in most countries. Overall, folate status data for WRA globally are limited and must be carefully interpreted due to methodological issues. Future surveys would benefit from using the microbiologic assay to assess folate status, along with assay-matched cutoffs to improve monitoring and evaluation of folic acid interventions, thus informing global efforts to prevent NTDs.
Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/epidemiología , Ácido Fólico/sangre , Reproducción/fisiología , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Femenino , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/sangre , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/complicaciones , Humanos , Defectos del Tubo Neural/etiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Despite the global recommendation for fortification of salt with iodine, including salt used in food processing, most salt iodization programs have focussed only on iodization of household salt. Food manufacturers are frequently concerned about the potential instability of iodine and changes in organoleptic properties of their products if iodized salt is used instead of non-iodized salt. To address these concerns, this paper provides a comprehensive review of studies conducted to assess the effect of iodized salt on the organoleptic properties of processed foods and condiments. A comprehensive review was conducted of eligible studies identified by searching electronic databases (PubMed, Medline) and open Internet searches for studies examining the effect of salt iodized with either potassium iodide (KI) or potassium iodate (KIO3) on processed foods. A total of 34 studies on the effect of iodized salt on 38 types of processed foods are summarized. There is no evidence that the use of iodized salt in production of processed foods or condiments causes adverse organoleptic changes that will affect consumer acceptability or product quality. Universal salt iodization is widely recognized as the most cost-effective intervention to eliminate iodine deficiency. Taking into account increases in the proportion of dietary salt consumed through processed foods, and declines in salt consumed as household salt, iodized salt should be used in the production of processed foods as a means of assuring optimal iodine nutrition without the risk of affecting the organoleptic properties of foods.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Food fortification and biofortification are well-established strategies to address micronutrient deficiencies in vulnerable populations. However, the effectiveness of fortification programs is not only determined by the biological efficacy of the fortified foods but also by effective and sustainable implementation, which requires continual monitoring, quality assurance and control, and corrective measures to ensure high compliance. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of efficacy, effectiveness, economics of food fortification and biofortification, and status of and challenges faced by large-scale food fortification programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). METHODS: A literature review of PubMed publications in English from 2000 to 2017, as well as gray literature, targeting nongovernmental organizations whose work focuses on this topic, complemented by national reports and a "snowball" process of citation searching. The article describes remaining technical challenges, barriers, and evidence gap and prioritizes recommendations and next steps to further accelerate progress and potential of impact. RESULTS: The review identifies and highlights essential components of successful programs. It also points out issues that determine poor program performance, including lack of adequate monitoring and enforcement and poor compliance with standards by industry. CONCLUSIONS: In the last 17 years, large-scale food fortification initiatives have been reaching increasingly larger segments of populations in LMIC. Large-scale food fortification and biofortification should be part of other nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive efforts to prevent and control micronutrient deficiencies. There are remaining technical and food system challenges, especially in relation to improving coverage and quality of delivery and measuring progress of national programs.
Asunto(s)
Biofortificación , Alimentos Fortificados , Salud Global , Promoción de la Salud , Política Nutricional , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , PobrezaRESUMEN
As infectious disease control programs achieve increasing success, further reductions in child mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will require focused prevention strategies for birth defects and other noninfectious diseases. Neural tube defects (NTDs) can cause early death or lifelong disability. Preventing NTDs provides a feasible, significant opportunity to decrease the toll of birth defects and contribute to further reducing child mortality globally. The Micronutrient Forum convened a technical consultation on Folate Status in Women and Neural Tube Defects Prevention to develop a roadmap to inform and prioritize investments in NTD prevention in LMICs; help guide implementation efforts in terms of the feasibility of interventions and the potential for acceleration; and identify research and knowledge gaps. Here, we describe the impetus for and approach to the consultation and present the conclusions and a framework for developing a roadmap for action to accelerate NTD prevention in LMICs. The framework (1) provides options for action on folate status assessment; (2) outlines a way forward to develop and implement a time-bound global action plan for NTD prevention; and (3) identifies common impediments to NTD prevention, broad strategies to overcome or minimize these impediments, and basic building blocks necessary to accelerate action.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Fólico/sangre , Defectos del Tubo Neural/prevención & control , Adolescente , Países en Desarrollo , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Eritrocitos/metabolismo , Femenino , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Fólico/economía , Alimentos Fortificados/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Defectos del Tubo Neural/sangre , Defectos del Tubo Neural/epidemiología , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina B 12/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Maternal and neonatal mortality are unacceptably high in developing countries. Essential nutrition interventions contribute to reducing this mortality burden, although nutrition is poorly integrated into health systems. Universal health coverage is an essential prerequisite to decreasing mortality indices. However, provision and utilization of nutrition and health services for pregnant women and their newborns are poor and the potential for improvement is limited where health systems are weak. The Community-Based Maternal and Neonatal Health and Nutrition project was established as a set of demonstration projects in 4 countries in Africa with varied health system contexts where there were barriers to safe maternal health care at individual, community and facility levels. We selected project designs based on the need, context, and policies under consideration. A theory driven approach to programme implementation and evaluation was used involving developing of contextual project logic models that linked inputs to address gaps in quality and uptake of antenatal care; essential nutrition actions in antenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care; delivery with skilled and trained birth attendant; and postnatal care to outcomes related to improvements in maternal health service utilization and reduction in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Routine monitoring and impact evaluations were included in the design. The objective of this paper is to describe the rationale and methods used in setting up a multi-country study that aimed at designing the key maternal and neonatal health interventions and identifying indicators related to inputs, outcomes, and impact that were measured to track change associated with our interventions.