Antitachycardia pacing success in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators by patient, device, and programming characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is an established implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy that terminates ventricular tachycardias (VTs) without painful ICD shocks. However, factors influencing ATP success are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine ATP success rates by patient, device, and programming characteristics. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the PainFree SmartShock Technology study included spontaneous ATP-treated monomorphic VT episodes. ATP success rates were calculated for various factors. Also, the relationship of ATP programming on shock burden and syncope were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 2770 enrolled patients (2200 [79%] male; mean age 65 years), 1699 (61%) received an ICD and 1071 (39%) a cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator. ATP had >80% rate of success for terminating VTs overall, with similar rates observed between ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator devices (82.2% vs 80.3%, respectively; P = .81) as well as between primary and secondary prevention patients with ICDs (77.2% vs 83.9% respectively; P = .25). Arrhythmias with a median cycle length of ≥320 ms had a significantly higher ATP success rate (88.0%; 95% confidence interval 84.8%-90.6%). The cumulative percentage of ATP success increased from 71% at 1 ATP sequence delivered to 87% at ≥8 sequences delivered. Programming more ATP sequences was associated with lower shock burden (P = .0005). There was no evidence that more sequences were associated with higher rates of syncope (P = .16). CONCLUSION: Delivering more ATP sequences resulted in a higher overall success of terminating VTs, while programming more ATP was associated with decreased shock burden and no evidence of increased syncope or acceleration. This suggests that more ATP sequences should be programmed when possible, but confirmation in prospective studies will be necessary.

The development of the extravascular defibrillator with substernal lead placement: A new Frontier for device-based treatment of sudden cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillato (EV ICD) system with substernal lead placement is a novel nontransvenous alternative to current commercially available ICD systems. The EV ICD provides defibrillation and pacing therapies without the potential long-term complications of endovascular lead placement but requires a new procedure for implantation with a safety profile under evaluation. METHODS: This paper summarizes the development of the EV ICD, including the preclinical and clinical evaluations that have contributed to the system and procedural refinements to date. RESULTS: Extensive preclinical research evaluations and four human clinical studies with >140 combined acute and chronic implants have enabled the development and refinement of the EV ICD system, currently in worldwide pivotal study. CONCLUSION: The EV ICD may represent a clinically valuable solution in protecting patients from sudden cardiac death while avoiding the long-term consequences of transvenous hardware. The EV ICD offers advantages over transvenous and subcutaneous systems by avoiding placement in the heart and vasculature; relative to subcutaneous systems, EV ICD requires less energy for defibrillation, enabling a smaller device, and provides pacing features such as antitachycardia and asystole pacing in a single system.

First-in-Human Chronic Implant Experience of the Substernal Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of an extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: Limitations of existing transvenous and subcutaneous ICD systems include lead reliability and morbidity issues associated with ICD lead implantation in the vasculature or lack of pacing therapies (e.g., antitachycardia pacing) in subcutaneous systems. The EV defibrillator uses a novel substernal lead placement to address these limitations. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, chronic pilot study conducted at 4 centers in Australia and New Zealand. Participants were 21 patients referred for ICD implantation. Patients received EV ICD systems. Data collection included major systemic and procedural adverse events, defibrillation testing at implantation, and sensing and pacing thresholds. RESULTS: Among 20 patients who underwent successful implantation, the median defibrillation threshold was 15 J, and 90% passed defibrillation testing with a ≥10-J safety margin. Mean R-wave amplitude was 3.4 ± 2.0 mV, mean ventricular fibrillation amplitude was 2.8 ± 1.7 mV, and pacing was successful in 95% at ≤10 V. There were no intraprocedural complications. Two patients have undergone elective chronic system removal since hospital discharge. In the 15 patients presently implanted, the systems are stable in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human evaluation of an EV ICD demonstrated the feasibility of substernal lead placement, defibrillation, and pacing with a chronically implanted system. There were no acute major complications, and pacing, defibrillation, and sensing performance at implantation were successful in most patients. (Extravascular ICD Pilot Study [EV ICD]; NCT03608670).

Direct comparison of a novel antitachycardia pacing algorithm against present methods using virtual patient modeling.

BACKGROUND: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) success rates as low as 50% for fast ventricular tachycardias (VTs) have been reported providing an opportunity for improved ATP to decrease shocks. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how a new automated antitachycardia pacing (AATP) therapy would perform compared with traditional burst ATP using computer modeling to conduct a virtual study. METHODS: Virtual patient scenarios were constructed from magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological (EP) data. Cardiac EP simulation software (CARPEntry) was used to generate reentrant VT. Simulated VT exit sites were physician adjudicated against corresponding clinical 12-lead electrocardiograms. Burst ATP comprised 3 sequences of 8 pulses at 88% of VT cycle length, with each sequence decremented by 10 ms. AATP was limited to 3 sequences, with each sequence learning from the previous sequences. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine unique ATP scenarios were generated from 7 unique scarred hearts. Burst ATP terminated 145 of 259 VTs (56%) and accelerated 2.0%. AATP terminated 189 of 259 VTs (73%) with the same acceleration rate. The 2 dominant ATP failure mechanisms were identified as (1) insufficient prematurity to close the excitable gap; and (2) failure to reach the critical isthmus of the VT. AATP reduced failures in these categories from 101 to 63 (44% reduction) without increasing acceleration. CONCLUSION: AATP successfully adapted ATP sequences to terminate VT episodes that burst ATP failed to terminate. AATP was successful with complex scar geometries and EP heterogeneity as seen in the real world.

Therapy From a Novel Substernal Lead: The ASD2 Study.

OBJECTIVES: The ASD2 (Acute Extravascular Defibrillation, Pacing, and Electrogram) study evaluated the ability to adequately sense, pace, and defibrillate patients with a novel implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead implanted in the substernal space. BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous ICDs are an alternative to a transvenous defibrillator system when transvenous implantation is not possible or desired. An alternative extravascular system placing a lead under the sternum has the potential to reduce defibrillation energy and the ability to deliver pacing therapies. METHODS: An investigational lead was inserted into the substernal space via a minimally invasive subxiphoid access, and a cutaneous defibrillation patch or subcutaneous active can emulator was placed on the left mid-axillary line. Pacing thresholds and extracardiac stimulation were evaluated. Up to 2 episodes of ventricular fibrillation were induced to test defibrillation efficacy. RESULTS: The substernal lead was implanted in 79 patients, with a median implantation time of 12.0 ± 9.0 min. Ventricular pacing was successful in at least 1 vector in 76 of 78 patients (97.4%), and 72 of 78 (92.3%) patients had capture in ≥1 vector with no extracardiac stimulation. A 30-J shock successfully terminated 104 of 128 episodes (81.3%) of ventricular fibrillation in 69 patients. There were 7 adverse events in 6 patients causally (n = 5) or possibly (n = 2) related to the ASD2 procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The ASD2 study demonstrated the ability to pace, sense, and defibrillate using a lead designed specifically for the substernal space.

Initial Clinical Experience With a New Automated Antitachycardia Pacing Algorithm: Feasibility and Safety in an Ambulatory Patient Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) decreases patient shock burden but has recognized limitations. A new automated ATP (AATP) based on electrophysiological first principles was designed. The study objective was to assess the feasibility and safety of AATP in ambulatory ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Enrolled patients had dual chamber or cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs, history of ≥1 ICD-treated ventricular tachycardias (VT)/ventricular fibrillation episode, or a recorded, sustained monomorphic VT. Detection was set to ventricular fibrillation number of intervals to detect=24/32, VT number of intervals to detect≥16, and a fast VT zone of 240 to 320 ms. AATP prescribed the components and delivery of successive ATP sequences in real time, using the same settings for all patients. ICD datalogs were uploaded every ≈3 months, at unscheduled visits, exit, and death. Episodes and adverse events were adjudicated by separate committees. Results were adjusted (generalized estimating equations) for multiple episodes. AATP was downloaded into the ICDs of 144 patients (121 men), aged 67.4±11.9 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33.1±13.6% (n=137), and treated 1626 episodes in 49 patients during 14.5±5.1 months of follow-up. Datalogs permitted adjudication of 702 episodes, including 669 sustained monomorphic VT, 20 polymorphic VT, 10 supraventricular tachycardia, and 3 malsensing episodes. AATP terminated 39 of 69 (59% adjusted) sustained monomorphic VT in the fast VT zone, 509 of 590 (85% adjusted) in the VT zone, and 6 of 10 in the ventricular fibrillation zone. No supraventricular tachycardias converted to VT or ventricular fibrillation. No anomalous AATP behavior was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The new AATP algorithm safely generated ATP sequences and controlled therapy progression in all zones without need for individualized programing.

Effect of ICD Therapies on Mortality in the OMNI Trial.

BACKGROUND: Analyses from primary prevention trials on implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy have shown an association between shocks and increased mortality. Recent data suggest a similar association with antitachycardia pacing (ATP). OBJECTIVE: The OMNI study is an observational study of pacemaker and ICD use. We aim to examine associations between ICD therapies and mortality in this setting. METHODS: A total of 2,255 OMNI patients with ICDs were included. Treated episodes were classified as appropriate or inappropriate. Patients were assigned into 1 of 3 groups depending on whether the episode required ATP only, single shock, or multiple shocks, and then followed for all-cause mortality. Additionally, we aimed to determine the frequency with which inappropriate ATP precipitated ventricular arrhythmias that led to shock, since this has been suggested as a mechanism of harm. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 39 ± 19 months, there were a total of 470 deaths (21%). Compared to patients with no treated episodes, patients with appropriate therapy had greater risk of death. Hazard ratios were 1.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.02; P = 0.023) for the ATP-only group, 2.11 (95% CI 1.51-2.96; P < 0.001) for the single-shock group, and 2.55 (95% CI 1.43-4.57; P = 0.002) for the multishock group. There was no significant association between any type of inappropriate therapy and increased mortality. We identified only 7 instances of inappropriate ATP precipitating ventricular arrhythmia resulting in shock. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving appropriate therapy of all types had increased mortality compared to those with no episodes. Furthermore, inappropriate ATP rarely precipitates ventricular arrhythmias.

A multicenter study of shock pathways for subcutaneous implantable defibrillators.

INTRODUCTION: A purely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) requires higher energy but may be an effective alternative to transvenous ICDs to deliver lifesaving therapies. OBJECTIVE: To identify combinations of anteroposterior subcutaneous shock pathways and waveforms with defibrillation efficacy comparable to transvenous ICDs. METHODS: Defibrillation testing was performed in 141 patients temporarily implanted with an active can emulator and subcutaneous coil electrodes. The patients were subdivided into 5 groups within 2 study phases. In all groups, a posterior electrode was positioned with its tip close to the spine. In the first study phase, 2 different can locations were evaluated: (1) an inframammary pocket (IM-1-750), or (2) a conventional infraclavicular pocket (IC-1-750). In both cases, a 70 J biphasic shock was used (peak voltage 750 V; 270 µF capacitance). In the second phase, configuration IC-1-750 was enhanced by the addition of a second (parasternal) subcutaneous electrode (IC-2-750). Furthermore, the effects of a different 70 J shock waveform (1,000 V, 160 µF) were evaluated for configurations IM-1-750 and IC-2-750 (becoming IM-1-1000 and IC-2-1000). RESULTS: The proportion of patients satisfying a defibrillation safety margin test of 2 consecutive successes at ≤50 J was 74%, 11%, and 44%, respectively, for the IM-1-750, IC-1-750, and IC-2-750 configurations, and 93% and 86% for the IM-1-1000 and IC-2-1000 configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillation efficacy comparable to that of a transvenous system was achieved with an anteroposterior subcutaneous ICD configuration, with 160 µF capacitance, 1,000 V, and 70 J output. An infraclavicular pocket location becomes feasible if a parasternal subcutaneous coil is added.

Differences in effects of electrical therapy type for ventricular arrhythmias on mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks have been associated with an increased risk of death. It is unknown whether this is due to the ventricular arrhythmia (VA) or shocks and whether antitachycardia pacing (ATP) termination can reduce this risk. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether mortality in ICD patients is influenced by the type of therapy (shocks of ATP) delivered. METHODS: Cox models evaluated effects of baseline characteristics, ventricular tachycardia (VT; <188 bpm), fast VT (FVT; 188-250 bpm), ventricular fibrillation (VF; >250 bpm), and therapy type (shocks or ATP) on mortality among 2135 patients in four trials of ATP to reduce shocks. RESULTS: Over 10.8 +/- 3.3 months, 24.3% patients received appropriate shocks (50.6%) or ATP only (49.4%), and 6.6% died. Mortality predictors were age (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.08, P <.0001), New York Heart Association class III/IV (3.50 [2.27-5.41]; P <.0001), coronary disease (3.08 [1.31-7.25]; P = .01), and cumulative VA (VT + FVT + VF) episodes shocked (1.20 [1.13, 1.29]; P <.0001). Beta-blockers (0.65, 0.46-0.92; P <.0001) and remote myocardial infarction (0.53, [0.38-0.76] P = .0004) predicted reduced risk. Since 92% of VT and all VF received a single therapy type (ATP and shocks, respectively), the effect of therapy on episode risk could not be established. For FVT (32% shocked, 68% ATP), episode and therapy effects could be uncoupled; ATP-terminated FVT did not increase episode mortality risk, whereas shocked FVT increased risk by 32%. Survival rates were highest among patients with no VA (93.8%) of ATP-only (94.7%) and lowest for shocked patients (88.4%). Monthly episode rates were 80% higher among shocked versus ATP-only patients. CONCLUSIONS: Shocked VA episodes are associated with increased mortality risk. Shocked patients have substantially higher VA episode burden and poorer survival compared with ATP-only-treated patients.

Acute defibrillation performance of a novel, non-transvenous shock pathway in adult ICD indicated patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a totally subcutaneous, anteroposterior defibrillation shock pathway using a long time-constant shock waveform that emulates a proposed device having approximately twice the capacitance and thus twice the available energy of traditional transvenous devices. BACKGROUND: A non-transvenous defibrillation system potentially offers advantages over a transvenous system including simplification of the implant procedure and reduction of the impact of device complications by eliminating the need to place a lead within the heart. Previous non-transvenous defibrillation efficacy studies have been reported using anterolateral and anterior-anterior shock vectors. An external anteroposterior shock vector has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to anterolateral shock vectors but a prospective study on an anteroposterior shock vector with implanted electrodes has not been previously reported. METHODS: The non-transvenous shock vector consisted of an anterior low pectorally-placed active can emulator electrode and a posterior subcutaneous coil electrode. The shock waveform was a biphasic with 50% tilt per phase and a time constant of decay of 12 ms. Defibrillation efficacy was characterized using a step-down defibrillation threshold protocol (35 J, 25 J, 15 J). RESULTS: A total of 33 patients with standard ICD indications were enrolled in the study with 32 fully completing the protocol. The patient population was 69% male, with a mean age of 59 +/- 12 years. Mean ejection fraction was 27 +/- 12%. Of the 32 patients tested, 26 patients (81%) were successfully defibrillated at 35 J or less, 18 patients were defibrillated at 25 J or less and 9 patients were successfully defibrillated at 15 J. CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillation using a long time-constant waveform delivered through an anteroposterior non-transvenous pathway including a pectoral active can emulator electrode and a posterior subcutaneous coil electrode is feasible with over 80% of patients defibrillated successfully using 35 J or less.

Optimizing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment of rapid ventricular tachycardia: antitachycardia pacing therapy during charging.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients demonstrated the efficacy and safety of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for rapid ventricular tachycardias (VT). To prevent shock delay in case of ATP failure, a new feature (ATP during charging) was developed to deliver ATP for rapid VT while charging for shock. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of this new feature. METHODS: In a prospective, nonrandomized trial, patients with standard ICD indication received an EnTrust ICD. VT and ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes were reviewed for appropriate detection, ATP success, rhythm acceleration, and related symptoms. RESULTS: In 421 implanted patients, 116 VF episodes occurred in 37 patients. Eighty-four (72%) episodes received ATP during or before charging. ATP prevented a shock in 58 (69%) of 84 episodes in 15 patients. ATP stopped significantly more monomorphic (77%) than polymorphic VTs (44%, P = .05). Five (6%) episodes accelerated after ATP but were terminated by the backup shock(s). No symptoms were related to ATP during charging. In four patients, 38 charges were saved by delivering ATP before charging. Of 98 induced VF episodes, 28% were successfully terminated by ATP versus 69% for spontaneous episodes (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Most VTs detected in the VF zone can be painlessly terminated by ATP delivered during charging, with a low risk of acceleration or symptoms. ATP before charging allows delivery of two ATP attempts before shock in the same time that would otherwise be required to deliver only one ATP plus a shock. It also offers potential battery energy savings.

Direct measurements of membrane time constant during defibrillation strength shocks.

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation shocks impose significant energy demand on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Several modeling studies have been devoted to optimizing shock parameters, and a large number of these studies treat the heart as a simplified lumped network. The time constant of membrane polarization (tau(m)) is a key variable for such modeling efforts. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform direct measurements of transmembrane potential (V(m)) during defibrillation strength shocks and estimate tau(m) of membrane polarization. METHODS: A portion of the left ventricular epicardial surface of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts was stimulated using uniform electric fields produced by two parallel line electrodes. The V(m)s were recorded from di-4-ANEPPS-stained hearts using a multisite optical mapping system. The hearts were paced with 20 S1 pulses from the apex, and shocks (S2: 5, 10, 20 V/cm) were applied via the line electrodes during the action potential of the 20th S1 at two different coupling intervals (S1S2: 120 and 180 ms). Residual responses were obtained by subtracting responses to the 19th S1 from the responses to the 20th S1S2 pair and used for time-constant analysis by fitting a monoexponential function. RESULTS: tau(m) exhibited a large variation and ranged from approximately 1 to 30 ms. Furthermore, tau(m) varied with electric field strength, S1S2 interval, position of the tissue from stimulating electrodes, and polarity of the response. To a large extent, the effects of all these factors were captured in a single parameter-the change in transmembrane voltage (DeltaV(m)) in response to the applied field (E). tau(m) showed a monotonically decreasing trend with DeltaV(m) for all Es and S1S2s. CONCLUSION: Time constant of membrane polarization varies significantly during defibrillation strength shocks and shows a strong dependence on DeltaV(m).

The dilemma of ICD implant testing.

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been induced at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant to ensure reliable sensing, detection, and defibrillation. Despite its risks, the value was self-evident for early ICDs: failure of defibrillation was common, recipients had a high risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF, and the only therapy for rapid VT or VF was a shock. Today, failure of defibrillation is rare, the risk of VT/VF is lower in some recipients, antitachycardia pacing is applied for fast VT, and vulnerability testing permits assessment of defibrillation efficacy without inducing VF in most patients. This review reappraises ICD implant testing. At implant, defibrillation success is influenced by both predictable and unpredictable factors, including those related to the patient, ICD system, drugs, and complications. For left pectoral implants of high-output ICDs, the probability of passing a 10 J safety margin is approximately 95%, the probability that a maximum output shock will defibrillate is approximately 99%, and the incidence of system revision based on testing is < or = 5%. Bayes' Theorem predicts that implant testing identifies < or = 50% of patients at high risk for unsuccessful defibrillation. Most patients who fail implant criteria have false negative tests and may undergo unnecessary revision of their ICD systems. The first-shock success rate for spontaneous VT/VF ranges from 83% to 93%, lower than that for induced VF. Thus, shocks for spontaneous VT/VF fail for reasons that are not evaluated at implant. Whether system revision based on implant testing improves this success rate is unknown. The risks of implant testing include those related to VF and those related to shocks alone. The former may be due to circulatory arrest alone or the combination of circulatory arrest and shocks. Vulnerability testing reduces risks related to VF, but not those related to shocks. Mortality from implant testing probably is 0.1-0.2%. Overall, VF should be induced to assess sensing in approximately 5% of ICD recipients. Defibrillation or vulnerability testing is indicated in 20-40% of recipients who can be identified as having a higher-than-usual probability of an inadequate defibrillation safety margin based on patient-specific factors. However, implant testing is too risky in approximately 5% of recipients and may not be worth the risks in 10-30%. In 25-50% of ICD recipients, testing cannot be identified as either critical or contraindicated.

QRS duration does not predict occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether QRS duration (QRSd) correlates with occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with coronary disease (CAD) receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). BACKGROUND: A QRSd measured on a standard electrocardiograph (ECG) correlates with total mortality risk in CAD patients at high risk for sudden death; however, the relationship between QRSd and risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]) is unclear. METHODS: PainFREE Rx II was a randomized trial, comparing efficacy of antitachycardia pacing versus shock therapy for VT/VF in patients receiving ICDs. We retrospectively correlated the QRSd and specific ECG conduction abnormalities on the 12-lead ECG at study entry with occurrence of VT/VF in 431 patients with CAD enrolled in the trial. RESULTS: The QRSd was < or =120 ms in 291 of 431 (68%) patients. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was present in 65 patients, right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 48 patients, and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) was present in 124 patients. Over 12 months' follow-up, VT/VF occurred in 95 (22%) patients (22% of patients with QRSd < or =120 ms vs. 23% of patients with QRSd >120 ms, p = NS). Patients with LBBB were less likely to experience at least one VT/VF episode than patients with QRSd <120 ms. Patients with RBBB and nonspecific IVCD did not differ from patients with narrow QRS complexes with regard to occurrence of tachycardias. CONCLUSIONS: The QRSd and ECG conduction abnormalities are not useful to predict ICD benefit in patients having the characteristics of our study population. The utility of QRSd to predict VT/VF events in patients with CAD requires further prospective evaluation.

Appropriate and inappropriate ventricular therapies, quality of life, and mortality among primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: results from the Pacing Fast VT REduces Shock ThErapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in primary and secondary prevention. Quality of life, mortality, appropriate therapies for specific ventricular rhythms, and inappropriate therapies for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were compared among 582 patients (primary prevention=248; secondary prevention=334) in PainFREE Rx II, a 634-patient prospective, randomized study of antitachycardia pacing or shocks for fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT). METHODS AND RESULTS: ICDs were programmed identically with 3 zones (ventricular tachycardia [VT] <188 bpm; FVT=188 to 250 bpm; ventricular fibrillation [VF] >250 bpm) but randomized to antitachycardia pacing or shock as initial therapy for FVT. All treated episodes with electrograms were adjudicated. Primary prevention patients had lower ejection fractions and more coronary artery disease. beta-Blocker use, antiarrhythmic drug use, and follow-up duration were similar. Over 11+/-3 months, 1563 treated episodes were classified as VT (n=740), FVT (n=350), VF (n=77), and SVT (n=396). The distribution of VT, FVT, and VF was not different between primary and secondary prevention patients (respectively, VT 52% versus 54%, FVT 35% versus 35%, and VF 14% versus 10%). More secondary prevention patients had appropriate therapies (26% versus 18%, P=0.02), but among these patients, the median number of episodes per patient was similar. Inappropriate therapies occurred in 15% of both groups and accounted for similar proportions of all detected and treated episodes (46% in primary prevention patients versus 34% in secondary prevention patients, P=0.09). Quality of life improved modestly in both groups, and mortality was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention patients are slightly less likely to have appropriate therapies than secondary prevention patients, but episode density is similar among patients with appropriate therapies. SVT resulted in more than one third of therapies in both groups, but quality of life and mortality were similar.

Improved defibrillation efficacy with an ascending ramp waveform in humans.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare an ascending ramp waveform (RAMP) with a standard, clinically available biphasic truncated exponential waveform (BTE) for defibrillation in humans. BACKGROUND: In animal studies, RAMP had a lower defibrillation threshold (DFT) than BTE. METHODS: We studied 63 patients at implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement using a dual-coil lead and left pectoral active can. The subjects were divided into two groups, one with a 12-ms ascending first phase and one with a 7-ms ascending first phase. Phase 2 of RAMP for both groups was a truncated exponential decay with 65% tilt and reversed polarity. The BTE had a 50% tilt in each phase. DFT and upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) were measured for both waveforms using a binary search protocol. RESULTS: The patient population was 77% male, with a mean age of 63 +/- 10 years and ejection fraction of 33 +/- 13%. Delivered energy at DFT was lower with the 7-ms RAMP vs BTE (5.4 +/- 2.6 J vs 6.5 +/- 3.4 J; P < .01) but unchanged with the 12-ms RAMP (7.4 +/- 4.5 J vs 7.1 +/- 4.9 J). Maximal voltage at DFT was significantly lower with either RAMP compared to BTE (P < .01). There was a strong correlation between ULV and DFT for both RAMP and BTE (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The 7-ms ascending ramp waveform significantly reduced delivered energy (18%) and voltage (24%) at DFT, whereas the 12-ms RAMP reduced only DFT voltage. This is the first report of a waveform that is superior to a BTE for defibrillation in humans. ULV correlates with DFT for RAMP, supporting the use of ULV testing for implantation of devices.

Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results.

BACKGROUND: Successful antitachycardia pacing (ATP) terminates ventricular tachycardia (VT) up to 250 bpm without the need for painful shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients. Fast VT (FVT) >200 bpm is often treated by shock because of safety concerns, however. This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compares the safety and utility of empirical ATP with shocks for FVT in a broad ICD population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 634 ICD patients to 2 arms-standardized empirical ATP (n=313) or shock (n=321)-for initial therapy of spontaneous FVT. ICDs were programmed to detect FVT when 18 of 24 intervals were 188 to 250 bpm and 0 of the last 8 intervals were >250 bpm. Initial FVT therapy was ATP (8 pulses, 88% of FVT cycle length) or shock at 10 J above the defibrillation threshold. Syncope and arrhythmic symptoms were collected through patient diaries and interviews. In 11+/-3 months of follow-up, 431 episodes of FVT occurred in 98 patients, representing 32% of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and 76% of those that would be detected as ventricular fibrillation and shocked with traditional ICD programming. ATP was effective in 229 of 284 episodes in the ATP arm (81%, 72% adjusted). Acceleration, episode duration, syncope, and sudden death were similar between arms. Quality of life, measured with the SF-36, improved in patients with FVT in both arms but more so in the ATP arm. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with shocks, empirical ATP for FVT is highly effective, is equally safe, and improves quality of life. ATP may be the preferred FVT therapy in most ICD patients.

Incidence and characteristics of type-2 breaks in response to antitachycardia pacing therapy in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.

INTRODUCTION: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) effectively treats monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). The VT may cease immediately upon ATP completion (type-1 break), or it may persist or change to another tachyarrhythmia for one or more beats before termination (type-2 break). We investigated the prevalence and characteristics of type-2 breaks in ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed VT episodes with stored electrograms that had at least one ATP therapy delivered in PainFREE Rx trial, a multicenter trial with 220 coronary artery disease patients. Further subanalysis was performed by classifying the VT as slow or fast based on the cycle length (CL); slow VT: CL >320 ms, fast VT: 240 < or =CL < or =320 ms. To assess the effect of ATP on VT, comparison was performed of pre-ATP and post-ATP CL variability, average CL, and morphology. A total of 514 episodes (264 slow VT and 250 fast VT) were analyzed. The burst ATP terminated 457 (89%; 239 slow VT and 218 fast VT) of 514 episodes. Forty five (10%) episodes in 18 (32%) patients had type-2 breaks. The mean number of beats during type-2 breaks was 5.4 +/- 3.1 (median 4). The mean time for episode termination measured from the end of ATP to return of first sinus/paced beat was 2.9 +/- 1.2 seconds (median 2.6). The VT CL variability increased by 150% after ATP delivery. The ATP affected either VT CL or morphology, or both of 36 (80%) type-2 breaks (9% accelerated, 47% decelerated, 22% changed in morphology only). Among the 9 (20%) episodes that remained unchanged in morphology and CL, four episodes (9%) were unaffected by ATP. CONCLUSION: Approximately 10% of VT episodes that were successfully terminated with burst ATP therapy had type-2 breaks. Type-2 breaks are associated with an increase in CL variability. Approximately 9% of all type-2 episodes may be spontaneously terminating nonsustained VT given that ATP did not affect these episodes in any way.